Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,209,253 members, 8,005,425 topics. Date: Monday, 18 November 2024 at 12:32 AM |
Nairaland Forum / ANCUA's Profile / ANCUA's Posts
(1) (of 1 pages)
Travel / Re: Nigerian Lady Denied US Visa, Nigerians Demand Refund Policy. by ANCUA(m): 9:04am On Nov 11 |
When they denied my 78 year old retiree Dad visa in August with no reason who wanted to spend just few days with his cousin in the U.S while traveling to Canada to visit my Sister, that's when I know that there is serious wahala..Probably making money off Nigerians without any intent of issuing visas. 4 Likes |
Business / Re: How Can I Get GIFMIS Code? by ANCUA(m): 11:04am On Apr 26, 2022 |
Pls, were you able to get this resolved. PLS am in this situation now. How do I get my TIN linked on the GIFMIS Portal. How were you paid? Regards. |
Science/Technology / How Do I Recover My Contacts Synced By Skype by ANCUA(m): 10:47am On Jul 21, 2020 |
Good morning All, Please I need a way out of this mess. I recently downloaded Skype on my phone and selected sync contact during setup. I noticed my contacts that was over 3000 reduced to 378. Pls how do I recover the contacts. Where did Skype sync my contacts to. Cc Lalasticlala Ishilove Semid4lyfe Obinoscopy |
Politics / How Abba Challenged Supreme Court Judgement At Anambra High Court!! by ANCUA(m): 4:01pm On Jun 12, 2020 |
HOW ABBA CHALLENGED SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT AT ANAMBRA HIGH COURT!! It is not an imaginary tale, and it is not an exaggeration. Abba community actually approached Anambra High Court seeking to set aside a Supreme Court judgement!! But nothing is more settled in our jurisprudence than the dictum of the finality of the Supreme Court judgement. True to form, Abba community desecrated that principle with their bizarre action. THIS IS THE STORY. On 12th November 1999, then Chief Judge of Anambra State, Hon. Justice Obioha Nwazota, entered judgement against the plaintiffs Abba in Njikoka LGA, and in favor of the 1st and 2nd defendants Ukwullu/Ukpo in Dunukofia LGA - in consolidated suits No. AA/53/75 & AA/11/77 - in a land dispute that had lasted for more than 25 years. In less than 2 weeks, Abba filed a notice of appeal, with which they secured a stay of execution from the then Chief Justice of Anambra State, His Lordship Hon. Justice C. Ononiba, who hailed from Nimo, a town that claims kinship with Abba. From that point going forward, Abba departed any pretenses to righteousness. It was glaringly clear that from evidentiary standpoint, Abba had no chance of overturning Justice Nwazota’s judgement in a fair appeal process. An extra legal strategy was needed. They eventually settled for a reprehensible legal engineering. As late as year 2000s, it was practicable to retrieve lost Court cases by forcing a retrial (trial de novo). And the most common method of forcing a retrial was simply make the judges’ Record of court proceedings to disappear permanently. In that scenario, the losing party (appellant) could competently argue for a retrial, since an appeal cannot be heard without the trial court’s record of proceedings. The dubious practice was notoriously popular in the south western Nigeria, where land cases were a matter of life and death. Being naturally mendacious people, this inglorious method was indeed very appealing to Abba. Abba committed time and resources to this mission, including what was left of their credibility and morality. They hired prominent lawyers from south western Nigeria, and together hatched their treacherous plans, and went to work. Unfortunately, their mission was unwittingly aided by the defunct Court of Appeal Practice Direction and Order 3 (13.2) which stipulated that “all original documents delivered to the court below under this rule shall remain in the custody of the court below until the record of Appeal has been prepared, and shall then be forwarded with the record to the Registrar (of the Appeal Court) and shall remain in the custody of the Court until the determination of the appeal.” This provision put the responsibility of compiling and transmitting the lower court’s records exclusively on the high court registry. Thus, if records were not compiled and transmitted, blame the high court registrar; if records disappeared, also blame the registrar. That made the task for Abba relatively easy. All they needed to do under that provision was seek out well placed judicial officers at Anambra High Court Registry, offer them enough incentives to take the rap, then wait to take delivery of the Record Book at Oye Abba market. As far as Abba was concerned, the plan worked to perfection. They felt great, because even though they were the real perpetrators of the dastardly scheme, Abba and their lawyers were in the clear; what is more, Abba was well positioned to shed a bucket of crocodile tears, and appeared justified in demanding fresh trial. In four years following their filing of notice of appeal, Abba did nothing to further the appeal. Instead, they spent time and fortunes recruiting insidious agents. They strategically engaged retired Justice Olike as their consultant on the case. Then they conveniently recruited the assistant Registrar of Anambra High Court, Mrs Olike (who just happened to be the wife of their consultant), and who was in charge of the Appeal Court Section of the High Court. Surprise surprise, on 19th September 2003, the record book of the land dispute between Abba vs Ukpo/Ukwullu disappeared forever. The coup was complete!! Then in early October 2003, Abba, who for four years took no steps whatsoever to prosecute their appeal, and who neither asked for, nor obtained enlargement of time to appeal, suddenly went on the offense. They accused Ukpo of stealing the Records to frustrate their appeal and, expectedly, cried for a fresh trial (which essentially was the culmination of the plot). LET ME DIGRESS: The case stalled for several years, but it was advantage Abba. They occupied Ukpo and Ukwullu lands and enjoyed the proceeds. Abba relocated its Oye Abba market to the disputed land; they rented plots of land to telecommunications companies to erect masts; they built shops and stalls; they manned Ukpo Junction and forcibly collected tolls from commercial bike operators. Above all, Abba strongmen fenced in hundreds of plots of Ukpo land inside residents which were themselves built on Ukpo land. In spite of the considerable provocations, Ukpo were a class act in civility, law & order. Ukpo maintained exemplary patience all through the over 45 years of grinding and grueling court appearances after court appearances. Ukpo knew that justice is slow but its taste is sweet. Igwe Ukpo, HRH Igwe (Dr.) Robert C. Eze, Okofia IV, ever the great tactician, exhorted and admonished restive Ukpo youths to be patient. For more than 45 years, we were patient, no physical confrontations, no riots and no breach of the peace. 45 years, it paid off! BUT LET’S GET BACK TO THE COURT PROCESSES. By the time Abba got to the Appeal Court, the table had turned. Zainab Adamu Bulkachuwa, the former President of the Court of Appeal, had ushered in a new Practice Direction, which took effect on 1st May 2013. For all intent and purpose, the order took a retrospective effect, because the Appeal Court decided it had had enough of the evil-geniuses in the legal profession, who exploited the orchestrated disappearance of judges’ record books to further their own sinister designs. The new Court of Appeal Order 08, Rules 1 & 4 state as follows:- “The Registrar of the Court below shall within 60 days after filing of a notice of appeal compile and transmit the Record of Appeal to the Court”, and “Where at the expiration of 60 days after filing of the notice of appeal the Registrar has failed and or neglected to compile and transmit the Records of Appeal in accordance with the preceding provision of this Rule, it shall become mandatory for the appellant to compile the Records of all documents and exhibits necessary for his appeal and transmit to the Court within 30 days after the registrar’s failure or neglect”. What does this profound change mean? It means that the new Court of Appeal Practice Direction has made it impossible for Abba, for instance, to blame the Registrar, or blame Ukpo or blame anybody else for the disappearance of the Records. This new provision made it mandatory for Abba to compile the trial Records themselves (as obviously the Anambra High Court Registry had failed to) within 30 days, and forward to the Appeal Court. This was an impossibility since Abba had since destroyed the stolen Records. Because Abba failed to transmit the Records, the Respondents (our lawyers) were entitled by law to move a motion to dismiss ABBA’s appeal. The motion was so moved, and ABBA’s appeal was so dismissed. Alas, Abba had fallen on their own sword!! Abba proceeded to the Supreme Court where they formulated 4 grounds of Appeal. Again there was no consolation. On 15th February 2019, the apex Court, in a unanimous judgement delivered by Hon. Justice Adamu Galumje, ruled in favor of the 1st and 2nd defendants, Ukpo and Ukwullu in all four grounds of Appeal formulated. The Honorable Judge also awarded N1,000,000 cost against the plaintiffs, Abba. As a stamp of finality of the protracted case, the Chief Judge of Anambra State, upon being presented with the rolled Supreme Court judgement, handed Ukpo the Warrant of Entry - to repossess our God given land. We know Abba have their own fictitious interpretation of the Supreme Court judgement, but every adult was truly horrified when Abba filed yet another case (suit No’s. AA/53/75 & AA/11/77 & Motion No. NN/70M/2020) at Anambra High Court, pleading the Court to set aside the Supreme Court judgement. The conduct of Abba is symptomatic of the brazen impunity that is fast overtaking our civic society, and it should be of concern for all us. Think about it, if Abba cannot be stopped by the Supreme Court of Nigeria, who can? If they flagrantly disregarded the Supreme Court ruling, how vicious can they become; and to what length can they go? Since the start of the land dispute more than 45 years ago, Ukpo and Ukwullu have played by the rules - the rules of human decency, the rules of fair play and the rules of law. For all their noisy gyrations and protest processions to Anambra Government house, Abba are really stark naked - completely exposed by history, tradition and the courts of law. Fortunately, the judiciary appears unshaken in its resolve to provide a bulwark against obnoxious behaviors. All law-abiding citizens of Nigeria should, therefore, stand to applaud the strong response of Hon. Justice Onyinye Anumonye of Anambra High Court Neni, who presided over Abba’s latest reckless legal action. I paraphrase Justice Animonye’s ruling below. On 19th May 2020, Hon. Justice Onyinye Anumonye of Anambra High Court Sitting In Neni, said he had exhaustively looked at the issues canvassed by the applicants and was of the view that after the Supreme Court judgement, all issues relating to the Ukpo/Ukwullu vs. Abba case are contained in the consolidated suits and are laid to rest permanently. In the exact words of the learned judge, “The ruling of the Supreme Court is final and its finality is unchangeable”. The Judge further said “no matter, under any guise, brought under the court against Supreme Court judgement, can be entertained or reheard by any court”. He opined that the judgement of the Supreme Court on the consolidated matter before the apex Court on February 15th, 2019 dealt extensively on the issues in the Ukpo/Ukwullu community case, which formed part of the issues in the motion before the court. He dismissed the suit with N250,000 cost against the plaintiffs, Abba, emphasizing that “there is no way any issue related to it can be entertained in any court in the land.” In summary, Abba’s interpretation of the Supreme Court judgement is self-serving, and a joke. But that did not stop them from telling whoever cared to listen that the Supreme Court directed parties to “go back to the trial court to sort out the mess”. Well, I guess Anambra High Court, Neni has now effectively and decisively sorted out the mess. It’s left to be seen whether Abba will go home and live in peace. *Copied. Cc Lalasticlala Ishilove Semid4lyfe Obinoscopy |
Crime / Re: Police Declare Chimamanda Adichie’s Kinsmen Wanted Over Land Dispute by ANCUA(m): 1:23pm On Oct 03, 2019 |
Mutemenot: We read one side of a story and make our conclusion no matter how lie laden it is..Pls if you really want to be Objective on this topic, read the write below and the judgement carefully before taking a stand..The Land dispute is question has three parties(Towns) involved Ukpo/Ukwulu and Abba. How come nobody cares to mention the 3rd Community Ukwulu who are the first respondent on this case. It's obvious all these posts full of lies and propaganda is being targeted at maligning the person and character f Prince Engr Arthur Eze. Please read below and be informed. http://www.lawpavilionpersonal.com/newfulllawreport.jsp?pk=SC.589/2016 Abba took Ukwulu to court accusing them of trespass. After initially serving as witness for Ukwulu and alarmed that Abba was also claiming a big chunk of Ukpo land, Ukpo joined the suite in a consolidated format as 2nd set of defendants (Suite Nos. AA/53/75 & AA/ 11/77). JUSTICE OBIORA NWAZOTA: On 12TH November 1999 the Chief Judge of Anambra State, His Lordship Hon Justice Obiora Nwazota, delivered judgement in consolidated suites in favor of the two brothers, Ukpo and Ukwulu communities. The learned Chief Judge dismissed the claims of the plaintiffs (Abba) with respect to the disputed land, whilst the reliefs sought by the 1st and 2nd sets of defendants (Ukwulu and Ukpo) with claims to the land as “Agu Odoagba” and Ogwulugwu Land” in Ukwulu and Ukpo, respectively, were granted. This case was the last decided by Justice Nwazota, as he retired from the bar, as well as Anambra Chief Judge effective afterward. JUSTICE G.C. ONONIBA: On 18TH November 1999, Abba filed a notice to appeal and were given the conditions of appeal, with which they proceeded to obtain stay of execution from His Lordship, Justice G.C. Ononiba (now Chief Judge of Anambra State) on 11/12/2000. Curiously, Justice Ononiba, from Nimo which claims kinship with Abba, granted an unconditional stay of execution to Abba, thereby presenting to the plaintiffs (Abba) through the back door what they could not obtain during the substantive suit. Armed with the unconditional stay of execution against Nwazota’s judgement of 12 November 1999, Abba lost interest in pursuing the appeal. And even though the stay bounded all parties over to maintain peace in the area and on the disputed land, Abba entered the land, setting up the infamous “Oye Abba” market, indiscriminately planting signages, building shops, renting plots to GSM operators and collecting tolls, while they plotted to subvert justice. (Justice Nwazota’s judgement was considered so thorough that the only option available to Abba to overturn it was by destroying the Record of Proceedings, in order to force a completely new trial.) SETTING THEIR SUBVERSSIVE PLOT IN MOTION: (23RD October 2003 is a fateful day, so mark the date. But this background story first.) During the Justice Nwazota’s trial, Ukpo and Ukwulu had compelling evidence. All our neighbours: Enugu-Agidi, Nawgu, Awkuzu, all stood witness to the fact that Ukpo and Ukwulu have been their land neighbors for centuries. Nobody in the immediate vicinity bore witness for Abba. Abba claimed kinship with Abagana and Nimo but were hard pressed to prove why they do not have contiguous borders with Umu Owelle. Traditionally in those days, brothers lived next to one another, and if Abba was blood relative of Abagana and Nimo and Ezi-Owelle, it should have been placed in direct contiguity with them. On the other hand, Ukpo proved without shadow of doubt that we were the original settlers and all Dunu brothers lived contiguously. The evidence and witnesses were iron cast, and Abba knew it. They had to find another way to circumvent justice. They hired a new lead lawyer, the indefatigable Wole Olanipekun (SAN). The new lawyers found a creative way, the Western style: if the Record of Proceedings disappeared, they would be in a position to argue for trial de novo (a new trial). This strategy was particularly enticing because all the witnesses who appeared on behalf of Ukpo and Ukwulu were, by this time, dead. So why not, they would give it a shot; a big shot it was! Abba sent out town criers every night to impose levies for the war chest. I could hear them late in the night, cajoling and threatening those who were hesitant to pay. For good measure, Abba hired a legal consultant, one retired Justice Olike, from Nawfia, whose wife was conveniently the Assistant Registrar of Anambra State High Court. So now, Mrs. Olike, the Assistant Registrar, was in the bag! The plot was actualized on 23rd October 2003 (I told you, remember this date). That was the date the Record of Proceedings containing the judgement of Justice Nwazota disappeared, never to be found again. (How do we know this date? You’ll find out later.) Being now rest-assured that the Record of Proceedings has disappeared for good, Abba went on the offense, yelling that they cannot transmit records to the Appeal Court in Enugu because Ukpo had stolen the Record of Proceedings to frustrate their appeal. Never mind that this is a text book example of crocodile tears. Early in 2004, alarmed by the insidious scheming by Abba, a group called CONCERNED CITIZENS OF UKPO, wrote a petition to the Nigerian Judicial Commission (NJC), requesting an investigation into the missing Record. And lo and behold, six months later the NJC set up the Otuocha Panel of Enquiry, headed by Honorable Justice P.A.C. Abidigwe, to look into the missing Record. The Panel released its report on 15/12/2006, and the most important finding was that the Record of Proceedings was last signed for on 23rd October 2003 by the office of Mrs. Olike, the Assistant Registrar of Anambra State High Court. I told you, remember 23rd October 2003; and remember Mrs Olike. Her husband was the Chief Legal Consultant of Abba in the case. In conclusion, Tribunal pointedly stated that Mrs Olike, Abba and their legal team had a case to answer regarding the missing Record. Does anybody still doubt that Abba bribed, connived and conspired to steal and destroy the Record of Proceedings? Remember it took Abba less than one month to file notice of appeal and obtain a stay of execution, but did not file the substantive appeal in four years. Appellants are required to satisfy the conditions of appeal by, among other things, transmitting records to the Appeal Court within 6 months, failing which they will be out of time to appeal (unless they ask for time extension). In this case, Abba was out of time and did not show any desire to prosecute their appeal, did not ask for time extension in six months, one year, two, three, then four years. At which time their case had suffered a mortal defect. APPEAL COURT ENUGU: In line with their original plot, Abba approached the Appeal Court Enugu, armed with the plea that the Record of Proceedings was missing, and asked the Court (via motion No. CA/E/30/2009) to direct the Anambra State High Court to start the case de novo. Remember: since Nwazota’s judgement, this has been their over-arching strategy. However, on 27/6/2016, the motion was struck out by the Appeal Court for want of record. SUPREME COURT: Expressing dissatisfaction with the Appeal Court ruling, Abba approached the Supreme Court, pleading denial of fair hearing. The Apex court directed the Appeal Court to re-instate the motion (No. SC/115/2009) on the basis of human right to fair hearing. BACK TO APPEAL COURT: Again, the Appeal Court on 11/7/2017 resolved all issues canvassed by Abba in favor of Ukpo and Ukwulu, and threw out the appeal. The higher court also vacated Justice Ononiba’s 12/11/1999 stay of execution, paving the way for Ukpo and Ukwulu to re-possess their lands. BACK TO SUPREME COURT: Abba rushed back to Supreme Court and formulated 4 grounds of appeal against the Court of Appeal’s ruling. On 15th of February 2019, in a lead judgement delivered by Hon. Justice Paul Adamu Galumje, the Supreme Court ruled against Abba and in favor of Ukpo and Ukwulu in all the four issues formulated, and also awarded N1,000,000 cost in favor of the defendants, Ukpo and Ukwulu. ABBA’S FIXATION ON PAGE 27 The Supreme Court judgement of 15th February 2019 runs in over 37 pages, but Abba is fixated on only page 27. Abba’s distraction stems from the fact that the learned Justice took an academic expedition. Before arriving at the four issues formulated for the Appeal by Abba, the lead judge, Hon. Justice Paul Adamu Galumje had undertaken what laymen could describe as philosophical and intellectual excursion. During that ventilation, the learned Justice introspected on the impact of the missing Record of Proceedings on the concept of justice itself. Lawyers call this type of reverie “obiter dictum”, an unforce-able point of view, which is irrelevant when points of law are being considered. Alas, Justice Galumje expressed an “obiter” which Abba found complementary to their cause, and they are determined to hold on to it, like a drowning man furiously grasping a sinking trunk. But Justice Adamu Galumje’s view was a casual expression of a viewpoint while he was on his way to the law points. An “obiter” is unforce-able. On the other hand, there is “ratio decidendi”, which are the pivotal points of any suite. Abba formulated 4 grounds in their appeal. None of them asked the Supreme Court for trial de novo. Neither was de novo canvassed during any of the hearings. Delivering judgement on all four grounds, the Court ruled in favor of Ukpo and Ukwulu and awarded costs to the same parties. Lawyers will tell you that the court does not give that which is not asked for. At any rate “obiter” cannot be enforced against “ratio”. Abba has done a great de-service to her illustrious daughter, Chimamanda Adichie, by not availing her of the Supreme Court judgement; because you do not have to be a lawyer to understand the ruling. Which is the reason why I am shocked that not one person in the whole of Abba town could correctly read, understand and explain the judgement to their community. If Chimamanda was given, and read, the Supreme Court judgement before she wrote her article in the Guardian, I will be entitled to make a case of intellectual deficit against her!! WARRANT OF POSSESSION Supreme Court represents the bus-stop of all litigations in Nigeria; when it rules on any case, one can only appeal to God. In line with this time-tested legalistic wisdom, the Chief Judge of Anambra State, upon being served the Supreme Court judgement, issued Ukpo and Ukwulu the clearance (Warrant of Entry) to re-possess their lands. Or, is Abba community suggesting that the Chief Judge of Anambra State does not understand the Supreme Court judgement? The Commissioner of Police Anambra State has been served the Supreme Court judgement, as well as the Warrant of Entry; that is why the Police is on firm ground in upholding the law and enforcing the peace on the erstwhile disputed land. Or, is Abba community also suggesting that the Commissioner of Police does not understand the Supreme Court ruling? ABBA SAID IT’S BACK IN COURT Abba insists it has once again filed a suite on the same settled issues at a trial court in Anambra State. The mere fact of Abba filing another suite on same issues on which the Supreme court has ruled is itself seminal and profound. Because what Abba is asking Anambra State trial court to do is to set aside the Supreme Court ruling! That is huge, and I am sure, Chimamanda will be able to put this new gigantic development in her most colorful prose. 2 Likes 1 Share |
Politics / Re: Ukpo And Abba Land Dispute: Setting The Records Straight by ANCUA(m): 10:46am On Sep 24, 2019 |
ursullalinda: Police is only trying to stop breakdown of law and order. There was alleged manhandling of the bailiff by the opposing people of Abba community, who was to serve the enforcement order of the Supreme Court judgement. Abba community youths have on several cases tried to lure Ukpo and Ukwulu communities into clashes that would lead to loss of life which they ignored. The Supreme Court ruling in favor of Ukpo and Ukwulu communities is final and brings to an end the legal fight. Please go through the court cases carefully from the High court through the appeal court to the Supreme court judgements. |
Politics / Ukpo And Abba Land Dispute: Setting The Records Straight by ANCUA(m): 10:05am On Sep 24, 2019 |
UKPO AND ABBA LAND DISPUTE: SETTING THE RECORDS STRAIGHT PREAMBLE Ukpo, Ukwulu and Abba are neighbouring communities sharing common boundaries. Attempts to delineate these boundaries have resulted in a long legal battle between these communities. Recently, the Supreme Court resolved the matter in favour of Ukpo and Ukwulu communities. And instead of abiding by the orders of the apex court, Abba community took recourse to brigandage, propaganda and deception with a view to steer further conflict and possible bloodshed. We, the people of Ukpo Community in view of the happenstances, lies and falsehoods been peddled, published and scattered all over the media by some persons from Abba community, wish to put the records straight by stating the true position of the Ukpo, Ukwulu and Abba protracted land dispute. ORIGIN OF ABBA PEOPLE (ABRIDGED) Abba people came from Ichida in present Anaocha Local Government Area of Anambra State – see the brochure of Igwe Abba’s Ofala 2018. They were hired as mercenary warriors and were defeated in inter-communal war. Dunukofia brothers working in synergy defeated them and took them as captives. Ukpo spared their own share of the war captives (Abba) and gave them the present land which they occupy. These was based on an understanding that they will remain subservient, obedient and continue to provide them (Ukpo) with good palm wine because they were known to be good wine tapers. As was customary, they took oath never to take or annex any portion of Ukpo land beyond the area allowed them. It was not long before greed and covetousness, discontent and selfish aggrandisement moved them into encroachment of their benefactors’ land in utter disregard to their initial understanding. THE LAND DISPUTE Abba is a community in Njikoka L.G.A of Anambra State. They sued Ukwulu, a community in Dunukofia L.G.A of Anambra State through their representatives. Thereafter, Abba became the Plaintiffs while Ukwulu became the 1st sets of Defendants. In the matter, Abba claimed amongst other parcels of land, the entire Akpu village and part of Oranto village belonging to Ukpo another community in Dunukofia L.G.A of Anambra State. Dissatisfied with the above Ukpo applied to be joined & was joined as the 2nd set of Defendants. On the 12/11/1999, the Anambra State High Court presided over by his Lordship Rtd. Hon. Justice Obiora Nwazota (the then C.J of the State) in consolidated suits No's. AA/53/75 and AA/11/77 granted declaration of title to the disputed land in favour of the 1st and 2nd sets of Defendants (i.e Ukwulu & Ukpo). Dissatisfied with the above judgment, Abba community (Plaintiffs and now Appellants by virtue of this appeal) on the 18th of November, 1999, filed a notice of Appeal against the said judgment at the Court of Appeal Enugu Division. Incidentally on the 14/12/2000, they secured an order of Stay of Execution against the Judgment of 12/11/1999. Hence, they mischievously failed to take steps to transmit the Records of Appeal until prompted by the 1st Set of Respondents (i.e Ukwulu community) before they reluctantly took steps to transmit the record in 2004 (almost 4 years after filing Notice of Appeal). Thereafter, all efforts made by the registrar of the court to transmit the said records failed as the records were said to be missing from archives. Consequently, the 2nd sets of Defendants now 2nd sets of Respondents (i.e. Ukpo community) petitioned the then Chief Judge of Anambra State and a Judicial Panel headed by Hon. Justice P.A.C Obidigwe was set up to carry out an enquiry with respect to the missing Court's records in the consolidated suits No's. AA/53/75 and AA/11/77. After an elaborate enquiry, the panel on 15/12/2006 released her findings wherein Abba community was said to have questions to answer over the said missing court's records. In their desperate bid to achieve their devilish intention of denying Ukwulu & Ukpo communities, the benefits of the above High Court judgment, Abba community filed a motion at the Court of Appeal seeking an order directing the then C.J. Anambra State to have the above matter reassigned to another Court for trial de novo (afresh). However, on 27/6/2016 the said motion was struck out in favour of Ukwulu & Ukpo communities, on the ground that the appeal had not been entered in the registry of the court. Similarly, the Appeal No CA/E/30/2009 filed by Abba community was dismissed for failure to compile and transmit the records of appeal to Court of Appeal. Dissatisfied with the Court of Appeal Judgment delivered on the 27/6/2016 Abba community appealed against the said judgment in Motion No Sc/115/2009 on the ground (Among other grounds) that they were not given fair hearing at the Court of Appeal. The appeal was allowed by Supreme Court which reinstated it in Court of Appeal. On their second missionary journey at the Court of Appeal, the court on the 11/7/2017 resolved all issues conversed by Abba community in favour of Ukwulu & Ukpo communities and dismissed the appeal –CA/E/86/2012- filled by Abba community. The court also vacated the order of stay of execution granted to Abba community against the judgment of the High Court delivered on 12/11/1999 and further granted warrant of possession over the disputed land to Ukwulu & Ukpo communities. Dissatisfied with the above decision of the Court of Appeal, Abba community went to Supreme Court and four Issues for determination were raised: 1. Whether the Plaintiffs/Appellants (Abba community) were given fair hearing at the court of Appeal? 2. Whether Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to set aside the order of Stay of Execution granted by the trial Court on the 14/12/2000 against the judgment of the trial court delivered on 12/11/1999? 3. Whether it is the duty of the Plaintiffs/Appellants to compile and transmit the records of appeal to Court of Appeal? 4. Whether the Court of Appeal acted in error by relying on order 8 of Court of Appeal Rules 2011 in placing the burden of compiling and transmitting the record of appeal on the Plaintiffs/Appellants? THE SUPREME COURT VERDICT The Supreme Court via its judgment delivered on 15/2/2019 by Hon. Justice Paul Adamu Galinje resolved all the above issues against the Plaintiffs/Appellants and dismissed their (Abba community) Appeal. The said Judgment is now reported in Nwora V. Nwabueze (2019) 7 NWLR (Pt. 1670) Pp. 1-39. Note, neither the Plaintiffs/Appellants (Abba community) nor the 1st sets & 2nd sets of the Defendants/Respondents (Ukwulu & Ukpo communities) raised the issue of Trial De Novo at the Apex Court as such that was not part of the issues for determination before the Supreme Court. Therefore, any statement relating to that (Trial De Novo) made by the Court is statement made by the way, and as such is an obiter dictum which has no legal consequences or precedent value and of no binding effect. It is the ratio decidendi which has the binding effect. Abba community ought to know that Supreme Court is not a Father Christmas or a Philanthropist whose nature is to dole out gifts even when not solicited for. It is elementary that reliefs not sort by litigants cannot be granted by any court. PRINCE ENGR. ARTHUR EZE’S PEACE MOVES Prince Engr. Arthur Eze in his benevolence, kind and Philanthropist nature engineered several peace meetings between Ukpo, Ukwulu and Abba communities wherein he sincerely pleaded with Ukpo and Ukwulu communities to (despite the fact that the Supreme Court Judgment over the said land is in the favour of Ukpo and Ukwulu) concede some Parcels of land from the disputed land to Abba community. He (Prince Engr. Arthur Eze) firmly condemned “Winner Take all Syndrome” and further offered to give huge princely sum of money to each of the three disputing communities for peace to reign amongst them. Regrettably, Abba Community rejected the above laudable peace initiative of Prince Engr. Arthur Eze and threatened to deal ruthlessly with any Ukpo or Ukwulu person found on the said land or within Abba Community. An indigene of Ukpo, Mr. Udoka Igbom on the 19th day of June, 2019, was to become a victim of Abba Community's desperation to arrogate that to itself what does not belong to them. We have petitioned the IGP with regards to the attempted murder of our son (Mr. Udoka Igbom) by some hoodlums from Abba Community. Prince Engr. Arthur Eze by his noble roles in ensuring lasting peace amongst the communities deserves sincere commendations and not vilification and unnecessary name calling by some Abba war mongers. CONCLUSION Recall that the said High Court Judgment delivered on 12/11/1999, by his lordship Obiora Nwazota (the then CJ of the state) in consolidated suits No's. AA/53/75 & AA/11/77 which granted declaration of title to the disputed land in favour of Ukwulu & Ukpo Communities against Abba Community is validly subsisting and binding. The law is that a judgment of a Court remains binding and valid unless and until it is set aside by a competent Court of law. See Central Bank of Nigeria & Anor. v. Olayato Aribo (2018) 4 NWLR (Pt.1608) 130 at 156 per Kekere-Ekun, JSC. In firm support thereof, the Supreme Court held that the Court of Appeal was right in setting aside the order of stay of execution granted by the trial Court on the 14/12/2000 against the High Court judgment delivered on 12/11/1999. That being the true position, the judgment creditors (Ukpo & Ukwulu communities) are legally entitled to seek the enforcement of the said judgment given that the order of stay of execution against it has been set aside by the Supreme Court. In view of the above Supreme Court Judgment, Warrant of Possession was granted to Ukwulu & Ukpo Communities with respect to the said disputed land and same has been duly served on Abba Community. It is pertinent to state that in a Peace Meeting between Ukpo & Abba Community before the CP Anambra State Mr. Dandaura Mustapha the Igwe, the President General and also the counsels to Abba community all promised to warn their people (Abba Community) to stay clear of the land once Warrant of Possession is granted to Ukwulu & Ukpo Communities and same served on them (Abba community). This has been done and all legal requirements met. Yet Abba Community still ferments trouble and violently resists the court bailiffs from enforcing the court judgment and the police from performing their constitutional duties. Our Question; Are Judgments of the Supreme Court meant to be obeyed or disobeyed? Contrary to the trending falsehood by Abba people bordering on brutality by men of the Nigeria Police, the police has been diligently performing their constitutional duty in line with court judgments without been influenced by anyone. No one from Abba community has been harassed, intimidated or chastised by men of the Nigeria Police over the said land dispute between Ukpo, Ukwulu and Abba communities. Ukpo is peace loving and law abiding community, we don’t resort to violence in settling disputes. We have been patient since 1999 when the first judgment was delivered in our favour and after 20 years, the Apex Court resolved same in our favour. Why should Abba community be allowed to violently deprive us the benefits of these judgments? We respect and will always defend the dignity of human life. Cc Lalasticlala Ishilove Semid4lyfe Obinoscopy |
Literature / Re: Chimamamanda Adichie Fights Arthur Eze Over Land Grabbing by ANCUA(m): 7:52am On Sep 24, 2019 |
A REBUTTAL TO: MY HOME TOWN IS UNDER SIEGE, AN ARTICLE PUBISHED IN THE GUARDIAN OF 20/9/19, WRITTEN BY CHIMAMANDA NGOZI ADICHIE, BEST SELLING AUTHOR. When I read Adichie’s article, the first emotion that flooded through me was anger. There she was, the entire page 12 in the Guardian devoted to her; adorned with her personality, juxtaposed with her flowing prose but crisscrossed with fabrics of ignorance, half-truths, outright lies and sheer fabrications. In literature, Ngozi Adichie is precocious and a prodigy, respected in Nigeria and around the world. How could she put her shiny reputation on the line with such a spectacularly uninformed adventure, even for her beloved hometown? How dare her turn facts on its head and try to subvert the immutability of truth and the integrity of history! In fiction, Adichie is permitted to create her own version of reality; however, in the real world, reality is protected by facts, and facts are sacrosanct. Just then I remembered, and I was not angry with her any more. I remembered that Ngozi Adichie, with all her literally achievements, hails from Abba, a bellicose and belligerent town. In her community, pugnacity is an inheritance, and mendacity is in the heritage. There is a saying that you cannot completely cure madness, even with the best education! Adichie may be the last hope for Abba to thwart the course of justice. They have tried to instigate communal clash; Ukpo and Ukwulu did not take the bait. They serially tried in the court of law, and failed every step of the way. They stole the trial court’s Record of Proceedings to force a re-trail; that also failed. They enlisted the sympathy of Anambra government; so far not much concrete result. Now it seems, Adichie is Abba’s last hope. To be fair to Adichie, she would not be the only person to put her reputation on the line for her beloved town, but she must also be prepared to the muddied in the process. An important indigene of Abba recently told me that in this land dispute between Ukpo and Abba, Prince Arthur Eze makes the only difference. In other words, Ukpo could not defeat Abba if not for the involvement of Arthur Eze. I thought that was stupid statement because you cannot separate Ukpo and Arthur, but it goes directly to the heart of their plan to use Chimamanda Adichie to discredit Prince Arthur Eze. Currently, the battle cry in Abba is to destroy Ukpo’s case by first destroying the reputation of Arthur. The way Abba reckons it, their illustrious daughter has enough standing to sully Prince Arthur’s image and depict him as a wealthy bully who represents all that is wrong with Nigeria; to cast him as an influential man who has the police in his pocket; a land grabbing billionaire who would stop at nothing to forcibly acquire other people’s land; and a mean-spirited man who uses his wealth to oppress Abba people instead of improving lives. In a nutshell, that is the sole purpose of her article – to damage Arthur’s public image and make it stick. But she does not know Arthur. In the words of my people (God bless Ukpo), what can a small rat do to an iron pot? I can bet my farm that Adichie has never met Arthur Eze. If she had, she would have known better, much better. You do not have to be Arthur’s friend or kinsman to attest to the fact that he is the most conciliatory, the kindest person, and arguably the most public-spirited billionaire God created. If Adichie has ever met Arthur, she would know that he has no iota of meanness in him, and that the Almighty God created Arthur for the sole purpose of giving, as opposed to amassing anything, least of all land. If Adichie is given the least insight into the land matter between Abba and Ukpo, she would have known that Arthur Eze is Abba’s best advocate, to the chagrin of his own kinsmen. WHAT ARE THE FACTS Nogozi Adichie is too young to have had any meaningful personal experience of the land dispute, so it is safe to assume that her parents and kinsmen handed down the story to her. Yet the sheer number of lies, the falsifications, exaggerations and the gusto with which she handled her ill-fated presenttion are simply stunning. My task therefore is to state the facts, set the records straight. The land dispute has lasted for more than 44 years, so the best approach will be to chronicle the important timelines. Brief History: The existence of Abba as a community is a consequence of ancient inter-communal war, when its progenitor, Ichinambubor, a mercenary from Ichida, fought against Ukpo and Ifite-Dunu. He was captured; but instead of putting a sword through his heart as was the norm in those days, his life was spared. An expert wine tapper, Ichinambubor was, again contrary to what obtained in those ancient time, settled in Ukpo and Ifite-Dunu lands, where he was engaged in palm-wine tapping (you could argue that Ukpo and Ifite-Dunu liked buzz!!). Being a virtual slave, Ukpo and Ifite-Dunu refused to grant Ichinambubor a wife, so he ventured afar to Abagana to take a wife. His first son was named Abamulu, meaning that Abagana made it possible. The present-day Abba is thus descendant from Ichinambubor and his son, Abamulu. That Abba community is now rising to challenge Ukpo, the original settlers and their benefactor, to a land dispute is testament to Ukpo’s magnanimity. It is also a testament to Abba’s perfidy. But there it is: in the last 80 years or so, Abba embarked on massive land annexation and expansionist endeavors. They encroached upon Ukpo and Ukwulu lands, and farmed and hunted far beyond imaginable scopes. In the last 44 years, they set out to make the lands permanently theirs. They took Ukwulu to court accusing them of trespass. After initially serving as witness for Ukwulu and alarmed that Abba was also claiming a big chunk of Ukpo land, Ukpo joined the suite in a consolidated format as 2nd set of defendants (Suite Nos. AA/53/75 & AA/ 11/77). JUSTICE OBIORA NWAZOTA: On 12TH November 1999 the Chief Judge of Anambra State, His Lordship Hon Justice Obiora Nwazota, delivered judgement in consolidated suites in favor of the two brothers, Ukpo and Ukwulu communities. The learned Chief Judge dismissed the claims of the plaintiffs (Abba) with respect to the disputed land, whilst the reliefs sought by the 1st and 2nd sets of defendants (Ukwulu and Ukpo) with claims to the land as “Agu Odoagba” and Ogwulugwu Land” in Ukwulu and Ukpo, respectively, were granted. This case was the last decided by Justice Nwazota, as he retired from the bar, as well as Anambra Chief Judge effective afterward. JUSTICE G.C. ONONIBA: On 18TH November 1999, Abba filed a notice to appeal and were given the conditions of appeal, with which they proceeded to obtain stay of execution from His Lordship, Justice G.C. Ononiba (now Chief Judge of Anambra State) on 11/12/2000. Curiously, Justice Ononiba, from Nimo which claims kinship with Abba, granted an unconditional stay of execution to Abba, thereby presenting to the plaintiffs (Abba) through the back door what they could not obtain during the substantive suit. Armed with the unconditional stay of execution against Nwazota’s judgement of 12 November 1999, Abba lost interest in pursuing the appeal. And even though the stay bounded all parties over to maintain peace in the area and on the disputed land, Abba entered the land, setting up the infamous “Oye Abba” market, indiscriminately planting signages, building shops, renting plots to GSM operators and collecting tolls, while they plotted to subvert justice. (Justice Nwazota’s judgement was considered so thorough that the only option available to Abba to overturn it was by destroying the Record of Proceedings, in order to force a completely new trial.) SETTING THEIR SUBVERSSIVE PLOT IN MOTION: (23RD October 2003 is a fateful day, so mark the date. But this background story first.) During the Justice Nwazota’s trial, Ukpo and Ukwulu had compelling evidence. All our neighbours: Enugu-Agidi, Nawgu, Awkuzu, all stood witness to the fact that Ukpo and Ukwulu have been their land neighbors for centuries. Nobody in the immediate vicinity bore witness for Abba. Abba claimed kinship with Abagana and Nimo but were hard pressed to prove why they do not have contiguous borders with Umu Owelle. Traditionally in those days, brothers lived next to one another, and if Abba was blood relative of Abagana and Nimo and Ezi-Owelle, it should have been placed in direct contiguity with them. On the other hand, Ukpo proved without shadow of doubt that we were the original settlers and all Dunu brothers lived contiguously. The evidence and witnesses were iron cast, and Abba knew it. They had to find another way to circumvent justice. They hired a new lead lawyer, the indefatigable Wole Olanipekun (SAN). The new lawyers found a creative way, the Western style: if the Record of Proceedings disappeared, they would be in a position to argue for trial de novo (a new trial). This strategy was particularly enticing because all the witnesses who appeared on behalf of Ukpo and Ukwulu were, by this time, dead. So why not, they would give it a shot; a big shot it was! Abba sent out town criers every night to impose levies for the war chest. I could hear them late in the night, cajoling and threatening those who were hesitant to pay. For good measure, Abba hired a legal consultant, one retired Justice Olike, from Nawfia, whose wife was conveniently the Assistant Registrar of Anambra State High Court. So now, Mrs. Olike, the Assistant Registrar, was in the bag! The plot was actualized on 23rd October 2003 (I told you, remember this date). That was the date the Record of Proceedings containing the judgement of Justice Nwazota disappeared, never to be found again. (How do we know this date? You’ll find out later.) Being now rest-assured that the Record of Proceedings has disappeared for good, Abba went on the offense, yelling that they cannot transmit records to the Appeal Court in Enugu because Ukpo had stolen the Record of Proceedings to frustrate their appeal. Never mind that this is a text book example of crocodile tears. Early in 2004, alarmed by the insidious scheming by Abba, a group called CONCERNED CITIZENS OF UKPO, wrote a petition to the Nigerian Judicial Commission (NJC), requesting an investigation into the missing Record. And lo and behold, six months later the NJC set up the Otuocha Panel of Enquiry, headed by Honorable Justice P.A.C. Abidigwe, to look into the missing Record. The Panel released its report on 15/12/2006, and the most important finding was that the Record of Proceedings was last signed for on 23rd October 2003 by the office of Mrs. Olike, the Assistant Registrar of Anambra State High Court. I told you, remember 23rd October 2003; and remember Mrs Olike. Her husband was the Chief Legal Consultant of Abba in the case. In conclusion, Tribunal pointedly stated that Mrs Olike, Abba and their legal team had a case to answer regarding the missing Record. Does anybody still doubt that Abba bribed, connived and conspired to steal and destroy the Record of Proceedings? Remember it took Abba less than one month to file notice of appeal and obtain a stay of execution, but did not file the substantive appeal in four years. Appellants are required to satisfy the conditions of appeal by, among other things, transmitting records to the Appeal Court within 6 months, failing which they will be out of time to appeal (unless they ask for time extension). In this case, Abba was out of time and did not show any desire to prosecute their appeal, did not ask for time extension in six months, one year, two, three, then four years. At which time their case had suffered a mortal defect. APPEAL COURT ENUGU: In line with their original plot, Abba approached the Appeal Court Enugu, armed with the plea that the Record of Proceedings was missing, and asked the Court (via motion No. CA/E/30/2009) to direct the Anambra State High Court to start the case de novo. Remember: since Nwazota’s judgement, this has been their over-arching strategy. However, on 27/6/2016, the motion was struck out by the Appeal Court for want of record. SUPREME COURT: Expressing dissatisfaction with the Appeal Court ruling, Abba approached the Supreme Court, pleading denial of fair hearing. The Apex court directed the Appeal Court to re-instate the motion (No. SC/115/2009) on the basis of human right to fair hearing. BACK TO APPEAL COURT: Again, the Appeal Court on 11/7/2017 resolved all issues canvassed by Abba in favor of Ukpo and Ukwulu, and threw out the appeal. The higher court also vacated Justice Ononiba’s 12/11/1999 stay of execution, paving the way for Ukpo and Ukwulu to re-possess their lands. BACK TO SUPREME COURT: Abba rushed back to Supreme Court and formulated 4 grounds of appeal against the Court of Appeal’s ruling. On 15th of February 2019, in a lead judgement delivered by Hon. Justice Paul Adamu Galumje, the Supreme Court ruled against Abba and in favor of Ukpo and Ukwulu in all the four issues formulated, and also awarded N1,000,000 cost in favor of the defendants, Ukpo and Ukwulu. ABBA’S FIXATION ON PAGE 27 The Supreme Court judgement of 15th February 2019 runs in over 37 pages, but Abba is fixated on only page 27. Abba’s distraction stems from the fact that the learned Justice took an academic expedition. Before arriving at the four issues formulated for the Appeal by Abba, the lead judge, Hon. Justice Paul Adamu Galumje had undertaken what laymen could describe as philosophical and intellectual excursion. During that ventilation, the learned Justice introspected on the impact of the missing Record of Proceedings on the concept of justice itself. Lawyers call this type of reverie “obiter dictum”, an unforce-able point of view, which is irrelevant when points of law are being considered. Alas, Justice Galumje expressed an “obiter” which Abba found complementary to their cause, and they are determined to hold on to it, like a drowning man furiously grasping a sinking trunk. But Justice Adamu Galumje’s view was a casual expression of a viewpoint while he was on his way to the law points. An “obiter” is unforce-able. On the other hand, there is “ratio decidendi”, which are the pivotal points of any suite. Abba formulated 4 grounds in their appeal. None of them asked the Supreme Court for trial de novo. Neither was de novo canvassed during any of the hearings. Delivering judgement on all four grounds, the Court ruled in favor of Ukpo and Ukwulu and awarded costs to the same parties. Lawyers will tell you that the court does not give that which is not asked for. At any rate “obiter” cannot be enforced against “ratio”. Abba has done a great de-service to her illustrious daughter, Chimamanda Adichie, by not availing her of the Supreme Court judgement; because you do not have to be a lawyer to understand the ruling. Which is the reason why I am shocked that not one person in the whole of Abba town could correctly read, understand and explain the judgement to their community. If Chimamanda was given, and read, the Supreme Court judgement before she wrote her article in the Guardian, I will be entitled to make a case of intellectual deficit against her!! WARRANT OF POSSESSION Supreme Court represents the bus-stop of all litigations in Nigeria; when it rules on any case, one can only appeal to God. In line with this time-tested legalistic wisdom, the Chief Judge of Anambra State, upon being served the Supreme Court judgement, issued Ukpo and Ukwulu the clearance (Warrant of Entry) to re-possess their lands. Or, is Abba community suggesting that the Chief Judge of Anambra State does not understand the Supreme Court judgement? The Commissioner of Police Anambra State has been served the Supreme Court judgement, as well as the Warrant of Entry; that is why the Police is on firm ground in upholding the law and enforcing the peace on the erstwhile disputed land. Or, is Abba community also suggesting that the Commissioner of Police does not understand the Supreme Court ruling? ABBA SAID IT’S BACK IN COURT Abba insists it has once again filed a suite on the same settled issues at a trial court in Anambra State. The mere fact of Abba filing another suite on same issues on which the Supreme court has ruled is itself seminal and profound. Because what Abba is asking Anambra State trial court to do is to set aside the Supreme Court ruling! That is huge, and I am sure, Chimamanda will be able to put this new gigantic development in her most colorful prose. olisaEze: 6 Likes |
(1) (of 1 pages)
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 149 |