Stats: 3,191,682 members, 7,945,101 topics. Date: Tuesday, 10 September 2024 at 11:12 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? (5730 Views)
Lessons From The Story Of Jephthah And Human Sacrifice. / Man To Collect Equipment Donated To RCCG If Adeboye Fails To Endorse A Candidate / Suicide & Depression TRUTH - Does The BIBLE Endorse Suicide? (by Nephtali1981) (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by PastorAIO: 2:32pm On Feb 09, 2022 |
NNTR: You will enjoy me a lot more if you could get over the pain that you're feeling (which is actually self inflicted) and talk to me without hurling insults. |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by PastorAIO: 2:39pm On Feb 09, 2022 |
NNTR: The very passage you quote tells us that Josiah will SACRIFICE the priests. It doesn't even use Way yiz bah but uses another word for sacrifice which only further confirms that what did occur was a sacrifice. |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by PastorAIO: 3:08pm On Feb 09, 2022 |
NNTR: Ezekiel 8:14 14Then he brought me to the entrance of the north gate of the house of the LORD, and behold, there sat women weeping for Tammuz. 15Then he said to me, “Have you seen this, O son of man? You will see still greater abominations than these.” Those high places/shrines were where yhwh was worshipped. Other deities got worshipped there too. Similarly the Temple where yhwh was worshipped was also where the other deities were worshipped too. There was a power struggle between the Temple priests and the priests of the high places. The Temple priests wanted Jerusalem to be the only place where sacrifices were made to yhwh even though a lot of those shrines and high places were established for yhwh and some by yhwh. 2Chron 33: 15He removed the foreign gods and the idol from the house of the LORD, along with all the altars he had built on the temple mount and in Jerusalem, and he dumped them outside the city. Just as their were idol worship in the temple there was idol worship in Bethel. But in actual fact Bethel recognised as a spiritual place where yhwh can be encountered. This went way back to the time of Jacob who had a dream there and set up the first altar and called the place Beth-El, the house of God. It was a pilgrimage destination and the priests in Jerusalem were vexed because people went there instead of coming to the temple in Jerusalem to worship. In fact the purpose of Jeroboam investing in Bethel was specifically to give his people an alternative to going to Jerusalem. This is really what was going on, politically speaking. It was a power struggle. 1Kings 12 26And Jeroboam said in his heart, “Now the kingdom will turn back to the house of David. 27If this people go up to offer sacrifices in the temple of the LORD at Jerusalem, then the heart of this people will turn again to their lord, to Rehoboam king of Judah, and they will kill me and return to Rehoboam king of Judah.” 28So the king took counsel and made two calves of gold. And he said to the people, “You have gone up to Jerusalem long enough. Behold your gods, O Israel, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt.” 29And he set one in Bethel, and the other he put in Dan. 30Then this thing became a sin, for the people went as far as Dan to be before one. |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by PastorAIO: 3:20pm On Feb 09, 2022 |
Located about ten miles north of Jerusalem near the border of Israel and Judah, Bethel was known as Luz in pre-Israelite times (Gen. 28:19). The name “Bethel” (beit el) means the "house (or place) of God." Abraham, according to Genesis 12:8, built an altar east of Bethel shortly after arriving in Canaan from Haran. Later, Jacob, believing the place to be the "gate of heaven," named it Bethel. He is depicted as erecting a sacred pillar there shortly after having the dream of "Jacob's Ladder" (Gen. 28:18). The early shrine was apparently outside of the town of Luz, probably at a "high place." The exact location of either the primitive altar or later shrine at Bethel remains undetermined by archaeologists, although some believe the town may have been uncovered.[1]https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/bethel |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by jamesid29(m): 9:52am On Feb 10, 2022 |
PastorAIO: This is where I believe ,the first problem stems from sir. You are using your understanding of a word in it's target language to reinterpret what it must mean in it's source language. Pls note, a concordance is not the same thing as dictionary or lexicon In other to accurately translate words from one language(SL) to another(TL), one has to have a working level proficiency of the language's structure, grammer, culture,worldview of the speakers,context, quantity, time period and so on. Even to accurately do a word study without having to be highly proficient in a language, one has to atleast have a beginners level understanding of some of those things mentioned Without the above mentioned, something might look evident, but that does not follow that it is encompasses the full picture or that it's even correct. I'm glad you recognize these complexities with your example of the usage of the Yoruba word "Ebo"(although your other example of Cult does fall under a different matter). In that vain, I believe the first step is to address how the Hebrew grammar is structured and where the word wayyizbah fits into that But before going into that, I would like to nail down your answer to the last conversation. You sort of explained around it but did not really answer the question( Sorry if I am the one that missed your point). I can assure you that my question is not in anyway intended to be a gotcha question. I truly believe it would help us down the road in having some common understanding of translation and language nuance. So If I may ask it again in a clearer way, In 2chronicles 18:2, would you say that slaughter/kill is a suitable translation of the verb or do you think the translators mistranslated the verb(whether malicious or otherwise)? Thanks Pls note: I'm replying to the entirety of your last post, not just this quoted part. Thanks 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by PastorAIO: 2:10pm On Feb 11, 2022 |
jamesid29:Au contraire sir. I am not looking at the English word 'sacrifice' to understand the passages. Even in modern English Sacrifice is not limited to a Propitiation. For example, I can make sacrifices in order to afford to buy a new car. The sacrifices here suggests hardships and self imposed deprivations. It should be obvious that I wasn't focused on Sacrifice as used in modern English because I also said it had to be an Offering. That propitiatory aspect is what can be found whenever and wherever Way yiz bah is used. Like I said, Ebo is often translated as sacrifice in English too, but when we look at all the contexts in which the word pops up we realise that a closer translation would just be A Nourishment, a feeding. As one can feed Ogun shrine so one can also feed a child. It would be odd to say in English that you've just given your Child a sacrifice when all you did was give him fried plantains.
Where do we set the bench mark for what is a 'working level of proficiency of the language'? Many scholars of Hebrew texts make the same points as I do. For instance Dr Kipp Davis. He is a great deal more proficient in Hebrew than either of us. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZx4KzlxW0A However, I don't agree that because one's knowledge is not thorough then one should stop thinking at all. Or that one's insights are less valid. That is sort of an appeal to authority. Let ignoramus speak his opinion then let the more informed and come and criticise or buttress that opinion from their more informed perspective. Yes, a concordance is not a dictionary. What a concordance does is show us the different contexts in which a word is used and that helps us to understand the connotations carried by the word. For instance we know that ebo can be given to deities and it can be given to human and the common thread is that something/someone is being fed. Similarly every context in which we see the word Way Yiz Bah involves a Propitiation or the other, whether it is a deity being propitiated or a human. To further confirm that Josiah what Josiah did was considered a sacrifice and not just a judicial slaughter NNTR furnished us with a passage: 1 Kings 13:1-2Here a different word altogether, yet translated as Sacrifice, is used talking about the same event.
I'm keen to hear what you know about how Hebrew language is structured and how that pertains to our discussion. As regards 2Chronicles 18:2, without indication that the slaughtered sheep and cattle were presented as a propitiation to his In-law then that translation would not be suitable. Obviously sometimes to accurately capture an idea that is born by one single word in a language it may require more than one word or a phrase even in a different language. To translate it as Slaughter without reference to the presentation would be wrong and misleading. As indeed NNTR and Steep were misled by dissociating what happened there from what happened in 2Kings. Way yizbah = Slaughtered for propitiation/slaughtered for offering towards someone or something. |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by orisa37: 2:19pm On Feb 11, 2022 |
Thou shall not commit MURDER of any kind. |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by jamesid29(m): 2:48am On Feb 14, 2022 |
PastorAIO: That's really what you're doing sir. Without attempting to understand how each language works on its own terms, you're making authoritative statements on one of them.. This usually leads to a lot of misunderstanding and sometimes serious errors when people make translations in this manner. E.g John 1:1 and the identity of the word. Like in this case, you're basing your argument on the word wayyizbah and looking it up on a concordance. Two out of those concordance entries don't match your own understanding of the word so your conclusion was, the translators were being malicious in 2kings and as for 2chronicles, the answer is still up in the air. As I stated in my last post sir, the first misunderstanding stems from your understanding of what the form wayyizibah really means. The thing is wayyizibah is not really a word on its own. It's a combination of a narrative sequence tool called a waw/vav consecutive ( 'WA' + the doubling of the first letter of the verb it's attached to) and a conjunction of a verb in it's 3rd person masculine singular. Unlike English, Hebrew verbs & nouns are built from a 3 consonant root word in combination with one of 7 stems(constructor/binyan) namely: "Pa'al/Qal, Niphal,Hiphil and so on". So for example: שׁ-מ-ר (sh-m-r), in the Qal stem/constructor, we get שָׁמַר (shamar) - meaning Guard. This concept will coming handy latter Also hebrew verbs also change forms to denote Person,Gender,Number and Tense. For example using our verb above ( Shamar): He will guard in hebrew would be just one word Yishmor (יִשְׁמֹר) She will guard in hebrew would be just one word Tishmor (תִּשְׁמֹר) As you can see, the three word sentence in English is smushed together into just one Hebrew verb. In that one word denotes the Person ( in this case, the subject in the 3rd person: he/she), Number(singular/plural), Gender(male/ female) and Tense(present, past or future tense in English: in Hebrew its Perfect or Imperfect tense). This type of smushing of word happens across the board for 1st person, 2nd person, plural, present tense,past tense and so on. This makes a single verb be spelt differently depending on where it's used. For an English speaker, the verbs Yishmor, Tishmor, Shamar and it's many other forms might look like they are different words, but in reality they are all the same word( in this case Shamar). So if want to know what the word Yishmor means, you have to go look up what the word Shamar(it's root verb) means. And if you want to look up a concordance on the word Yishmor, you’ll only get the word where it’s used as a 3rd person mascular singular. Consequently for our verb in question Way Yisbah,technically the "h" here had the ch sound but anyway the second part of the word Yisbah is actually a 3rd person singular of the verb Zabach in the imperfect tense. Now for the first part of the word(the waw-prefix/ the WAY part), As stated above this is called a Waw consecutive or Preterite (= “past”) or a Wayyiqtol. This concept is a narrative style used in the Hebrew bible to show a sequence of events. In other words, its used to express the main line of action in a past tense narrative. English uses the simple past tense to achieve the same result. For example: George walked toward the cliff, wondering what had happened to his friends. Standing on the edge,he gazed down its face, looking for some sign of them, but no one was there. He sighed, put his hands to his mouth, and shouted yet again. There was still no answer, but then something far below him moved on the face of the cliff. The main storyline consists of five events: George walked, gazed, sighed, put, shouted, and something moved. The other verbal forms (“wondering”, “had happened”, “standing”, “looking”, and “was”), also identify events (or non-events), but do not describe the next event on the storyline. Both “wondering” and “standing” tell us that George was doing two things at the same time : wondering as he walked and standing as he gazed. “Looking for” modifies “gazed”, narrowing its focus to tell us that George was not merely admiring the scenery. Only the highlighted sequential verbs identify a sequence of actions. Also in biblical Hebrew The waw/vav consecutive/ Preterite (= “past”)/ Wayyiqtol is also a thread—a narrative tool used to tell readers that the event that it describes is the next event in the sequence of events in the story. For example: In Gen 24:17-18: And ran the servant to meet her, and said, let me drink please a little water from your jar and so she said, ....... The main storyline consists of five events: The servant ran, then he said something, so she said something, and she quickly let down her jar and then gave him water. Hebrew uses waw-consecutive to show that this actions are a sequence of events. This is done basically by adding waw(W/V) followed by a patach vowel(an "ah" vowel like f[b]a[/b]ther) and lastly a strong dagesh to the first letter of the verb(it's just a sign that generally means double the letter it's pointed on in English: Eg hamock, becomes hammock, if the dagesh is on the m letter). So the word: Yō·mer( 3rd person masculine singular of the verb ruts/רוּץ) becomes Way·yō·mer(וַיֹּ֕אמֶר) - And (he) said Tō·mer( 3rd person feminine singular of the same verb ruts/רוּץ) becomes Wat·tō·mer(וַתֹּ֖אמֶר) - And she said: So this is the same way, Yiz·baḥ(3rd person mascular singular of the verb Zabach) becomes "Way yizbah". If you use an interlinear and check closely under the an highlighted "Way·yiz·bah", you would see a Conj‑w | V‑Qal‑ConsecImperf‑3ms underneath. This is there to tell you that this word is a "conjunction waw", a verb of the "Qal(stem)", Its a Consecutive imperfect( meaning it's showing a sequence of events in a story: something happened,then another thing happened and so on), and finally it's in a 3rd person masculine singular form of it's verb. So if you're using a concordance to look up the word Wayyizbah and making a translational judgement of that without understanding what the verb is doing there, you would be looking up wrong thing. Ofcourse because of time, there's been a lot of simplification and things are generally more complex than this, but I hope you got the general idea. In other to do an accurate word study of the word and an interpretation of the text itself, one has to 1) Strip the word of it's conjugation and other stuff to get to the root word & stem. This is called parsing. Most good software tools like logos, olive tree etc automatically do this part. 2)Look up the parsed word in a good lexicon to see it's current semantic range. Semantic range can change depending on more discoveries & understanding of the language 3) You can use a concordance to find every instance of the word in it's root word & stem. Languages are very tricky. A word can be used one way a thousand times and used in another way with a different naunce and meaning in a few other place. That's a feature of every language, even English. E.g 9 out of 10 times, the word "to dust" connotes cleaning but in a few cases it can also be used as "to sprinkle" 4)Learn enough about the background, culture, worldview and so on of the text in question. The goal is to try and get into the world of the author and original audience. In other words to think the way they would have thought.. This is arguably harder and slower than it sounds but Cultural river plays a huge role in how we understand any text( or any piece of information/ communication actually). The way I think is different from the way someone brought up in Germany thinks even though we share the same century and there's always a lot of miscommunications when both parties do not understand their cultural differences. 5) It's always a good idea to look up good critical commentaries and other resources on the text, regardless of the level one is( even expert scholars do this). Knowledge doesn't happen in a vacuum and seeing how others who have expertise in the field parse the text can help one see blindspots or gain perspective. Of course doing all this is not a guarantee that one will not make mistakes( we all have blindspots) but it's a whole lot better than not doing them. You're making the point we've all been trying to make to you sir. Almost every regular speaker of the Yoruba language, associates Ebo with the meaning Ritual offering. I even did a google search of it and everywhere I looked(even in sites and papers focused on yoruba tradition or spirituality), I didn't see any where ebo meant anything other than ritual sacrifice. You're actually the first person I'm hearing a different meaning from. I am not disputing you're interpretation of ebo because a) Critical Resources on yoruba spirituality and traditions are not easily accessible, so just because I couldn't find one anywhere that matches what you said after a couple searches doesn't automatically mean I should discard it b) I do not know enough about the Yoruba conception of certain things in other to authoritatively negate your argument. Now let's assume you are correct: Imagine you are faced with a text that say, Iya re fun l'ebo Working proficiency is not an abstract concept or something hard to benchmark. It just basically means knowing enough to work with the language or subject matter. German scholarship dominated & pushed the field of biblical studies forward a couple of centuries ago. Because of that, many critical commentaries and works are written in German. Today most biblical scholars have to have enough knowledge of German in other to engage with many of those works. They might not be able to speak German fluently but they know enough of the language to work with it. Most physicist have to know maths to a certain degree so they can do their calculations. Even in MMA, regardless of one's martial arts background (kick boxing, karate etc), every MMA fighter needs to know how to grapple to an extent. Israel Adesanya comes from a kick boxing background and is not an expert grappler but he won't have been successful in MMA if he didn't pick up enough grappling skills to survive in the octagon. As I said earlier, working proficiency is not an abstract concept neither is it hard to benchmark. It doesn't necessarily mean one is an expert in the field but means one at least has enough understanding of the field to effectively engage and work with it. Our conversation has been about 2kings and A) whether what Josiah did was a ritual sacrifice to God and B)whether translations were intentionally manipulated to hide this fact. This has been the only conversation between the both of us. The video of Dr kipp doesn't touch on any of this two points. In what I watched, he doesn't associate Josiah's killing of the priest with a ritual sacrifice to Yahweh, neither does he even hint at it or even bring it up. There's a reason for that... (incase I missed it because I skipped right to section on Israel, pls provide the timestamp and I'll go back & watch it). On the passages he raised, I believe you can engage his aurguments with the paper you provided a link to. The author already did well in providing arguments from both sides of the conversation . It's a good place to start following the rabbit trail from. Just my opinion though
That's not the point sir. The point is not about not thinking but about knowing our limitations on the things we might reasonably not be certain about. I'll round up here by giving two examples 1) A scholar I respect alot made an aurgement connecting Hammurabi with Amraphel of Gen 14 using linguistic connections. Problem is, many other expert in the space reject this view and I don't know enough about the augment to speak confidently on it(one way or another). Best I can do is mention it and leave it at that.( That's if I even mention it at all in the first place) 2) Recently, I was pondering on Matthew 7 and I had an interesting interpretation of one of the verses. It made sense to me based on the text but before I went out telling people about it, I checked it up against some sources to see how well my arguments stacked up. Slowly, I realized I had missed some things and my interpretation was possibly a bit skewed. So the point isn't about not thinking but about knowing that with everything we know, there's a world of things we are yet to know especially if we haven't done due deligence. Over the years I've learnt to live with ambiguities. There are very few things I hold on too very strongly. One of the things I can say for certain when it comes to my faith is that the God of the bible is exactly who Jesus portrayed him to be "A just & loving God". This is not an understanding that comes from emotions but from my understanding of the scripture on its own terms. I've seen other people who were anti christians but who allowed the bible speak on its own terms come to the same conclusion( some are even not still Christians but don't doubt God's justice and love ). I know you might not see things that way but I hope some day, you will. Have a great week ahead. 1 Like |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by PastorAIO: 2:42pm On Feb 17, 2022 |
These are a lot of words. Well let me try to answer them as best I can. When I first read this post a few days a go you said something that it seems that you have since deleted. Something to the effect that you believe the god of the bible to be 'just and good as portrayed by Jesus' and from that is based your understanding of the verses. Of course my position is diametrically contrary to that. We all know that premises, context and framing plays a big part in interpretations. So when you start with the premise that Yhwh is 'just and good' then that will colour how you interpret the passages. So obviously when you see Way yizbah and fail to interpret it as sacrifice that premise plays a part in your interpretation. I must confess I still haven't read it. I've only skimmed through it though it looked very interesting. I picked up on the fact that he was presenting various contradicting opinions and also offering some of his own. This is the way with scholarship generally. Almost anything open to interpretation can be interpreted in such a variety of ways that may even contradict each other. So why do I insist on the interpretation that I have? First and foremost, unlike you, I do NOT think that yhwh is just and good. Our understandings of the bible will differ to the extent that our premises differ. I don't know if the text I shared looks into the Ezekiel passage that I quoted earlier. But that passage is a clear as daylight admission that Yhwh did give statutes and commandments that children should be sacrificed. Ezekiel 20 24because they had not obeyed my rules, but had rejected my statutes and profaned my Sabbaths, and their eyes were set on their fathers’ idols. 25Moreover, I gave them statutes that were not good and rules by which they could not have life, 26and I defiled them through their very gifts in their offering up all their firstborn, that I might devastate them. I did it that they might know that I am the LORD. This establishes the fact that, for whatever reason, Yhwh intentionally gave statutes and commands. You may say it was a punitive move because they failed to heed his previous commands. Again I am not interested in the motivation. I'm interested in the fact that these statutes were actually given. It is from this basis that I read much regarding the 'slaughter' of humans on an altar. I see the same word that is used for the slaughter of animals in ritual sacrifice and I see that word applied also to human victims. Further more I see that the first born is to be redeemed according to commands and I ask, redeemed from what? What happens to the other 'first fruits' that yhwh similarly requests. I shall be back to address the other parts of your post. jamesid29: |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by jamesid29(m): 8:09am On Feb 18, 2022 |
PastorAIO:hmm.... it's alright sir Enjoy the rest of your week |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by PastorAIO: 11:28am On Feb 18, 2022 |
jamesid29: While the internet is a fine repository off much information there is much it doesn’t cover. I find this to be especially true of things involving Yoruba culture. The best source of information on these things is traditional elders. Not even our age mates. Luckily I have a Yoruba dictionary written by RC Abraham It clearly shows that to bö is to feed, but not only to feed but with the intention to fattened or make more robust. In other words to nurture and nourish. So you can feed a cow but if the cow is not getting fatter then that is aböti. The same way you feed a child you also feed a Orisha shrine. The intention is the same. To nourish and to make robust. That is why Yoruba do not have a shrine for Eledumare because there is nothing that a human can give to say he wants to feed eledumare. On the contrary it is Eledumare that feeds the world. It is Orisha that are fed, not Eledumare. There is no contradiction in meaning when you use bö for children or for shrines. Similarly my point is that there is no contradiction of meaning when you read Wayyizbah in reference to cattle and when you read it in reference to humans. I was with a friend when I looked it up and we discovered the word Ibö mbö! What a useful word. Many men I know, including my friend, are languishing under ibömbö. That is Alimony or child support in English. That gave us a laugh. 2 Likes
|
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by sonmvayina(m): 12:10pm On Feb 18, 2022 |
NNTR: Was he commended by God for burning his daughter. ? No he was not. He did it anyway... This event took place when the jews were trying to settle down as a nation. Everybody was doing whatever they liked. Both good and evil. He made a vow that letter cost him his happiness. He has to sacrifice his own daughter. He did, but it is an abomination in God's eyes...The story teller is telling us that is it stuupid and as such we should desit from it.. So the message I'm the story is that we should trust in our strength and desist from making vows or promises that will cost us our happiness... |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by jamesid29(m): 1:26pm On Feb 18, 2022 |
PastorAIO: LoL... I hope you know that Abraham's Modern Yoruba dictionary is available on online libraries, right... It is well sir 1 Like |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by PastorAIO: 2:49pm On Feb 18, 2022 |
jamesid29: I didn’t know that. It needs to be higher up on Google’s algorithms cos it doesn’t come up when you put in Yoruba words. In fact, ridiculously, I’ve often googled a word only to be sent to Nairaland of all places. Lol. |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by jamesid29(m): 3:13pm On Feb 18, 2022 |
PastorAIO:Part of my job heavily depends on research.. In any case, I borrowed it and it clearly shows that apart from both words not even sharing the same sound, they don't share the same root or etymology. Added the other one's that share the same sound but not the same root or meanings for further clarity. Anyway, it's fine. 1 Like
|
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by PastorAIO: 3:32pm On Feb 18, 2022 |
jamesid29: I don't get what you mean by not sharing the same sound. And also, where did you look into the etymology to find that they have different roots? (these are genuine questions, not gotcha questions) |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by jamesid29(m): 3:40pm On Feb 18, 2022 |
PastorAIO:Just look at the dictionary. I believe you should know how it's structured since you also own it. As for the sound, that has to do with the ami.. BỌ́ is a different ami ohun from BỌ 1 Like |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by DeepSight(m): 3:53pm On Feb 18, 2022 |
OK Jamesid29, Away from all the technicality of language and wayizbahs and Josiahs and Jephtahs and what not. What is your own take on the concept of a transcendental omnipotent God requiring any kind of propitiatory sacrifice for sins - be it the animal sacrifices of the Old Testament or the alleged sacrifice of Christ of the New Testament. |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by jamesid29(m): 4:39pm On Feb 18, 2022 |
DeepSight:That's actually a very fascinating question. For a being to be truly God from our perspective, he not only has to be omnipotent, he also has to be perfectly Just. A perfectly just being would also have to do justice to sin otherwise he is no longer perfectly Just. Unlike gods of the ancient world, the bible makes a claim that the God of the bible is also perfectly loving. So if I may ask you, how do you think the bible resolves the tension between the character of a God who is perfectly just and perfectly loving , and who has to deal with free moral agents who have fallen to sin? 1 Like |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by DeepSight(m): 6:14pm On Feb 18, 2022 |
jamesid29: And your answer is just as interesting. For a being to be truly God from our perspective, he not only has to be omnipotent, he also has to be perfectly Just. A perfectly just being would also have to do justice to sin otherwise he is no longer perfectly Just. Do I understand right that by asking this question, you are headed in the direction which generally says that arising from the fall of man, there was no other way to balance the scales of divine justice - the sacrifice of a "pure lamb of God" being necessary to "pay the price" on behalf of mankind? Because if the foregoing familiar argument is where you are headed, please help me with a few questions - 1. What was the purpose of the animal sacrifices of the Old Testament 2. Does the idea that one person can "pay" for the sins of another meet the requirements of justice? 3. Why must any such "payment" be in torture, blood and death? 4. What has changed after the alleged propitiatory sacrifice of Christ - do humans not still have to live righteous lives to be acceptable to God - as always was the case anyway? 5. Why is genuine repentance of sins insufficient such that a torturous blood sacrifice is required? These to my mind are more important questions than all the hassle about language technicalities because Christian doctrine centres on the alleged propitiatory sacrifice of Christ. Many thanks in advance. |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by jamesid29(m): 8:06pm On Feb 18, 2022 |
DeepSight:I totally agree with you that language technicalities is really not that important in the grand scheme of things. I just wanted to point out a misunderstanding and really didn't think it would get this long. In any case,to your questions. I do think they're really important since they're at the core of the Christian faith. To answer your questions is to start from the very beginning of the bible and trace a matrix of ideas with a unified theme through it. If you don't mind, I'll like to post a few videos that I believe do a good job at this. The videos are super short (5-10mins ) and very accessible. One of the author is a solid biblical scholar and a couple of college teachers actually use their videos for their first year students I really do hope you find these resources helpful or at least worth pondering. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zy2AQlK6C5k https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=takEeHtRrMw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbipxLDtY8c https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTnq6I3vUbU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNOZ7ocLD74 1 Like |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by DeepSight(m): 9:21pm On Feb 18, 2022 |
jamesid29: Thank you very much for the videos - which I took the time to watch and absorb carefully. Sadly, my hope that they might provide anything new did not materialize. They only provide standard statements of Christian theology without substantively addressing the questions I raised. For example in the first video you have a standard statement about how the animal sacrifices of the old testament absorbed sin and made reconciliation (with God) possible and how the sacrifice of Christ also made this possible in a more perfect way. This does nothing to show exactly why such sacrifices are the way to reconciliation (- - - is God blood thirsty? - - - ) or exactly how such sacrifices present reconciliation. All of the other videos follow in the same pattern of a simple repetition of standard Christian theology without tangible rationalization or justification of same. In my world view, a creator is primarily responsible for its created work. And consequently the responsibility for the state of the world rests primarily with the creator of the world and not created beings. https://www.nairaland.com/6902122/creator-judge-created Thank you nevertheless, for sharing, appreciated. |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by NNTR: 7:56am On Feb 19, 2022 |
DeepSight:loll DeepSight:Ezekiel 22:30 'I searched for a man among them who would build up the wall and stand in the gap before Me for [the sake of] the land, that I would not destroy it, but I found no one [not even one].' This is a very good worded sentence and done expressed so as to wring out information, loll Phrase words first to be familiar with are: template/die/prototype/archetype/blueprint/exemplar/first model/original etc, then leader, example. Next will be, to acknowledge that, sin, coming from a bible perspective, Jewish in particular, is a concept that has to do with missing a mark, coming off target, essentially falling short of God's standard, essentially, if said in layman terms, then a fault, defect, glitch, irregularity, crookedness or flaw. Following will also be, to acknowledge that, the animal sacrifices of the Old Testament were temporaries, precursors of the sacrifice of Christ, of the New Testament, so to speak, who coincidentally is God Incarnate, that's meaning, God personified in human being flesh, i.e. God in human being body or flesh, loll As for the, aforementioned 'template/die/prototype/archetype/blueprint/exemplar/first model/original etc', we see them in Manufacturing processes, Computing softwares, Biochemistry etc. Take for example, minting coins, requires using a die. Creating word documents requires, to start with, using a normal.dot template. Even, we all, as human beings, are archetypes of Adam and Eve. Nearly all living organisms have their genetics encoded in their DNA Now, what is going to be the optimum correction, if something should go wrong (e.g. in terms, of a fault, defect, glitch, irregularity, crookedness, flaw, blemish, blotch, streak, wrinkle, kink etc) with an actual 'template/die/prototype/archetype/blueprint/exemplar/first model/original etc'? Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories. cc: TenQ |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by NNTR: 7:57am On Feb 19, 2022 |
DeepSight:Leviticus 17:11 Life is in the blood, and I have given you the blood of animals to sacrifice in place of your own. Leviticus 17:14a The life of every living creature is in its blood... Hebrews 9:22 In fact under the Law almost everything is cleansed with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness [neither release from sin and its guilt, nor cancellation of the merited punishment]. Genesis 4:10 “What have you done?” replied the LORD. “The voice of your brother’s blood cries out to Me from the ground. Watch this. So, we found a way to connect blood to crime, but if there's no body, no blood, then there's no DNA evidence start investigation with, isnt it? Now, my dear beloved brother friend, before turning your nose up at blood and its importance in the grand scheme of God's, plan of salvation, redemption and reconciliation, you ought of thought about, why blood, why not bone, why not head, why not leg, why not kidney, why not nose etc Do you understand why blood is called the red river of life? OK, go up a notch, and ponder a bit on DNA, that I passingly earlier mentioned above, think about it, in addition to its relationship blood and life in general, loll 'Is God blood thirsty?' you asked, loll. Of course not. Of course, God is not bloodthirsty, neither is God bloodlust. At least not in the manner or way, you're imagining God to be, loll Without trying to come across as a broken record, the animal sacrifices of the Old Testament were temporaries, precursors of the sacrifice of Christ, the genuine article, as it were. You're absolutely correct in saying that 'a creator is primarily responsible for its created work. And consequently the responsibility for the state of the world rests primarily with the creator of the world and not created beings' Now, in a similar vein, the Creator, God, too is responsible for you, one of its created work, just as you are responsible for your son(s) and daughter(s) still living with you under your roof, meaning, your home or house) However, just as the state of the world rests primarily with the Creator of the world and not the created beings, so does, the state of your house, in general, rests primarily with you and not with your kids (i.e. son(s) and daughter(s)), but there's caveat, though with this, loll, which is after you've assigned your kids (i.e. son(s) and daughter(s)) their individual and respective rooms in your house, the responsibilities for the state (e.g. cleanliness, hygiene, of those rooms shifts to now rest primarily with your kids (i.e. son(s) and daughter(s)) . Watch this, I am sure that since assigning rooms to your kids (i.e. son(s) and daughter(s)), you dont without first knock on the door, barge into their rooms unannounced. Whether they like it or not, you dont access their rooms and begin changing the arrangement of things in their rooms just like that Circling back to your '... without tangible rationalization or justification of same...' mystification, loll, now if you've followed almost all I shared above, you would realised that while we had a first Adam (i.e. template), Christ, is the second Adam or better still, the Last Adam, loll. Another term, you've probably heard band about, is born again, aka born on high or born of the Spirit, well the advent of the second Adam made that possible. Another thing is that, God didnt do, hasn't done anything He would and/or could do Himself. In fact, what God did, was a DIY, meaning, did a Do-It-Yourself, being that, in the person of Jesus, repaired and/or rebuilt the wall and stood in the gap, when no was found who could or who was willing to. Better, I pause at this juncture, though I have more, plenty actually, to share and shine light on blood and all, loll. Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories. |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by TenQ: 9:57am On Feb 19, 2022 |
NNTR:Let me check the original post. I'll feed you back |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by TenQ: 10:07am On Feb 19, 2022 |
tctrills:It certainly was not righteousness, it was ignorance. Why? 1. The proposal of Jephthah was stupid in its own sense. Who does Jephthah will come out from his door to greet him? A dog, a cow, a slave or her daughter? 2. The Bible recorded what actually happened as a historical record. Jephthah was not commanded to do such but that was what he did. God did not validate what Jephthah did in any way. 3. It was a time of gross ignorance in Israel. Everyone did as he thinks! Judg 17:6: "In those days there was no king in Israel, but every man did that which was right in his own eyes." Conclusion: Was it true that Jephthah sacrificed his daughter? Yes What it RIGHTEOUSNESS? No Was Jephthah commanded as such? No Why was it recorded? It was an accurate account of what happened at that time in Israel with Jephthah! Cc: NNTR |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by TenQ: 10:51am On Feb 19, 2022 |
DeepSight:I think the major problem is NOT understanding the weight and seriousness of sin. What do you think should be the punishment for rebellion or blatant disobedience to the CREATOR of Everything? Just as there are Physical laws (gravity, electromagnet, entropy etc), there are biological laws (reproduction, mutation, aging etc), social laws, etc, there is also spiritual laws one of which is "the law of sin and death". The law of sin and death prescribes DEATH (severance) from the SOURCE of EVERYTHING who is God Himself. We own our Body and we own our Soul but we do not own our Spirit. Our spirit is God's. When we soil our spirit with sin, we more or less soil God with blemish hence if God would remain perfect, such tainted spirit is severed eternally from God. But, there is a CLAUSE John 3:16: "For God so loved the world, ... This necessitated God Himself to prescribe a workaround to this law of sin and death without violating His attribute of being Just. To free the "loved" person from the judgement of his CRIME against God, someone MUST pay the debt with his Life The concept of the SCAPEGOAT is well evident in the scripture. Please check this scripture: Lev 16:7-10,16-18,21-22: "And he shall take the two goats, and present them before the LORD at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation. And Aaron shall cast lots on the two goats; one lot for the LORD, and the other lot for the scapegoat. And Aaron shall bring the goat on which the LORD's lot fell, and offer him for a sin offering. But the goat, on which the lot fell to be the scapegoat, shall be presented alive before the LORD, to make an atonement with him, and to let him go for a scapegoat into the wilderness. … And he shall make an atonement for the holy place, because of the uncleanness of the children of Israel, and because of their transgressions in all their sins: and so shall he do for the tabernacle of the congregation, that remains among them in the middle of their uncleanness. And there shall be no man in the tabernacle of the congregation when he goes in to make an atonement in the holy place, until he come out, and have made an atonement for himself, and for his household, and for all the congregation of Israel. And he shall go out to the altar that is before the LORD, and make an atonement for it; and shall take of the blood of the bullock, and of the blood of the goat, and put it on the horns of the altar round about. … And Aaron shall lay both his hands on the head of the live goat, and confess over him all the iniquities of the children of Israel, and all their transgressions in all their sins, putting them on the head of the goat, and shall send him away by the hand of a fit man into the wilderness: And the goat shall bear on him all their iniquities to a land not inhabited: and he shall let go the goat in the wilderness." 1. The children of Israel sinned 2. God's prescription is a SUBSTITUTE for the punishment 3. This sacrifice is done ONCE a YEAR for the sin of Israel. NOTE: This is God's own SOLUTION for the PROBLEM of SIN in Man. To the New Testament: Heb 9:12: "Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us." Heb 10:4: "For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins." The Blood of Animals is an antitype pointing to the time when the LAMB of God will once and for all take away the sins of the world. John 1:29: "The next day John sees Jesus coming to him, and said, Behold the Lamb of God , which takes away the sin of the world." Jesus Himself explained it like this: Only those who accept God's solution and prescription for the problem of sin gets SAVED. John 3:14-15: "And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up: That whoever believes in him should not perish, but have eternal life." Conclusion: Why does God require Blood/Life as sacrifice for SIN? Because sin MUST be punished (no escape for that)! Cc: NNTR 1 Like |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by DeepSight(m): 4:58pm On Feb 20, 2022 |
TenQ: 1. None of this explains the animal sacrifices of the old testament and 2. The concept of an innocent party paying with his life for the sins of guilty parties hardly seems just. Balancing the scales of justice requires appropriate reciprocal consequences to those persons who deserve them. The idea that anyone can step in and "buy-out" the punishment is a commercial concept which should be alien to true justice, especially justice of a divine nature. Not only is this "buy-out" concept mercantile in nature, it is also intrinsically pagan and thus as far away from the purity of divine justice as can be imagined. This is aside from the fact that the said sacrifice of Christ is questionable as a sacrifice. Because to lay down a life that you know for sure you are picking up again three days later is a much better deal than any other mortal has. 1 Like |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by DeepSight(m): 5:03pm On Feb 20, 2022 |
NNTR: Please stop punctuating your write-ups with "lol" after every few words, if you mean to be taken seriously. Now, note that nothing you have said has justified the blood-lust of Yahweh. Why exactly is genuine repentance insufficient, why must blood-letting do the job of forgiveness? How exactly does that make sense if Yahweh is not a pagan barbarian? |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by Steep(m): 5:15pm On Feb 20, 2022 |
DeepSight:What I think is that the animal sacrifice represented the sacrifice of Jesus, they were temporary till the real sacrifice. 1 Like |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by DeepSight(m): 6:08pm On Feb 20, 2022 |
Steep: But how exactly does that work? How does something like that stand in the gap for the supposed real thing? Is it that papa-God sha must see blood before him go hear pesin, abi wetin, break it down. And secondly this still does not answer why that "real sacrifice" is so necessary in the first place. Why is genuine repentance from sins insufficient? |
Re: Does The Bible Endorse Human Sacrifice? by DeepSight(m): 6:18pm On Feb 20, 2022 |
Essentially the question remains this - on what basis can a Christian condemn any ritual human sacrifice when such is at the very centre and core of Christian doctrine and indeed the Christian grounds his salvation on such. |
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (Reply)
How To Say '*God Is Good...all The Time' In Different Languages / Open Confession Of Former Cult Member / Dedicate Yourself To Satan
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 255 |