I tried login in with my username and the otp generated on mobile app. The error message I got was that my user ID does not exist. What could that signify?

Google is ur friend

kiyosaki1:
I read: My Daughter Is In Marlians Cult And She Doesn't Wear Pant To School - Mother Cries Out https://www.nairaland.com/5627708/marlians-cult-daughter-doesnt-wear with dismay various comments and solidarity given to the fail mother, who failed in her parenting duty, ascribing the failure in her duty as a mother to the influence of Naira Marely. The same way our politicians ascribe the failure in the governance to past administration. We can all see where she picked up her bulk passing behaviour.

There are many ills in our society that are going on, and which the children can easily pick up from the social media, the various cable TV, the peer group and so forth, brimming with ills.

These teenagers have access to them and can influence them when making choices, but it's the duty of parents to teach their wards what norms and values expected of them.

In the western world that's even worse, we had kids that are well behave and are not influenced by the ill of the society. So for a mother to come out to ascribe her child's negative behaviour to a person or celebrity is exposing to the whole world her failure in her duty. I expected her to be reprimanded and not the icon.

The last time I checked, Nigeria is still a free society, and not a sharia governed society, and for those reprimanding the Marlians, may be we should call for a full blown sharia in all state in the country, so our kids can be well behaved so much for the moral police bunch of hypocrites.

U really made a great point. I agree d mother deserves serious repremand for trying to ignore her failure as a parent. Charity, they say, begins at home. Train ur child/ward to have rest of mind in d future

PuntHunt:
Because you harvest stones so everyone should eat it with you and forget rice, right?



Unintelligent thinking. You all need the competition and it'll force you to keep getting better so you won't be forcing rubbish down our throats.

God bless you ó... U hit the right notes. It is really through competition they'll know how far behind their local ideas are lagging

themonk:

My brother what are you still doing at Ogun state, are you waiting to donate your head?

nicolartsdesign:
how true is this

Very true.... I stay very close to Owode, news of the woman's gruesome murder went around so fast the day it occurred.

Jazakumlahu khaeran

BeautifulSE:


Typical brainwashed ipob miscreant. If everyone is on the right, you clowns from erosion republic are always on the left. You're the same set of people that idolize idiots like FFK and Trump. Strange people. You can clearly see that these people are being bullied cos of their powerlessness. Tommorow, you'll carry your biscuit heads and start crying about marginalization and expect us to sympathize with you.

May I also let you know there are more Muslims than Christians in Israel? I'm sure you didn't even know until now that there are Palestinian Christians. When will you dummies realize Israel is not a Christian country. Forget all the Bible tales for now and use your brain. 127 countries have voted against Israel. They all can't be wrong. The truth is clear. Even the Pope is against Israel

God bless u abundantly for enlightening the uninformed @Cyynthialove whose reasoning is massively impaired by silly sentiment. U really stated my thought. Israel is a Zionist state. Only a stupid Christian will see this as a hatred campaign against Christianity. God bless u once again

glambo:


Open your mind when you read and discuss issue, l made reference to the medical profession and their dress code. The reference literally means that you can't go into the theatre without the overall, hand glove and head cover.
What you wear underneath your head cover isn't important.
But for in the practise of law In Nigeria as laid down in the book to(ay

It's unfortunate u couldn't read between the lines to understand the simple point. I rest my case

glambo:



Mr, no one is saying wearing of hijab is wrong or bad.
The fundamental human right isn't a leverage to violet Organisation rules and regulation.
Take the medical profession, will any Dr go into the theatre without the mandatory overall, gloves and head cover, that is a lay down rule that must be strictly adhere to, no fundamental human right can change that it's either he wears the necessary clothing or stay out of the surgery room.
This is the same scenario that is playing out here.
The law profession has a standard dress code and the dress code can't be changed on the religious believe of one religion or another.
To effect the change necessary legal action should be followed.

I have decided to let the matter rest, but I can't allow ur wrong analysis and analogy go without challenge. Oga, whenever u dnt know anything about anything, pls don't try proving anything. Who told u in d medical profession doctors dnt wear Hijab into the theatre? Have u been into the theatre before? Have u been present where surgery is being performed? If NO, I believe u watch medical scenes in movies. Even d male doctors in surgery do not leave their heads bare just to ensure total cleanliness and decontamination in surgery. Now think of that and tell me if wearing Hijab in d surgery room is wrong. In d case of law the requirement is to be in robe and wig but as a Muslim who wants to follow God's law and in consonance with the constitution's provision for freedom to religion group, I want to believe the Hijab she wore never disrespect the constitution neither did it contravene the constitution. It was claimed that it is the school's tradition for everyone to bare their head, but the school's tradition is obviously flouting the constitution's directive and u are there saying it is in violation of some rule which isn't spelt anywhere. I wish for people to leave sentiment aside and take a look at this objectively, taking constitution into cognizance. U'll all realise there's no need for argument as this is a clear injustice to d young lady. I rest on this case. No more comment. Thnx

Vivere:


Oga, you are fond of digressing. We were talking about lawyers not doctors. You have failed to answer all the remaining questions I asked you.

1). Show me where it is expressly stipulated in the rule books by the Council of Legal Education that the hijab is approved as part of the things that can be worn with the wig and gown for court appearances.

2). Firdaus was aware of the prescribed mode of dressing for lawyers, when she started studying law and when she attended law school. Why didn't she raise any objections at that time, about the hijab being excluded from the female lawyer's dress code?

3). Is there a court ruling that states the hijab can be worn for court appearances, like the one backing the Sikhs vwearing of turban to UK courts?

4). Does the fact that something is permitted in Kenya, automatically mean it is approved for use in Nigeria?

No emotional religious rants, please. Simple short answers would do. God bless you as you comply.

1. Hijab is never expressly prohibited by the council of legal education, thus there is a very good argument ground that since it is never prohibited it safe to wear it. See legal counsel to verify the validity of my claim, u'll be surprised of ur lack of knowledge of the law

2. Firdaos spent 5 years studying law. She went for lectures wearing Hijab for all those years. I believe when she got to the law school, she was seen wearing Hijab and wasn't frown at. There has never been any warning for Muslims to eschew Hijab at any point in their course of study. I challenge u and the council of legal education to provide any document they issued to students warning them not to wear Hijab.

3. Does there have to b any court ruling that tells u u have to seek permission to be affiliated to any religion? The same eventually applies to dressing. And since no law prohibits wearing Hijab by Muslim lawyers, I believe a great argument is created here in favour of Hijab for Muslim lawyers.

4. Yes, this is a case of human right which is universal Mr. Go and ask anybody, they'll tell u that human right is d same everywhere. Freedom of association is in Kenyan's constitution as it is everywhere. If Kenya, UK and most especially western Christian predominated countries can uphold this universal fundamental human right of dressing in the legal profession, I don't know what ur case is over the issue of Hijab for Muslim lawyers.

If u are honest with urself u will agree with ur conscience that ur hatred for Islam is why u don't see anything wrong in the case of this young lady.

lezz:
yes, at the very end the lady will be granted huge financial relief for the violation of her right to practice Islam. The board will be instructed to publish an apology in 5 National dailies and her call to bar will be televised live on NTA.

I suggest u save this page so u can remember when u hear or read the lady's victory story. I leave u now

Vivere:


Oga, you are the one being ignorant. Lawyers have been called to bar for more than 40 years in Nigeria, since 1962. A high percentage of them have been female Muslims. How come none of them decided to wear a hijab under the wig and gown as a practising lawyer? Does the hijab make them more effective in court?

I do not have a phobia for the hijab, as I have extended family members who are Muslims. I respect them wholeheartedly and they in turn, show me a lot of respect. But I do not subscribe to unnecessary controversy or rascality.

Before studying law or entering law school, the girl was aware of the prescribed mode of dressing to court. Kenya is NOT Nigeria. If Kenya legalises same-sex marriage today, does that mean such marriages would automatically be valid in Nigeria? This example is just one of the many that can be cited by several people.



Oga, the rule book prescribes approved dress code. It does not list a hijab as part of the approved dress code. If you see anywhere inside the rule book stating that hijab is approved as part of the prescribed dress code for lawyers, please paste it here....

U keep skirting round the truth. Citing a same sex instance is very silly and goes further to show ur shallow thinking vessel. Ur continued refusal to see this as a case of human right subversion tells so much about ur level of intelligence. So in ur own understanding, if something isn't mentioned it means that thing is barred. Do u even understand this law u deceive urself of defending. Why do we have Muslim doctors that wear Hijab and Muslim in other professions wearing Hijab to accompany their primary professional dress. What's so sacred about dress code in the legal profession. I pity u with ur sorry argument. Ur rigid narrow mind will b ur undoing, I'll suggest u go upgrade ur thinking faculty, I'm sure it's so obsolete.

Vivere:


I have read it. There is no part inside it, that says legal practitioners are free to contravene approved dress codes when it comes to court appearances, because of 'freedom of religion'.

Let me make this simple for u if u are having trouble understanding it. I want u to ask a legal practitioner to expantiate on human right for u, may be u will begin to understand where an infringement had occurred. And also try and find where, in the law school rule book, wearing of Hijab was prohibited.

Vivere:


Oga, what are you wailing about? Initially, I did not know Sikhs were allowed to wear turbans in court in the UK. You provided pictures.

Then I went back to check and discovered that they were allowed to do so, because of a court ruling in 2015. So I asked if a similar court ruling existed in Nigeria. Instead of supplying proof like you did before when provided pictures of Sikh lawyers and judges, you now ran to Kenya. Why? Was that the question you were asked? The things which may be permissible in one country, may be illegal in another country (e.g. same-sex marriage).

The Sikh lawyers did not wake up to start wearing turbans as part of their wig and gown, overnight. Unlike what Firdaus wants to do. There was a court ruling backing up their actions. Does Nigeria have similar rulings or laws on ground?

May I ask if there is any law anywhere in the law school's rule book where Hijab is categorically barred for Muslim law students. I'd appreciate if u can show me where. The point Mr, is that there shouldn't be reason for any adjudication on a very clear issue here. I challenge u to try and find out again if there was a new case that made wearing of Hijab acceptable in Kenya. Stop being ignorant and know that there doesn't have to be any court judgment that accept wearing of Hijab in d first place, d issue of Hijab ordinarily shouldn't give u phobia at all if the section of fundamental rights was respected. This is very simple, don't u see?

Vivere:


If it existed, you would have quickly jumped up to provide it and splash it across this thread like you did with the Sikh lawyers and Kenyan female Muslim lawyers wearing hijabs.

Like I stated in my earlier response, I won't refer u to a particular section. I want you to go and read the constitution, it's for ur own good. You are a Nigerian, so u need to avail urself with ur country's constitution. You'll surely thank me later when u get to the section that address citizens' right. Happy reading

Vivere:


If it existed, you would have quickly jumped up to provide it and splash it across this thread like you did with the Sikh lawyers and Kenyan female Muslim lawyers wearing hijabs.

Like I stated in my earlier response, I won't refer u to section. I want you to go and read the constitution, it's for ur own good. You are a Nigerian, so u need to avail urself with ur country's constitution. You'll surely thank me later when u get to the section that address citizens' right. Happy reading

lezz:

Mr. Acube , please help the lady sue the board for infringing on her constitutional rights. And please try and cite examples where lawyers have dressed informally in court in Nigeria.

Help that lady.

Keep ur ears to the ground, we haven't heard the end of this issue. Events will soon begin to unfold and this lady, I'm certain, will surely have her way. U will all learn, just wait and see

Vivere:


Please quote in black and white, the relevant section and clauses of the constitution that you are referring to, which supports your claims. Thanks.

I don't have to refer u anywhere lest u say I make it up, just go and study Nigeria constitution, I'm sure ull get what I tell there ad while u are at it u can learn some other things, that way u won't jump blindly into argument over issues u know nothing about. Oya go and do ur homework boy

Vivere:

I knew u would try to twist this whichever way u desire. I never called u names cos Hypocrite is what u are. I'm so sure the lady would have been wearing Hijab to classes throughout her studies and was never cautioned for her dress sense, why the sudden barrier. People like u will go to ur grave ignorant because u choose to live and die ignorant. U wanted proof, u got d proof but ur sorry head won't admit to knowing so much less than u boast u do. I pity ur condition. Over-inflated empty barrels everywhere. A piece of advice, always get ur facts correct before joining issues with others. I hope u will receive sense from here on.
Am not twisting anything. Hypocrisy runs in your veins which is why you are so ready to tag others with that silly label. Did Firdaus tell you she was ignorant of the proper mode of dressing for lawyers? Didn't she know that the head covering or hijab was not part of the prescribed dress code for lawyers, when she started studying law all the way to the law school?

As for the pictures you showed in your previous post, I was unaware that a Sikh judge or Sikh lawyers were allowed to wear turbans as part of their dress code to appear in court. So how can someone be tagged a hypocrite, on account of something he is totally unaware of?

Apart from that, I just learnt that Sikhs were allowed to wear their turbans as a result of a court ruling enacted in 2015. Does such a similar court ruling exist in Nigeria??

You are the one that needs to receive sense and stop twisting issues, o! Even Mariam Mukhtar Aloma who is a former Chief Justice of Nigeria from July 2012 to November 2014 and was called to the English Bar in November, 1966 did not wear a hijab under her lawyer's outfit to court, did she?

Mr, u started on this twisted path the moment u and people like u made this look like a religious issue. I intentionally used the Sikh to drive my point home that everybody has the right to exercise his/her right as provided by the constitution which is supreme and binds everybody in their conducts.
Here is another picture of law students called to bar in Kenya with the chief justice there. Why must u people put religious tag on an issue which is a clear case of blatant disregard for someone's fundamental right. Another piece of advice, try to read the constitution, the section on fundamental human right and u will know this isn't Muslims ranting but the constitution giving directions which ur judicial dads decided to set aside and coming up with their personal rules. Check d picture below

Vivere:

These men are Sikhs. I didn't realise they were allowed to wear their turbans in court.

But the Muslim Lady Firdaus you are defending attended University of Jos and Law School Abuja, and never made a fuss about wearing her hijab under her wig and gown until the day she was called to bar. Was she unaware of the strict dress code for lawyers, when she enrolled to study law? Why didn't she kick up a fuss when she started studying law or make a case for the adoption of the hijab as part of the lawyer's dress code, when she entered law school? She obviously likes needless controversy.

Maybe hypocrisy runs in your family, but not in mine. Ignorance, nay stupidity is when you say something about someone you don't even know on a faceless forum with so much conviction.

Now run along and go display your 'hypocrisy' somewhere else where it will be appreciated. No need for name calling. Maybe you are used to being a hypocrite, which is why you find it so easy to tag others as one. Thank you.

I knew u would try to twist this whichever way u desire. I never called u names cos Hypocrite is what u are. I'm so sure the lady would have been wearing Hijab to classes throughout her studies and was never cautioned for her dress sense, why the sudden barrier. People like u will go to ur grave ignorant because u choose to live and die ignorant. U wanted proof, u got d proof but ur sorry head won't admit to knowing so much less than u boast u do. I pity ur condition. Over-inflated empty barrels everywhere. A piece of advice, always get ur facts correct before joining issues with others. I hope u will receive sense from here on.

Vivere:


Do not lie. Which lawyers and judges in UK put on items other than wigs, in court? Am not talking about outside the court, o!

The first is British Sikh Judge Sir Rabinder Singh Promoted To The UK Court Of Appeal

The second is a lawyer also in UK

The third is also a UK judge among his colleagues judges.

Oya try talk ur way out of this, hypocrite.

Sunmolar:

dem born em with hijab ni?

Were u born wearing cloth? Use ur sense

udemzyudex:


Funny enough, he was trying to assume things, since the verse says let down your outer garment then it means veil.. As if garment is worn inside and not outside.

Outer garment can be your sweater, your raincoat, your jacket.

Olodo, u are taking things out of context. To ur understanding what do u think d garment mention there is meant to do if not cover them and to whom does the verse make reference if not women. Must you be spoon-fed always? Read with ur objective mind always

hazard1759:
U dont know the difference between kenya and Nigeria?

Is this even an issue?
Some people are just hell bent on being stupid. How can u study for years, attend law school, only to insist on wearing a hijab to ur call to bar, there by going against the very law u're going to practice.

I always laugh whenever I hear or read comments from people like you. Goats like you are why the word "docile" was invented. Your stupid gullibility without asking question is what keeps allowing some people somewhere misrepresent issues for you and you will swallow them hook, line and sinker. The constitution already supports the lady's choice of dressing and very soon dull heads like u will b tutored on the supremacy of the constitution so u will b well informed.

hazard1759:
Is she the first Muslim Woman to study Law? If no, why is her case different?

Her case is different because she chose to put her foot down and exercise her fundamental human right. She should be celebrated for pointing out the hypocrisy of the judiciary and not vilified. For your info. the lady will eventually have her way, this delay is just a recess for her

otivere:
Please any Muslim here should show where in the Quran female was instructed to to use hijab. I strongly believe muslim that wear it is because of the desert area and due to sand breeze that cause blindness. Same thing apply to Christians. Celestine Church of Christ don't wear shoe or sleepers to worship just because God instruct Moses to off his shoe. They will trek with foot from their house to church. Muslim and Christian needs understanding of the Bible and Quran

It is very clear that if u are given d Queen verses that support it u will still find another excuse to negate it. Why waste valuable knowledge on lost goats. Keep on with ur history lesson

kimbraa:
Every institution is governed by rules and regulations, and if you can't deem it fit to keep by the rules, you fùck off. What are you even talking about? So they should make exceptional rules for Muslims?. SHM.

When will u people think out of ur bigotry. What exception is there to make when d constitution clearly supports fundamental human right. Are u brain dead to understand d fact that the constitution supercedes the rule of any institution in the country? Are u people even thinking before coming to claim rubbish on social media. Consider the school fees expended on u as waste

jamesibor:
No hijab as she knows the rule and abides by it.

So the first daughter should now be the constitution upon which we should all behave. Op get ur fact right before u make presentation lest u are considered unlearned

SuccesYear:
@ the pic is just like saying because your Pastor or Imam is going to hell then you too is sure of following.




If a man embezzle does that mean u shld follow suit

Very good response. U make common sense jare

Arielle:
I consider myself liberal but I'm begining to wonder if people who assert that we have ZERO in common with our Muslim fellow citizens don't have a point. How can anyone justify such idiocy? Chairman of the NBA? Shameful. Of all professions, the legal profession is the bastion of tradition. Dressing, mode of address and seniority are issues that are very strictly upheld. If you can't follow the law, then you should never seek to join the profession. In the court of law the constitution is sacrosanct. The laws of the land are sacrosanct. The ethics of the profession are unimpeachable. Religious laws do not apply. Leave it outside the courtroom. Someone should have advised the young lady better. She should have known all these before choosing to train as a lawyer. I hope she enjoys her 15 minutes of ignominy.

If I get u right u are claiming that the ethics of law profession is so sacrosanct as to take prevalence over the constitution of the federal republic of Nigeria. Then in that case, what will that make Nigeria, a democracy or a totalitarian state. If the ethics of law profession is so rigid as u want us to believe, then why are our colonial masters whose law we adopt tolerating the so called "unacceptable" dressing in their courtrooms. This is high time we stop our archaic reasoning and step into the 21st century. The constitution is written in simple English for goodness sake

mgbadike81:
that dress code have been in use from the colonial era.that's all I have to say.

If that is true, then I'll suggest u go research UK's tolerance of dressing choice in the courtroom for lawyers and judges alike. UK is our colonial Master àbí, so I think it is only right we learn from our masters.