Mintayo:
No you have not,what i see you doing is trying to discredit the Bible.

I'm Trying to discredit bible while u're trying to credit it, but who is biaz for concealing the truth.
You know in ur mind what is happening in that verses so don't discredit me with any unfounded allegation.

Mintayo:
I have been tru dis road with many of ur folks before.
If you cannot tell me how that Deuteronomy fits into your prophet even when it doesnt,then forget it.

I can't pet you any longer. The truth stands firmly while an error is shaking.

If you want to know the Prophet in that verse, read ur bible with the talent that God gave you.

It was John Vs Jesus over Elijah.

Now John Vs Jewish levites over Messiah and The Prophet.

If you like open ur mind for the truth and if you don't, den na u SABI.

Thanks for replying this.

Emusan:
That is what I'm saying stop pretending as if you don't know.

What have you be saying?

That Messiah is the Prophet and the Prophet is the Messiah... What did you get, Contradiction?

You think ur Pastors' given answer will convince me? LOL!

Keep deceiving urselfs and say u're reading Bible.
Jesus is Emmanuel, very funny, Apologist in deed.

Emusan:
I always laugh at this statement from folks like you and it show the low level you're being operated.

Laugh? may be u never tired.

Emusan:
Does version the same as original?

Lol, lecturer, ur studs are standing o.

Emusan:
Today look at all the English versions of Qur'an is it the same? No! so get wisdom.

NO! But,
1. All Arabic versions are the same all over the world.

2. It does has 114 chapter from Yusuf Ali to Pickhall and others whether in America or India.

3. You can not see a chapter/verse in one version but be missing in another version.

This is just 3 differences between Bible and Quran that i can remember for now.
Any beef

macof:

Lol they are misunderstanding the quran that makes Islam a bad religion however u see it.

Considering the number of Ritual Killings in the South west of Nigeria alone. Pagans are shameless people for criticizing Islam because of some Muslim.

Can you say Traditionalists are not the main Religious Terrorist in the South West of Nigeria.

macof:
A religion that millions misunderstand and feel so devoted to such misunderstanding.

This convince me that Tradition is worst. There is no excuse that 99% of those Herbalist/Spiritualist are not evil.
They kill people for useless rituals.

macof:
Maybe even u misunderstand the quran.

Who knows who?

macof:
wat about all the battles against pagans that Mohammed instigated

What evil pagans?
Those that buried their children alive?
That kill human being for their festivals?

Lol, i guess u'll say Quran is Lying?
And history must also be lying. Egyptian, Roman, Nigerian and others' history is also lying'

Pagans, Christians have no say whatsoever when it comes to killings of innocent people. And i know that you guys understand this but hypocrisy is at work.

Lets just review "Christianity and Terrorism" and "Paganism and Terrorism" and see how good they are.

FrancisTony: @harbiolar you 're even a male. LOL, tot you were female tho'

I thought as much.

FrancisTony: It's written in the bible that we should worship God and i'm sure you know the verses.

Let all the angels of God worship him".

Then you can worship the two interchangably?

Ranchhoddas: did u just say those that did not hear the message will go to heaven?

If their Good deeds exceed their Bad deeds.

And there is only One God, One Heaven and One Hell.
Nothing like Muslim and Christian Hell or Heaven.
Only descriptions vary.

tomber: Luke 11: 27 And it came to pass, as he spake these things, a certain woman of the company lifted up her voice, and said unto him, Blessed is the womb that bare thee, and the paps which thou hast sucked.
28 But he said, Yea rather, blessed are they that hear the word of God, and keep it.

Not get it. Are you answering my question?
if yes then you should choose the person and explicit bible verse. thanks.

Where is Mintayo jare? this Emusan is vexing me.

Emusan:

You are still trying to make sure that Muhammad fits into Bible when your book totally bridge the relationship between the inspiration behind the two books.

Excuse me! if He was there, then He is there. And He was not there then He is not there.
Ok?

If you know ur religion to the extent of relying on it, then i wonder why u're playing hide and seek.

And i don't think u meditate on this statement of ur's b4 posting it.

Bible and Inspiration, i wonder which denomination's version God actually inspired.

FrancisTony:
no Ma'am. Bible told me

Who deserves our worships and prayers, Jesus OR Father?

Bible source...

FrancisTony: @bolded yeah. For the suffering and his blood that was shed on calvary.

Ok!
.
.

FrancisTony:
@Non bolded. Thanks. Act 2: 32 This Jesus God has raised up, of which we are all witnesses.
33 therefore being exalted to the right hand of God and having received from the Father the promise of the holy spirit, he poured out this which you now see and hear.
36 Therefore let all the house of Isreal know assuredly that God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Christ
[quote author=FrancisTony]
.Ok! the source of coequal.

[quote author=FrancisTony]
Philipians 2:9 therefore God also has highly exalted him and given him the name which is above above every name.
10. That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those in heaven, and of those on earth, and of those under earth
11. And that every tongue should confess that Jesus christ is LORD. Make sure u think about the bolded ones wela.
#shalom

Of course, Noted!!!

macof:

Wat town are u from?

I knw what u're coming with, yet, i'll tell u that i'm
MESI O`OGO... ni IBADAN

Ranchhoddas: so what you are saying is that people will burn for ever just because they were born in saudi arabia or tibet.btw,u have not touched number 2.

NO! One won't burn forever just because [S]he was born in a country but because [S]he failed to serve the purpose of his/her creation.
We have Arab Christians as we have Euro-Muslims.

So the Region, Family... where you were born into is not an excuse in as long as the brain is intact.

Those that have an excuse are:
1. Those that did not hear the Divine Message, but sound in piety.

2. A mad person before reaching Puberty.
If [S]he ran mad after Puberty, then [S]he would account for the actions [S]he willingly did.


NO vex pls!!!

tenderlaw:
Awon were.

Ode n fi aini Eko ti tie ba Yoruba loju je.

Mintayo:
And tell me if the prophet u v in mind fits in into d above.

No! Let use the same weight that christians used (e.g Jesus lived in such&such, Jesus is like such&such) to come out from theory into law as it's in those verses up there. Then after given me a clue of such, the onus would be on me to counter-attack ur theory. On a longrun, somebody will come out with the Purest Law. Lo ba tan (It's finished)

Mintayo: I don't have any evidenc to give you,it is quite evident in the Bible who the Deuteronomy was talking about(that cannot change)...

Even if man Changed/Denied it like Jews did, it is for his/her own innocent soul.

Mintayo: you are the one left with evidence or prove that the prophet being talked about is the one you have in mind.

Clueless! like in strange world. Lets use the above system

Mintayo: So answer the question I asked previously.

I hope i've

Mintayo:
and why didnt you quote the verse till verse 22?

I'm doing that now.

Deut 18:15-22
15. The Lord Thy God will raise up unto thee a Prophet from the midst of thee, of thy breathen, like unto to me; unto him you shall hearken.

16. According to all that thou desiredts of the Lord thy God in Hobreb in the day of the assembly saying let me not hear again the voice of the Lord my God, Neither let me see this great fire any more, that i die not.

17. And the Lord said unto me, they have well spoken that which they have spoken.

18. I will raise them up a Prophet from among their breathen, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that i shall command him.

19. And it shall come to pass that whoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, i will require it of him.

20. But the Prophet which shall pressume to speak a word in my name. Which i have not commanded him to speak, or that shall speak in the name of other gods, even that prophet shall die.

21. And if thou say in thy hearts how shall we know the word which the Lord had not spoken?

22. When a prophet speaketh in the name of the Lord, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the Lord hath not spoken. But the Prophet has spoken presumptiously; Thou shall not be afraid of him.

Mintayo:
Like i was expecting,you were actually twisting the Bible,you are treating the Bible as d quran...who told you Elijah is the voice in the wilderness?
Who told u John was involve in the transfiguration? Because it was Elijah that appeard with Moses? Smh

I've already dropped the subject but i think i've to say one more thing.
I did not twist the bible but u're the one trying to hamonize the verse.

Matthew 17:11-13.
11. ELIJAH truely shall first come, and restore all things. But i say unto you, that ELIJAH IS COME ALREADY and they know him not.

12. But have done unto him whatsoever they listed likewise shall also the son of man suffer of them.

13. Then the disciples understood that He spake unto them of JOHN THE BAPTIST.


John 1:19-22.
19. And this was John's testimony when the Jewish Leaders in Jerusalem sent priest and the levites to ask him who he was.

20. He did not fail to confess, but confessed freely, "I am not the Messiah".

21. They asked him, Then who are you?
Are you ELIJAH?
He said, I AM NOT!

But who did Jesus called him?

Who did Jesus say will preceed him?

Who did Jesus said has come to restore all things?

Then who and what is the role of the voice in the wilderness?

FOR THE SAKE OF ARGUMENT LETS DROP THIS SUBJECT AS WELL.

Mintayo:
I am afraid i can not continue with you again.

Haba! Who are you doing this for, Me or God

We have just one more subject...

Mintayo:
Which prophet were they expecting? The answer is found in Deut 18:15-22.

This's what i got; "I will raise them up a prophet from among their breathen, like unto thee and i will put my words in his mouth. And he shall speak unto them all that i. shall command him"

Mintayo:
Now let me ask you,who is that prophet?

Lol, leg puller! I knw u have the best candidate in person of Jesus Christ. But pls can u give us THREE EVIDENCES to confirm this.

Mintayo:
what are u trying to prove or do? After i told u that Jesus is the Messiah? I don't have to tell u anything. Your quran confirms it.


whose statements? John was not involved in the transfiguration. Jesus was talking to His disciple, explaining things to them,maybe you shld go reread that chapter, slowly nt like someone lookin for a mistake.


I actually did nt expect u to understand.Go and study the life of Elijah and compare it with that of John. The pharasee were looking for the same physical Elijah in John but no John only has the same Spirit as that of Elijah.


[quote author=Mintayo]
The Spirit of Elijah is the one working in John,

That is why Jesus called him Elijah, But it is a misery that John denied this.

Mintayo:
just as the Spirit of Jesus is working in all geniuine born-again christains.

How did you an Ordinary person know that the spirit of somebody is working in you and a person like John the Baptist wouldn't know whose spirit is working in him?

Mintayo:
it was not Elijah that quotes that but John.

We are talking about TRANSFIGURATION (someone's spirit using another person's body)

Mintayo:
He was telling the pharesse the prophesy that was prophesied abt Him...just to let them know that his coming to prepare d way has been forseen and told by a prophet long before him. What Isaiah said was fulfilled in the life of John.

I asked you earlier that who was the voice in the wilderness bt u did not answer.

Elijah was the voice in the wilderness and Isaiah reported the Prophecy which John quoted to reply the pharisees.

Then Elijah fulfiled the prophecy through the personality of John and Jesus also supported the claim.
Jesus: "But Elijah is come"
"And the disciples knew that he was talking about John"

Mintayo: John was not involved in the transfiguration.

^^^ John was involved according to the statement of Jesus Christ.

Mintayo:
Yes.

yes he did bcus he was nt the physical OT Elijah bt the same Spirit operates in them.

^^ is the meaning of TRANSFIGURATION but you said John wasn't involved, was he nw involved or not?

Mintayo:
Do u kne they v so many things in common e.g they both r always in th wilderness? Go figure d rest.

^^ Again u confirmed the theory of TRANSFIGURATION. is John involved or nt?

Mintayo:
Yes

i actually perceieved it that this where it will all end,i already knew where this is all going.

You are not afraid of the truth, or are you?

Mintayo:
what are u trying to prove or do? After i told u that Jesus is the Messiah? I don't have to tell u anything. Your quran confirms it.

You are right here, quran clearly called him Al-mashi (The Christ). Now i drop this subject until i have time to create a topic on it.

Mintayo:
whose statements? John was not involved in the transfiguration.

YES! HE WAS INVOLVED.

Mintayo:
Jesus was talking to his disciples about the personality of John the baptast and he linked JOHN with ELIJAH. Jesus in this context was probably aware of this so called TRANSFIGURATION between ELIJAH & JOHN.

[quote author=Mintayo]
maybe you shld go reread that chapter, slowly nt like someone lookin for a mistake.

This is not a matter of looking for a mistake but an obvious GOBE. Even sham shamoun have to swallowed it with faith.

Mintayo:
I actually did nt expect u to understand.Go and study the life of Elijah and compare it with that of John. The pharasee were looking for the same physical Elijah in John but no John only has the same Spirit as that of Elijah.

How could they be looking for the same physical Elijah in John?
Did they have any physical knowledge about Elijah?
No! if they were looking for physical Elijah in John then they would have known that John didn't have the appearance of their prophet, thus they would ve saved themselves the stress of approaching John and those useless interrogations of are you this, are you that.

What they were looking for was Elijah in personification of someone else. If John had told them that he was Elijah, they would have no choice than to take him as Elijah.
They ve already known the fact that John wasn't an Ordinary person, He was having a spirit of one of the prophets they were expecting.

macof:

guy wats ur beef with Lord Sango?

Are u asking me

lord Sango indeed.

Kamsy10:

when did you become op in this thread?

Oh brother! i'm sorry, i've forgotten that the thread is not mine.

Check ma posts and u'll see that i've been adv for the thread since, so u need to pardon me.

Hmmm! OP eh? he has ran away.

Ukuts gp: is that nt true?

That somebody is saying something like that to Mary.

Did Jesus tell you to be disgracing his mother

What is it that you Christians like dodging a question and start arguing.
Did i say OP is not right with what he wrote?

What does it take you to refute my lies the same way i've done to ur post.
Respond my statements in a mature manner. Do as Do!

god2baski:
Abraham was the one who started tithing hundred of years before the law was given, like i said it is a choice

Is it only tithing that Abraham established?

What happened to others which so called mainstream christians wouldn't want to hear?

Lol, ignored as usual.

Kamsy10: @op........ I dare you to mention your church

I'm a Christ Militia.

Check ma other posts and tell me something.

Kamsy10: @op........ I dare you to mention your church

I'm a Christ Militia.

macof:

Lol like Sango

Sango ko Chinko ni.

FrancisTony: your jehovah witness religion has blinded you tho' but God is still the baba 'cos he's the father but they're one.

This is not a religious fight.
Where searching for the TRUTH.

FrancisTony: 'cos he was never God that time till he rose up and was exalted.

Who told you what happened to Jesus after death, did he?

FrancisTony: true. I concur
.
But he was exalted after dieing for our sin

What can you use to support this, may be bible verses that said he was exalted after dieing and not b4 dieing

FrancisTony:
i.e he wasn't the same rank with God before until he shed his blood for our sin.

And death make him coequal with God?

Acidosis:


No you can't.

But i didn't sound like someone who is seeking an approval, or did i?