Nastymods:


I ah donkey

DissTroy:


Now you put it correctly: It's your agenda negating the actual truth.

Post like yours are the ones which should actually have the fact-checkers' label as false information.

budaatum:
This is what happens when you refuse to cop a plea for a crime you claim to have never committed.

basilico:


your opinions are irrelevant. Go back to school . In some culture people like you get physically circumcized.
whiner naysayer never do well

there a lot of reasonable people here. you are the most caustic.

budaatum:

I expect my opinion to be irrelevant to ignorant fools like you. Thankfully, your maga kraken sort is not the only type here.

budaatum:


If you'd bothered to follow the conversation from its inception you'd understand the irony of posting a positive outcome for drumpthgp to prove my point, but of course that would mean work on your part which is not to be expected.

The truth is drumpthgp did not cop a plea for a crime he claimed he did not commit, and it would have been stupid if he had copped a plea.

DissTroy:


You got caught in a web. You used a news source that has openly declared hatred for a man as evidence against the very same man. Even in a law court, an established history of bias against a defendant standing trial already nullifies the credibility of a witness or a prosecutor.

New York Times and CNN have stated obvious seething hatred for Trump which negates their credibility in issues about him.

DissTroy:


You got caught in a web. You used a news source that has openly declared hatred for a man as evidence against the very same man. Even in a law court, an established history of bias against a defendant standing trial already nullifies the credibility of a witness or a prosecutor.

New York Times and CNN have stated obvious seething hatred for Trump which negates their credibility in issues about him.

budaatum:


That so called "bias" is what makes my point, diss. Drumpthfg did not cop a plea to a crime he says he did not commit.

budaatum:


That so called "bias" is what makes my point, diss. Drumpthfg did not cop a plea to a crime he says he did not commit.

basilico:


Hey Diss

There seems to be a ruling elite behind the scenes. Against conservative views. And its worldwide. In my opinion it seems like a coordinated effort to stem dissent.
media has been fully made compliant,
I think that Goolag Google/Facebook is the major driver behind these machinations. Ad revenue is where money is made. He who controls the money controls the mind.
I believe you are a Search Engine Optimization expert. Because thats where mony is.

DissTroy:


You got caught in a web. You used a news source that has openly declared hatred for a man as evidence against the very same man.

budaatum:


You obviously missed the conversation or you'd realise they had to eat humble pie with that particular article about cases against drumpthg being dropped.

By your reasoning they would have buried that information instead.

DissTroy:


As a neutral who isn't involved in the ongoing USA/U.K. versus Russia proxy war, if you ever were in doubt about the bias of big tech and the media, they way they have reported the details of the Ukraine crisis would open four eyes.

It's been common knowledge that search results are manipulated and some contrary news sources outrightly refused to be indexed by Google and the likes.

That's why many people are increasingly using alternative search engines like DuckDuckGo.

In fact, it is very easy for a Leftist to remove a search result showing a Right-leaning opinion. All you have to do is add "discriminatory" or "homophobic" or trash points like that and your query would be quickly replied.

The supposed bots are programmed and vettted by people who are biased to begin with.

----

Please find out the number of times GoDaddy has seized and deactivated the domain names of Right-leaning websites (I could give you popular examples), but such domain hosting companies are supposed to be neutral.


The elites control these companies who control the search results for their agenda.

Similar to .NG controlled by the FG, and I avoid buying .NG domains for certain reasons.

DissTroy:


You are missing the point.

If I have previously stated on another thread that I hate you and want to see the end of you, the day a brawl happens on this thread involving you and some other guy, and I am called upon to testify; the fact that I have admitted an obvious bias against you in the past means my testimony is not admissible in this public court.

DissTroy:

New York Times, CNN and those who have admitted hatred for Trump are not credible news sources for a testimony against him. Bring me Al Jazeera or the seemingly neutral likes.

DissTroy:

You don't get it and it beats me that you don't. I expect more from you, Budaatum.

budaatum:


But that's not the point here diss. The article I posted shows how they hounded drumpthfg and lost. Basically, egg on their face, but your "obvious bias" blinds you to that fact it seems.

DissTroy:

Your responses so far show you think Trump is in the wrong ...

budaatum:


"Bring you", diss? Because you can't duckduckgo for yourself perhaps, or do you think buda must spoon-feed you?

Go on, duck so we can see how drumpthfg, wisely, for once, did not cop a plea for a crime he claims he did not commit.

Ben can even testify that he did not cop a plea for either of his impeachments too, which just further proves my point, which is that the innocent, on the whole, do not cop pleas for crimes they never commited.

benalvino3:


Nobody makes this argument that all innocent people plead guilty to crimes they did not commit.

Try and be honest. You are now making argument nobody makes and attack it as usual.

DissTroy:
Basilico , here's another real-time proof of Big Tech bias like Google and the rest in favour of the Left.


If you search "Hillary Clinton lied" for news about her mails and testimonies;

On DuckDuckGo - which is not biased, it shows search results of neutral and right-leaning websites and the left too on the frontpage. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=hillary+clinton+lied&t=h_&ia=web . These analyze the situation logically.

On Google, it prioritizes news articles from Leftist media and even from junk Left websites while it pushes others to lower pages. https://www.google.com/search?q=hillary+clinton+lied These websites defend Hillary's actions and praise her as a "strong woman". So anybody who searches on Google would think she did no wrong and go with the narrative.

_____

First screenshot in black: DuckDuckGo .

Second screenshot in white: Google.

And that's the junk Leftist litter all over social media as factual opinion when they are just programmed puppets.

Manipulating the SEO.

chopnaira:


Ya ah calls yaself tech expert Buti ya ah nat knows dat a seach engine ah bring results based onu da reflection ofu ita users

No Wanda Naijaeriya ah enta gutta everyday

Kikikikikikiki

DissTroy:


You are stupid. All were searched for in incognito mode and caches cleared.

No, I don't call myself a tech expert - I am one in my field who makes a living off tech with a verifiable portfolio on the internet which you can see by just searching my full names.

budaatum:


And bing is just about the worst search engine I've come across. I tried it for a while and was so disgusted I removed Edge from all my machines.