NNTR:
You wouldnt find it LOL, if shoe was on the other foot, and it was your darling princess, that you've realised, you wouldn't have the chance to walk down the aisle and she would never know how it passionately feels like, being made a woman

I won't be choosing how my daughters intend to live their lives as adults so I would totally support any reasonable decision they make including celibacy.

It was both. The former concerning a human being and the latter concerning an animal

LoL there was no dichotomy, that is you trying to be too clever by half.

Wouldnt make a difference if I should

Would make all the difference but you can't because the story is she was roasted for your god. LMAO!

NNTR:
Exodus 32:7-28
I ask you who were the priests killed by Josiah?
What calibre of priests are they?

_{Personal text: b]Jesus/b] is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

The were human priests. They were sacrificed by Yahweh's favoured king.

2 Kings 22
1Josiah was eight years old when he began to reign, and he reigned thirty-one years in Jerusalem. His mother’s name was Jedidah the daughter of Adaiah of Bozkath. 2 And he did what was right in the eyes of the LORD and walked in all the way of David his father, and he did not turn aside to the right or to the left.

They weren't just killed, they were sacrificed on the altar.

You're still running away from Ezekiel 20:25

If that one is too hard for you to digest try this smaller morsel. After all mendacity is not as bad as human sacrifice.

1Kings 22
23Now therefore behold, the LORD has put a lying spirit in the mouth of all these your prophets; the LORD has declared disaster for you.”

When your expectations for redemption come from the promises of a liar, ol boy you're lost. No hope for you.


And na inside gutter you go kpai!

LordReed:
I won't be choosing how my daughters intend to live their lives as adults so I would totally support any reasonable decision they make including celibacy.

Jephthah raised up, trained and taught a good daughter

LordReed:
LoL there was no dichotomy, that is you trying to be too clever by half.

The devil is, in the, IT detail

LordReed:
Would make all the difference but you can't because the story is she was roasted for your god. LMAO!

In your dreams and fantasy world she was

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

PastorAIO:
[s]The were human priests. They were sacrificed by Yahweh's favoured king.

2 Kings 22
1Josiah was eight years old when he began to reign, and he reigned thirty-one years in Jerusalem. His mother’s name was Jedidah the daughter of Adaiah of Bozkath.
2And he did what was right in the eyes of the LORD and walked in all the way of David his father, and he did not turn aside to the right or to the left.

They weren't just killed, they were sacrificed on the altar.

You're still running away from Ezekiel 20:25

If that one is too hard for you to digest try this smaller morsel. After all mendacity is not as bad as human sacrifice.

1 Kings 22
23Now therefore behold, the LORD has put a lying spirit in the mouth of all these your prophets;
the LORD has declared disaster for you.”

When your expectations for redemption come from the promises of a liar, ol boy you're lost. No hope for you.

And na inside gutter you go kpai![/s]

2 Kings 23:1-20
1King Josiah sent word and they brought to him all the elders of Judah and of Jerusalem.
2The king went up to the house of the LORD, and with him all the men of Judah
and all the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the priests, the prophets, and all the people, both small and great;
and he read in their hearing all the words of the book of the covenant which was found in the house (temple) of the LORD.
3The king stood by the pillar and made a covenant before the LORD,
to walk after the LORD and to keep His commandments, His testimonies,
and His statutes with all his heart and soul, to confirm the words of this covenant that were written in this book.
And all the people entered into the covenant.
4Then the king commanded Hilkiah the high priest and the priests of the second rank
and the doorkeepers to bring out of the temple of the LORD all the articles made for Baal, for [the goddess] Asherah,
and for all the [starry] host of heaven;
and he burned them outside Jerusalem in the fields of the Kidron, and carried their ashes to Bethel [where Israel’s idolatry began].
5He got rid of the idolatrous priests whom the kings of Judah had ordained to burn incense [to pagan gods] in the high places in Judah’s cities
and all around Jerusalem--also those who burned incense to Baal, to the sun, to the moon, to the constellations [of the zodiac],
and to all the [starry] host of heaven.
6Josiah brought out the Asherah from the house of the LORD to the Brook Kidron outside Jerusalem,
and burned it there, and ground it to dust, and threw its dust on the graves of the common people [who had sacrificed to it].
7And he tore down the houses of the [male] cult prostitutes, which were at the house (temple) of the LORD,
where the women were weaving [tent] hangings for the Asherah [shrines].
8Then Josiah brought all the [idolatrous] priests from the cities of Judah,
and desecrated the high places where the priests had burned incense [to idols], from Geba to Beersheba, [that is, north to south];
and he tore down the high places of the gates which were at the entrance of the gate of Joshua the governor of the city,
which were on one’s left at the city gate.
9However, the priests of the high places were not allowed to go up to the altar of the LORD in Jerusalem [to serve],
but they ate unleavened bread among their brothers.
10Josiah also defiled Topheth, which is in the Valley of Ben-hinnom (son of Hinnom),
so that no man could make his son or his daughter pass through the fire [as a burnt offering] for Molech.
11And he got rid of the horses that the kings of Judah had given [in worship] to the sun at the entrance of the house of the LORD,
by the chamber of Nathan-melech the official, which was in the annex; and he burned the chariots of the sun.
12The altars [dedicated to the starry host of heaven] which were on the roof, the upper chamber of Ahaz, which the kings of Judah had made,
and the altars which Manasseh had made in the two courtyards of the house of the LORD, the king tore down;
and he smashed them there and threw their dust into the Brook Kidron.
13The king desecrated the high places which were opposite [east of] Jerusalem,
which were on the right (south) of the mount of corruption which Solomon the king of Israel had built for Ashtoreth
the repulsiveness of the Sidonians, for Chemosh the repulsiveness of Moab,
and for Milcom the repulsiveness of the sons (descendants) of Ammon.
14He broke in pieces the sacred pillars (cultic memorial stones, images)
and cut down the Asherim and replaced them with human bones [to desecrate the places forever].
15Further, the altar that was at Bethel, the high place which Jeroboam the son of Nebat,
who made Israel sin, had made, even that altar and the high place he tore down.
Then he demolished its stones, ground them to dust, and burned the Asherah.
16And as Josiah turned, he saw the graves that were there on the mountain,
and he sent men and had the bones taken from the graves, and burned them on the altar and [thereby] desecrated it,
in accordance with the word of the LORD which the man of God prophesied,
who proclaimed these things [about this altar, naming Josiah before he was born].
17Then Josiah said, “What is this monument (gravestone) that I see?”
The men of the city told him,
“It is the grave of the man of God who came from Judah and proclaimed these things which you have done to the altar of Bethel.”
18He said, “Let him alone; let no one disturb his bones.”
So they left his bones undisturbed, with the bones of the prophet who came from Samaria.
19Josiah also removed all the houses of the high places which were in the cities of Samaria,
which the kings of Israel had made provoking the LORD [to anger]; and he did to them just as he had done [to those] in Bethel.
20All the priests of the high places who were there he slaughtered on the altars, and burned human bones on them
[to desecrate the places forever]. Then he returned to Jerusalem.

Running away? What a daft thing to imagine and say, on top of when I've earlier put forward to you Exodus 32:7-28, so you can see confirmed what happens to idolators.

See how you found it hard to admit what the calibre of priests were that King Josiah killed. You couldn't engage your brain to see that the priests were idolators. They, essentially were priests turned bad

Of course they are human priests, or were you expecting them to be animal priests

God doesnt take delight in human beings, offered as burning sacrifices. No human being has offered God, approved human burning sacrifice. God has never accepted any human beings, offered as burning sacrifices. God finds the practice not only to be repulsively but its a stupid thing to do. God intervened before Abraham got to sacrifice his son Isaac.

It is living human being sacrifice that God accepts and approves of, not some dead burnt human sacrifice. If you support human being sacrifice, then put yourself up for it and not somebody else

Its hardened reprobates, scoundrels and rogues like you, who set a bad example for others, occupying the good office of pastor and give them a bad name

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

NNTR:
Jephthah raised up, trained and taught a good daughter

The devil is, in the, IT detail

In your dreams and fantasy world she was

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

The fantasy dreamer here is you.

LordReed:
The fantasy dreamer here is you.

Judges 11:30-31
30And Jephthah made a vow to the Lord:
“If you give the Ammonites into my hands,
31whatever comes out of the door of my house to meet me when I return in triumph from the Ammonites will be the Lord’s,
and I will sacrifice it as a burnt offering.”

The vow Jephthah were two vows rolled up as one. Whatever comes out represents anything, however, the red underlined, 'it', represents a clean animal

I am sure you wouldn't want being henceforth called or addressed as 'it', so please rein in the larking about. The 'it', is in the detail and the 'it', makes a great deal of difference to Judges 11:31

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

NNTR:
Judges 11:30-31
30And Jephthah made a vow to the Lord:
“If you give the Ammonites into my hands,
31whatever comes out of the door of my house to meet me when I return in triumph from the Ammonites will be the Lord’s,
and I will sacrifice it as a burnt offering.”

The vow Jephthah were two vows rolled up as one. Whatever comes out represents anything, however, the red underlined, 'it', represents a clean animal

I am sure you wouldn't want being henceforth called or addressed as 'it', so please rein in the larking about. The 'it', is in the detail and the 'it', makes a great deal of difference to Judges 11:31

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

The It means he thought it would be an animal yet did not change his mind when he saw it was his daughter, there was no dichotomy.

NNTR:
al, for [the goddess] Asherah,
and for all the [starry] host of heaven;


Running away? What a daft thing to imagine and say, on top of when I've earlier put forward to you Exodus 32:7-28, so you can see confirmed what happens to idolators.

See how you found it hard to admit what the calibre of priests were that King Josiah killed. You couldn't engage your brain to see that the priests were idolators. They, essentially were priests turned bad

Of course they are human priests, or were you expecting them to be animal priests

No matter the calibre, whether ido-later or Ido-sooner, The point which seems to be flying over your head is that they were sacrificed!

Now it is possible that you are confused because of the bible translations that you are reading because the translators sanitised the text.

The Hebrew says that he Way yiz bah the priests. Way yiz bah means to sacrifice. Not to punish by death. To sacrifice.

If anyone wants to confirm they can see it in this concordance.

https://biblehub.com/hebrew/vaiyizbach_2076.htm

Genesis 31:54
HEB: וַיִּזְבַּ֨ח יַעֲקֹ֥ב זֶ֙בַח֙
NAS: Then Jacob offered a sacrifice
KJV: Then Jacob offered sacrifice
INT: offered Jacob A sacrifice

Genesis 46:1
HEB: בְּאֵ֣רָה שָּׁ֑בַע וַיִּזְבַּ֣ח זְבָחִ֔ים לֵאלֹהֵ֖י
NAS: to Beersheba, and offered sacrifices
KJV: to Beersheba, and offered sacrifices
INT: came to Beersheba and offered sacrifices to the God

Numbers 22:40
HEB: וַיִּזְבַּ֥ח בָּלָ֖ק בָּקָ֣ר
NAS: Balak sacrificed oxen and sheep,
KJV: And Balak offered oxen and sheep,
INT: sacrificed Balak oxen


everywhere in the Hebrew bible where you see wayyizbah they translate it as sacrifice. Only in 2Kings when Josiah sacrifices the priests that's when your translators deceive you and say 'slaughtered'. But Mendacity is what is to be expected. It shows that they know their evil but they want to hide it. Like you avoid points made and ramble nonsensically in the hope of derailing the point.

The point to be clear:
Josiah, Yhwh's favoured King, Sacrificed Priests on the altars.

NNTR:

God doesnt take delight in human beings, offered as burning sacrifices. No human being has offered God, approved human burning sacrifice. God has never accepted any human beings, offered as burning sacrifices. God finds the practice not only to be repulsively but its a stupid thing to do. God intervened before Abraham got to sacrifice his son Isaac.

Look at this one. Yet before he can forgive your sins unless Jesus of nazareth is sacrificed Abi?

Hebrew 9

22Indeed, under the law almost everything is purified with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins.

28so Christ, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to deal with sin but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him.

PastorAIO:


No matter the calibre, whether ido-later or Ido-sooner, The point which seems to be flying over your head is that they were sacrificed!

Now it is possible that you are confused because of the bible translations that you are reading because the translators sanitised the text.

The Hebrew says that he Way yiz bah the priests. Way yiz bah means to sacrifice. Not to punish by death. To sacrifice.

If anyone wants to confirm they can see it in this concordance.

https://biblehub.com/hebrew/vaiyizbach_2076.htm

Genesis 31:54
HEB: וַיִּזְבַּ֨ח יַעֲקֹ֥ב זֶ֙בַח֙
NAS: Then Jacob offered a sacrifice
KJV: Then Jacob offered sacrifice
INT: offered Jacob A sacrifice

Genesis 46:1
HEB: בְּאֵ֣רָה שָּׁ֑בַע וַיִּזְבַּ֣ח זְבָחִ֔ים לֵאלֹהֵ֖י
NAS: to Beersheba, and offered sacrifices
KJV: to Beersheba, and offered sacrifices
INT: came to Beersheba and offered sacrifices to the God

Numbers 22:40
HEB: וַיִּזְבַּ֥ח בָּלָ֖ק בָּקָ֣ר
NAS: Balak sacrificed oxen and sheep,
KJV: And Balak offered oxen and sheep,
INT: sacrificed Balak oxen


everywhere in the Hebrew bible where you see wayyizbah they translate it as sacrifice. Only in 2Kings when Josiah sacrifices the priests that's when your translators deceive you and say 'slaughtered'.

The point to be clear:
Josiah, Yhwh's favoured King, Sacrificed Priests on the altars.

@bolded is not really correct sir.

PastorAIO:


Look at this one. Yet before he can forgive your sins unless Jesus of nazareth is sacrificed Abi?

Hebrew 9

22Indeed, under the law almost everything is purified with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins.

28so Christ, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to deal with sin but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him.

Discussing with NNTR, you will find that when you assert that two plus two is four, you will be required to actually draw two apples on one side, then draw two apples on the other side, and count them and show that there are now four apples. Sadly, after doing this, you will find this poster repeatedly ask you just how two plus two is actually four. Poker faced, this poster will say you have shown no such thing, and at the last minute is likely to insult you for saying that you have shown that two plus two is four.

PastorAIO:
[s]No matter the calibre, whether ido-later or Ido-sooner, The point which seems to be flying over your head is that they were sacrificed!

Now it is possible that you are confused because of the bible translations that you are reading because the translators sanitised the text.

The Hebrew says that he Way yiz bah the priests. Way yiz bah means to sacrifice. Not to punish by death. To sacrifice.

If anyone wants to confirm they can see it in this concordance.

https://biblehub.com/hebrew/vaiyizbach_2076.htm

Genesis 31:54
HEB: וַיִּזְבַּ֨ח יַעֲקֹ֥ב זֶ֙בַח֙
NAS: Then Jacob offered a sacrifice
KJV: Then Jacob offered sacrifice
INT: offered Jacob A sacrifice

Genesis 46:1
HEB: בְּאֵ֣רָה שָּׁ֑בַע וַיִּזְבַּ֣ח זְבָחִ֔ים לֵאלֹהֵ֖י
NAS: to Beersheba, and offered sacrifices
KJV: to Beersheba, and offered sacrifices
INT: came to Beersheba and offered sacrifices to the God

Numbers 22:40
HEB: וַיִּזְבַּ֥ח בָּלָ֖ק בָּקָ֣ר
NAS: Balak sacrificed oxen and sheep,
KJV: And Balak offered oxen and sheep,
INT: sacrificed Balak oxen

everywhere in the Hebrew bible where you see wayyizbah they translate it as sacrifice. Only in 2Kings when Josiah sacrifices the priests that's when your translators deceive you and say 'slaughtered'. But Mendacity is what is to be expected. It shows that they know their evil but they want to hide it. Like you avoid points made and ramble nonsensically in the hope of derailing the point.

The point to be clear:
Josiah, Yhwh's favoured King, Sacrificed Priests on the altars.[/s]

Jeremiah 7:31
'They have built pagan shrines at Topheth, the garbage dump in the valley of Ben-Hinnom,
and there they burn their sons and daughters in the fire.
I have never commanded such a horrible deed;
it never even crossed My mind to command such a thing!'

2 Kings 17:17
They sacrificed their sons and daughters in the fire and practiced divination and soothsaying.
They devoted themselves to doing evil in the sight of the LORD, provoking Him to anger.

1 Kings 13:1-3
1Now behold, there came a man of God from Judah to Bethel by the word (command) of the LORD, while Jeroboam was standing by the altar [which he had built] to burn incense.
2The man cried out against the [idolatrous] altar by the word of the LORD, “O altar, altar, thus says the Lord: ‘Behold, a son shall be born to the house of David, Josiah by name; and on you shall he sacrifice [the bodies of] the priests of the high places who burn incense on you, and human bones shall be burned on you.’”
3And he gave a sign the same day, saying, “This is the sign which the LORD has spoken: ‘Behold, the altar shall be split apart and the ashes that are on it shall be poured out.’”

In your quackness, dumbness and pointless self, you fail to grasp and understand that God is completely against humans, being offered up as a dead burning sacrifice. Get this fact and truth set in the bone framework enclosing your brain please

Look at you, making a fool of yourself playing very hard trying to explain a non-existent event by proof-texting one single verse of the bible and another single verse.

Duh, did king Josiah say he made the sacrifices to God? Answer nah. Smh.

If anyone wants to confirm they can check any concordance, to see that, it was desecrate (i.e. inverse of sacrifice) that king Josiah did

Its only an arrant nonsense, fake paistor like you, who wouldnt know that king Josiah's act of desecration (i.e. embarrassed the bad priests by killing them all and leaving them as sacrifices on their fake gods' altars) was prophesied well before he was born

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

LordReed:
The It means he thought it would be an animal yet did not change his mind when he saw it was his daughter, there was no dichotomy.

You're woefully mistaken because God doesnt accept anything short of firsthand human sacrifice and on top of that, God even doest accept human being burnt offering sacrifices

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

jamesid29:


@bolded is not really correct sir.

Kindly correct me please

DeepSight:
[s]Discussing with NNTR, you will find that when you assert that two plus two is four, you will be required to actually draw two apples on one side, then draw two apples on the other side, and count them and show that there are now four apples. Sadly, after doing this, you will find this poster repeatedly ask you just how two plus two is actually four. Poker faced, this poster will say you have shown no such thing, and at the last minute is likely to insult you for saying that you have shown that two plus two is four.[/s]

Look what the cat dragged in, the alter-ego, galloping in to the rescue, loll.

It will please you and your alter-ego, to know that, I dont suffer the both of you gladly.

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

NNTR:
You're woefully mistaken because God doesnt accept anything short of firsthand human sacrifice and on top of that, God even doest accept human being burnt offering sacrifices

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

PastorAIO:
[s]Look at this one. Yet before he can forgive your sins unless Jesus of nazareth is sacrificed Abi?

Hebrew 9

22Indeed, under the law almost everything is purified with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins.

28so Christ, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to deal with sin but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him.[/s]

Smh, I give up. Blind as a bat.

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

NNTR:


Smh, I give up. Blind as a bat.

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

And this is a response to something so self-evidently fundamental to the Christian faith - the indisputable fact that Christ is said to have been offered up as a sacrifice for sins?

In response to that being pointed out, you shamefully attempt to pretend the poser is too stupid to countenance, and accuse the poster of being "blind as a bat," while therefore throwing up your hands in surrender.

Cringe-worthy, but nothing new.

PastorAIO:


Kindly correct me please

2 Chronicles 18:2

NNTR:
Jephthah was sad to the point of ripping his own clothes, because he found out he had miscalculated. He didn't factor in that it will be his daughter who will first come out to greet him.

Jephthah, in the second part of the vow, as an afterthought, was actually expecting to see an animal meet him

Samuel's mother (i.e. Hannah) couldn't have been sad because with the blessing of her husband Elkanah, she willing to keep the promise she made, that Samuel will belong to the Lord his whole life serving Him

I have helped underlined one of the most significant detail in Judges 11:31

The girl understood that what was going to happen to her, is chastity and be dedicated to God's service, the fulfilling of the first vow.

The second vow, has nothing to do with her, being that she isnt an animal.

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

---

---

LordReed:
The It means he thought it would be an animal

Hip hop hooray, ho, hey, ho, hey, ho, hey, ho, hey.
Give it up for naughty by nature, there's light inside the end of the tunnel. You slowly but surely have conceded that Jephthah in his calculation and afterthought, was actually expecting an animal to come meet and greet him, not his daughter

LordReed:
yet did not change his mind when he saw it was his daughter, there was no dichotomy.

Do you use it for your darling daughters or other females in your family, work place or even community in general? C'mon say the truth, and let the devil remain being a liar

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

jamesid29:

2 Chronicles 18:2

The Hebrew word used there is zabah, it is of a primitive root and I quote from the concordance - "to slaughter an animal (usually in sacrifice): kill, offer, sacrifice, do sacrifice, slay."

Can you expand on your point?

DeepSight:
[s]And this is a response to something so self-evidently fundamental to the Christian faith - the indisputable fact that Christ is said to have been offered up as a sacrifice for sins?

In response to that being pointed out, you shamefully attempt to pretend the poser is too stupid to countenance, and accuse the poster of being "blind as a bat," while therefore throwing up your hands in surrender.

Cringe-worthy, but nothing new.[/s]

Smh, doesnt even know what a figure of speech is. Pfft

So we have tag team going on here, with you and your alter ego alternatingly hand slapping each other to get in, loll

What part of firsthand sacrifice dont you understand?
God sacrificing Himself, apart from being a firsthand sacrifice is completely different from sacrifices involving abducting, kidnapping, stealing, bundling up into a car or snatching another human being to commit nefarious and selfish activities often for financial gains.

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

NNTR:


What part of firsthand sacrifice dont you understand?
God sacrificing Himself

God sacrificing himself to himself to forgive us our sins. Right.

DeepSight:
God sacrificing himself to himself to forgive us our sins. Right.

It choke you, like a fishbone in the throat, loll.

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

DeepSight:


The Hebrew word used there is zabah, it is of a primitive root and I quote from the concordance - "to slaughter an animal (usually in sacrifice): kill, offer, sacrifice, do sacrifice, slay."

Can you expand on your point?

Kindly refer to pastorAi's assertion for context.

jamesid29:

Kindly refer to pastorAi's assertion for context.

Yes I did sir. And he said this -

PastorAIO: everywhere in the Hebrew bible where you see wayyizbah they translate it as sacrifice. Only in 2Kings when Josiah sacrifices the priests that's when your translators deceive you and say 'slaughtered'.

- Which you then bolded and said -

@ bolded is not really correct sir

He then asked you to please correct him, and you responded by citing 2 Chronicles 18:2.
I then picked up my concordance and saw that the word used there was zabah.

So how does your citing this verse show that he is "not really correct" in his statement above?
Unless i am missing something, glad to be corrected, thanks.

jamesid29:
Kindly refer to pastorAi's assertion for context.

Shouldnt be hard to do, loll.

Alter ego loading ... Please wait, loll

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

NNTR:
It choke you, like a fishbone in the throat, loll.

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

Not surprising that you would ignore the obviously repugnant principle of propitiatory sacrifice for forgiveness of sins at play.
A principle well established in scripture.

No worries: I have come to understand the way you roll. Enjoy - its not peculiar to you. Its very familiar and often observed among religionists.

NNTR:
God is Love.
God is Omnipresent, meaning that, God is here, God is there, God is everywhere and that simultaneously can be in more than one place at a time.

Now zeroing on your question proper. God widely and constantly express love from all places

Isnt Mohammed a Muslim?
Of course, God is All-Powerful, and even His power is not subjected to the limitations of time, space and matter.

Surat Qaf [50:16] - The Noble Qur'an
Surat Qaf [verse 16] - And We have already created man and know what his soul whispers to him,
and We are closer to him than [his] jugular vein.

Personally speaking, I often pray to myself, while at the same time, I follow Jesus' laid down example to follow, which is, praying to God, our Father above.

Now my dear beloved AntiChristian Muslim brother friend, let me paint you a picture on the Jesus-God relationship. Remember, I earlier advanced that I often speak to myself. Yeah? OK then, now lets go a tad deeper, loll.

With the earlier quoted Surat Qaf [50:16] from The Noble Qur'an above in your mind, think about the relationship between your own body and soul. Watch this. Your body regularly talks (i.e. speaks or prays) to your mind, for example, your body tells your soul, that your left hand, is cold or even, asks your soul, for things, like food and water, if not warmth then, loll. So do you see that your body, soul and even your spirit, is you? Also notice that your body and soul often work so well together, that they cooperatively seem to like and want the same things, loll. Are you getting it now, loll.

My dear beloved AntiChristian Muslim brother friend, since you still are struggling to break free your imprisoned mind, loll, let me shine another level of illumination needed for you to see all this with, loll

You can quote John 3:16, Acts 3:13, John 17:3 and John 20:17 until you are blue in the face, they won't remove the fact and truth that Jesus is God Incarnate, meaning, Jesus, is God embodied in a human form, that is, Jesus, equally is, God in a human being body.

Given that you know that, God, fundamentally is, Spirit, meaning, God is not composed of physical matter but God is incorporeal. Now watch this, your soul and spirit too, that are incorporeal, works with your body that is physical. Next listen to this, Jesus, who is, God in flesh, who is, God in a human being body, works with God, that fundamentally is Spirit, the same way, your body works with your mind, loll. Whatever plan(s), desire(s), wish(es) want(s) etc your soul has, your body carries out for it. So, just as the body, is a physical expression of the soul, so Jesus is a visible and physical expression of an invisible God, loll.

Unlike your 'God', God actually is Humble enough to do whatever is necessary for Him to become
The majesty of God gives Him no emotional problem or inhibition to prevent Him become whatever is necessary He become. In the wilderness, He became a Rock of water to quench the thirst of the Israelites. In same wilderness, He become pillars of cloud in the day and light in the dark etc
Dont you come down to the level of your kids?
Do you every time send messengers or house-helps to your kids?

For your information, messengers and Prophets cannot redeem you from your sins

Hebrews 10:5
That is why, when Christ came into the world, He said to God,
“You did not want animal sacrifices or sin offerings.
But you have given Me a body to offer.

No human being has the right to unjustly kill another another human being.
No human being has the right to kill another human being for personal and selfish financial gains.
If any human being wants to or needs to kill another human being, then such human being should create their own human being, made from scratch with raw materials, to kill.

Leviticus 17:11
Life is in the blood, and I have given you the blood of animals to sacrifice in place of your own.

Leviticus 17:14a
The life of every living creature is in its blood...

Hebrews 9:22
In fact under the Law almost everything is cleansed with blood,
and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness
[neither release from sin and its guilt, nor cancellation of the merited punishment].

Genesis 4:10
“What have you done?” replied the LORD.
“The voice of your brother’s blood cries out to Me from the ground.

Watch this. So, we found a way to connect blood to crime, but if there's no body, no blood, then there's no DNA evidence start investigation with, isnt it?

Now, my dear beloved AntiChristian Muslim brother friend, before turning your nose up at blood and its importance in the grand scheme of God, plan of salvation, redemption and reconciliation, you ought of thought about why blood, why not bone, why not head, why not leg, why not kidney, why not nose etc

Do you understand why blood is called the red river of life?
OK, go up notch, and ponder a bit on DNA in addition to its relationship blood and life in general, loll

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

---

---

DeepSight:
[s]Not surprising that you would ignore the obviously repugnant principle of propitiatory sacrifice for forgiveness of sins at play.
A principle well established in scripture.

No worries: I have come to understand the way you roll. Enjoy - its not peculiar to you. Its very familiar and often observed among religionists. [/s]

Hebrews 10:5
That is why, when Christ came into the world, He said to God,
“You did not want animal sacrifices or sin offerings.
But you have given Me a body to offer.

Your agbada has hooked barb wire, but be careful with you and your alter ego masquerade heading towards the expressway

Watch this. I repeat, no human being has the right to unjustly kill another another human being.
In fact, no human being has the right to kill another human being for personal and selfish financial gains.

Now, if any human being, wants to or needs to kill another human being, then such human being should create their own human being, made from scratch, and with using raw materials, to kill or do as they deem fit.

Hebrews 10:5 above? Pfft, not a chance of ice in hell, that will sink in.

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

NNTR:

---

---

Hip hop hooray, ho-hey, ho-hey, ho-hey-ho.
Give it up for naughty by nature, there's light inside the end of the tunnel. You slowly but surely have conceded that Jephthah in his calculation and afterthought, was actually expecting an animal to come meet and greet him, not

Do you use it for your darling daughters or other females in your family, work place or even community in general? C'mon say the truth, and let the devil remain being a liar

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

LMAO! It's so funny that you are using semantics to try and wriggle your way out of this. This sentence: "Think twice before you co-sign a loan, no matter who it is", is a prime example that it can refer to a person so just stop this line of argument, kole werk.

DeepSight:


Yes I did sir. And he said this -



- Which you then bolded and said -



He then asked you to please correct him, and you responded by citing 2 Chronicles 18:2.
I then picked up my concordance and saw that the word used there was zabah.

So how does your citing this verse show that he is "not really correct" in his statement above?
Unless i am missing something, glad to be corrected, thanks.

Ok sir... Basically pastorAi's assertion was that the word wayyizbaḥ in 2 Kings 23:20 was exclusively used & translated as "To sacrifice" in every other place in English translations of the Hebrew Bible except in this particular instance with the story of Josiah & the priests.
Translators chose to use "To slaughter" in an effort to deceive(his words) us.

On its own, this is a misunderstanding of how modern (non secterian/ individualistic) translations work.

But more importantly, for the purpose of our conversation, his assertion was a bit incorrect.
2 Kings 23:20 is not the only place wayyizbaḥ is not translated as "To sacrifice".

Hope that helped sir

jamesid29:


Ok sir... Basically pastorAi's assertion was that the word wayyizbaḥ in 2 Kings 23:20 was exclusively used & translated as "To sacrifice" in every other place in English translations of the Hebrew Bible except in this particular instance with the story of Josiah & the priests.
Translators chose to use "To slaughter" in an effort to deceive(his words) us.

On its own, this is a misunderstanding of how modern (non secterian/ individualistic) translations work.

But more importantly, for the purpose of our conversation, his assertion was a bit incorrect.
2 Kings 23:20 is not the only place wayyizbaḥ is not translated as "To sacrifice".

Hope that helped sir

No, because 2 Chronicles 18:2 is not an example that helps you. The word there is different. It is zabah.

DeepSight:


No, because 2 Chronicles 18:2 is not an example that helps you. The word there is different. It is zabah.

Actually it is wayyizbaḥ. The root word for wayyizbaḥ is zabah hence the "strong number".
The form wayyizbaḥ only occurs about 15times, two of which are in 2kings and 2chronicles.

You can pick up any good interlinear Bible to confirm.
Even the link he(pastorAi) posted confirms it as well