Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,209,838 members, 8,007,300 topics. Date: Tuesday, 19 November 2024 at 07:20 PM

Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood - Religion - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood (699 Views)

6 Reasons Why The Noah’s Global Flood Couldn’t Have Happened. / 7 Reasons Why The Noah’s Ark Story Is A Myth. / Noah's Ark Rebuilt & Opened For Public In Atlanta US With Its Exact Measurements (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (Reply) (Go Down)

Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by SSIPON(m): 5:14am On Oct 18, 2021
The Bible (Genesis 6–9) describes a worldwide flood (the Noachian Flood) covering even the highest mountains of the earth and the construction of a huge boat (a rectangular box-like craft) that transported animals, at least two of a kind of all land animals on the earth. The Qur'an (Suras 11 and 71) has almost a duplicate story with a similar huge boat that transported animals and a worldwide flood. In addition two older stories exist in ancient Babylonian epics that describe a huge flood. One is the Epic of Gilgamesh, describing a flood on the Euphrates River (Academy of Ancient Texts nd). The other is the Epic of Atrahasis, which has a huge flood on the Tigris River (Byers nd).

In the Epic of Gilgamesh, [Utnapishtim] is warned that a god plans to destroy all humanity and is told to build a ship to save himself, his family, friends, and cattle. In the Epic of Atrahasis, a tribal chief survived with his family by floating in a boat down to the Persian Gulf. After the flood subsided, the chief got out on dry land and erected an altar and sacrificed to a water god so that such a flood would not happen again (Anonymous nd-a). Noah also built an altar when he got off the Ark and offered sacrifices (Genesis 8:20). Because these stories all describe an ancient huge flood in Mesopotamia, it is extremely likely that a huge flood could have occurred. However, the next question is: "Did the Noachian Flood cover the whole earth?"

Scientific Evidence Against a Whole-Earth Flood

The Bible says that the rains that created the Noachian Flood lasted for 40 days (Genesis 7:17), that the waters prevailed on the earth for 150 days (Genesis 7:24), and after these 150 days the waters gradually receded from the earth so that by the seventh month and the seventeenth day, Noah's Ark came to rest upon the mountains of Ararat (Genesis 8:4). A year plus two months and twenty-seven days later the earth was dry enough so that Noah,his family, and the load of animals could disembark from the Ark (Genesis 8:14).

Because this flood was intended by God to destroy all flesh on earth (Genesis 6:13) and because sedimentary rocks on all continents contain fossils that supposedly represent the "destroyed flesh of all life," it might be thought that the Bible story, describing a wholeearth flood, was true. However, interlayered with these fossil-bearing sedimentary rocks on all continents are layers of evaporite rock salt (sodium chloride), gypsum (hydrated calcium sulfate), anhydrite (calcium sulfate), and various potash and magnesium salts, which are associated with red beds (shales) containing fossilized mud cracks (Schreiber and others 2007).

Many of these mineral compounds and red beds have combined thicknesses on different continents of more than one kilometer (~3,281 feet) (Collins 2006). The red beds are red because they contain red hematite (iron oxide) which formed from magnetite grains that were oxidized while the muds were exposed to oxygen in open air. The mud cracks can form only under drying conditions that cause the mud to shrink and form polygonal cracks. The evaporite mineral compounds in the layers are deposited in the correct chemical order predicted by the solubility of each kind of ion in these compounds and whose increasing concentrations during the evaporation of water would cause them to precipitate in a predictable depositional sequence as the water volume decreased. Such evaporite deposits would be expected to occur where a marine sea was once present and to disappear when the sea became completely dry. Therefore, one could expect these evaporites to be at the top of the supposed Noachian Flood deposits when the water supposedly receded and the land dried out, but certainly not in different levels in between older and younger fossiliferous "Flood deposits".

We read in the Bible that there is only one time in which the Flood waters are said to recede and leave the earth dry. That is, no multiple worldwide climatic conditions are described in which flooding, then drying to a dry earth, more flooding, more drying to a dry earth, in repeated cycles that occur over and over again in that Flood year. On that basis, it is logical that all the kinds of evaporite deposits and red beds in many different levels in the supposed Noachian Flood deposits could form only in local climates with desert drying-conditions and could not possibly have formed all at the same time — a time when a flood covered the whole earth for more than one year (Collins 2006). On that basis, the Noachian Flood story cannot describe a whole-earth flood, but it could only represent a large regional flood.
Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by hupernikao: 5:56am On Oct 18, 2021
SSIPON:
The Bible (Genesis 6–9) describes a worldwide flood (the Noachian Flood) covering even the highest...

We read in the Bible that there is only one time in which the Flood waters are said to recede and leave the earth dry. That is, no multiple worldwide climatic conditions are described in which flooding, then drying to a dry earth, more flooding, more drying to a dry earth, in repeated cycles that occur over and over again in that Flood year. On that basis, it is logical that all the kinds of evaporite deposits and red beds in many different levels in the supposed Noachian Flood deposits could form only in local climates with desert drying-conditions and could not possibly have formed all at the same time — a time when a flood covered the whole earth for more than one year (Collins 2006). On that basis, the Noachian Flood story cannot describe a whole-earth flood, but it could only represent a large regional flood.

Well, I guess the writer of this OP got the real point wrong in understanding Noah's story.
In their age, Moses time, it is common to use stories to teach an essence and truths. And in the best of their colleges in Egypt and Mesopotamia, usage of nature and events in the past are employed to communicate wisdom.

If the writer above sat in the exam class of Moses, he would have failed woefully, as he has treated Noah's story as scientific records but failed to know the essence of the story.


As a Primer, Moses was a prophet of God not a scientist. If you miss this in the Bible story, the whole message of the writings is lost.

Moses wasn't communicating science but he was to communicate the plan of God for humanity. And this, he is to do firstly, to his people.

Due to limitation of knowledge of their time, they speak using events, expressions to teach their wisdom.

This same story you narrated was already in place even before the birth of Moses (check history well, in the ancient near East). That means people in their days are well aware of such stories. That means, in Moses education in Egypt, he must have been taught in his classroom.

Acts 7:22
And Moses was learned in all the wisdom of the Egyptians, and was mighty in words and in deeds.


Hence Moses wasn't narrating some new stories but yet he unveiled new facts about God's plan. This wasn't taught in any school but taught by God's Spirit.


Therefore, the question any intelligent student of the Bible will ask is this.

AS A PROPHET OF GOD, WHAT WAS MOSES COMMUNICATING WHEN HE WROTE ABOUT THIS STORY.

Obviously not science but theology.

So, the first step for the author to realize the right interpretation of this scriptural text, is to first treat it as a theological text written within the history of man. Hence man's events culture and language will be his tool of communication and vehicle of revealing God's inspired message and plan for humanity.

Likewise, a man on a journey to debunk the scientific implication of such writing, will have to seek answers with the ancient world of Mesopotamia and not on the pages of an inspired theological compendium written to unveil spiritual facts.

2 Likes

Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by SSIPON(m): 6:09am On Oct 18, 2021
hupernikao:


Well, I guess the writer of this OP got the real point wrong in understanding Noah's story.
In their age, Moses time, it is common to use stories to teach an essence and truths. And in the best of their colleges in Egypt and Mesopotamia, usage of nature and events in the past are employed to communicate wisdom.

If the writer above sat in the exam class of Moses, he would have failed woefully, as he has treated Noah's story as scientific records but failed to know the essence of the story.


As a Primer, Moses was a prophet of God not a scientist. If you miss this in the Bible story, the whole message of the writings is lost.

Moses wasn't communicating science but he was to communicate the plan of God for humanity. And this, he is to do firstly, to his people.

Due to limitation of knowledge of their time, they speak using events, expressions to teach their wisdom.

This same story you narrated was already in place even before the birth of Moses (check history well, in the ancient near East). That means people in their days are well aware of such stories. That means, in Moses education in Egypt, he must have been taught in his classroom.

Acts 7:22
And Moses was learned in all the wisdom of the Egyptians, and was mighty in words and in deeds.


Hence Moses wasn't narrating some new stories but yet he unveiled new facts about God's plan. This wasn't taught in any school but taught by God's Spirit.


Therefore, the question any intelligent student of the Bible will ask is this.

AS A PROPHET OF GOD, WHAT WAS MOSES COMMUNICATING WHEN HE WROTE ABOUT THIS STORY.

Obviously not science but theology.

So, the first step for the author to realize the right interpretation of this scriptural text, is to first treat it as a theological text written within the history of man. Hence man's events culture and language will be his tool of communication and vehicle of revealing God's inspired message and plan for humanity.

Likewise, a man on a journey to debunk the scientific implication of such writing, will have to seek answers with the ancient world of Mesopotamia and not on the pages of an inspired theological compendium written to unveil spiritual facts.
Ok

1 Like

Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by MaxInDHouse(m): 7:43am On Oct 18, 2021
God's word said:

But God gave attention to Noah and to all the wild animals and domestic animals that were with him in the ark, and God caused a wind to blow over the earth, and the waters began to subside. Genesis 8:1

Scientists have discovered that the amount of water locked up in the Arctic and Artatic circle should dissolve the water will cover the whole earth.
So stop deceiving yourself! smiley

1 Like

Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by Workch: 7:44am On Oct 18, 2021
[s]
hupernikao:


Well, I guess the writer of this OP got the real point wrong in understanding Noah's story.
In their age, Moses time, it is common to use stories to teach an essence and truths. And in the best of their colleges in Egypt and Mesopotamia, usage of nature and events in the past are employed to communicate wisdom.

If the writer above sat in the exam class of Moses, he would have failed woefully, as he has treated Noah's story as scientific records but failed to know the essence of the story.


As a Primer, Moses was a prophet of God not a scientist. If you miss this in the Bible story, the whole message of the writings is lost.

Moses wasn't communicating science but he was to communicate the plan of God for humanity. And this, he is to do firstly, to his people.

Due to limitation of knowledge of their time, they speak using events, expressions to teach their wisdom.

This same story you narrated was already in place even before the birth of Moses (check history well, in the ancient near East). That means people in their days are well aware of such stories. That means, in Moses education in Egypt, he must have been taught in his classroom.

Acts 7:22
And Moses was learned in all the wisdom of the Egyptians, and was mighty in words and in deeds.


Hence Moses wasn't narrating some new stories but yet he unveiled new facts about God's plan. This wasn't taught in any school but taught by God's Spirit.


Therefore, the question any intelligent student of the Bible will ask is this.

AS A PROPHET OF GOD, WHAT WAS MOSES COMMUNICATING WHEN HE WROTE ABOUT THIS STORY.

Obviously not science but theology.

So, the first step for the author to realize the right interpretation of this scriptural text, is to first treat it as a theological text written within the history of man. Hence man's events culture and language will be his tool of communication and vehicle of revealing God's inspired message and plan for humanity.

Likewise, a man on a journey to debunk the scientific implication of such writing, will have to seek answers with the ancient world of Mesopotamia and not on the pages of an inspired theological compendium written to unveil spiritual facts.
[/s]
Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by SSIPON(m): 8:18am On Oct 18, 2021
MaxInDHouse:
God's word said:

But God gave attention to Noah and to all the wild animals and domestic animals that were with him in the ark, and God caused a wind to blow over the earth, and the waters began to subside. Genesis 8:1

Scientists have discovered that the amount of water locked up in the Arctic and Artatic circle should dissolve the water will cover the whole earth.
So stop deceiving yourself! smiley
I just no get your time...
Good morning, biko. cheesy grin grin
Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by MaxInDHouse(m): 9:44am On Oct 18, 2021
SSIPON:

I just no get your time...
Good morning, biko. cheesy grin grin
The Bible is not a science textbook but no matter what scientists discovers they'll forever find out that the Bible is ahead of them! smiley
Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by SSIPON(m): 9:49am On Oct 18, 2021
MaxInDHouse:

The Bible is not a science textbook but no matter what scientists discovers they'll forever find out that the Bible is ahead of them! smiley
Okay smiley

Did anyone tell you that the people that wrote the Bible were dumbasses?

Did anyone tell you that scientific discovery began recently?

smiley
Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by MaxInDHouse(m): 9:59am On Oct 18, 2021
SSIPON:

Okay smiley
Did anyone tell you that the people that wrote the Bible were dumbasses?
Did anyone tell you that scientific discovery began recently?smiley

Call it whatever you want just know that God's word is not teaching us science but whenever it touches on science it's always accurate!

When your forefathers in science thought the earth was flat God told Isaiah (one of the so called "dumbasses"wink to pen it down that the earth is Spherical! Isaiah 40:22

When your forefathers in science thought that the earth was resting on some gigantic animals God told Moses to pen it down that the earth is hanging upon nothing! Job 26:7

So how did those dumbasses knew so much? smiley
Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by Dtruthspeaker: 10:21am On Oct 18, 2021
Genesis Flood Again Workch aka Sipping aka Chinawhatever? cheesy

SSIPON:
it is extremely likely that a huge flood could have occurred. However, the next question is: "Did the Noachian Flood cover the whole earth?"[/color]

Una thinking eh!

"extremely likely a Huge Flood could have occurred with the question "Did the Noachian Flood cover the whole earth?

Does this make any good sense?

The huge flood referred to, The topic of this thread, is it not the same one covering the whole earth?

Abi, e cover space? grin

[quote author=SSIPON post=106831488]
Scientific Evidence Against a Whole-Earth Flood

Because this flood was intended by God to destroy all flesh on earth (Genesis 6:13) and because sedimentary rocks on all continents contain fossils that supposedly represent the "destroyed flesh of all life," it might be thought that the Bible story, describing a wholeearth flood, was true. However, interlayered with these fossil-bearing sedimentary rocks on all continents are layers of evaporite rock salt (sodium chloride), gypsum (hydrated calcium sulfate), anhydrite (calcium sulfate), and various potash and magnesium salts, which are associated with red beds (shales) containing fossilized mud cracks (Schreiber and others 2007).

Sorry oh, Does Flesh convert to Rock? grin oya lie here grin

2) "Supposedly": Doesn't supposedly mean that it is not True because una no know but na conjecture where person fit chook Lie put?

All dis long long tory just to Lie say Genesis Flood no dey True? grin

Dem no teach you say when you set talk too much na Lie Be dat? grin

I beg make I go justify today daily bread the thread no jell today!

2 Likes

Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by SSIPON(m): 10:29am On Oct 18, 2021
MaxInDHouse:


Call it whatever you want just know that God's word is not teaching us science but whenever it touches on science it's always accurate!

When your forefathers in science thought the earth was flat God told Isaiah (one of the so called "dumbasses"wink to pen it down that the earth is Spherical! Isaiah 40:22

When your forefathers in science thought that the earth was resting on some gigantic animals God told Moses to pen it down that the earth is hanging upon nothing! Job 26:7

So how did those dumbasses knew so much? smiley











Please take your time and read this, don't rush to quote me.

The main thing about you is that conversations with you are meaningless.

The old testament is based on the Torah. The Torah was borrowed from other earlier religions. Even as far back as 2500 years ago, the Greek knew the shape of the earth. Science never said that earth rests on an elephant - that is the belief of Buddhists (I think).

Even as far back as when the Bible was written, people had a basic idea of embryology.

No, Mr. Max, citing age old ideas in the Bible is not helping your case here.

You think science began today or something?

There were universities even as far back as when the Bible was written, so it makes sense for you to see things like the earth being round, in the Bible.

So in your mind you thought people were dumbasses back then, and an almighty creator bestowed upon them the basic knowledge of embryology?


Did you know that some Muslims cite the Qur'an as true, because they claim there is a verse that claims states the number of bones in the human body. Does that mean that everything in the Qur'an is true, that you should become a Muslim and that the knowledge about the average number of bones in the human body was bestowed upon the writers of the Qur'an by God? No. We know that humans even back then knew about the skeletal system, so it's not surprising if we see that info in the Qur'an, because it was WRITTEN BY HUMANS WHO LIVED BACK THEN.

Human civilization is about 10,000 years old. The tablets of the Bible, Qur'an and Torah are all younger than human civilization. To claim that humans did not know anything until God spoke to some middle eastern men, is very stupid. I expected better from you Max. Even the Neanderthals that lived about 40,000 years ago, were knowledgeable and made tools like we do today.

Honestly, you are here thinking I am running away from you or something. The thing is that I don't like arguing with you, not because I'm afraid of you, but because you don't know, and you don't want to acknowledge that you don't know. You are always quick to quote because you think being Christian gives you a higher moral and intellectual standpoint over the next person.

Let me end this like you with the nefarious smile emoji -- smiley (I noticed you love using the smile emoji, haha)


Don't quote me again, have a nice day.
Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by MaxInDHouse(m): 10:36am On Oct 18, 2021
SSIPON:

Please take your time and read this, don't rush to quote me.
The main thing about you is that conversations with you are meaningless.
The old testament is based on the Torah. The Torah was borrowed from other earlier religions. Even as far back as 2500 years ago, the Greek knew the shape of the earth. Science never said that earth rests on an elephant - that is the belief of Buddhists (I think).
Even as far back as when the Bible was written, people had a basic idea of embryology.
No, Mr. Max, citing age old ideas in the Bible is not helping your case here.
You think science began today or something?
There were universities even as far back as when the Bible was written, so it makes sense for you to see things like the earth being round, in the Bible.
So in your mind you thought people were dumbasses back then, and an almighty creator bestowed upon them the basic knowledge of embryology?
Did you know that some Muslims cite the Qur'an as true, because they claim there is a verse that claims states the number of bones in the human body. Does that mean that everything in the Qur'an is true, that you should become a Muslim and that the knowledge about the average number of bones in the human body was bestowed upon the writers of the Qur'an by God? No. We know that humans even back then knew about the skeletal system, so it's not surprising if we see that info in the Qur'an, because it was WRITTEN BY HUMANS WHO LIVED BACK THEN.
Human civilization is about 10,000 years old. The tablets of the Bible, Qur'an and Torah are all younger than human civilization. To claim that humans did not know anything until God spoke to some middle eastern men, is very stupid. I expected better from you Max. Even the Neanderthals that lived about 40,000 years ago, were knowledgeable and made tools like we do today.
Honestly, you are here thinking I am running away from you or something. The thing is that I don't like arguing with you, not because I'm afraid of you, but because you don't know, and you don't want to acknowledge that you don't know. You are always quick to quote because you think being Christian gives you a higher moral and intellectual standpoint over the next person. Let me end this like you with the nefarious smile emoji -- smiley (I noticed you love using the smile emoji, haha)
Don't quote me again, have a nice day.

I will quote you again and again and again as long as you keep writing rubbish about God's word!
The book was written long ago but you said those who wrote it are dumbasses so i want to show you that those so called dumbasses knew so much ahead of today's scientists even though they don't have all the equipments to test what they knew.
So an unseen Supernatural Being is behind all what they penned down that's the undeniable fact! 2Timothy 3:16 smiley
Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by SSIPON(m): 10:40am On Oct 18, 2021
Dtruthspeaker:
Genesis Flood Again Workch aka Sipping aka Chinawhatever? cheesy


Please read;

Again, don't misquote me.

The middle east is prone to floods.


Read the title of this post, I said "WHOLE-EARTH" flood.


Nna,it seems reading is such is a difficult thing for you.

I even created a post describing the topology of the middle East and why the story exists in the first place. The Noah's Flood story is not even a Christian/Muslim/Judaism tale in the first place. It was based of off a Sumerian tale.


You and MaxInDHouse have the same problem and let me list it here for you:

1. You don't read properly. This is why having a decent conversation with you is hard, because you just like to quote, even if you don't understand.

2. You are so obsessed with your Bible that you don't realise that it doesn't work that way. It's just like a Muslim trying to convince you that Islam is true, by pulling out his Qur'an, putting your verses to your face and expecting you to believe or something.

I was once Christian like you. I did all these things you are doing now. You think I was born agnostic or something?




Please if you are going to misquote me, then do it intelligently. This is embarrassing and you know it.

Also for the last time, I don't know who is Workch, so keep me out of whatever you and him are beefing about. I'm not in a good mood today. I'm not joking.

Have a nice day.
Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by SSIPON(m): 10:40am On Oct 18, 2021
MaxInDHouse:


I will quote you again and again and again as long as you keep writing rubbish about God's word!
The book was written long ago but you said those who wrote it are dumbasses so i want to show you that those so called dumbasses knew so much ahead of today's scientists even though they don't have all the equipments to test what they knew.
So an unseen Supernatural Being is behind all what they penned down that's the undeniable fact! 2Timothy 3:16 smiley

Quote.me where I said that those who wrote the Bible are dumbasses?

I'm waiting.


Mind you this was what I typed:

Okay smiley

Did anyone tell you that the people that wrote the Bible were dumbasses?

Did anyone tell you that scientific discovery began recently?

smiley

Now point to me where I called the Bible writers dumbasses??


The book was written long ago but you said those who wrote it are dumbasses so i want to show you that those so called dumbasses knew so much ahead of today's scientists even though they don't have all the equipments to test what they knew.

The distance from the earth to the sun, was made known centuries ago, using CRUDE INSTRUMENTS.

Science has improved since the old days. We now know that the reason why we have striped animals, is not because the parents of the animal were mating in front of crossed sticks. But YOUR BIBLE CLAIMS that when two animals mate in front of crossed sticks, their offspring will be striped.

@MaxInDHouse, please read through before your quote. I don't have having to repeat myself.
Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by Workch: 11:01am On Oct 18, 2021
Dtruthspeaker:
Genesis Flood Again Workch aka Sipping aka Chinawhatever? cheesy

You are deceiving yourself by think I am everyone that doednt share your silly religious opinions on nairaland.
Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by MaxInDHouse(m): 11:14am On Oct 18, 2021
SSIPON:

@MaxInDHouse, please read through before your quote. I don't have having to repeat myself.
Next time mind the words you use for people because the Bible was inspired by God himself so instead of judging the book due to your desire to practice vile things go and live your life whichever way you choose but don't justify your lawless lifestyle by rubbishing Gods word! smiley
Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by SSIPON(m): 11:15am On Oct 18, 2021
MaxInDHouse:

Next time mind the words you use for people because the Bible was inspired by God himself so instead of judging the book due to your desire to practice vile things go and live your life whichever way you choose but don't justify your lawless lifestyle by rubbishing Gods word! smiley
Lol, take care of yourself Max. He still haven't shown me where I called the Bible writers dumbasses. smiley
Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by MaxInDHouse(m): 11:21am On Oct 18, 2021
SSIPON:

Lol, take care of yourself Max. He still haven't shown me where I called the Bible writers dumbasses. smiley
You didn't call them dumbasses but you want to tell everyone that what they wrote wasn't real, shey?
Keep deceiving yourself! smiley
Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by SSIPON(m): 11:42am On Oct 18, 2021
MaxInDHouse:

You didn't call them dumbasses but you want to tell everyone that what they wrote wasn't real, shey?
Keep deceiving yourself! smiley
Again, where did I say that everything they wrote wasn't real
Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by MaxInDHouse(m): 11:47am On Oct 18, 2021
SSIPON:

Again, where did I say that everything they wrote wasn't real
Perhaps you should remind yourself of the topic of the thread! smiley
Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by Workch: 11:58am On Oct 18, 2021
SSIPON:

Lol, take care of yourself Max. He still haven't shown me where I called the Bible writers dumbasses. smiley
You are not wrong if you say that the writers of the Bible are dumb.
Including those believing it
Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by Dtruthspeaker: 12:25pm On Oct 18, 2021
SSIPON:


Please read;

Again, don't misquote me.

The middle east is prone to floods.


Read the title of this post, I said "WHOLE-EARTH" flood.


Nna,it seems reading is such is a difficult thing for you.

I even created a post describing the topology of the middle East and why the story exists in the first place. The Noah's Flood story is not even a Christian/Muslim/Judaism tale in the first place. It was based of off a Sumerian tale.


You and MaxInDHouse have the same problem and let me list it here for you:

1. You don't read properly. This is why having a decent conversation with you is hard, because you just like to quote, even if you don't understand.

2. You are so obsessed with your Bible that you don't realise that it doesn't work that way. It's just like a Muslim trying to convince you that Islam is true, by pulling out his Qur'an, putting your verses to your face and expecting you to believe or something.

I was once Christian like you. I did all these things you are doing now. You think I was born agnostic or something?




Please if you are going to misquote me, then do it intelligently. This is embarrassing and you know it.

Also for the last time, I don't know who is Workch, so keep me out of whatever you and him are beefing about. I'm not in a good mood today. I'm not joking.

Have a nice day.

As I said earlier, Liars Always talk too much, so the Aware Always Avoid Long Speeches and therefore, we look for the point or points which you may be making to address them.

And as you see, I cut out the points I saw to comment on them.

I did not read as far enough to see the type of sands in the middle east.
Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by Dtruthspeaker: 12:29pm On Oct 18, 2021
SSIPON:


Please read;

Again, don't misquote me.

The middle east is prone to floods.


Read the title of this post, I said "WHOLE-EARTH" flood.


Nna,it seems reading is such is a difficult thing for you.

I even created a post describing the topology of the middle East and why the story exists in the first place. The Noah's Flood story is not even a Christian/Muslim/Judaism tale in the first place. It was based of off a Sumerian tale.


You and MaxInDHouse have the same problem and let me list it here for you:

1. You don't read properly. This is why having a decent conversation with you is hard, because you just like to quote, even if you don't understand.

2. You are so obsessed with your Bible that you don't realise that it doesn't work that way. It's just like a Muslim trying to convince you that Islam is true, by pulling out his Qur'an, putting your verses to your face and expecting you to believe or something.

I was once Christian like you. I did all these things you are doing now. You think I was born agnostic or something?




Please if you are going to misquote me, then do it intelligently. This is embarrassing and you know it.

Also for the last time, I don't know who is Workch, so keep me out of whatever you and him are beefing about. I'm not in a good mood today. I'm not joking.

Have a nice day.

As I said earlier, Liars Always talk too much, so the Aware Always Avoid Long Speeches and therefore, we look for the point or points which you may be making to address them.

And as you see, I cut out the points I saw to comment on them.

I did not read as far enough to see the type of sands in the middle east and your header has already told us the direction you must go.

And since you are going in that Untrue Direction, Nothing you would say would be Valid which is what I did by raising the Invalidities even from the beginning parts of your post!

So how would it remain intact when I get to the end of It?

It's already in tatters!
Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by Workch: 12:55pm On Oct 18, 2021
SSIPON:


Please read;

Again, don't misquote me.

The middle east is prone to floods.


Read the title of this post, I said "WHOLE-EARTH" flood.


Nna,it seems reading is such is a difficult thing for you.

I even created a post describing the topology of the middle East and why the story exists in the first place. The Noah's Flood story is not even a Christian/Muslim/Judaism tale in the first place. It was based of off a Sumerian tale.


You and MaxInDHouse have the same problem and let me list it here for you:

1. You don't read properly. This is why having a decent conversation with you is hard, because you just like to quote, even if you don't understand.

2. You are so obsessed with your Bible that you don't realise that it doesn't work that way. It's just like a Muslim trying to convince you that Islam is true, by pulling out his Qur'an, putting your verses to your face and expecting you to believe or something.

I was once Christian like you. I did all these things you are doing now. You think I was born agnostic or something?




Please if you are going to misquote me, then do it intelligently. This is embarrassing and you know it.

Also for the last time, I don't know who is Workch, so keep me out of whatever you and him are beefing about. I'm not in a good mood today. I'm not joking.

Have a nice day.
I don’t how you even have time to argue with illiterates. I swear l

I just make fun of them after exposing their ignorance.
Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by SSIPON(m): 1:27pm On Oct 18, 2021
Dtruthspeaker:


As I said earlier, Liars Always talk too much, so the Aware Always Avoid Long Speeches and therefore, we look for the point or points which you may be making to address them.

And as you see, I cut out the points I saw to comment on them.

I did not read as far enough to see the type of sands in the middle east and your header has already told us the direction you must go.

And since you are going in that Untrue Direction, Nothing you would say would be Valid which is what I did by raising the Invalidities even from the beginning parts of your post!

So how would it remain intact when I get to the end of It?

It's already in tatters!


*facepalms*

Take your time and re-read the post.


I never said a flood never happened, I said a WHOLE EARTH FLOOD.


I see your problem. With an attention span shorter than your current age, why won't you quote me with bs.
Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by SSIPON(m): 1:28pm On Oct 18, 2021
Dtruthspeaker:



I did not read as far enough to see the type of sands in the middle east.

When you did not read the whole thing, then shut up. This is a too part post by the way, you didn't even read quarter of it and you just spread your nyash for all of Nairaland to see.
Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by SSIPON(m): 1:31pm On Oct 18, 2021
MaxInDHouse:

Perhaps you should remind yourself of the topic of the thread! smiley

Perhaps you should re-read the two posts I sent. smiley
Perhaps you should have paid attention to your primary school comprehension classes. smiley
Lol, you outed yourself Max, you outed yourself as someone who doesn't read to understand, but reads to pull whatever meaning He can think off.

Maybe you should look at the title again. This is a two part posts. Go and find the other parts, then makes sure your understand it, then we can talk. Because you've been embarrassing yourself here with your busybody. Your body dey scratch you. You see a post, you just read the title, bam! You jump to comment section and spew incoherent trash.
Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by MaxInDHouse(m): 1:54pm On Oct 18, 2021
SSIPON:


Perhaps you should re-read the two posts I sent. smiley
Perhaps you should have paid attention to your primary school comprehension classes. smiley
Lol, you outed yourself Max, you outed yourself as someone who doesn't read to understand, but reads to pull whatever meaning He can think off.

Maybe you should look at the title again. This is a two part posts. Go and find the other parts, then makes sure your understand it, then we can talk. Because you've been embarrassing yourself here with your busybody. Your body dey scratch you. You see a post, you just read the title, bam! You jump to comment section and spew incoherent trash.

The topic is all what i needed and the person talking!
The Bible is inspired by God so there's nothing you can say AGAINST it! smiley
Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by NaijaSatanlst: 2:02pm On Oct 18, 2021
MaxInDHouse:


The topic is all what i needed and the person talking!
The Bible is inspired by God so there's nothing you can say AGAINST it! smiley


Boss, you've been disturbing this whole section with your nonsense.

If you do anyhow with me, I fucck you up. You get? smiley
Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by MaxInDHouse(m): 2:24pm On Oct 18, 2021
NaijaSatanlst:

Boss, you've been disturbing this whole section with your nonsense.
If you do anyhow with me, I fucck you up. You get? smiley
Keep crying! smiley
The way i dismantled your nonsense and ingredients against Noah's story is paining you guys shey? smiley
My friend go and hugg the electric transformer! cheesy
Re: Scientific Evidence Against The Noah's Whole-Earth Flood by NaijaSatanlst: 2:26pm On Oct 18, 2021
MaxInDHouse:

Keep crying! smiley
The way i dismantled your nonsense and ingredients against Noah's story is paining you guys shey? smiley
My friend go and hugg the electric transformer! cheesy
The only thing that was dismantled here was your ass. LMAO.


Edit: Just looked through Ur profile and saw that you are a JW, Clown cheesy

(1) (2) (Reply)

Pastor Ashimolowo To Retire, Appoints Son As Resident Pastor In UK / Lagos Catholic Archdiocese Suspends Priest For Comments About Igbo Songs. / She Visited A Church For The First Time In UK & Got All These Gifts

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 134
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.