Oluwabengz:


Lol...even the owner sef is married. So married man don cancel. Married man be that. driver and owner both get bills to pay.

Generally, i still think 30k weekly rental is fair.

hopefullight:


God bless you with these analogy. It is only on uber business they are debating while drivers should earn more than the Partners.

40k or nothing should be the Standard with the rate at which car part and repairs is increasing.

donfortune48:


I'm not against anyone's opinion oh! But try to dey always give your reasons make e dey clear for everyone to understand.

Why is 30k fair to you when a hardworking driver makes over 200k a week?

hopefullight:


30k weekly transcends to 120k monthly.

So it will take owner averagely 2 years to recover for an average corolla cost( lets say 2.4m)

While the drivers can make the same 2.4m within a year if he keep 70k to himself weekly( net 100k, 30k for owners, 70k for drivers).. this is a very dickes and selfish business model.

Yet owners of the car will spend on repairs and damage, pay insurance telc while the drivers flex and pay nothing on repairs.

ANY OWNER/PARTNER COLLECTING LESS THAN 40K IS A slowpoke. EXPECIALLY ON TOKUNBO CARS.

hopefullight:


ANY OWNER/PARTNER COLLECTING LESS THAN 40K IS A slowpoke. EXPECIALLY ON TOKUNBO CARS.

XGhost:


Actually the reason it's a debate is because its a partnership and NOT employment. In the other analogy the workers are employees, in e-hailing the driver is not, same way car owner does not work for the e-hailing company.
The agreement is supposed to guarantee income for the landlord, unlike in the employer employee scenario where income is not guaranteed.
The reason you must negotiate terms is because all parties in the e-hailing chain feed off one another

izzou:


So I guess partners can never have extra earnings

Oluwabengz:


Baba, i know what you are doing

XGhost:


Actually the reason it's a debate is because its a partnership and NOT employment. In the other analogy the workers are employees, in e-hailing the driver is not, same way car owner does not work for the e-hailing company.
The agreement is supposed to guarantee income for the landlord, unlike in the employer employee scenario where income is not guaranteed.
The reason you must negotiate terms is because all parties in the e-hailing chain feed off one another

kanuisagoat:


You don't get, the analogy was only meant to show that bearing the risk does not translate to you making more money.

He says the driver bears all the risk and should earn more money. This is because he's only looking at the physical risk but I don't see it that way. The partner invested 100% of the money and is bearing the financial risk.

Sometimes I even wonder how this 30k weekly was arrived at. Who did the calculations and how did we get here because I know how much I make a week and it has never made any sense to me especially with the partner doing all the repairs. Don't get me started on 25k

kanuisagoat:


So when we give a vehicle to a married man how much should he remit and who will bear the cost of maintenance?

Pearl1910:


Yea...driver bears all the risk, danger and threat, puts all the work, time and energy. Utilizes his Intelligence and craft to make the money.
Car is insured but life cannot be replaced so if he makes 1m and gives owner 30k its not out of place.

dapotemi:


Driver should use all this intelligence and craft to make 2.5 million or 1.5 atleast and buy a CAR.. Eyin onisolenu po lori platform yii... See talk!

Oluwabengz:


Lol...even the owner sef is married. So married man don cancel. Married man be that. driver and owner both get bills to pay.

Generally, i still think 30k weekly rental is fair.

donfortune48:


Congratulations @Dru23.
Finally your challenge have paid off.

You can now officially increase your rent to a suitable amount with what's obtainable on the streets.

hopefullight:


With weekly remittance of 40k, I dont see how the income is threaten because a driver make these within 2 days conveniently.

Only selfishness and entitlement mentality of drivers is the reason why someone will be suggesting 25k weekly for a tokunbo car.

IFSHR:
Since it's easy to make that 120k weekly and partners want the lion share

The reasonable thing to do is to just retrieve your car and go hustle and net that 120k this time all to yourself Abi.

dapotemi:
The only reason i decided to handle maintenance is because an average Nig driver lacks maintenance culture, even on his personal car, not to talk of a rental car. Do you know that a mad driver bought all this oil in eva/ragolis bottle and pour into my 2006 corrolla? A driver that remit 15k weekly, which i later increase to 20k..
Look at all the dashboard drivers has been posting for the past one month here, how can you be making such money and yet be asking for 25k weekly, out of an average of 100k net?
You know what, you guys see car owner as someone who has money and probably doesn't know what to do with it, and you see yourself as PROBLEM that needs all d money to get fixed, hence, you should earn 3/4.... You are not different from all thos agbero driving T4 or LT.. But you forgot one thing, once they take that car from you, you go back to your crumbs.. Car owner will still survive. You were not remitting a kobo b4 he bought his car.. Lets be fair..

hopefullight:


With weekly remittance of 40k, I dont see how the income is threaten because a driver make these within 2 days conveniently.

Only selfishness and entitlement mentality of drivers is the reason why someone will be suggesting 25k weekly for a tokunbo car.

tunlapapa:


I was about typing this before I saw your post.
If you feel a driver is cheating you, roll your sleeves and enter the streets so you make all the money.

kanuisagoat:


You don't get, the analogy was only meant to show that bearing the risk does not translate to you making more money.

He says the driver bears all the risk and should earn more money. This is because he's only looking at the physical risk but I don't see it that way. The partner invested 100% of the money and is bearing the financial risk.

Sometimes I even wonder how this 30k weekly was arrived at. Who did the calculations and how did we get here because I know how much I make a week and it has never made any sense to me especially with the partner doing all the repairs. Don't get me started on 25k

IFSHR:
Since it's easy to make that 120k weekly and partners want the lion share

The reasonable thing to do is to just retrieve your car and go hustle and net that 120k this time all to yourself Abi.


No sir, its not easy to be honest.. Its not about lion share, its about being reasonable and fair.. I work for someone, i earn salary, i got a degree to be qualified for that job, i put in alot of effort to get that degree, i leave my house 5am everyday to get to work 7/8am....You see that my CEO, she stays in banana island, usually come to work around 11am or even 1pm, sometimes she does show up self and there is nothing we can do.. My self and all other staff put in the CRAFT and INTELLIGENCE, facing threat every day at different bus stop, jumping bus etc.. You know what, on monday am going to walk up to my boss and explain to her, why i should be earning more than her? Pls advice me..
You see how you driver reason here..

IFSHR:
Since it's easy to make that 120k weekly and partners want the lion share

The reasonable thing to do is to just retrieve your car and go hustle and net that 120k this time all to yourself Abi.

Pearl1910:


Yea...driver bears all the risk, danger and threat, puts all the work, time and energy. Utilizes his Intelligence and craft to make the money.
Car is insured but life cannot be replaced so if he makes 1m and gives owner 30k its not out of place.

IFSHR:


Oga car owner....so how much are you suggesting...what do you think is the fair rate?