How many goals to reach 100 Hazard?

Thecassanova:
How many goals to reach 100 Hazard?

In the Champions League?

eph12:

In the Champions League?

Shatap there!

Thecassanova:
How many goals to reach 100 Hazard?

Open or Closed goals

Eruditor:


One community shield as well. We must count it. United fans celebrated it as a trophy the other season. So Pep 3 CFC 2. Local trophy or not.

Hear it from the horse's mouth

raumdeuter:

Every top team goes into the season hoping to win 1 the CL, 2 the league and a distant 3rd the FA cup.

Carling cup and Charity shield are worthless tournaments

According to Aparisports CEO
- PEP 1
- CHELSEA 2

Eruditor:


If you have players of less value to sell your netspend will be insignificant.

Chelsea fans should try to have sense every once in a while.

the netspend is important as it is factored into the next season transfer budget for the manager,at least this is done in football manager and ML.the only exception is when the manager has access to a cash cow but this isnt possible in ML.why do you think small clubs like fulham,stoke dont go about signing the 60m,70m players?.
Secondly,I am shocked that u just whitewashed my opinion simply because i am a blue,that in itself is the height of stupid hasty conclusions

Skimpledawg:

Shatap there!

eph12:

In the Champions League?

And dem they dia dey drag sey Pep na local champion. Meanwhile dia own starboy na only clubs wen get name like viju, bor'ley and ekpa e dey see to flex muscle n form skills!

simonjassy:

the netspend is important as it is factored into the next season transfer budget for the manager,at least this is done in football manager and ML.the only exception is when the manager has access to a cash cow but this isnt possible in ML.why do you think small clubs like fulham,stoke dont go about signing the 60m,70m players?.
Secondly,I am shocked that u just whitewashed my opinion simply because i am a blue,that in itself is the height of stupid hasty conclusions

All this net spend talk is just talk for people to feel fancy about. Only fans bother themselves with these terms to feel smart. In actual terms, the value of spend is reported in the club's books over the length of the signed contract. So City might sign a player for £60m on a 6-year term and Chelsea sign a player for £50m on a 5-year term in the same window. If both clubs do not sell a player in the that window, net spend doesn't equal +£10m in Chelsea's favour, both clubs will report £10m for that year on their books. So net spend talk is useless in this instance.

Eruditor:


If you have players of less value to sell your netspend will be insignificant.

Chelsea fans should try to have sense every once in a while.

You meant sales worth of 345m, was from players of less value, right? Foreign materials are dancing shakushaku in your head.

Taught about uploading this

Segedinho:
Taught about uploading this

as if, if klopp flash una club dem no go start contract arrangement.

Segedinho:
Taught about uploading this

So, Liverpool should sack him and appoint you?

alekside:
So, Liverpool should sack him and appoint you?

nateevs:



All this net spend talk is just talk for people to feel fancy about. Only fans bother themselves with these terms to feel smart. In actual terms, the value of spend is reported in the club's books over the length of the signed contract. So City might sign a player for £60m on a 6-year term and Chelsea sign a player for £50m on a 5-year term in the same window. If both clubs do not sell a player in the that window, net spend doesn't equal +£10m in Chelsea's favour, both clubs will report £10m for that year on their books. So net spend talk is useless in this instance.

i highly doubt this,cause the sign on fee and salary is listed in the clubs book.i.e 60m plus the player's salary and only his salary will be listed in subsequent years until his contract runs out.

alekside:
So, Liverpool should sack him and appoint you?

.
Baba but but I no lie na.....

Probably the scariest thing I've read his year.

Cathy don't go to the supermarket today. Skynet is already here

Google, Apple and Facebook know when a woman visits an abortion clinic, even if she tells no one else: the GPS coordinates on the phone don’t lie. One-night stands and extramarital affairs are a cinch to figure out: two smartphones that never met before suddenly cross paths in a bar and then make their way to an apartment across town, stay together overnight, and part in the morning.


As the internet expanded, Google grew along with it. No matter what service it deployed or what market it entered, surveillance and prediction were cooked into the business. The amount of data flowing through Google’s systems is staggering. By the end of 2016, Google’s Android was installed on 82% of all new smartphones sold around the world, and by mid-2017 there were more than 2 billion Android users globally.

Google also handles billions of searches and YouTube plays daily, and has a billion active Gmail users, meaning it had access to most of the world’s emails. Some analysts estimate that 25% of all internet traffic in North America goes through Google’s servers. The company isn’t just connected to the internet, it is the internet.

What does Google know? What can it guess? Well, it seems just about everything. “One of the things that eventually happens … is that we don’t need you to type at all,” Eric Schmidt, Google’s former CEO, said in a moment of candour in 2010. “Because we know where you are. We know where you’ve been. We can more or less guess what you’re thinking about.” He later added: “One day we had a conversation where we figured we could just try to predict the stock market. And then we decided it was illegal. So we stopped doing that.”

PlainJAY:


Hear it from the horse's mouth



According to Aparisports CEO
- PEP 1
- CHELSEA 2

Is that my post?

Eruditor:


You are being smart by an inch. But an inch is not enough. If you know where I called those results local or irrelevant, quote me. Otherwise, deal with the facts.

Pls dont get me wrong, i never said u called those results local or irrelevant...


My statement was:

Here on this forum we dont consider local league and community abi village shield results cos they are irrelevant...

simonjassy:

the netspend is important as it is factored into the next season transfer budget for the manager,at least this is done in football manager and ML.the only exception is when the manager has access to a cash cow but this isnt possible in ML.why do you think small clubs like fulham,stoke dont go about signing the 60m,70m players?.
Secondly,I am shocked that u just whitewashed my opinion simply because i am a blue,that in itself is the height of stupid hasty conclusions

This dude is quoting FM for me and is telling me that is why clubs without money don't buy 70M players?

Guy, Pogba does not even need to stick his schlong in you. You are already dencia.

Sod off.

nateevs:



All this net spend talk is just talk for people to feel fancy about. Only fans bother themselves with these terms to feel smart. In actual terms, the value of spend is reported in the club's books over the length of the signed contract. So City might sign a player for £60m on a 6-year term and Chelsea sign a player for £50m on a 5-year term in the same window. If both clubs do not sell a player in the that window, net spend doesn't equal +£10m in Chelsea's favour, both clubs will report £10m for that year on their books. So net spend talk is useless in this instance.

A sensible post like this, 2 likes. The other post from the breath of dense air, 8 likes.

Im still searching for city's semi-final or final match result since pep joined,

couldn't find it on google so unto the next search engine...

Ramdateur abi sleekdot ur assistance would be much appreciated

airmark:




You meant sales worth of 345m, was from players of less value, right? Foreign materials are dancing shakushaku in your head.

City made 345M selling Gael Clichy, Kolarov, Joe Hart, Yaya, Fernando, Pantilimon, Sagna, Jesus Navas, Zabaleta etc?

Did the fishes in the Atlantic ocean eat your brain when you were swimming through it, AirHack?

Eruditor:


Is that my post?

Are you trying to doubt Aparisports' authenticity ?

Eruditor:


LOL beat Tottenham first before you start prating.

If you are lucky and you beat them and you lose in the final to city, the next posts will be on how much Pep spent in 2016.

I said any trophy...we have Europa, FA cup and EFL to play for...so any of dz trophies will just do

Eruditor:


[s]City made 345M selling Gael Clichy, Kolarov, Joe Hart, Yaya, Fernando, Pantilimon, Sagna, Jesus Navas, Zabaleta etc?

Did the fishes in the Atlantic ocean eat your brain when you were swimming through it, AirHack?[/s]

Lruditor. Chelsea sold more valuable players than City, yet spent lesser than Fraudiola did. Use your brain bro, not everytime you rush to kiss Dayo's azzz.

I still laughed today when i remembered you once said, "Tallness is a talent".

airmark:


Lruditor. Chelsea sold more valuable players than City, yet spent lesser than Fraudiola did. Use your brain bro, not everytime you rush to kiss Dayo's azzz.

I still laughed today when i remembered you once said, "Tallness is a talent".

And he dey open mouth to shout Dense Dense

airmark:


Lruditor. Chelsea sold more valuable players than City, yet spent lesser than Fraudiola did. Use your brain bro, not everytime you rush to kiss Dayo's azzz.

I still laughed today when i remembered you once said, "Tallness is a talent".

Did Chelsea sell more players (numerically) than City? Did Chelsea purchase as many players as city per whatever currency? You are the one who told your missus to yell "Raumdeuter" during you people's sessions if she wanted you to stroke harder. It is you we should be worried about WRT arse kissing.

At the same time, an individual who is 7 feet tall could also be thought to have talent because height in basketball generally means a capacity for achievement (although we probably wouldn’t normally have thought of height as a talent).

...we might define talent as “anything that predisposes an individual to success in a position or organization.”

https://jasonlauritsen.com/2011/08/what-is-talent/

Facts are not subject to voting. I said height is a talent and nothing since then has changed my opinion on that. Thank you.

While we are at it, is Kyrchowiak still the best DM in the world?

although we probably wouldn’t normally have thought of height as a talent

When even the 'proof' is unwilling to agree to such bs

In life sha, we learn everyday...
Elruditor thanks for opening my eyes, i never saw height as a talent b4...

Eruditor:


This dude is quoting FM for me and is telling me that is why clubs without money don't buy 70M players?

Guy, Pogba does not even need to stick his schlong in you. You are already dencia.

Sod off.

FM is the closest thing we as ordinary individuals have access to that is similar to actual football management.I am sorry if an erudite such as yourself is not enlightened about it.
Or do you have access to man united club management book records down to the nitty gritty details?.
Finally,learn to pass your message without insults it casts doubts on your supposed status of an 'erudite'.

Eruditor:


This dude is quoting FM for me and is telling me that is why clubs without money don't buy 70M players?

Guy, Pogba does not even need to stick his schlong in you. You are already dencia.

Sod off.

southampton sold vvd for 75m, what stops them from buying another player for nearly that same amount?.