MaxInDHouse:


I was chatting with LordReed (an atheist) over the certainty that the Church of Satan will fail to make LOVE, JOY and PEACE reign in their gathering because they don't want to talk about Jesus who is the key to these things!

So your friend Ex-Kingdom Hall attendee came into the discussion to support the motion that atheists can make peace reign in their gathering (without the spirit of God)

Therefore i asked him the below question:



Your friend's response to the question!


Please can you make anything out of his response?
Well the truth is whoever turn his/her back on God's organization can never be specific so they are either here nor there!

After being exposed on that thread that you LIED you backtrack into you are trying to remind me once again(It's just a trick to draw you out of the comfort zone of atheistic mindset)

That scripture I cited hit you so hard that you don't know when you start responding to the questions you have bee running away from.

MaxInDHouse:
Don't worry continue chatting with him, i think he's enjoying the discussion with you!

Don't worry continue chatting with him....MaxInDHouse

Why should I when na you start to mention my moniker and decide to keep chatting deliberately with me .

I think he's enjoying the discussion with you... MaxInDHouse

As long as it not a regimented kind of thinking.

Janosky:

Are you ok with my responses on the other thread?

This thread.

GardenOfGod:
I don't have the time at the moment to show you where your New World Translation proves that JESUS IS JEHOVAH. it's been a while I come to this section that's why most of you post stuffs you will never defend to the end.

This God's name Jehovah appear originally more than 7,000 times in the bible.... Haddeylium

Na blunder be this statement in the first place when he himself knows that the name Jehovah was coined by those he called christendom +/- 500 years ago.
How can something that was not even in existence be found in over 7000 places in the Bible or be removed in the first place?


Another , some considered that God’s personal name was too sacred to be pronounced out of respect for Judaism superstitious belief , of whom Jesus said: “You have made the word of God invalid because of your tradition.”—Matt. 15:6 This is baseless as well.... Haddeylium

And indeed he has add to the invalidity of God's word by saying a name JEHOVAH that was coined by a man in christendom and was made traditional to stand for God's name +/- 500 years ago was removed and replaced with titles( a name that didn't exist in the first place) and this is what God and God's organization accepted as his name. This was what made the thread baseless. This is really laughable.

He then rendered the thread baseless further by saying......

Having a close relationship with God involve getting to know him by name... Haddeylium


When we know that we all have strong relationships with our earthly father without knowing or calling them by their personal names. How much more our heavenly father who dwells in heaven.

elated177:
This thread.

E get as e be thread

Atheists can't make peace reign in their gathering~ Maximus

We (atheists) can make it work~ LordReed

Can you present a gathering of atheists working towards that?~ Maximus

The Church of Satan~ LordReed listing their agenda.

All these are common ideas in all human society yet none has ever worked~ Maximus

But we can come together to reason~ LordReed

Sure you'll meet but it will not work because racism and politics will hinder you~ Maximus

You said we can't meet together~ LordReed

Nothing stops people from meeting together but achieving LOVE, JOY and PEACE is what is impossible without the spirit of God~ Maximus

LordReed is correct~ Acholardey

Do you believe it's possible for imperfect humans to achieve PEACE without the Prince of Peace~ Maximus to Acholardey

It's not necessary for Jesus to be in their group for them to achieve PEACE~ Acholardey

OK let me here a YES or NO then explain~ Maximus

Jesus said the atheists are wiser than believers~ Acholardey

That's not what Jesus meant~ Maximus

It is just accept that you were wrong for insisting that atheists can't make peace reign without Jesus the Prince of Peace~ Acholardey

Maximus

When last did you see them preaching house to house again? Their Master from the Watchtower commanded them not to preach again. their Watchtower is their God! The fallacy and blunder committed by the few of them on Nairaland is alarming and pitiful. i have no time for them at the moment.

achorladey:


This God's name Jehovah appear originally more than 7,000 times in the bible.... Haddeylium

Na blunder be this statement in the first place when he himself knows that the name Jehovah was coined by those he called christendom +/- 500 years ago.

How can something that was not even in existence be removed in the first place?


Another , some considered that God’s personal name was too sacred to be pronounced out of respect for Judaism superstitious belief , of whom Jesus said: “You have made the word of God invalid because of your tradition.”—Matt. 15:6 This is baseless as well.... Haddeylium

And indeed he has add to the invalidity of God's word by saying a name JEHOVAH that was coined by a man in christendom and was made traditional to stand for God's name +/- 500 years ago was removed and replaced with titles( a name that didn't exist in the first place) and this is what God and God's organization accepted as his name. This was what made the thread baseless. This is really laughable.

He then rendered the thread baseless further by saying......

Having a close relationship with God involve getting to know him by name... Haddeylium


When we know that we all have strong relationships with our earthly father without knowing or calling them by their personal names. How much more our heavenly father who dwells in heaven.

MaxInDHouse:
Atheists can't make peace reign in their gathering~ Maximus

We (atheists) can make it work~ LordReed

Can you present a gathering of atheists working towards that?~ Maximus

The Church of Satan~ LordReed listing their agenda.

All these are common ideas in all human society yet none has ever worked~ Maximus

But we can come together to reason~ LordReed

Sure you'll meet but it will not work because racism and politics will hinder you~ Maximus

You said we can't meet together~ LordReed

Nothing stops people from meeting together but achieving LOVE, JOY and PEACE is what is impossible without the spirit of God~ Maximus

LordReed is correct~ Acholardey

Do you believe it's possible for imperfect humans to achieve PEACE without the Prince of Peace~ Maximus to Acholardey

It's not necessary for Jesus to be in their group for them to achieve PEACE~ Acholardey

OK let me here a YES or NO then explain~ Maximus

Jesus said the atheists are wiser than believers~ Acholardey

That's not what Jesus meant~ Maximus

It is just accept that you were wrong for insisting that atheists can't make peace reign without Jesus the Prince of Peace~ Acholardey

Maximus

Liar, liar, pants on fire. LMFAO!

LordReed:


Liar, liar, pants on fire. LMFAO!

He wants to score points after backtracking on that thread after his LIES were exposed. He has forgotten......

It's just a trick to draw you out of the comfort zone of atheistic mindset

LordReed:

Liar, liar, pants on fire. LMFAO!

Keep deceiving yourself!

MaxInDHouse:




You will enjoy the company of people who left Jehovah's Witnesses organization!

Sebi you don't want people who will be specific when you're chatting with them on what God wants us to do!



Now try to reason along with an ex-Kingdom Hall attendee who is criticizing what we are doing in the organization!
You'll now understand what i meant each time i ask them if they've found a better performing group while they'll be agitating as if the question is bitting them.
He'll never be able to answer a single question convincingly because he wants to support all forms of worship so how do you want him to be specific when you ask him any question?

Remember, you back out of debate with me.

MaxInDHouse:

Keep deceiving yourself!

Nah I leave it to you, you do an excellent job of self deceit.

MightySparrow:

Remember, you back out of debate with me.

I have told you that i hate fruitless arguments {1Timothy 6:4; Titus 3:9} so if you don't want a specific answer that will make us know exactly what God's word requires then i'll leave you to chat with others, i believe you're enjoying the chatting with the Ex-Kingdom Hall attendee!

LordReed:

Nah I leave it to you, you do an excellent job of self deceit.

That's what many often say when they realized that they're chatting with a true believer but i don't just leave you in doubts i present the benefits of real faith that you can never find anywhere else!

I curse God and his name

MaxInDHouse:

Keep deceiving yourself!

This what deceiving yourself mean to you

That their is a difference between

1. those who are racist and raise weapons against one another and taking sides as well.

and

2. those who are not racist and raise weapons against one another despite not taking sides.

MaxInDHouse:


I have told you that i hate fruitless arguments {1Timothy 6:4; Titus 3:9} so if you don't want a specific answer that will make us know exactly what God's word requires then i'll leave you to chat with others, i believe you're enjoying the chatting with the Ex-Kingdom Hall attendee!

The argument and discussion is always fruitless when no one dance to your tune any longer

MaxInDHouse:

That's what many often say when they realized that they're chatting with a true believer but i don't just leave you in doubts i present the benefits of real faith that you can never find anywhere else!

Do JWs divorce one another?

LordReed:

Do JWs divorce one another?

Of course we are imperfect but a divorcee will not be comfortable in our midst because we don't appreciate divorcees in our midst. That's part of the reasons why many do leave our organization because once you're a divorcee there are lots of privileges you can't have in our midst, so each person who wants to be viewed as a bonafide member of our global family must fight really hard to keep their marital vows!

hupernikao:


I don't have issues with the usage of J, which of course is not part of Jewish consonant. But you were the one who want to box God into Jehovah because you felt others are wrong. Hence I let you know that even the name spelling Jehovah is corrupted if we go by your explanation. Hence your explanation will also make Jerusalem wrong. It was never called Jerusalem until recent, go and check your jews lexicon well.
But you tried to justify your own corruption.

I really don't understand you. Can you make yourself clear?
How can someone be named Jesus, Josiah Jerusalem if there's no J in Hebrew language?
That's what they called Translations.
You don't get the subject matter. If Many of these modern translators find it okay to call Yehoshua, JESUS in English.
Why then is JEHOVAH removed and replaced with LORD?
Think carefully

So, my point is.

Using lord for Jehovah or yahweh or yhwh isn't the issue but your understanding of the word and your heart. But since you want to tread that line, I gave you to poser.

God's word says;
(Isaiah 42:
I am Jehovah. That is my name;
I give my glory to no one else.

It's is because God wants people to know him by his name, that's why he appears more than 7,000 times in the bible.

GardenOfGod:
I don't have the time at the moment to show you where your New World Translation proves that JESUS IS JEHOVAH. it's been a while I come to this section that's why most of you post stuffs you will never defend to the end.

Really? I don't think that's the discourse here tho.
As the OP's, why is God's name JEHOVAH removed and replaced with LORD in your bible?

MightySparrow:


Before Exodus 6;3 was God known by any name?
Which other versions other than the one shown above? What makes it special?

What Bible translation do you use?

haddeylium:

I really don't understand you. Can you make yourself clear?
How can someone be named Jesus, Josiah Jerusalem if there's no J in Hebrew language?
That's what they called Translations.
You don't get the subject matter. If Many of these modern translators find it okay to call Yehoshua, JESUS in English.
Why then is JEHOVAH removed and replaced with LORD?
Think carefully

So your own study confirmed that ancient Hebrew had the letter J. You may need to speak with your other folks, they will correct your wrong premise.

haddeylium:
God's word says;
(Isaiah 42:
I am Jehovah. That is my name;
I give my glory to no one else.

It's is because God wants people to know him by his name, that's why he appears more than 7,000 times in the bible.

God never said Jehovah, the word never exist in Hebrew language. if I am to go with your premise of corrupting what God said. He never said Jehovah. You changed what he said to Jehovah. Why not leave what he said there since changing his name had corrupted the meaning. You just did that now.

He never referred to himself as Jehovah.

Yippeedaniel:
Jehovah isn't even inda Bible. The Tetragrammaton isn't Jahova.

Jehovah is an English translation and not Hebrew.
What is the tetragrammaton of God's name?

hupernikao:


So your own study confirmed that ancient Hebrew had the letter J. You may need to speak with your other folks, they will correct your wrong premise.

Reason I employed you to think carefully before replying.
Ofcourse! There's is no letter J in Hebrew alphabet but Hebrew names today have letter J because they're translated.
The same way I'll translate JOY in English to AYÒ in Yoruba. They're the same.

God never said Jehovah, the word never exist in Hebrew language. if I am to go with your premise of corrupting what God said. He never said Jehovah. You changed what he said to Jehovah. Why not leave what he said there since changing his name had corrupted the meaning. You just did that now.
He never referred to himself as Jehovah.

What do you think he said and why is it not found in your bible?
Someone said the correct is Yahweh and its fine. Pronunciation and spelling differs. I don't understand Hebrew, what's is important is not desecrating God's word

GardenOfGod:
I don't have the time at the moment to show you where your New World Translation proves that JESUS IS JEHOVAH. it's been a while I come to this section that's why most of you post stuffs you will never defend to the end.

Wetin you Sabi except TWISTING Kingdom interlinear and misquote comments you NEVER wrote.
Carry your GIBBERISH outta this forum.

haddeylium:

Reason I employed you to think carefully before replying.
Ofcourse! There's is no letter J in Hebrew alphabet but Hebrew names today have letter J because they're translated.
The same way I'll translate JOY in English to AYÒ in Yoruba. They're the same.

Did God give a J. All the places I'm the Bible where you see YHWH, was it Jehovah God gave? No.

So why flog this. You changed the name to suit what you wanted. A Jew will argue with you that his God is not Jehovah and that you truncated God's word. Why because of spelling, translation and change of words. This is the same you are doing now. Which both are very unnecessary. But since you want to tread that path, I chose to drag you there.


So, whether Jehovah, YHWH, Lord, God. These never affect the textual meaning and interpretation of the scriptures when done well. That is the Summary.

hupernikao:


Did God give a J. All the places I'm the Bible where you see YHWH, was it Jehovah God gave? No.

So why flog this. You changed the name to suit what you wanted. A Jew will argue with you that his God is not Jehovah and that you truncated God's word. Why because of spelling, translation and change of words. This is the same you are doing now. Which both are very unnecessary. But since you want to tread that path, I chose to drag you there.


So, whether Jehovah, YHWH, Lord, God. These never affect the textual meaning and interpretation of the scriptures when done well. That is the Summary.

Drag me where? You're not making sense at all
What you saying is 'I don't care if you're called Doctor, Father, or James' it doesn't change anything.
Ofcourse it does! Doctor, Father, God, lord are Titles. They're are not God's name. He has is own personal name like you do and he want people to call on his name that appears more than 7,000 times in the bible.

Due to different languages that exist, God's name can have different linguistics variation but they point is they have the same meaning
Yahweh/Jehovah/YHWH means He will become what he will be become/. He will prove to be what he will prove to be
Lord means having power over other person
Lord cannot substitute the above because they have total different meaning and that's desecrating God's word

Now, look at the list of God's name in different languages with linguistic variation but with same meaning
Arabic: يهوه (Yahwah)
Arawak: Jehovah
Ateso: Yahweh
Chin (Haka-Lai): Zahova
Chinese: 雅威 (Yǎwēi), 爺火華
English: Jehovah, Yahweh, Yehuwah
Japanese: Ehoba

Now, do you understand?

achorladey:


This God's name Jehovah appear originally more than 7,000 times in the bible.... Haddeylium

Na blunder be this statement in the first place when he himself knows that the name Jehovah was coined by those he called christendom +/- 500 years ago.
How can something that was not even in existence be found in over 7000 places in the Bible or be removed in the first place?


Another , some considered that God’s personal name was too sacred to be pronounced out of respect for Judaism superstitious belief , of whom Jesus said: “You have made the word of God invalid because of your tradition.”—Matt. 15:6 This is baseless as well.... Haddeylium

And indeed he has add to the invalidity of God's word by saying a name JEHOVAH that was coined by a man in christendom and was made traditional to stand for God's name +/- 500 years ago was removed and replaced with titles( a name that didn't exist in the first place) and this is what God and God's organization accepted as his name. This was what made the thread baseless. This is really laughable.

He then rendered the thread baseless further by saying......

Having a close relationship with God involve getting to know him by name... Haddeylium

D

Achorladey is LYING again, he says God's name YHWH doesn't exist.


Achorladey was YHWH removed and replaced with the title "Lord"?
Continue DECEIVING yourself.
Truth is far off from you.

achorladey:


When we know that we all have strong relationships with our earthly father without knowing or calling them by their personal names. How much more our heavenly father who dwells in heaven.

See this shameless Hypocrite!
Yet, Achorladey bears his own Father's name.
Numbers 6:27
"They must place my name upon the people of Israel."
2 Chronicles 7:14 "the people called by my name"

Acts 15:14,17-18 , "God has taken out a people called by his name, known from of old"

Numbers 6:27, Acts 15:14,17-18 & 2 Chronicles 7:14, This Bible truth causes Sifia pains
to Atheists & 3 dog head slaves, them know say them no follow.

elated177:



Are you ok with my responses on the other thread?

I have responded to your last comments there.
Shalom.

achorladey:


Why do you think the name jehovah takes precedence over this. I have read and heard your people claiming that jehovah is God's personal name... MightySparrow


Key question you raised. When they come out and say God's name was removed from the Bible you begin to wonder who is really removing what in particular.

Even this Jehovah they use here and there didn't originate with their religious organization.

Is God's name YHWH removed and replaced with the title " Lord"?
The truth dey pain Achorladey for brain.