nairaman66:


Our focal point of argument has been derailed! My point is, the tank wasn’t empty when it crashed! From the scene, you could see the impact and wreckage was minimal, meaning there was a maneuver by the pilots before the crash! It could be the final impact on rocks that killed the passengers!

I already clearly stated the Pilot had feathered the props so he could use airflow to keep them spinning ..this feathered spin will increase the glide/decent ratio and at the same time generate some electricity to keep instrument panels working and as well as some minimal flight controls which he used to crashland the plane as best as he could ...I had drawn attention to the elevator position to prove the pilot was still in control til the last

Abi it's something else that killed Dem cos the plane no too scatter like that o especially for a small plane. Rest in peace

FarahAideed:
A quick look at the crash site and wreckage I can tell following things :

1 .The plane lost power to both engines long before the impact.

2 . The plane had empty fuel tank at the time of the crash .

3. The crash-land was a controlled glide with the propellers properly feathered for such approach.

4. I suspect this aircraft ran out of fuel because I know it doesn't have the ability to dump fuel .

This guy just de talk nonsense. Where you see propeller for this plane l? You just mentioned all scenarios that could crash a plane to feel like you know what you are talking.

RIP
Shai! That fresh creamy p***y don waste like that

Exactly how the world lost aaliya years ago...

tarantino1:


The last heavyweight boxer to retire undefeated.
Hopefully, somebody beats Fury before he retires.

But that's for another thread.

No one will be able to beat Fury

He will retire undefeated.

baby124:

This guy just de talk nonsense. Where you see propeller for this plane l? You just mentioned all scenarios that could crash a plane to feel like you know what you are talking.

Typical empty Low IQed Nigerian that never wants to learn ... The aircraft in question is a beechcraft 350 King Air and if you know anything about planes you will know it's a turbo prop aircraft which is simply Propeller driven aircraft powered by jet driven turbines instead of pistons ..

You can see image of her boarding the same plane and I have taken the liberty to circle the propeller just in case you don't know what one means

NairalandMD:

exactly my thought, the pilot really tried but nah impact shock go kill em (heart attack)... coz the plane noh really crash like that nah

Same thought I had but how non of them survive shock me o

Because just before I see the news I dey watch documentry of that plane crash of 2016 wey carry one Brazilian football club players and 6 people come out of that one!

FarahAideed:


Typical empty Low IQed Nigerian that never wants to learn ... The aircraft in question is a beechcraft 350 King Air and if you know anything about planes you will know it's a turbo prop aircraft which is simply Propeller driven aircraft powered by jet driven turbines instead of pistons ..

You can see image of her boarding the same plane and I have taken the liberty to circle the propeller just in case you don't know what one means

The plane she is approaching does not look like the plane she eventually got on. I do not see the propeller engines on the crashed plane and that plane looks smaller. By the way, propeller planes are actually more durable than non-propeller. You can not know what happened to the plane until the black box is located. All you have here is speculation. So much for your high IQ.

The flesh has perished... The millions of followers and money could not save her. The question remains is she saved... Does she identify with christ in the capacity of having christ in her. Where she has gone, no church or pastor will save you. The question is which spirit do you identify with. Jesus or devil. Let us learn

kokanepyramid:

A plane decelerating has got nothing to do with falling, you can decelerate a plane without descending.

Your understanding of physics is rather poor.

You can't look at deceleration from the surface when dealing with a free falling object such as a plummeting plane.

And mind you, deceleration is the exact opposite of acceleration only in English. In physics or mathematics, it is not that straightforward.

Decrease in speed is same as deceleration, rate of decrease in speed or rate of deceleration measures how rapid or gradual the decrease in speed was. That's quantifying it.

No, this is too shallow.

What happens when an object such as a plane is hurtling down to Earth? Its achieves above terminal velocity, which means acceleration ceases to exist. At this stage, the plane is decelerating.

Perhaps, there is any physicists in the house who can pick a hole in my physics.

I am more of a mathematician than a physicist, although I have a degree in a combination of both.

The right word for your initial post should be descending fast as it's no longer a controlled descent.

No, descending does not fully express the magnitude of a nosediving plane, especially one that has reached terminal velocity.

FarahAideed:


If it struck something uncontrollably the wreck won't look like that ... The props were completely not powered before the crash beacuse if they were I would see their shatter marks on the fuselage ...the second thing to note is the that the elevator position show the pilot was still using them before the crash and with the engines completely outs the only way that could happen is that he had feathered the propellers to allow the airflow rotate them..doing this will increase is glide and as well provide little power for some minimal flight controls

I don't know this much about airplanes, though.

Just exploring the physics.

BluntTheApostle:


Your understanding of physics is rather poor.

You can't look at deceleration from the surface when dealing with a free falling object such as a plummeting plane.

And mind you, deceleration is the exact opposite of acceleration only in English. In physics or mathematics, it is not that straightforward.




No, this is too shallow.

What happens when an object such as a plane is hurtling down to Earth? Its achieves above terminal velocity, which means acceleration ceases to exist. At this stage, the plane is decelerating.

Perhaps, there is any physicists in the house who can pick a hole in my physics.

I am more of a mathematician than a physicist, although I have a degree in a combination of both.




No, descending does not fully express the magnitude of a nosediving plane, especially one that has reached terminal velocity.

Keep yapping what you know nothing about,

I'm done arguing with you, physicist indeed.

baby124:

The plane she is approaching does not look like the plane she eventually got on. I do not see the propeller engines on the crashed plane and that plane looks smaller. By the way, propeller planes are actually more durable than non-propeller. You can not know what happened to the plane until the black box is located. All you have here is speculation. So much for your high IQ.

Same aircraft...you cant see the propellers because they broke off on impact ..I have never called any aircrash wrong for years know .I have studied the crash site and wreck and I am 90 percent sure it was caused by fuel starvation...well I will be following up the AIB investigation on this and when the verdict is out I will come here to remind u

Kennedy97:


Same thought I had but how non of them survive shock me o

Because just before I see the news I dey watch documentry of that plane crash of 2016 wey carry one Brazilian football club players and 6 people come out of that one!

It has been established they hit a high tension power line moments before hitting the ground . So maybe the electricity breached the faraday cage of the aircraft

kokanepyramid:

Keep yapping what you know nothing about,

I'm done arguing with you, physicist indeed.

What is negative acceleration?

kokanepyramid:

Keep yapping what you know nothing about,

I'm done arguing with you, physicist indeed.

Just so you know that there is more to acceleration and deceleration than the basic English meanings of speeding up and slowing down:

From that screenshot, you can see that negative acceleration (the same as deceleration) can actually imply speeding up.

FarahAideed:


Not saying it's not possible many factors make this hard to make this a reality .

1 . aircraft makes are always saving up on any extra weight and probably adding many airbag to an aircraft would mean more weight.

2 : The sheer explosive force mechanism airbags depend on to work would be too dangerous having in a pressurized cabin as they might pose more problems during a crash than solution.

3. 99 percent of air crashes would come in too hard and potential of a fire happening ..I don't know what kind of gas those airbag cannisters carry and if they are fire retardant in the first place

Some planes actually have airbags, but they are for survivable shocks or impacts.

So, they are useless when it comes to hard crashes.

BluntTheApostle:


What is negative acceleration?

Negative acceleration is deceleration.
Terminal velocity simply means at a point during free fall the body stops accelerating and maintains constant velocity.
A free falling plane can not be decelerating downwards. Instead it's accelerating at g,

BluntTheApostle:


Just so you know that there is more to acceleration and deceleration than the basic English meanings of speeding up and slowing down:

From that screenshot, you can see that negative acceleration (the same as deceleration) can actually imply speeding up.

You are bringing vector into the mix here.
A free falling plane can be accelerating downwards while decelerating forward particularly during a stall, reason acceleration and deceleration are vector quantities and I'm laying emphasis on fall here.

Reason a plane has vertical and horizontal speeds during takeoff and landing.

I hope they develop planes with parachutes

Good day please if you’ve got any issue with your NiN National identity number and you want to rectify it
Do hit this number 08053646326
Thanks ��

kokanepyramid:

Negative acceleration is deceleration.
Terminal velocity simply means at a point during free fall the body stops accelerating and maintains constant velocity.
A free falling plane can not be decelerating downwards. Instead it's accelerating at g,

Alright, I admit I was wrong with that.

Explorers:



https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10170723/Popular-Brazilian-singer-Mar-lia-Mendon-26-killed-four-plane-crash.html

That's life for you.
We live today, we leave tomorrow.
Rest in Peace to them.

RIP. Condolences