eph12:

Source: I no fit lie you

Lol simple eye test does it and 99percent of fans here agree on Fred's lack of quality with the ball.

Leyqute:


LooL. And who told you I don’t want either?

One thing I’m sure about is that we need more better players. About the coach, the jury is still out. But then sacking anyhow, with this kain squad, no be the way to go.

It doesn’t matter how many times Arsenal change their coach. They’ll still be pisspoor. But give Klop that Man City squad. Or Pochettino or any half decent coach and you’ll see them make top 4 at least.

The only club that has 3 league titles in the last 4 years is City. They’re also the only team who strengthens their squad with sense every season.

If you want to compete with them, you should invest- maybe not as much as they have , but reasonably well enough.

Chelsea, who fires and hires anyhow, splashes the cash at least.

Chelsea are the most successful club in England for the past 15 years. They have hired 16 managers in that period.

Their hire & fire method is ultra-effective. I wish Roman is the owner of Man Utd. He’s a genuine football fan that wants only the best for his club.

There’s no way in hell he would have kept Ole if similar results were posted at Chelsea. Yet, over here, OleInners are literally fighting everyone to keep him in the job. The fans who want to win are being kept silent or being bullied to accept mediocrity.

patrickmuf:
Most times your criticism of Ole is after games when your emotion is prolly high but when the dust settles, you're back to defending him...

Whenever Ole does not get it right I criticize but for you guys whether we win, draw or lose, it's not even criticism but outright abuse. O wrong nau.

Leyqute:


I remember the term I used then was ‘cautiously optimistic’. We had a long, drawn out argument where everyone was saying we must win the league.

We can win the league if we are always on top form. However a season is full of ups and downs. Even City, they had their ups and downs.

The difference is that they can maintain their ups for longer periods and reduce the time they are down. And this is due to their coach and the depth of their squad.


See as everywhere choke when we hit rough patch

I remember Oasis and I having a little debate when I posted Pogba's quote saying he's not sure about us winning the league and we were topping then oo. Ole himself called for caution but some fans here believes it's the league or nothing yet here we are.

eph12:

I blame Fred for winning that ball back. All these nonsense for no dey

Illimitable:


Chelsea are the most successful club in England for the past 15 years. They have hired 16 managers in that period.

Their hire & fire method is ultra-effective. I wish Roman is the owner of Man Utd. He’s a genuine football fan that wants the only the best for his club.

There’s no way in hell he would have kept Ole if similar results were posted at Chelsea. Yet, over here, OleInners are literally fighting everyone to keep him in the job. The fans who want to win are being kept silence or bullied to accept mediocrity.

I see you didn’t mention anything about Chelsea’s squad depth and transfer policy and approach in that period.... Chelsea that bought their first EPL title

Illimitable:


Chelsea are the most successful club in England for the past 15 years. They have hired 16 managers in that period.

Their hire & fire method is ultra-effective. I wish Roman is the owner of Man Utd. He’s a genuine football fan that wants the only the best for his club.

There’s no way in hell he would have kept Ole if similar results were posted at Chelsea. Yet, over here, OleInners are literally fighting everyone to keep him in the job. The fans who want to win are being kept silence or bullied to accept mediocrity.

Does it mean no coach has lasted more than a year at Chelsea in the last 15 yrs?

handelex:
I remember Oasis and I having a little debate when I posted Pogba's quote saying he's not sure about us winning the league and we were topping then oo. Ole himself called for caution but some fans here believes it's the league or nothing yet here we are.

And na coach get fault for everything

Illimitable:


Chelsea are the most successful club in England for the past 15 years. They have hired 16 managers in that period.

Their hire & fire method is ultra-effective. I wish Roman is the owner of Man Utd. He’s a genuine football fan that wants the only the best for his club.

There’s no way in hell he would have kept Ole if similar results were posted at Chelsea. Yet, over here, OleInners are literally fighting everyone to keep him in the job. The fans who want to win are being kept silence or bullied to accept mediocrity.

Does it mean no coach has lasted more than a year at Chelsea in the last 15 yrs seeing they've hired 16 managers according to you? And can you pls name the 16 managers

handelex:
Well your opinion about Fred won't change so is mine unless he improves on the ball which is not likely to happen. Cheers to pastor Fred

Where are the stats oga?

handelex:
Lol simple eye test does it and 99percent of fans here agree on Fred's lack of quality with the ball.

One of the best passer in the team lacks quality on the ball? Because he no dey do leg over? Omo

handelex:
Does it mean no coach has lasted more than a year at Chelsea in the last 15 yrs?

FBI handelex.....

Go and get the counters you used in primary school and count carefully.

Count them 5 different times and confirm if the numbers are consistent each time.

eph12:

One of the best passer in the team lacks quality on the ball? Because he no dey do leg over? Omo

Fred and best passing in the same sentence.

Don’t push it bro.

Illimitable:


FBI handelex.....

Go and get the counters you used in primary school and count carefully.

Count them 5 different times and confirm if the numbers are consistent each time.

You see if I didn't ask that question now, one would think Chelsea actually hired 16 managers and sacked anyone who didn't win something after a year. Amongst the name you posted there were caretakers and then actual managers that were hired for the job.

Joezinho:


Can we also agree ole gollum is finished at the ground level?

How old was mou when he conquered Europe?40 years old.. How old is your mcm the serial bottler? 48 years old..

I Stan a great coach!!!

Make him use im previous records enter top 4 na

Abi e no fit find am again?

Very soon we go look am as normal as ancelotti

handelex:
You see if I didn't ask that question now, one would think Chelsea actually hired 16 managers and sacked anyone who didn't win something after a year. Amongst the name you posted there were caretakers and then actual managers that were hired for the job.

Ole & Giggs were also once caretaker managers.

Ole got the job, Giggs didn’t. If you are good at your job, you would retain it.

handelex:
You see if I didn't ask that question now, one would think Chelsea actually hired 16 managers and sacked anyone who didn't win something after a year. Amongst the name you posted there were caretakers and then actual managers that were hired for the job.

In that list, Mourinho’s name appeared twice, some of the managers were in charge for less than 10 days and some were not even hired for the post - they were assistant managers.

It’s quite interesting how people will twist things to support their argument.

eph12:

One of the best passer in the team lacks quality on the ball? Because he no dey do leg over? Omo

Because he gives shit passes, lacks proper ball control and loses the ball in dangerous places

handelex:
Fred and best passing in the same sentence.

Don’t push it bro.

Bring the passing stats

Leyqute:


In that list, Mourinho’s name appeared twice, some of the managers were in charge for less than 10 days and some were not even hired for the post - they were assistant managers.

It’s quite interesting how people will twist things to support their argument.

#doublepost

Leyqute:


In that list, Mourinho’s name appeared twice, some of the managers were in charge for less than 10 days and some were not even hired for the post - they were assistant managers.

It’s quite interesting how people will twist things to support their argument.

Stop with the epistle.

Did management change hands or not? Why and how they changed hands are irrelevant. The most important issue is they were changed and new ones were hired.

Mourinho/Hiddink names appearing more than once are irrelevant. The fact of the matter is there was a change and a previous manager got sacked.

Illimitable:


Ole & Giggs were also once caretaker managers.

Ole got the job, Giggs didn’t. If you are good at your job, you would retain it.

This means United have had 5 managers in the last 9 years (Nwoyes, LvG, Giggs, Mou, Ole) - an average of a maneja each season and a half. Approx. or 1 maneja in 2 sissins

By your logic, United actually have been hiring and firing.

Wonder where Ed kept the league trophy he’s won by doing so.

Illimitable:


Ole & Giggs were also once caretaker managers.

Ole got the job, Giggs didn’t. If you are good at your job, you would retain it.

So if one should count the managers United hired post Fergie, Giggsy should also be included?

handelex:
I'm not a blind supporter neither do I criticize unfairly. I criticize Ole here well well and my opinion of him not being good enough is well noted here. I praise him as well for the good he's done given his ability, that my friend does not make me an Oleinner, I'm just objective and unsentimental.

Most times your criticism of Ole is after games when your emotion is prolly running high but when the dust settles, you're back to defending him...

It's only Afrodoc2 that has managed to balance his argument here irrespective of our performances...

Illimitable:


Stop with the epistle.

Did management change hands or not? Why and how they changed hands are irrelevant. The most important issue is they were changed and new ones were hired.

Mourinho/Hiddink names appearing more than once are irrelevant. The fact of the matter is there was a change and a previous manager got sacked.

LooL. Okay.

handelex:
So if one should count the managers United hired post Fergie, Giggsy should also be included?

Why won’t he be included?

Had Giggsy won every game 6-0 while he was manager, LVG wouldn’t have been hired.

Leyqute:


In that list, Mourinho’s name appeared twice, some of the managers were in charge for less than 10 days and some were not even hired for the post - they were assistant managers.

It’s quite interesting how people will twist things to support their argument.

Lol, he should understand that there's a difference between caretakers and real managers hired to do the job. Some Chelsea fans probably don't know some names listed there.

Illimitable:


Chelsea are the most successful club in England for the past 15 years. They have hired 16 managers in that period.

Their hire & fire method is ultra-effective. I wish Roman is the owner of Man Utd. He’s a genuine football fan that wants only the best for his club.

There’s no way in hell he would have kept Ole if similar results were posted at Chelsea. Yet, over here, OleInners are literally fighting everyone to keep him in the job. The fans who want to win are being kept silence or bullied to accept mediocrity.

@ bolded

This one na definitely ment

handelex:
Lol, he should understand that there's a difference between caretakers and real managers hired to do the job. Some Chelsea fans probably don't know some names listed there.

So you are suggesting United didn’t pay Giggs any salary while he was interim or there was no contract drawn & signed to give him the job?

There’s no difference between caretakers and real managers. It’s the same job - a contract is drawn out and salary is paid.

handelex:
Lol, he should understand that there's a difference between caretakers and real managers hired to do the job. Some Chelsea fans probably don't know some names listed there.

LooL. Eddie Newton was ‘in charge’ for 2 days pere- 18 to 20 Dec 2015. Another one was in charge only for like 10 days in February.

Illimi says we must accept those ones as manejas too.

Leyqute:


And that’s a bad thing because ...

Handelex understands what I'm on about...

Leyqute:


In that list, Mourinho’s name appeared twice, some of the managers were in charge for less than 10 days and some were not even hired for the post - they were assistant managers.

It’s quite interesting how people will twist things to support their argument.

As I see the screenshot and looked through it
I just laughed

Some people are really great