Greatihex:
He has a Biafran birth certificate. Fact.

You guys need to stop being fools. Nnamdi Kanu has a Nigerian passport that was collected by the court as part of his bail condition. Nigeria govt only issues passport to citizens. How did he obtain his citizenship?

OfoIgbo:


A UK minister has just issued a statement. Nigeria must explain how Kanu was abducted.
The matter has been taken up a notch. Malami and co are in trouble

You mean that statement from Sowore and published by Sahara reporters. Can British prime minister issue a statement and BBC news did not publish it?

Vireani79:

How many days ago was he arrested So to u Britain will send war ships immediately if they want to take action Make una dey calm down The music never begin play U don't kidnap people and bring dem back to court U use interpol This is where the real issue begins

Bros we are waiting hahaha.................. May till eternity

emilo2bad:

You mean that statement from Sowore and published by Sahara reporters. Can British prime minister issue a statement and BBC news did not publish it?

Yes. In fact, very often.

OfoIgbo:


Yes. In fact, very often.

It can't happen. So Sowore is now the spokesman of British. It like statement of buhari is not publish by NTA and Radio Nigeria it can't happen

emilo2bad:

It can't happen. So Sowore is now the spokesman of British. It like statement of buhari is not publish by NTA and Radio Nigeria it can't happen

It was a British minister that talked. Not the prime minister.

The British parliament debated the abduction. Now a UK minister has issued a query to Nigeria.

I'm sure the Nigerian figures involved are already peeing in their pants

OfoIgbo:


It was a British minister that talked. Not the prime minister.

The British parliament debated the abduction. Now a UK minister has issued a query to Nigeria.

I'm sure the Nigerian figures involved are already peeing in their pants

Show the link to the information apart from Sahara reporters. British and Nigeria newspapers can do please

emilo2bad:


Show the link to the information apart from Sahara reporters. British and Nigeria newspapers can do please

It is you that has to show me a newspaper clipping that disproves this news. Ministers or foreign missions normally issue denials when false information has been broadcast about them or their government ministers

Has the British minister denied the news? Has. The British house of lords denied debating Kanu's abduction?

Sahara reporters news has not been debunked by the British authorities, who happen to have an embassy in Nigeria and are aware of this Sahara news

OfoIgbo:


It is you that has to show me a newspaper clipping that disproves this news. Ministers or foreign missions normally issue denials when false information has been broadcast about them or their government ministers

Has the British minister denied the news? Has. The British house of lords denied debating Kanu's abduction?

Sahara reporters news has not been debunked by the British authorities, who happen to have an embassy in Nigeria and are aware of this Sahara news

Nigeria government or British government will not issue statement because they know it's fake news by Sowore Sahara reporters. And you will continue to live in denied. BRITISH WILL NEVER DEBATE a terrorist like kanu issue

emilo2bad:

Nigeria government or British government will not issue statement because they know it's fake news by Sowore Sahara reporters. And you will continue to live in denied. BRITISH WILL NEVER DEBATE a terrorist like kanu issue

Go to youtube and you will see clips of the UK House of Lords debating the Kanu kidnapping situation. This happened about two weeks ago.

Just a few days ago, a UK minister has issued Nigeria with a query, which must be answered.

Sahara's news on the UK minister is not fake, otherwise the UK embassy in Nigeria would have debunked it.

Tell Malami and Lai to answer the query sharp sharp, or else

OfoIgbo:


Go to youtube and you will see clips of the UK House of Lords debating the Kanu kidnapping situation. This happened about two weeks ago.

Just a few days ago, a UK minister has issued Nigeria with a query, which must be answered.

Sahara's news on the UK minister is not fake, otherwise the UK embassy in Nigeria would have debunked it.

Tell Malami and Lai to answer the query sharp sharp, or else

The bolded words above is making me laugh hard. You must be an efulefu to think a sovereign state like Nigeria, which is not under anybody, any country, and any state must answer the quer(y)(ies) of another country compulsorily

He can decide to answer and he can decide not to answer

onedayatime:

The bolded words above is making me laugh hard. You must be an efulefu to think a sovereign state like Nigeria, which is not under anybody, any country, and any state must answer the quer(y)(ies) of another country compulsorily

He can decide to answer and he can decide not to answer

No, for this one, they must answer, after all they kidnapped someone bearing the UK passport. This is an international matter now.

OfoIgbo:


No, for this one, they must answer, after all they kidnapped someone bearing the UK passport. This is an international matter now.

They must answer? Answer for what? If they gave an answer, it is because they wish to.

Now, about kidnapping and international law. How did MNK left Nigeria in the first place? Was it through an illegal means or legal means? The obvious answer is through an ILLEGAL means. If he left through an illegal means and he was brought back through an illegal means, then, no complain, no whining, no murmuring

onedayatime:

They must answer? Answer for what? If they gave an answer, it is because they wish to.

Now, about kidnapping and international law. How did MNK left Nigeria in the first place? Was it through an illegal means or legal means? The obvious answer is through an ILLEGAL means. If he left through an illegal means and he was brought back through an illegal means, then, no complain, no whining, no murmuring

MNK left Nigeria because Nigeria attempted to kill him. In fact Nigeria killed twenty something people in their attempt to kill him, unfortunately for them, he managed to escape.

Ask yourself how come Nigeria did not follow due process to have Kanu extradited to Nigeria from UK or from any civilized country. Because they know Kanu had proof of Nigeria's attempt at killing him.
Even Kenya is claiming that Nigeria acted alone, which is more of an international crime on various levels.

Buhari has now implicated various Nigerian officials in crimes that will eventually catch up with all those involved, including Buhari himself, who committed treason against Nigeria and hasn't been tried for that heinous crime.
All the people involved in this abduction are very likely to pay, especially now that Nigerians are no longer smiling. Future governments will seek their pound of flesh

OfoIgbo:


MNK left Nigeria because Nigeria attempted to kill him. In fact Nigeria killed twenty something people in their attempt to kill him, unfortunately for them, he managed to escape.

Ask yourself how come Nigeria did not follow due process to have Kanu extradited to Nigeria from UK or from any civilized country. Because they know Kanu had proof of Nigeria's attempt at killing him.
Even Kenya is claiming that Nigeria acted alone, which is more of an international crime on various levels.

Buhari has now implicated various Nigerian officials in crimes that will eventually catch up with all those involved, including Buhari himself, who committed treason against Nigeria and hasn't been tried for that heinous crime.
All the people involved in this abduction are very likely to pay, especially now that Nigerians are no longer smiling. Future governments will seek their pound of flesh

How did he left Nigeria is the question (not what they tried to do to him). His 2 passports is with the SC (Supreme court) and if his passports are with the SC, how then did he escaped? Certainly, not through the right channel.

You tried to paint the past as if the FG just went for him(as if the NA or FG just decided to attack him). It was during the day of Operation Python ( don't forget), infact it was the same scenerio with the Zakzaky. IPOB tried to blocked the NA from going to where they were going and wouldn't leave the road (don't forget)

onedayatime:


How did he left Nigeria is the question (not what they tried to do to him). His 2 passports is with the SC (Supreme court) and if his passports are with the SC, how then did he escaped? Certainly, not through the right channel.

You tried to paint the past as if the FG just went for him(as if the NA or FG just decided to attack him). It was during the day of Operation Python ( don't forget), infact it was the same scenerio with the Zakzaky. IPOB tried to blocked the NA from going to where they were going and wouldn't leave the road (don't forget)

Nigeria is not the immigration authority of Israel. When Kanu was in Nigeria, he was within the law. When he showed up in Israel, it is the Israeli's government duty to prosecute him, if they felt he broke their immigration rule. But they instead granted him asylum. So whether Nigeria has his 30 passports or not, should not be Nigeria's concern.

The mere fact that Nigeria tried to kill him, and that Nigeria killed many people, and none of those they killed around that time has been given justice by the Nigerian system, shows Nigeria is under a dictatorship. That alone will make the international community not to trust the Nigerian legal system to deliver justice to those that need it.

As things stand now, Nigeria has committed an international crime, but before the consequences of this international crime hits Nigeria, a UK minister has issued a query to Nigeria which Nigeria must answer.

Kanu will be the downfall of Buhari and his Fulani terrorists in power.

OfoIgbo:


Nigeria is not the immigration authority of Israel. When Kanu was in Nigeria, he was within the law. When he showed up in Israel, it is the Israeli's government duty to prosecute him, if they felt he broke their immigration rule. But they instead granted him asylum. So whether Nigeria has his 30 passports or not, should not be Nigeria's concern.

The mere fact that Nigeria tried to kill him, and that Nigeria killed many people, and none of those they killed around that time has been given justice by the Nigerian system, shows Nigeria is under a dictatorship. That alone will make the international community not to trust the Nigerian legal system to deliver justice to those that need it.

As things stand now, Nigeria has committed an international crime, but before the consequences of this international crime hits Nigeria, a UK minister has issued a query to Nigeria which Nigeria must answer.

Kanu will be the downfall of Buhari and his Fulani terrorists in power.

How did he end up in Israel? Simple question. Before being found in Israel, he was living in Nigeria (right?). How did he left Nigeria in the first place without his passports? Was it legal? Was it illegal?

You said he left Nigeria when NA wanted to kill him(right?), The FG brought him back because he was destroying Nigeria's properties, he was inciting violence against the Nigerians' officials and it's agents

onedayatime:


How did he end up in Israel? Simple question. Before being found in Israel, he was living in Nigeria (right?). How did he left Nigeria in the first place without his passports? Was it legal? Was it illegal?

You said he left Nigeria when NA wanted to kill him(right?), The FG brought him back because he was destroying Nigeria's properties, he was inciting violence against the Nigerians' officials and it's agents

As I wrote before, this your question should be asked by Israeli Immigration.
If Israel is alright with the way he showed up, then it is no other country's concern. It is not a crime at all. Countries have discretion to decide what happens within their borders.

Nigeria just abducted a British passport holder.

If Nigeria felt he was destroying Nigeria's properties, all that Nigeria needed to do was to apply for his extradition with the British authorities, or even seek judicial punishment of Kanu inside the UK.
Abducting a British national without due process is an international crime

OfoIgbo:


As I wrote before, this your question should be asked by Israeli Immigration.
If Israel is alright with the way he showed up, then it is no other country's concern. It is not a crime at all. Countries have discretion to decide what happens within their borders.

Nigeria just abducted a British passport holder.

If Nigeria felt he was destroying Nigeria's properties, all that Nigeria needed to do was to apply for his extradition with the British authorities, or even seek judicial punishment of Kanu inside the UK.
Abducting a British national without due process is an international crime

Then the British parliament should direct their question to Kenya immigration and not Nigeria since he was abducted in kenya Nigeria. If Kenya is alright with him being abducted in their country, then it is no other country's concern

OfoIgbo:


Go to youtube and you will see clips of the UK House of Lords debating the Kanu kidnapping situation. This happened about two weeks ago.

Just a few days ago, a UK minister has issued Nigeria with a query, which must be answered.

Sahara's news on the UK minister is not fake, otherwise the UK embassy in Nigeria would have debunked it.

Tell Malami and Lai to answer the query sharp sharp, or else

Bros give me the link to confirm

onedayatime:


Then the British parliament should direct their question to Kenya immigration and not Nigeria since he was abducted in kenya Nigeria. If Kenya is alright with him being abducted in their country, then it is no other country's concern

Kanu had a valid Kenyan visa in his British passport so he was legally inside Kenya.

The British authorities are not aware of Kanu seeking Nigerian visa, but yet we all see that Kanu is in Nigeria, and even the Nigerian officials foolishly boasted that they "arrested" Kanu with international assistance.
As Nigeria admitted the above, UK is well within her rights to query to get the details of how their national, who had a valid Kenyan visa to be in Kenya, all of a sudden ended up in Nigeria, with Nigeria all but admitting they kidnapped Kanu.

Kenya has even denied not being party to the abduction of Kanu. So as things stand today, Nigeria is left carrying the can. The UK minister has rightly issued a query to Nigerian officials. I am sure they are busy preparing their reply

OfoIgbo:


Kanu had a valid Kenyan visa in his British passport so he was legally inside Kenya.

The British authorities are not aware of Kanu seeking Nigerian visa, but yet we all see that Kanu is in Nigeria, and even the Nigerian officials foolishly boasted that they "arrested" Kanu with international assistance.
As Nigeria admitted the above, UK is well within her rights to query to get the details of how their national, who had a valid Kenyan visa to be in Kenya, all of a sudden ended up in Nigeria, with Nigeria all but admitting they kidnapped Kanu.

Kenya has even denied not being party to the abduction of Kanu. So as things stand today, Nigeria is left carrying the can. The UK minister has rightly issued a query to Nigerian officials. I am sure they are busy preparing their reply

Why twisting things to suit you? How he left Kenya to Nigeria as well unnoticed should be directed to Kenya and not Nigeria. He told the world he is going to Kenya and from Kenya, he found himself in Nigeria. How they found him in Nigeria shouldn't be directed as well to Nigeria but to Kenya (is that not what you are insinuating about him leaving Nigeria in the first place?).

All I know is he left Nigeria illegally and he came back illegally as well

onedayatime:

Why twisting things to suit you? How he left Kenya to Nigeria as well unnoticed should be directed to Kenya and not Nigeria. He told the world he is going to Kenya and from Kenya, he found himself in Nigeria. How they found him in Nigeria shouldn't be directed as well to Nigeria but to Kenya (is that not what you are insinuating about him leaving Nigeria in the first place?).

All I know is he left Nigeria illegally and he came back illegally as well

Unfortunately for you, the UK is intelligent enough to know to direct these queries to Nigeria.
After all Nigerian officials have already admitted illegally apprehending him somewhere OUTSIDE Nigeria

OfoIgbo:


Unfortunately for you, the UK is intelligent enough to know to direct these queries to Nigeria.
After all Nigerian officials have already admitted illegally apprehending him somewhere OUTSIDE Nigeria

Unfortunately for you, the Federal Republic of Nigeria is intelligent enough to know to ask them how MNK got a new passport when his UK passport is with Nigeria's Supreme Court

nairalandankrah:
And there was no trial..

Exactly as predicted!