frankson1:


Yeah, you're very correct when you say voting was done manually and the result also collated manually. But you're not correct when you say the results were transmitted electronically using the SCR. I was with the POs and I did everything and made sure my calculation was correct before sending. I worked with INEC tech guys where I'm confused.
There is no provision on the SCRs to state the results of each of the political parties.

I REPEAT, RESULTS WERE NOT TRANSMITTED TO ANY SERVER.

IT WASN'T THE RESULT THAT WAS TRANSMITTED.

objobj:



Block head. So that is why the whole vote all over the wards were shared between PDP and APC according to atiku servers results. No void votes. No other part was voted for. Not even the candidates of other parties voted for themselves.

davodyguy:
They will never listen.
For those of you shouting server this, server that.
Ask yourself

1. Why did 37 professors that served as returning officers travelled to Abuja to read out results of all political parties as long as the list was?

2. We're the results read on national TV signed by all party agents at ward levels and polling centres where elections were held?

3. Did people vote manually using their fingers on a paper and the papers were manually dropped in a ballot box?

4. Apart from using the machine for accreditation, did any Nigerian vote using machine or they used a hard copy paper?

5. Let's assume there's a server that records the accreditation and PVC that were used before voting, did any of the PVC show the political parties that the holder of the PVC voted for?

6. There was a server and the server showed number of PVC that were screened. Did the server also show who was voted for by the owner of the PVC?

I think people should learn how to reason with common sense.

If I'm a judge, I'll dismiss Atiku and PDP's case for waste of time