Rhydem:

Bloody liar, i watched the reply the guys mouth didn't even move F***kin' aboki.

Torosidis replied to this anyway by saying, he is not a racist.

You know, after the incident, I watched the video of the incident over and over again just to see if what the hell Torosidis might have done to provoke him. He did nothing.
Even if he nudged him with the ball, what on earth was Kaita doing there in the first place?

What an idiot.

What a fvckin liar.

Why didn't he say that before, or report it to the referee during the incident? First it was retaliation, now it's a racist slur. What's next?

He should never wear a Nigeria jersey again, not even as a spectator.

Stanley Okoro has to be the biggest age cheat EVER.

He'll retire by the time he reaches "21".

Can't believe how these cheats get away with this. Disgusting.

Sagamite:

You are being disillusional again. I can not recall any post that comes close to "because to them by default, if I don't uncritically take the woman's side then I have a problem".

The respond you got was either (1) you were ignored or (2) people questioned why you are not condemning the guy and appear to be going on a tangent crusade that was inappropraite (reasonable especially for someone that had not condemned the act). I can't fault them for a second considering the stance you put forth, you came across as a "thread resident" with misogynist issues that want to stop/ridicule any poster that condemned the male attacker. Yet you are feeling like some kind of victim now, despite the fact that is was you aggressively accosting/questioning/attacking people that condemned the attacker.

Interesting,

Bottom line is I put my views out and people took it the wrong way, as they usually would when someone questions a woman's conduct (which has apparently made ME a misogynist ).
Like I said before, when a male says that a woman is his "hero" for a attacking a man whether in retaliation or not, that has to be called out. It has to because it doesn't only indicate the "man=bad woman=good" mentality that plagues so many men, but he even took it as far as saying she's his hero. And lets keep it real here, if he hit her for a valid reason these males will be quick to dogmatically take the woman's side. I don't know, maybe you're cool with that but it isn't right.

Sagamite:

And "what it is" is that, under the law, if you did that, you should have a punitive act applied to you for attacking someone.

Well, if I don't get caught smacking someone up then I don't really give a toss about what the law says about it. simple.

ThiefOfHearts:

Dude's a total retard

son of a welfare queen

go tend to your WIC check and be quiet.

Instead of you to be a man and accept that you are wrong, you're running your mouth like a fagget

Where was I wrong?

Please! When you don't have anything valid to say you start name calling.

Show me where I was wrong, read (if you can, just try) all my posts and tell me exactly where I was wrong. I didn't switch up anywhere.
Know your place and you're the one running your mouth. B!tch.

Sagamite:

You need to develop a bit more intellect to know that this is not the moment to scream that crusade of yours.

Your "later" [condemnation] was too late and too light. The raucous, rehashed and pesistent dins of your crusade against all those complaining about the assualt completely over-shadows and betrays any impact your light, quarter-hearted, passing and feeble condemnation can summon.

And I must frankly say that it is quite asinine to, for a second, suggest there is any possible legitimate reason or provocation for anyone to hit anyone that has not physically assualted them or someone else.

You only hit people when you are retaliating or defending yourself (if you need to or are so inclined).

Comprehend?

Well, firstly, yeah, maybe I should have said that he deserved to get hit in my first post, but just because I didn't say that people assume that I somehow condoned it, when I just pointed out the double standard. How does that equate to me condoning his action?
But alot of these chivalrous punks took that as me justifying the attack through their emotional comments, because to them by default, if I don't uncritically take the woman's side then I have a problem. I never understood that.

And yeah, in theory your not supposed to hit anyone unless you have to defend yourself.
But realistically, FVCK THAT!!!
If someone is running his/her mouth constantly or provoking you for a prolonged period of time, you WILL react.
There are too many scenarios that would validate beating someone without that person assaulting you. It is what it is.

Sagamite:

She is dead right!

What she is saying is you kept on challenging people for condemning his attack.

Actually you did not even show a single sign of a stance that you think "he deserved to get hit back" until your 8th or 9th post. All you were doing was trying to harass others that were condemning him as demonstratining double standards by mere conjectural assumptions.

That behaviour I did not see sense in, hence why I told you:

Yes I was challenging people for condemning his attack but in no way did I condone it and later on I had to point out that I feel he DID deserve to get hit back.

And how was I "harassing" others? Pu$$yfied males who come out with comments like "she's my hero" have to be called out. This propagates the double standard. Would he be a hero to these males if he had a legitimate reason to hit her?

When it comes to this kind of situation, why does the man have to be fully responsible? He struck her first and he got hit back, good for him, she might have provoked him though, but still. But if it wad the other way round, the man would still be held fully accountable by these emotional drag queens.

ThiefOfHearts:

Son of a fool

You also repeated that people would have no problem with the situation in reverse, you retarded dimwit. What part of you should have KEPT IT at the original point, dont you understand?

Point is keep the bloody thread on topic.

Oponu

Yeah, I did repeat that as well as the fact he deserved to get hit back. You need a slap. FVck it, just like a dude you need a punch, knock some sense into your dumb a$$.

Typical hoodrat.

What I find interesting is how many Nigerians were so divided amongst each other over the Sani Kaita incident. I couldn't believe some of the comments. Now an African team is advancing in the World Cup and the same thing is continuing. People need to get over that, seriously.

Nothing wrong with supporting our West African neighbors at all. We have the same problems among our own people in Nigeria but we are united when Nigeria plays, until someone fvcks up. Not much difference really.

ThiefOfHearts:

should have kept it at that instead of whining about everyone else's responses.

You fool, I repeated that a few times.

Learn to read.

ThiefOfHearts:

Iya e ni slag first off

secondly, why do you care so much on those who are angry? and if people are more annoyed cos it was a woman nko? so what?

How does it affect you? How is it double standards when you are the ones that call women the weaker sex?

women are the weaker sex according to men so why would you be surprised that people would have a problem with a weaker person being attacked?

Wouldnt that make it an unfair fight? odada.

alot of the anger has to do with the fact that this happened randomly, not like she even knew him or she started anything with him, he randomly attacked her. Last I checked there are some people that are against unfair treatment. Perhaps they can give you a lessons on how to be human

What, are you slow?

Did I not say he deserved to get hit back? But of course you chose to ignore that.

Outstrip:

You act as if I should be insulted by you calling me a feminist

No I don't.

That's just the typical response you get from those types of people. That's what I pointed out. Whether you see it as an insult or not its up to you.

ThiefOfHearts:

Blood Shed is retarded

why does he keep changing the story?

The man hit her and LUCKILY she was able to hit him back, however she will still go on to report him so he can get a real punishment

what exactly is your gripe? Reasoning like a lunatic

"blah blah what if she hit him first blah blah"

Why are you trying to change the story by force? She DID NOT hit him first so your idiotic "point" is moot

You're just pissed cos she ended up hitting him back. It pain you that much?

abi you think its your Naija where you can act like an animal and no one can say anything cos after all who cares about what a woman has to say

Alainironu

LOL See the anger in your post and you claim I'm pissed. I was addressing the double standards and the attitude of some of the posters' reactions to this story. If you couldn't see that then learn to read you slag. My point is that he deserved to get hit back and they should just let it be. Simple. But the fact that it was a woman that got hit is the reason why so many people, including you, are so angry.

How do I know that? Just look at the nature of your post, you don't come with anything, just insults.

Outstrip:

But what if he was outraged that it was a woman that got hit first. It is natural for people to think so because typically men are stronger than women. So he is right to think that way though I don't think that was where he was going with it. You seem to have an issue with women.

WOW, typical feminist/mangina response. How did you come to that conclusion?

And here's the thing, if for example Gary Coleman was to hit Serena Williams in self-defense, people would generally ignore the fact that he's smaller and weaker, they'll just be outraged that a woman got smacked up because society has this "man=bad, woman=good" attitude. So a woman can never bee held accountable no matter how wrong she is.

Bottom line, yes if someone hits you unprovoked, male or female, then you have the right to fvck that person up, then just keep it moving.

Sagamite:

No, she should not leave anything there.

She was unwarrantedly and unprovokingly assualted and defended herself.

Whether her retaliation was even or not does not compensate for the fury of being unjustly attacked, which he cannot claim.

FURTHERMORE, he should be taught a lesson that you don't go about physically attacking people.

Your point is lame.

But I can't help but think that you're outraged because it was a woman that got attacked. I'm sure if it was the other way around you wouldn't be as outraged.

And how is my point lame? He hit her unprovoked (which we're not 100% sure of by the way, she might have said something, I dunno), then she hit him back. That's enough to teach someone a lesson. Simple. It's over, done and dusted.

Konjour:

So,after she's retaliated,what's she filing a suit for then? To sue him for damages? especially when 'her nail caught his lip'. what a dumbie.

Exactly! She retaliated and got even, simple. Leave it there.

But she's filing a law suit because she can. She knows she'll get all the sympathy simply because she's a woman.

Sagamite:

Nope!

Why?

Because the reason he did it was because he was angry and also felt he is stronger and can bully. If it was Mike Tyson, I am sure he would not dare. The microphone smashing is for having the mentality of a bullying brute.

If she slaps him, it is most likely more of an anger thing, but he should whoooze her one (if she is not his girl or his friend, basically a non-acquaintance) so she in future remembers how to hold her anger or demonstrate it differently and not think she is allowed to hit people.

Alright, what if Serena Williams punched Gary Coleman for no reason, would she deserve to be smashed in the face then?

Sagamite:

What is she suppose to do?

Turn the other cheek and say one more please?

I fault her for not smashing a microphone on his head.

WOW.

If she had slapped him first would you have encouraged him to smash the microphone on her head?

Outstrip:

This guy should not be compared to a Kaita. Kaita attacked a fellow sportsman. If they got in a fight we could have said it was fair. It's just like let's say someone of Gary coleman's stature calling me a name and I retaliate by slapping him hard. That would be wrong. When you know you are physically capable to taking someone and you attack the person you are simply a loser

Glad you acknowledged that gender isn't the issue. You're the first woman I personally know with a balanced perspective when it comes to this. I'm impressed .

Damn, some of the posts here,

It had to end someday .
I still hope he stays involved in Nigerian football though.

Thank you Kanu for your services and your works off the pitch, you have done our country proud.

Akwasi:

This pig should be arrested by the South African police. How can a 'strong' sportsman hit a feeble lady journalist?

Can only happen in Africa

LOL She isn't as feeble as you're making her out to be if she struck him back the way she did.

Why not disband the NFF a well?

And why didn't these people try this approach before the African Nations Cup?

Foolishness.

tpiah:

can you explain your daft stance which no one else gets?

is it ok in your books for someone to suddenly attack your sister/daughter/whoever and slap her senseless out of the blue?

what kind of mothers are raising you people?

she did not slap him first, so just shut up.

So how old were you when your parents divorced?

Did you not read my post? Where did I say it was right that she got slapped? I just pointed out the fact that if it was the other way around nobody would make such a big deal out of it.

Get the sand out of your uterus and learn to read.

D!ckhead.

Notice how outraged everyone is about the fact it was a WOMAN that got smacked, lol,

Gotta love them double standards. If she had slapped him first then he'd be wrong for retaliating.

I truly believe that there's something behind the team's exit in the first round. As rubbish as Yakubu is, I think he missed that chance deliberately, same for Kaita getting sent off against Greece.

Think about it, your team is in the lead, in control of the game, its a throw in to the opposite team, rather than getting back and defending, you run up to the man taking the throw in and kick him, for no apparent reason. Why he ran up to him when he should have been defending I'll never know. But something just isn't right.

Not to mention their lack of motivation throughout the tournament excluding Enyeama, Odiah and Kalu Uche.

Anichebe and co must be laughing now.

I truly believe that there's something behind the team's exit in the first round. As rubbish as Yakubu is, I think he missed that chance deliberately, same for Kaita getting sent off against Greece.

Think about it, your team is in the lead, in control of the game, its a throw in to the opposite team, rather than getting back and defending, you run up to the man taking the throw in and kick him, for no apparent reason. Why he ran up to him when he should have been defending I'll never know. But something just isn't right.

Not to mention their lack of motivation throughout the tournament excluding Enyeama, Odiah and Kalu Uche.

Anichebe must be laughing now.

I just hope he dumps Yakubu. Guy is useless, can't even fun for Bleep's sake.

He should start Nsofor on the left, Odemwingie on the right, and Martins and Kanu up front.

mama-gee:

Haruna: he's simply the most unskilled footballer in Nigeria's history, wonder where the NFA got him from to participate in the World Cup. Dude can't

even kick a corner kick right, bagging up yellow cards and offences here and there.

Mikel: he's simply an average skilled player but thinks he's all that thinking Nigeria would lose without him plus his money is beginning to get into his head definitely a spolit brat.

Rabiu: I have never seen or heard of that name before but from the evidence of Nigeria's match on Friday, I can tell he's not terrific either.

Azeez: One of the unknown players in the Nigerian team but I'm guessing he isn't that terrific.

Go get your weave done or something. This ain't for you.

snakova:

"I don’t see myself as a replacement for Mikel. We have the same style of playing, but Mikel is injured and has gone home.

LOL, As if to say "ah well, fVck him''. HAHA

Woah!!!

Not like I care much for Mikel, but I don't like how all these players are picking up serious injuries and the tournament hasn't even started yet.
But isn't it interesting that they lie about what's actually a minor injury that Anichebe picked up, but chose to keep Mikel who was seriously injured?

And this was the best chance to call Rabiu Ibrahim or Victor Anichebe.

Roger Mila should shut his mouth. Don't know what's up with him, just whining like a bitter old broad.

Eto'o has accomplished more than Roger Milla, even before he reached 25 lol. What hasn't Eto'o done for his country?

Yes, Roger Milla helped Cameroon reach the quarterfinals in 1990. But you know what? So did Diouf and co in 2002.

LOL I knew it. I JUST KNEW IT!!!!

Something just wasn't right.

The lie they told about Victor Moses should also be brought to light.

This is just pitiful, I feel for Anichebe. People should have caught on when Mikel is injured yet still included and he had a serious injury.