Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,202,110 members, 7,980,914 topics. Date: Monday, 21 October 2024 at 08:20 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nutuk's Profile / Nutuk's Posts
(1) (of 1 pages)
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by Nutuk: 10:39am On Jun 24, 2015 |
MikeCZAR: No that is right, no cooperation in weapons development but cooperation in being subcontractors. However there is a branch of the electronics defence company Aselsan in Pretoria, called Aselsan South Africa (ASA) |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by Nutuk: 8:10am On Jun 24, 2015 |
mzilakazi: Hehehe, you got me. You must be one of those people who still believe the world is flat. At some of the pictures I can see eastern Africans (must be Somali), they look a little bit different than West Africans and are a bit smaller. Also North Africans have more Arabic features. But I have to admit that I really cannot see the physical difference between Nabibians and Kenyan's for instance or many other Africans. But vice versa it's the same, I heard from many Africans all you white people look the same. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by Nutuk: 6:44am On Jun 24, 2015 |
mzilakazi: Why would I wish? I am not African, I know for fact that my country is training Nigerian cadets as well. We have also good relations with South Africa, in fact our T_129 has been tested for hot summer conditions in S. Africa. Also our newly developped anti-ship missile dubbed "ATMACA" was tested at Denel's Overberg test range in May 2014. And there are defence cooperations like the IFV's for Malaysia with S. African Denel turrets on Turkish Pars vehicles: |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by Nutuk: 11:56pm On Jun 23, 2015 |
mzilakazi: Very strange that Somaliannewsroom claim them air force cadets, they all wear the land forces uniforms. Here is a picture with 3 African cadets in Turkish uniforms from left to right: white = navy, green = land forces, blue = airforce |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by Nutuk: 7:28pm On Jun 23, 2015 |
Henry120: I think he is confused by the uniforms and thinking those uniforms are Somali uniforms, they are not! Those uniforms are all Turkish uniforms, it doesn't matter from which countries the military students are they all wear the standard Turkish military cadet uniform. White uniform = navy cadet Green uniform = land forces cadet blue uniform = airforces cadet |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by Nutuk: 7:17pm On Jun 23, 2015 |
Centrifude: I already said I don't know for sure, there is no need for rude language. I cannot tell from which countries they are as currently there are many military cadets from many African countries in Turkey: Gambiya, Senegal, Burkina Faso, Mali, Nigeria, Algeria, Gana, Ethiyopia, Chad, Zimbabwe, Morroco and Somali are the main countries having cadets in Turkey. The guys from the pictures IMO are not the same persons, although there are indeed also many Somalians in Turkey getting scolarships and admitted to military academies. For the last 7-8 years Turkey placed a special attention to Africa, opening many embassies making diplomatic relations and the Turkish airlines has probably become the major airline that is flying to most of the African countries now. |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by Nutuk: 2:57pm On Jun 23, 2015 |
[img]http://kokpit.aero//image/data/P1120961.JPG[/img] And to answer on the discussion whether these are Nigerian students I cannot really confirm but I know that Nigerian military students are trained in Turkey and the uniforms they are wearing are Turkish cadet uniforms. So it is impossibile to tell from uniform whether they are Nigerian of Somali, but they do not look like Ethiopians and Somalians to me (again I am not sure) 1 Like |
Foreign Affairs / Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by Nutuk: 2:49pm On Jun 23, 2015 |
pavri: Hello all, I saw this forum by coincidence and joined. I am from Turkey and when I saw a discussion going on about whether the Rooivalk or T_129 is better I wanted to join and correct a few common mistakes. Firstly someone remarked that Turkey did not chose the Rooivalk because she technically failed, this is not true. The Rooivalk and Italian A_129 where shortlisted in the Turkish tender to provide a platform on which Turkey wanted to create a new chopper with complete renewed avionics, selfdefence suites, weapons pack etc. etc. The idea was to build on an existing proven platform to reduce development time, costs, overruns and delays. The Rooivalk as one of the shortlisted helicopters that technically fullfilled the requirements was not selected due to dissagreements with Denel on the prize of the chopper, not on technical details. The Rooivalk is a fine platform. Reacting to the ongoing discussion whether Rooivalk or the T_129 would win is a bit strange as it is not that the helicopters but the weaponspack on board determines the result. Usually the most modern chopper has the advantage, just ask yourself whether an Apache blk II or blkIII would be better. The blkIII with the newer avionics, selfprotection suite and wider weapon capabilities would be ofcourse in advantage. So I think it is similar with other helicopters, I don't know in how far the Rooivalk has received upgrades but the T_129 is brandnew with the T_129A model in production now, very soon the T_129B1 (2016) will be taken into production and around 2018 the B2 model. There will be mainly differences in the capabilities and selfprotection suites. B2 model will carry the MildarII (MMW radar) and the latest HEHSIS (helicopter selfprotection suite) which is recently installed and tested on two S-70 blackhawk helicopters. It's the only selfprotection suite in the world as far as I know that makes use of AESA antenna's. To be short the T_129 is really using the latest technology that exist which gives her quite some advantages and unique abilities. Last I want to say is all modern atack helicopters are quite fine, it's the way how effective the user army use them that determines their strength, example: no any other army than the US army can use the Apache blk III to her full efectiveness, cos only the US has the full infrastructure that supports the helicopter to her full extend. 2 Likes |
(1) (of 1 pages)
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 58 |