What states in Nigeria can we find these wonderful nuts??

I read this report and would like to share it. The views here expressed are those of a BBC reporter. Why not share yours.

" It seems the exact moment of independence is the time the old colonial power's flag comes down and the flag of the newly independent country goes up. So what do flags say about a country?

I was at the unveiling of the new, post-apartheid South African flag back in April 1994 and I still recall the shock and disgust that engulfed the room when that flag was revealed.  remember I filed a not-so-complimentary report for the BBC about it.

The reception given to the flag was so hostile that the committee that had been charged with finding a flag for the new South Africa was forced to announce that this was only an "interim flag" and would be changed after the constitutional negotiations were complete.

Full white sun

But guess what, the flag quickly grew on us and by the time the Nelson Mandela inauguration was over a month or so later, it had become so popular, nobody has raised the issue of it being an interim flag ever again. And indeed when you look at the flag now, it does seem to capture the spirit of the new South Africa.

It goes beyond unity, which was what everybody was trying to capture then. It seems to show vitality and effervescence.

Then enter Malawi, where the government has recently changed the national flag and is threatening arrest and prosecution for anyone found carrying the old flag.

And yet the change is not very much really.

The red and black strips have changed position, the red is now on top and the black strip in the middle and there is a green strip still below. The most important change is that the red rising sun at the top has been replaced with a full white sun in the middle.

We have the word of President Bingu wa Mutharika for it that this is meant to show the change in status of Malawi from a developing country, denoted by a rising sun, to that of a developed nation, denoted by a full sun. "We cannot permanently live in the past," is the way the president put it, and the new flag denotes the changed status of Malawi.

I confess I haven't been to Malawi for about 14 years and I am willing to accept the word of the president that the country has changed into a developed nation.

Although I notice the World Bank and IMF have not yet updated their classification and still list Malawi amongst us poor developing countries.

As flags go though, I am afraid the Malawian flag is still unattractive and looks like something from a junior secondary school art class.

Giant of Africa
All the same, the concept of changing your flag to denote a change in your economic circumstances does have a certain ring to it. My thoughts turn to our cousins Nigeria, who are just about to celebrate the 50th anniversary of their independence.

I have always felt that their national flag does not quite capture the dynamism and vigour of the country and its people.

It is a beautiful flag, I concede, but it seems placid and appears to denote a people who would turn the second cheek when given an unprovoked slap. But we all know better than that.

In 1959 when the flag was adopted, their circumstances and aspirations were probably quite modest. Now that the country is the "giant of Africa", should it not have a flag to match that status?

There is just about enough time for somebody - not a Malawian - to quickly design a suitable one and as 1 October dawns, the old flag would be lowered and the new vibrant flag would be raised.

It could also denote a new beginning and then they wouldn't have to spend so much money trying to re-brand and give a different image to their country.

A new flag for Nigeria at 50, I say."

I read this article on this subject and one reader made a comment i think we should all think about.

Quote

Beyond Petroleum’s (formerly known as British Petroleum) (BP) oil spill is not just American problem but the problem of the world for many reasons:
• Depending on the direction of the wind the spil could go to any part of the world. Compare this with the Chernobyl disaster in Russia which got to USA. Nigeria is not safe.
• The cost of clean up, no matter who pays for it initially would be recovered from the market place which means that you and I would pay one way or another.
• The dwindling supply of oil would dwindle even faster and eventually show up at the pump where the driver meets the pump.
• The environmental impact especially its impact on sea foods could affect the price and the safety of foods for a very long time. Nations of the world got a dress rehearsal of what happens when food is scarce a few years ago when food riots arose in some parts of the world.
• There are many more reasons, but you get the idea of where I am going.

With the knowledge of the enormity of the problem created by this oil disaster it behooves Nigeria and Nigerians to pay special attention to what is happening and how it is being solved. Nigerian president Jonathan and his oil minister Mrs. Madueke should be very much vested in this matter because:
• Nigeria has oil and has oil rigs in its delta.
• All the companies involved in the current disaster are operational in Nigeria (BP, Halliburton, et al) and must have built their rigs the same way (or even in an inferior way) as that in the Gulf of Mexico.
• Should the same thing happen in Nigeria, the oil companies would most likely adopt the same evasive and denial tactics used in the present event. And given that Nigeria is less sophisticated than USA the companies would expect a greater success. The experience would also have bolstered their confidence that they could weather the Nigerian storm.

What Nigeria should do is very straight forward and should be done now.

a) Create a standing committee made up of the best chemical and structural engineers, scientists, oil drilling experts policy wonks, and other professionals to monitor US government’s response to the disaster. This group would look for what information US is asking and getting and what they are learning from those documents. It should also learn how the clean up is being done such as what chemical treatments are used and how; how responsibility for clean up and other costs are assembled and allocated; what caused the explosion and what is done to prevent such future events. And so many other details. This committee should be in business for as long as the clean up is ongoing.
b) Nigerian government should also stop granting licenses for now until we know what happened and assess the chances of it happening in Nigeria.
c) There is a strong reason to call for the review of the construction of all rigs and to see how they compare with the ones in the Gulf of Mexico.
d) Apart from the Nigerian Government reactions suggested above, Nigerian Chemists, engineers, and scientists especially those in institutions of higher learning who have the education and knowledge should pay attention as interested observers and bone up on how to prevent the disaster and if they occur on how to deal with it. They should follow the events as a professional hobby. Their services could be needed in a hurry.
e) Bunkering, oil allocations, and pipelines ought to be given close attention from now going forward.

A wise man learns from the mistake of others. A foolish man waits to make his own mistakes and sometimes does not survive the mistakes.

If there is a silver lining in the Gulf disaster, it is that it happened in USA. This country is perhaps the only country that could stand up to the Big Oil and make demands. It has the resources to know when Big Oil plays games and can call a halt to the games. Poor oil producing countries like Nigeria has to watch what Big Brother is doing and learn.

To be fore warned is to be fore armed.

Unquote

Shege315: MGS4 only for 5K - Deal or no deal?