Tobbit:
Following our fights on your CBD thread about this. I'm glad you finally took it up, did your research and you're now seeing the light.

I passed a memo yesterday following an information I came across. I hope you are looking into that aswell


Shell Petroleum is out with an exclusive information..



It's a clause within the PIB Bill that is aimed at granting Dangote the sole right to export crude out of the Country... Imagine. Time for another protest Nigerians. Spread the word.



Post this information on your timeline across all your social media handles to sensitive and inform people........ Let's kill this bill before it sees the light of the day..

Marvel1206:
Bros.. buy confirm phone.. all these phones are rubbish.. am very sure yu dnt knw abt android phones.. okay before yu buy any phone, make sure u google the specs before u proceed i bought my itel it1503 15k and am enjoying it.. rocking psiphon unlimited browsing and dstv

dearpreye:


FRSC commission at D-Line in Port Harcourt. I was given a firm and ordered to pay the amount at a Union Bank opposite the building.

It was a bit stressful. Although some guys at the gate tried to play a fast one, but I ignored them as I was already aware of the procedure.

They will tell you what next to do after you've paid the amount.

Horus:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUncc8LG4Cc

[size=15pt]President-Elect Muhammad Buhari interview with BBC[/size]

Revolution:
Updated Running National Totals For The Presidential As They Are Announced By INEC:

APC: 2,066,140

PDP: 2,049,274

PDP leading by 16,866

we can't always watch we eat that is why we have a government. No body can tell what a farmer decides to use in his/her farm

Advertico:
Monsanto can always do anything for money. Glyphosphate is a gonner simple. Hope we have an agency that monitors the use of these banned chemicals in naija.

About glyphosate : Commercially known as Roundup, Gly Star, Drexell, Keystone, Bionide, Ortho etc
The World Health Organization's research arm declares glyphosate a probable carcinogen. What's the evidence?

The cancer-research arm of the World Health Organization last week announced that glyphosate, the world’s most widely used herbicide, is probably carcinogenic to humans. But the assessment, by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in Lyon, France, has been followed by an immediate backlash from industry groups.
On March 23, Robb Fraley, chief technology officer at the agrochemical company Monsanto in St Louis, Missouri, which sells much of the world’s glyphosate, accused the IARC of “cherry picking” data. “We are outraged with this assessment,” he said in a statement. Nature explains the controversy.
What does the IARC report say?

The IARC regularly reviews the carcinogenicity of industrial chemicals, foodstuffs and even jobs. On March 20, a panel of international experts convened by the agency reported the findings of a review of five agricultural chemicals in a class known as organophosphates. A summary of the study was published in The Lancet Oncology.

Two of the pesticides — tetrachlorvinphos and parathion — were rated as “possibly carcinogenic to humans”, or category 2B. Three — malathion,diazinon and glyphosate — were rated as “probably carcinogenic to humans”, labelled category 2A.
Why should I care about glyphosate?

Glyphosate is the world’s most widely produced herbicide, by volume. It is used extensively in agriculture and is also found in garden products in many countries. The chemical is an ingredient in Monsanto's weedkiller product Roundup, and glyphosate has become more popular with the increasing market share of crops that are genetically engineered to
be tolerant to the herbicide.

What evidence is there for a link between glyphosate and cancer?

The IARC review notes that there is limited evidence for a link to cancer in humans. Although several studies have shown that people who work with the herbicide seem to be at increased risk of a cancer type called non-Hodgkin lymphoma, the report notes that a separate huge US
study, the Agricultural Health Study, found no link to non-Hodgkin lymphomas. That study followed thousands of farmers and looked at whether they had increased risk of cancer.
But other evidence, including from animal studies, led the IARC to its ‘probably carcinogenic’ classification. Glyphosate has been linked to tumours in mice and rats — and there is also what the IARC classifies as ‘mechanistic evidence’, such as DNA damage to human cells from exposure to glyphosate.

Kathryn Guyton, a senior toxicologist in the monographs programme at the IARC and one of the authors of the study, says, “In the case of glyphosate, because the evidence in experimental animals was sufficient and the evidence in humans was limited, that would put the agent into group 2A.”

But not everyone agrees?

An industry group of agrochemical companies called the Glyphosate Task Force said
that the agency’s evaluation “demonstrates serious deficiencies in terms of methodological approach and the overall conclusion is inconsistent with the results of all regulatory reviews concerning glyphosate’s safety profile”.
Monsanto — a member of the task force — said that relevant scientific data that showed no risk was excluded from the review, and the IARC “purposefully disregarded dozens of scientific studies”, specifically genetic toxicity studies.
But Guyton strongly defends the IARC process and insists that there is a set of clear rules that lays out which studies can be considered by the experts convened by the IARC. These are broadly limited to peer-reviewed publications and government reports, leading to the
rejection of a number of industry-submitted studies.
Some academic scientists have sounded notes of caution over the IARC report. Oliver Jones, an analytical chemist at RMIT University in Melbourne, told the Science Media Center in London:
“IARC evaluations are usually very good, but to me the evidence cited here appears a bit thin.” He added: “From a personal perspective, I am a vegetarian so I eat a lot of vegetables and I’m not worried by this report.”
Doesn’t just about everything cause cancer if you look hard enough?

The IARC classifies compoundson a scale of decreasing certainty: group 1 is for agents that are
definitely carcinogenic to humans; 2A, probably carcinogenic to humans;
2B, possibly carcinogenic to humans; 3, not classifiable; and 4,
probably not carcinogenic to humans.
Monsanto said in its statement, “IARC has classified numerous everyday items in Category 2 including coffee, cell phones, aloe vera extract and pickled vegetables, as well as professions such as a barber and fry cook.”


But the IARC classified most of these items at the less dangerous 2B
level, whereas glyphosate is in the 'probably carcinogenic' 2A category.
Of Monsanto's list, only emissions from high-temperature frying and the
occupational exposure experienced as a barber are rated as 2A.
What happens next?

It is not part of the IARC’s process to quantify any increased risk of cancer due to a chemical, or to recommend a safe exposure level, although its studies can be influential. Rather, regulatory agencies around the world will have to decide what to do with the agency’s
finding. The Environmental Protection Agency is currently conducting a formal review of
the safety of glyphosate (which it does not consider carcinogenic in humans) and said that it would give “full consideration” to the IARC study.


http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/widely-used-herbicide-linked-to-cancer/

tasland:
⌣̊┈̥-̶̯͡»̶̥Ơ̴̴͡.̮Ơ̴̴͡K⌣̊┈̥-̶̯͡»̶̥ if we can no dere own price it Wȋ̊ℓℓ b better dan D̶̲̥̅̊aτ̲̅ china oo own

tasland:
but Ɣợ̣̣̇̇̇μ̥ said one company(bolyn) i̶̲̥̅̊s makin at lagos?

tasland:
⌣̊┈̥-̶̯͡»̶̥Ơ̴̴͡.̮Ơ̴̴͡K⌣̊┈̥-̶̯͡»̶̥ das nice dis manual Wȋ̊ℓℓ b preferable and ℓ believe it won't cost lyk automated one am talkin abt......pls can Ɣợ̣̣̇̇̇μ̥ make an enquirin abt τ̲̅ђe amount sum1 can get D̶̲̥̅̊aτ̲̅ manual machine?dis i̶̲̥̅̊s τ̲̅ђe one ℓ told Ɣợ̣̣̇̇̇μ̥ D̶̲̥̅̊aτ̲̅ τ̲̅ђe bishop am workin wit nw bought 8million,and τ̲̅ђe project am workin on nw

tasland:
⌣̊┈̥-̶̯͡»̶̥Ơ̴̴͡.̮Ơ̴̴͡K⌣̊┈̥-̶̯͡»̶̥ ℓ Wȋ̊ℓℓ ,bt av nt seen D̶̲̥̅̊aτ̲̅ manual machine if Ɣợ̣̣̇̇̇μ̥ can send ♍ε τ̲̅ђe pics

tasland:
yea too expensive bt if sum1 can buy it and be rented out t̶̲̥̅̊ợ̣̣̇̇̇ peoples before 6 t̶̲̥̅̊ợ̣̣̇̇̇ 8month τ̲̅ђe money Wȋ̊ℓℓ com bck t̶̲̥̅̊ợ̣̣̇̇̇ Ɣợ̣̣̇̇̇μ̥,pertainin t̶̲̥̅̊ợ̣̣̇̇̇ one bishop who bought τ̲̅ђe hydraform machine....one brick i̶̲̥̅̊s #65naira which am workin wit rite nw

tasland:
τ̲̅ђe machine i̶̲̥̅̊s very cost dere are lyk F̶̲̅Õ̳͡я type(ℓ Wȋ̊ℓℓ try t̶̲̥̅̊ợ̣̣̇̇̇ send Ɣợ̣̣̇̇̇μ̥ τ̲̅ђe pics tomoro,dere i̶̲̥̅̊s one we call it single machine because it as only one mouldin τ̲̅ђe cost i̶̲̥̅̊s between 3.5milion t̶̲̥̅̊ợ̣̣̇̇̇ 4milliion and τ̲̅ђe double one which com wit double mouldin i̶̲̥̅̊s between 7.5 t̶̲̥̅̊ợ̣̣̇̇̇ 8million

tasland:
Mouldin it by ursef i̶̲̥̅̊s d beta chioce....am a builder bt my own builder i̶̲̥̅̊s base on interlockin red bricks,very cheap and so so strong