BassReeves:
You're deluded. Imagine you, a handiwork of God, denying who your Creator is

I am not the handiwork of a nonexistent being.
I exist and can be proven, your god doesn’t.
They earlier you StArt thinking like someone with brain, the better

Olayoo:

There is no proof that he doesn't either. Atheists are close minded. The universe is complex. We haven't even cracked his the brain works talkless of understanding if a supreme dirty exist.

Theres no proof that the Flying Spaghetti Monster and Spider-Man don’t exist either. Maybe Spider-Man created the universe

There’s nothing as scared of evidence as religion. It pains you people when that is demanded

Are you hiding something?

Workch:
When you are done running away from providing evidence for your god. I will still ask you evidence for taking snakes in Genesis
Funny people, that’s they get scammed easily

Running from pillar to post now? Snake in Genesis and all supernatural events still revolve around your problem with naturalism/materialism/verificationism/scientism. As far as you carry hammer around and think everything is a nail, you will still be stuck at where you are.

I already concluded you don’t exist as you have failed to give me empirical evidence of your consciousness, mind and logic.

Good point.
1. Can we start with your consciousness?
If you can’t show me empirical proof for your consciousness, then you don’t exist. Agreed? Show us.

Number 2: show us empirical proofs for your logic and reasoning applied in this discourse. If you can’t , we can assume we all haven’t been applying logic in diverse ways here. Pls show us.

3. Show us an empirical proof of your mind not being separate from your body and our discussion happening in real time.We need to be sure you are typing in real time and not a million years ago.

4. Show me empirical proof for maths or we assume they don’t exist.

4. Show me an empirical proof that the device you are holding is finer and more beautiful aesthetically than mine.

If you don’t have any of these proofs, then you don’t exist, your mind don’t exist, aesthetics don’t exist, maths don’t exist , logic don’t exist.
I am following your logic and I like it.

Workch:
I am not the handiwork of a nonexistent being.
I exist and can be proven, your god doesn’t.
They earlier you StArt thinking like someone with brain, the better

You don’t exist. I asked you to show me empirical evidence of your consciousness, mind and this warped logic you are applying. You failed since. You don’t exist if you don’t provide that. QED

Good point.
1. Can we start with your consciousness?
If you can’t show me empirical proof for your consciousness, then you don’t exist. Agreed? Show us.

Number 2: show us empirical proofs for your logic and reasoning applied in this discourse. If you can’t , we can assume we all haven’t been applying logic in diverse ways here. Pls show us.

3. Show us an empirical proof of your mind not being separate from your body and our discussion happening in real time.We need to be sure you are typing in real time and not a million years ago.

4. Show me empirical proof for maths or we assume they don’t exist.

4. Show me an empirical proof that the device you are holding is finer and more beautiful aesthetically than mine.

If you don’t have any of these proofs, then you don’t exist, your mind don’t exist, aesthetics don’t exist, maths don’t exist , logic don’t exist.
I am following your logic and I like it.

Nothingserious:


You don’t exist. I asked you to show me empirical evidence of your consciousness, mind and this warped logic you are applying. You failed since. You don’t exist if you don’t provide that. QED

Good point.
1. Can we start with your consciousness?
If you can’t show me empirical proof for your consciousness, then you don’t exist. Agreed? Show us.

Number 2: show us empirical proofs for your logic and reasoning applied in this discourse. If you can’t , we can assume we all haven’t been applying logic in diverse ways here. Pls show us.

3. Show us an empirical proof of your mind not being separate from your body and our discussion happening in real time.We need to be sure you are typing in real time and not a million years ago.

4. Show me empirical proof for maths or we assume they don’t exist.

4. Show me an empirical proof that the device you are holding is finer and more beautiful aesthetically than mine.

If you don’t have any of these proofs, then you don’t exist, your mind don’t exist, aesthetics don’t exist, maths don’t exist , logic don’t exist.
I am following your logic and I like it.

All the question because his god disappointed him.
Can’t show himself

Dead god

Workch:
Theres no proof that the Flying Spaghetti Monster and Spider-Man don’t exist either. Maybe Spider-Man created the universe

There’s nothing as scared of evidence as religion. It pains you people when that is demanded

Are you hiding something?

Hahaha! You are still here wasting time.
Go and devote the amount of time you spend ruminating about our God to refute spaghetti and spider-man. We have raised GOD-CONSCIOUSNESS in you. May God be with you always. And may his consciousness abide in your mind now and ever, Amen!

Good point.
1. Can we start with your consciousness?
If you can’t show me empirical proof for your consciousness, then you don’t exist. Agreed? Show us.

Number 2: show us empirical proofs for your logic and reasoning applied in this discourse. If you can’t , we can assume we all haven’t been applying logic in diverse ways here. Pls show us.

3. Show us an empirical proof of your mind not being separate from your body and our discussion happening in real time.We need to be sure you are typing in real time and not a million years ago.

4. Show me empirical proof for maths or we assume they don’t exist.

4. Show me an empirical proof that the device you are holding is finer and more beautiful aesthetically than mine.

If you don’t have any of these proofs, then you don’t exist, your mind don’t exist, aesthetics don’t exist, maths don’t exist , logic don’t exist.
I am following your logic and I like it.

Nothingserious:


Running from pillar to post now? Snake in Genesis and all supernatural events still revolve around your problem with naturalism/materialism/verificationism/scientism. As far as you carry hammer around and think everything is a nail, you will still be stuck at where you are.

I already concluded you don’t exist as you have failed to give me empirical evidence of your consciousness, mind and logic.

Good point.
1. Can we start with your consciousness?
If you can’t show me empirical proof for your consciousness, then you don’t exist. Agreed? Show us.

Number 2: show us empirical proofs for your logic and reasoning applied in this discourse. If you can’t , we can assume we all haven’t been applying logic in diverse ways here. Pls show us.

3. Show us an empirical proof of your mind not being separate from your body and our discussion happening in real time.We need to be sure you are typing in real time and not a million years ago.

4. Show me empirical proof for maths or we assume they don’t exist.

4. Show me an empirical proof that the device you are holding is finer and more beautiful aesthetically than mine.

If you don’t have any of these proofs, then you don’t exist, your mind don’t exist, aesthetics don’t exist, maths don’t exist , logic don’t exist.
I am following your logic and I like it.

If I were god, I will just prove myself and save you from this embarrassment, but god doesn’t exist

He can’t show up

Workch:
All the question because his god disappointed him.
Can’t show himself

Dead god

Good point.
1. Can we start with your consciousness?
If you can’t show me empirical proof for your consciousness, then you don’t exist. Agreed? Show us.

Number 2: show us empirical proofs for your logic and reasoning applied in this discourse. If you can’t , we can assume we all haven’t been applying logic in diverse ways here. Pls show us.

3. Show us an empirical proof of your mind not being separate from your body and our discussion happening in real time.We need to be sure you are typing in real time and not a million years ago.

4. Show me empirical proof for maths or we assume they don’t exist.

4. Show me an empirical proof that the device you are holding is finer and more beautiful aesthetically than mine.

If you don’t have any of these proofs, then you don’t exist, your mind don’t exist, aesthetics don’t exist, maths don’t exist , logic don’t exist.
I am following your logic and I like it.

Workch:
Theres no proof that the Flying Spaghetti Monster and Spider-Man don’t exist either. Maybe Spider-Man created the universe

There’s nothing as scared of evidence as religion. It pains you people when that is demanded

Are you hiding something?

I never said I am a follower of any religion.Plus u talk of evidence. U should as Rene Descartes if there is evidence that consciousness exist. I never said God created the universe. Or a "God" for that matter. That doesn't mean one didn't. Understanding a supreme dirty is like predicting artificial super intelligence in the future. Atheist are still as gullible religious people.

Workch:
If I were god, I will just prove myself and save you from this embarrassment, but god doesn’t exist

He can’t show up

You are not God. That is the big difference! Lol

Good point.
1. Can we start with your consciousness?
If you can’t show me empirical proof for your consciousness, then you don’t exist. Agreed? Show us.

Number 2: show us empirical proofs for your logic and reasoning applied in this discourse. If you can’t , we can assume we all haven’t been applying logic in diverse ways here. Pls show us.

3. Show us an empirical proof of your mind not being separate from your body and our discussion happening in real time.We need to be sure you are typing in real time and not a million years ago.

4. Show me empirical proof for maths or we assume they don’t exist.

4. Show me an empirical proof that the device you are holding is finer and more beautiful aesthetically than mine.

If you don’t have any of these proofs, then you don’t exist, your mind don’t exist, aesthetics don’t exist, maths don’t exist , logic don’t exist.
I am following your logic and I like it.

Nothingserious:


Hahaha! You are still here wasting time.
Go and devote the amount of time you spend ruminating about our God to refute spaghetti and spider-man. We have raised GOD-CONSCIOUSNESS in you. May God be with you always. And may his consciousness abide in your mind now and ever, Amen!

Good point.
1. Can we start with your consciousness?
If you can’t show me empirical proof for your consciousness, then you don’t exist. Agreed? Show us.

Number 2: show us empirical proofs for your logic and reasoning applied in this discourse. If you can’t , we can assume we all haven’t been applying logic in diverse ways here. Pls show us.

3. Show us an empirical proof of your mind not being separate from your body and our discussion happening in real time.We need to be sure you are typing in real time and not a million years ago.

4. Show me empirical proof for maths or we assume they don’t exist.

4. Show me an empirical proof that the device you are holding is finer and more beautiful aesthetically than mine.

If you don’t have any of these proofs, then you don’t exist, your mind don’t exist, aesthetics don’t exist, maths don’t exist , logic don’t exist.
I am following your logic and I like it.

Because your god can’t show up, you ask silly questions.

I can’t believe I’m thing that can’t help me when I need them to show up. It’s hard to be you

Olayoo:

I never said I am a follower of any religion.Plus u talk of evidence. U should as Rene Descartes if there is evidence that consciousness exist. I never said God created the universe. Or a "God" for that matter. That doesn't mean one didn't. Understanding a supreme dirty is like predicting artificial super intelligence in the future. Atheist are still as gullible religious people.

They way you people quote authorities like you do what you are saying is laughable.

Try tried shifting the burden of proof and then you quote an author. I don’t care whom you quote, if he didn’t provide evidence for god, I cannot say he exist. It’s totally his opinion

Workch:
Because your god can’t show up, you ask silly questions.

I can’t believe I’m thing that can’t help me when I need them to show up. It’s hard to be you

Game up for this non-existent entity who cannot as much as show empirical evidence that I am not chatting with a puppet or toy now.



Good point.
1. Can we start with your consciousness?
If you can’t show me empirical proof for your consciousness, then you don’t exist. Agreed? Show us.

Number 2: show us empirical proofs for your logic and reasoning applied in this discourse. If you can’t , we can assume we all haven’t been applying logic in diverse ways here. Pls show us.

3. Show us an empirical proof of your mind not being separate from your body and our discussion happening in real time.We need to be sure you are typing in real time and not a million years ago.

4. Show me empirical proof for maths or we assume they don’t exist.

4. Show me an empirical proof that the device you are holding is finer and more beautiful aesthetically than mine.

If you don’t have any of these proofs, then you don’t exist, your mind don’t exist, aesthetics don’t exist, maths don’t exist , logic don’t exist.
I am following your logic and I like it.

Nothingserious:


You are not God. That is the big difference! Lol

Good point.
1. Can we start with your consciousness?
If you can’t show me empirical proof for your consciousness, then you don’t exist. Agreed? Show us.

Number 2: show us empirical proofs for your logic and reasoning applied in this discourse. If you can’t , we can assume we all haven’t been applying logic in diverse ways here. Pls show us.

3. Show us an empirical proof of your mind not being separate from your body and our discussion happening in real time.We need to be sure you are typing in real time and not a million years ago.

4. Show me empirical proof for maths or we assume they don’t exist.

4. Show me an empirical proof that the device you are holding is finer and more beautiful aesthetically than mine.

If you don’t have any of these proofs, then you don’t exist, your mind don’t exist, aesthetics don’t exist, maths don’t exist , logic don’t exist.
I am following your logic and I like it.

God doesn’t exist

Nothingserious:


Game up for this non-existent entity who cannot as much as show empirical evidence that I am not chatting with a puppet or toy now.



Good point.
1. Can we start with your consciousness?
If you can’t show me empirical proof for your consciousness, then you don’t exist. Agreed? Show us.

Number 2: show us empirical proofs for your logic and reasoning applied in this discourse. If you can’t , we can assume we all haven’t been applying logic in diverse ways here. Pls show us.

3. Show us an empirical proof of your mind not being separate from your body and our discussion happening in real time.We need to be sure you are typing in real time and not a million years ago.

4. Show me empirical proof for maths or we assume they don’t exist.

4. Show me an empirical proof that the device you are holding is finer and more beautiful aesthetically than mine.

If you don’t have any of these proofs, then you don’t exist, your mind don’t exist, aesthetics don’t exist, maths don’t exist , logic don’t exist.
I am following your logic and I like it.

God doesn’t exist

There is always a cause for everything. Going back ad infinitum, we will end up with the first cause. I don't care if its a deity or an wave, that is God. End of story.

Olayoo:

I never said I am a follower of any religion.Plus u talk of evidence. U should as Rene Descartes if there is evidence that consciousness exist. I never said God created the universe. Or a "God" for that matter. That doesn't mean one didn't. Understanding a supreme dirty is like predicting artificial super intelligence in the future. Atheist are still as gullible religious people.

There is nothing gullible about,
Please provide evidence for what your claim.

Stop embarrassing yourself, atheist are the most reasonable people because demeaning evidence means you can’t be gullible.

Workch:
They way you people quote authorities like you do what you are saying is laughable.

Try tried shifting the burden of proof and then you quote an author. I don’t care whom you quote, if he didn’t provide evidence for god, I cannot say he exist. It’s totally his opinion

Prove he doesn't.

Olayoo:

Prove he doesn't.

Then prove Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn’t exist as well

Olayoo:

Prove he doesn't.

Flying Spaghetti Monster is the creator of Christian and Islam god.

Prove that he doesn’t exist?

Workch:
There is nothing gullible about,
Please provide evidence for what your claim.

Stop embarrassing yourself, atheist are the most reasonable people because demeaning evidence means you can’t be gullible.

What evidence. You use logic that can be refuted by a new scientific law. Atheists have long existed. Even during the steady state theories that dominated the physical sciences before general relativity came along. You talk of empiricism and logic and fail to account the fact that God can be anything

Olayoo:

What evidence. You use logic that can be refuted by a new scientific law. Atheists have long existed. Even during the steady state theories that dominated the physical sciences before general relativity came along. You talk of empiricism and logic and fail to account the fact that God can be anything

If logic is enough, science wont have emanated.

Evidence has established more truth than anything, logic is prone to bais, manipulation and sometimes the loudest person wins the argument.

Evidence I straight, provide it and let’s test it. Anyone who don’t like evidence is a liar and fraudulent person. That person is trying to use fraud to hide something.

There is hardly fraud in evidence because to gives the clear picture

Workch:
Flying Spaghetti Monster is the creator of Christian and Islam god.

Prove that he doesn’t exist?

It exist in your books, your mind. Since existence cannot be limited by the physical world. God exist. Deal with it. Because your limited sensory experience can fathom what lies behind the physical world doesn't mean he doesn't.

Olayoo:

It exist in your books, your mind. Since existence cannot be limited by the physical world. God exist. Deal with it. Because your limited sensory experience can fathom what lies behind the physical world doesn't mean he doesn't.

Same way god exist in the books of believers and their minds.

You need to deal with the fact that god and the Flying Spaghetti Monster are equivalent in terms of whether they exist or not.

Workch:
If logic is enough, science wont have emanated.

Evidence has established more truth than anything, logic is prone to bais, manipulation and sometimes the loudest person wins the argument.

Evidence I straight, provide it and let’s test it. Anyone who don’t like evidence is a liar and fraudulent person. That person is trying to use fraud to hide something.

There is hardly fraud in evidence because to gives the clear picture

Give me evidence that a black hole exist. And then test it for me. Or give me evidence that the universe has a fourth dimension and test it for me.

Workch:
Same way god exist in the books of believers and their minds.

You need to deal with the fact that god and the Flying Spaghetti Monster are equivalent in terms of whether they exist or not.

Brah read my comment and understand before answering. God is the cause before everything. He doesn't have to be even conscious. Based on physical laws, the universe has a beginning. What prompted this beginning. God.

Olayoo:

Give me evidence that a black hole exist. And then test it for me. Or give me evidence that the universe has a fourth dimension and test it for me.

I am not here to teach you basic science. It’s not problem if you cannot afford telescopes that can detect black holes or you don’t know that satellites cannot give accurate GPS readings without properly accounting for effects of 4th dimension.

You can’t be scientifically illiterate and be gullible at the same time

That’s too much for you to bear

Just give me anything to test your god

Olayoo:

Brah read my comment and understand before answering. God is the cause before everything. He doesn't have to be even conscious. Based on physical laws, the universe has a beginning. What prompted this beginning. God.

Flying Spaghetti Monster is the cause before everything.
Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn’t have to be even conscious

I’m stupid, I don’t know the answer so I am just gonna say god did it

Workch:
God doesn’t exist

Lol! Are you trying to make one last frantic attempt to clutch at a straw? You are an intellectually drowning guy!

Good point.
1. Can we start with your consciousness?
If you can’t show me empirical proof for your consciousness, then you don’t exist. Agreed? Show us.

Number 2: show us empirical proofs for your logic and reasoning applied in this discourse. If you can’t , we can assume we all haven’t been applying logic in diverse ways here. Pls show us.

3. Show us an empirical proof of your mind not being separate from your body and our discussion happening in real time.We need to be sure you are typing in real time and not a million years ago.

4. Show me empirical proof for maths or we assume they don’t exist.

4. Show me an empirical proof that the device you are holding is finer and more beautiful aesthetically than mine.

If you don’t have any of these proofs, then you don’t exist, your mind don’t exist, aesthetics don’t exist, maths don’t exist , logic don’t exist.
I am following your logic and I like it.

Workch:
Flying Spaghetti Monster is the cause before everything.
Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn’t have to be even conscious

I’m stupid, I don’t know the answer so I am just gonna say god did it

And he was even trying to give you the cosmological and ontological evidences for God. He tried sef. Why waste such time on someone whose mind is closed to logic and reason? Hahaha!
Someone who cannot prove his logic, consciousness and mind? How will he consider the cosmological, teleological, moral arguments for God?

Good point.
1. Can we start with your consciousness?
If you can’t show me empirical proof for your consciousness, then you don’t exist. Agreed? Show us.

Number 2: show us empirical proofs for your logic and reasoning applied in this discourse. If you can’t , we can assume we all haven’t been applying logic in diverse ways here. Pls show us.

3. Show us an empirical proof of your mind not being separate from your body and our discussion happening in real time.We need to be sure you are typing in real time and not a million years ago.

4. Show me empirical proof for maths or we assume they don’t exist.

4. Show me an empirical proof that the device you are holding is finer and more beautiful aesthetically than mine.

If you don’t have any of these proofs, then you don’t exist, your mind don’t exist, aesthetics don’t exist, maths don’t exist , logic don’t exist.
I am following your logic and I like it.

Nothingserious:


Lol! Are you trying to make one last frantic attempt to clutch at a straw? You are an intellectually drowning guy!

Good point.
1. Can we start with your consciousness?
If you can’t show me empirical proof for your consciousness, then you don’t exist. Agreed? Show us.

Number 2: show us empirical proofs for your logic and reasoning applied in this discourse. If you can’t , we can assume we all haven’t been applying logic in diverse ways here. Pls show us.

3. Show us an empirical proof of your mind not being separate from your body and our discussion happening in real time.We need to be sure you are typing in real time and not a million years ago.

4. Show me empirical proof for maths or we assume they don’t exist.

4. Show me an empirical proof that the device you are holding is finer and more beautiful aesthetically than mine.

If you don’t have any of these proofs, then you don’t exist, your mind don’t exist, aesthetics don’t exist, maths don’t exist , logic don’t exist.
I am following your logic and I like it.

god doesn’t exist

Nothingserious:


And he was even trying to give you the cosmological and ontological evidences for God. He tried sef. Why waste such time on someone whose mind is closed to logic and reason? Hahaha!
Someone who cannot prove his logic, consciousness and mind? How will he consider the cosmological, teleological, moral arguments for God?

Good point.
1. Can we start with your consciousness?
If you can’t show me empirical proof for your consciousness, then you don’t exist. Agreed? Show us.

Number 2: show us empirical proofs for your logic and reasoning applied in this discourse. If you can’t , we can assume we all haven’t been applying logic in diverse ways here. Pls show us.

3. Show us an empirical proof of your mind not being separate from your body and our discussion happening in real time.We need to be sure you are typing in real time and not a million years ago.

4. Show me empirical proof for maths or we assume they don’t exist.

4. Show me an empirical proof that the device you are holding is finer and more beautiful aesthetically than mine.

If you don’t have any of these proofs, then you don’t exist, your mind don’t exist, aesthetics don’t exist, maths don’t exist , logic don’t exist.
I am following your logic and I like it.

God doesn’t exist
So fun doing this