OkCornel:


Then use your God given intellect to think and ask yourself why Jesus used his oneness with the father as an ideal example to pray for our UNITY in the faith.

Common sense should tell you his oneness with the Father has always been about unity, not a literal number. Jeez!

If you can’t get this, then you can’t get anything else.

And be quick, get into the Hebrew Scriptures and bring what aligns with your view point on the Oneness of God. As we can all see, you’re still deflecting rather than researching.

are you still thinking that God is three different beings into one is that what they taught you or what you want it to be

Kingsnairaland:
are you still thinking that God is three different beings into one is that what they taught you or what you want it to be

Is the Oneness of God a literal number? Or is it about unity irrespective of the literal numbers?

Pause, think, reflect and respond.

Then tell us how many beings David saw in the Spirit in Psalms 110 v 1 & Matthew 22 v 44 - 45

Bishopkingsley:


Let me stretch your knowledge about the things of God
Can I ask you a deep question to see your answer will be

Go ahead sir.

OkCornel:


Is the Oneness of God a literal number? Or is it about unity irrespective of the literal numbers?

Pause, think, reflect and respond.

Then tell us how many beings David saw in the Spirit in Psalms 110 v 1 & Matthew 22 v 44 - 45

He asked you a question you did not answer it I wished I asked it I want to know the answer tell us is he three different beings joint to one or they are different

OkCornel:


Go ahead sir.

I forgot let treat that guy own

Answer his own without diverting if you know you are brave and have Bible backing your theory state it here don't say only the chapters write it down as you say the answer

Bishopkingsley:


He asked you a question you did not answer it I wished I asked it I want to know the answer tell us is he three different beings joint to one or they are different

Three distinct beings with unity of mind and purpose.

Bishopkingsley:


I forgot let treat that guy own

Answer his own without diverting if you know you are brave and have Bible backing your theory state it here don't say only the chapters write it down as you say the answer

Ask your question while I await his answers on David and Daniel’s visions…

OkCornel:


Three distinct beings with unity of mind and purpose.

The three beings are they different beings that came together then having unity of mind

OkCornel:


Ask your question while I await his answers on David and Daniel’s visions…

No I work in orderly way step by step let finish his The three beings are they different beings that came together then having unity of mind

Bishopkingsley:


The three beings are they different beings that came together then having unity of mind

Are you taking over the discussion, or you’d rather let him ask the questions and then you ask yours.

OkCornel:
Is the Oneness of God a literal number?
Or is it about unity irrespective of the literal numbers?

Pause, think, reflect and respond.

Then tell us how many beings David saw in the Spirit in Psalms 110 v 1 & Matthew 22 v 44 - 45

Deuteronomy 6:4
'“Hear, O Israel:
The LORD our God, the LORD is one.'

Mark 12:29
'“Jesus replied, "This is the most important:
'Hear O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is One'

What on this thread is going on OkCornel? Bishopkingsley? and Kingsnairaland?
Is the Oneness of H₂O a literal number?
Or is it about unity irrespective of the literal numbers?

Please pause, think, reflect and respond.

BassReeves:


Deuteronomy 6:4
'“Hear, O Israel:
The LORD our God, the LORD is one.'

Mark 12:29
'“Jesus replied, "This is the most important:
'Hear O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is One'

What on this thread is going on OkCornel? Bishopkingsley? and Kingsnairaland?
Is the Oneness of H₂O a literal number?
Or is it about unity irrespective of the literal numbers?

Please pause, think, reflect and respond.

Patiently awaiting their response, as the word “one” still tingles people’s understanding.

Married couples are said to be one flesh…but made up of distinct beings yeah?

OkCornel:
Patiently awaiting their response, as the word “one” still tingles people’s understanding.

Married couples are said to be one flesh…but made up of distinct beings yeah?

Using that make do H₂O Metaphor.
What personally is your position and/or take?
Be explicit in your response please.
What exactly is your contention about?

OkCornel:

Are you taking over the discussion, or you’d rather let him ask the questions and then you ask yours.

This is my question since you want to drag foot

The three beings are they different beings that came together then having unity of mind

Bishopkingsley:


This is my question since you want to drag foot

The three beings are they different beings that came together then having unity of mind

This will still end up as Yachad v Echad which is a fruitless discussion to have with you. If you understand the concept of marriage or unity then that’ll answer whatever questions you’re putting forward.

Please ask the question you initially had in mind, that may lead to a more fruitful discussion. Time is too precious to waste.

BassReeves:
Using that make do H₂O Metaphor.
What personally is your position and/or take?
Be explicit in your response please.
What exactly is your contention about?

Hydrogen and Oxygen “unites” to make up water yes?

OkCornel:
Patiently awaiting their response, as the word “one” still tingles people’s understanding.

Married couples are said to be one flesh…but made up of distinct beings yeah?

Fyi, God is distinct from 'married couples'
You're contradicting yourself using apple to compare with oranges.
God is unitary wholeness, while 'married couples' is double, triple, quadruple, 700 wives up to the nth number wholeness

'married couples' are said to be one flesh, while the Lord God is one, plain and simple just one, you even would say God, simultaneously, is echad and yachid or yachad

OkCornel:


This will still end up as Yachad v Echad which is a fruitless discussion to have with you. If you understand the concept of marriage or unity then that’ll answer whatever questions you’re putting forward.

Please ask the question you initially had in mind, that may lead to a more fruitful discussion. Time is too precious to waste.

My brother are you afraid of answering the question I just want us to know each of our position clearly because it vital to know ourselves

Forget that example of husband and wife rather state what you believe unless you are afraid of your theory because if you ask me my own theory I will tell you one billion times

OkCornel:
Hydrogen and Oxygen “unites” to make up water yes?

H₂O is water, period. It is water whether in liquid, solid or vapour state.

Please stick to H₂O, as we are making it synonymous with God.

BassReeves:
Fyi, God is distinct from 'married couples'
You're contradicting yourself using apple to compare with oranges.
God is unitary wholeness, while 'married couples' is double, triple, quadruple, 700 wives up to the nth number wholeness

'married couples' are said to be one flesh, while the Lord God is one, plain and simple just one, you even would say God, simultaneously, is echad and yachid.

Don't mind him I want to get him in his mistakes lol why did you reveal it on time

BassReeves:
H₂O is water, period. It is water whether in liquid, solid or vapour state.

Please stick to H₂O, as we are making it synonymous with God.

WATER is one sample but many samples from Bible I want to use to blow his mind which I don't want to rush

OkCornel:


Hydrogen and Oxygen “unites” to make up water yes?

The three beings did they unite to make up God

BassReeves:
H₂O is water, period. It is water whether in liquid, solid or vapour state.

Please stick to H₂O, as we are making it synonymous with God.

This water example is so sweet to use because when God created earth earth was just water if you notice

Bishopkingsley:
WATER is one sample but many samples from Bible I want to use to blow his mind which I don't want to rush

When you know the descriptor name for God, mind you, not talking about God's personal name here though.
Just like water, its easier to relate to a make shift similarity with water i.e. H₂O, being that God is described as I AM that I AM, water will be and take the form of whatever you present it with

Here's more, God is formless and shapeless now, just as with water, if you put water into a cup, it becomes the cup. You put water into a bottle and it becomes the bottle, just as God is I AM that I AM, will be whatever is necessary for God to be.

BassReeves:
When you know the descriptor name for God, mind you, not talking about God's personal name here though.
Just like water, its easier to relate to a make shift similarity with water i.e. H₂O, being that God is described as I AM that I AM, water will be and take the form of whatever you present it with

Here's more, God is formless and shapeless now, just as with water, if you put water into a cup, it becomes the cup. You put water into a bottle and it becomes the bottle, just as God is I AM that I AM, will be whatever is necessary for God to be.

Well that my friend has gone when he comes we ask him more and you explain to him

Now let move on let me ask you what I wanted to ask him

Do Jesus have a separate throne from the father

Bishopkingsley:
Well that my friend has gone when he comes we ask him more and you explain to him

OkCornel has not asked for any explanation

Bishopkingsley:
Now let move on let me ask you what I wanted to ask him

Do Jesus have a separate throne from the father

Isaiah 66:1a
''Thus said YHWH:
“The heavens [are] My throne, And the earth My footstool ...'

Matthew 5:34
''But I say to you, Do not take an oath at all, either by heaven, for it is the throne of God,'

Matthew 23:22
''And when you swear ‘by heaven,’ you are swearing by the throne of God and by God, who sits on the throne.'

Before I even decide give you a or any response, I'll like your response to the following first:
1. Is the Father visible to the physical and/or naked eyes?
2. Why are you particularly interested in knowing if Jesus has a separate throne from the Father?
3. What made you say Jesus Christ has a separate throne from the Father?
4. What you make of Matthew 23:22?

BassReeves:
OkCornel has not asked for any explanation

Isaiah 66:1a
''Thus said YHWH:
“The heavens [are] My throne, And the earth My footstool ...'

Matthew 5:34
''But I say to you, Do not take an oath at all, either by heaven, for it is the throne of God,'

Matthew 23:22
''And when you swear ‘by heaven,’ you are swearing by the throne of God and by God, who sits on the throne.'

Before I even decide give you a or any response, I'll like your response to the following first:
1. Is the Father visible to the physical and/or naked eyes?
2. Why are you particularly interested in knowing if Jesus has a separate throne from the Father?
3. What made you say Jesus Christ has a separate throne from the Father?
4. What you make of Matthew 23:22?

Funny did you see me say any thing
I only asked you a question
No problem if you don't want to answer it
I always tell people Christianity is not reverse psychology you can't ask me a question while I was the one who ask you

If you feel like you can't answer it then no problem

Bishopkingsley:


WATER is one sample but many samples from Bible I want to use to blow his mind which I don't want to rush

What makes up water?

Deal with that before you run to ice, liquid and steam

OkCornel:


What makes up water?

Deal with that before you run to ice, liquid and steam

Officer cornel that is not what I ask you.... Because you are running away from my questions proves one thing you are not bold in your definition of your own Trinity or you have used style to accept your mistakes

So if you can't answer the question may I move to the next question..


Or is there a question that you want to ask me

Bishopkingsley:
Funny did you see me say any thing

Smh, talking of funny, you must have been a comedian in a former life

Bishopkingsley:
I only asked you a question

What was your basis for asking me such a lame question. Sorry no offence there

Bishopkingsley:
[s]No problem if you don't want to answer it[/s]

Where did you read about not want to answer the question?

Bishopkingsley:
[s]I always tell people Christianity is not reverse psychology[/s] ...

Smh. KMFT. The word, Christianity, is in your bible abi?

Bishopkingsley:
... [s]you can't ask me a question while I was the one who ask you[/s]

I can ask you questions at any time t, especially when I have explained to you, the reason why my response would or might be delayed

Bishopkingsley:
[s]If you feel like you can't answer it then no problem [/s]

If you had developed balls strong enough to respond to those four easy, simple, harmless, innocent, direct and straightforward questions, you would have found out from your provided answers that asking me that question was completely unnecessary and even be DOA

BassReeves:
Smh, talking of funny, you must have been a comedian in a former life

What was your basis for asking me such a lame question. Sorry no offence there

Where did you read about not want to answer the question?

Smh. KMFT. The word, Christianity, is in your bible abi?

I can ask you questions at any time t.

If you had developed balls strong enough to respond to those four easy, simple, harmless, innocent, direct and straightforward questions, you would have found out from your provided answers that asking me that question was completely unnecessary and even be DOA

Am sorry for asking you my bad

Bishopkingsley:
Am sorry for asking you my bad

Sorry for yourself.
Your bad is being intimidated by four easy, simple, harmless, innocent, direct and straightforward questions, that if you had answered them, you would have found out from your provided answers that asking me that question was completely unnecessary and even be DOA.

Why not grow some chutzpah and have a stab at the four easy, simple, harmless, innocent, direct and straightforward questions, so I can then immediately give you back my response to your original lame question