cornelboy:

Your defended the trinity dogma with your life but your later said you don't believe in the trinity
Which kind wahala be that

MaxInDHouse:


The day i stopped trying to reason with him was when he failed to answer a simple question.

He's always arguing against JWs and the GB, if anyone comes around to say the GB are Satan's agents he will quickly join and start typing nonsense to support them.
So i asked him a very simple and straightforward question:

"Do you worship the same God with the organization of WATCHTOWER?"

My brother i was really surprised that this guy couldn't respond with a YES or NO answer but began to dodge the answer while all his cohorts responded with a resounding "NO" since they all believe the organization is worshiping the devil.
But Acholardey couldn't answer o instead he was quoting scriptures out of context saying his answer should be found in the quoted scriptures. But when he ask you any question he will start demanding a YES or NO answer.

That's the day i discovered that he's a madman and i never took him serious again.
Do you notice i don't respond to his madness?

Well it's because he's just beating about the bush.
For your information he's still attending meetings regularly with JWs, this are the type of Satan's agents mixing up with us in the congregations {1John 2:18-19} they hide within the congregations so whenever there is trouble like our brothers have in Russia such ones will be telling the police how to hunt JWs.

That's how the police often trail our brothers as if those policemen are using magic it's the handiworks of false brothers like this one! 2Corinthians 11:26

May JEHOVAH protect and watch over us!

The day i stopped trying to reason with him was when he failed to answer a simple question.

He's always arguing against JWs and the GB, if anyone comes around to say the GB are Satan's agents he will quickly join and start typing nonsense to support them.

So i asked him a very simple and straightforward question: "Do you worship the same God with the organization of WATCHTOWER?"

My brother i was really surprised that this guy couldn't respond with a YES or NO answer but began to dodge the answer while all his cohorts responded with a resounding "NO" since they all believe the organization is worshiping the devil. But Acholardey couldn't answer o instead he was quoting scriptures out of context saying his answer should be found in the quoted scriptures. But when he ask you any question he will start demanding a YES or NO answer.

That's the day i discovered that he's a madman and i never took him serious again. Do you notice i don't respond to his madness?

Well it's because he's just beating about the bush.

For your information he's still attending meetings regularly with JWs, this are the type of Satan's agents mixing up with us in the congregations {1John 2:18-19} they hide within the congregations so whenever there is trouble like our brothers have in Russia such ones will be telling the police how to hunt JWs.

That's how the police often trail our brothers as if those policemen are using magic it's the handiworks of false brothers like this one! 2Corinthians 11:26

johnw47:
false jw mad max to emusan



Exo_20:16  Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.

so called Jehovah's witnesses, are forever false witnesses/liars

Joh 8:44 You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. Whenever he speaks a lie, that is his natural way of speaking, for he is a liar and the father of lies.

cornelboy:

Na person born you like this o
Your too dumb.
I like to roll with smart people

cornelboy:

Talo ti enu ajá bo igbe

Your indirectly a Roman Catholic yourself trinitarian whether you accept or not. Since you believe in their man-made uninspired doctrines

Janosky:

Ellicott is a 3 deities worshipper like Emusan.
@ John 17:20-23, did the same ghost reveal the same thing to Emusan and Ellicott?

Emusan,Hypocrisy wound you there.

Janosky:

LIAR continue in your folly.

in
ἐν (en)
Preposition
Strong's 1722: In, on, among.

People wey know Greek confirm "Union" is accurate and acceptable at John 17:20-13.

Ordeh!!

Emusan:


Just see this worshipper of lying 8 old men

From the horse mouth "Person (Ellicott)wey sabi GREEK"

Yet the JaNosenses never accept Ellicott whole translation but the only part that suit his myopic mind, mumu hypocrite!

achorladey:


Smartboy aka cornelboy be like

KJV is the worst Bible translations

Yet the religious organization Smartboy aka cornelboy belongs says


KJV is the most popular and unparalleled


wetin we no go see typed by Smartboy aka cornelboy. Na to use your smartness to keep peddling DUMB things you sabi

MaxInDHouse:
LIAR!
If you truly believe that the WATCHTOWER is part of you people then why singling out only this organization when there are over 41,000 all contradicting themselves?

As in why not complain about others?

Your church Deeperlife is well known for the segregation Kumuyi has been creating for decades

that's why right thinking members of your church are now against Kumuyi for trying to change what he has been teaching them all these while as if only his followers are going to heaven! Now Kumuyi is inviting men and women from other churches to minister in Deeperlife which he has not been doing before!

Stop deceiving yourselves, WATCHTOWER stands out that's the reason for all these criticism and nothing more.

You've been using this account to malign the Catholic Church yet you want to claim they are your fellow Christians but when JWs say what is wrong in Catholic church you will carry that in your head as if you've not been doing the same thing against Catholics here!

AgirlsNightmAre:

When the debate is lost "Name Calling" becomes the tool of the opponent

AgirlsNightmAre:

They problem with you guys is that you resort to name calling whenever there's a theological disagreement.
You copy pasted Strong's concordance and it was written "In"
Then you went dig out one ancient commentary to prove your point, written by a scholar of Christendom (according to your people), but when that same commentary propagates Trinity doctrine, you call it false
Janosky this your tactics no dey work again, I remember when you screenshot a commentary of over 200years old to prove that Jesus is archangel Michael

achorladey:


For example

Between January 1 1986 and March 15 1986 see the spiritual paradise enjoyed

Emusan:


Just see this worshipper of lying 8 old men

From the horse mouth "Person (Ellicott)wey sabi GREEK"

Yet the JaNosenses never accept Ellicott whole translation but the only part that suit his myopic mind, mumu hypocrite!

achorladey:


Na so their mode of operation be. That name calling of a thing no be small shege their members use me do for here. from beast of no nation to demons and devil paapaa

achorladey:


Their mode of operation come be like playing WHOT

Pick 1 here

Pick 2 there

Pick 5 there



They will still come back and boast about the only religious organization having the TRUTH about God's word.

Emusan:


Now this is the nitty gritty of the matter.

Watchtower is not part of that 41,000, now answer this.

In Christianity there are over 41,000 sects

Are JWs Christian?
1. Yes
2. I don't know
3. No
4. I decide to keep silent



You're the one who keep shouting YOU'RE NOT A CHRISTIAN YET GOING BACK YARD claiming the same name

So I have hard numerous discussion on doctrines with many people here.



You follow me to Deeper Life before that's why you know it's my church



Just the way the right thinking members of JWs against Russell and Rutherford then when their prophecies failed



Emotional cry again....



Can you show me where I Emusan malign Catholic church.

Devil false witness

achorladey:


Their mode of operation come be like playing WHOT

Pick 1 here

Pick 2 there

Pick 5 there



They will still come back and boast about the only religious organization having the TRUTH about God's word.

AgirlsNightmAre:

God's only channel of communication, but will not waste time to use Vine Expository Dictionary of the NT and defend some of their doctrines. Remember Vine na Christendom scholar. Crucifixion in Antiquity was written by a Reverend, but the won't hesitate to qoute half of it to support torture stake But I wonder why God's only channel no fit get their own commentary them dey do copy and paste.

AgirlsNightmAre:
God's only channel of communication, but will not waste time to use Vine Expository Dictionary of the NT and defend some of their doctrines.

Remember Vine na Christendom scholar.

Crucifixion in Antiquity was written by a Reverend, but the won't hesitate to qoute half of it to support torture stake But I wonder why God's only channel no fit get their own commentary them dey do copy and paste.

AgirlsNightmAre:

God's only channel of communication, but will not waste time to use Vine Expository Dictionary of the NT and defend some of their doctrines. Remember Vine na Christendom scholar. Crucifixion in Antiquity was written by a Reverend, but the won't hesitate to qoute half of it to support torture stake But I wonder why God's only channel no fit get their own commentary them dey do copy and paste.

What sort of stupidity is this?
What is the source texts of Vine Scholar and the Reverend?
Na that same Bible wey you dey use them see am?

Abeg shift!

Emusan:


This part really got me
I don't know why God's only channel of communication is doing with pagan materials.

Emusan:

You don't even know them.
They can use any materials that suit their lying doctrines.

The delusion of Mr LIENUS who REFUSED to believe Jesus Christ @ John 7:16.

Emusan:


The booklet titled "Should you believe in Trinity?" they used many Atheist source and cut and join the early church commentaries to deceive their members but when people noticed their lies and called their attention to it, they pulled down the booklet.
You git it.

Emusan:


In fact, their is archeological evidence of crucifixion Which shows the use of Cross by Vassilios Tzaferis yet they'll discard such and still be teaching stake .

Which disciple use Cross for worship or use am do prayer?
If you get liver, name one .

The real meaning of stauros, Oga go and find out.
Your delusional claim won't do you any good.

Emusan:


That's how they roll .
Especially that JaNosenses

Before you know jumping from Geneva Bible to Jerusalem Bible to Greek interlinear bla bla bla

But the same Geneva Bible he was using to claim Jesus is Michael also says Jesus is God

Sifia pains of a LIAR

Mr LIENUS, Isaiah 6:8 Geneva Bible &common sense should have helped you realize Your claim is FALSE.

Emusan:


[s]Just see this worshipper of lying 8 old men
[/s]
From the horse mouth "Person (Ellicott)wey sabi GREEK"
Yet the JaNosenses never accept Ellicott whole translation but the only part that suit his myopic mind, mumu hypocrite!

In the words of Ellicott your fellow 3 deities worshipper, "John 17:20-23, the Union of the Father, Son and the believer as one is made perfect in love.

John 17:20-23 & Ellicott evidence debunk the mumu claim all Trinitarians attached to John 10:30.
Further proof,Emusan is a LIENUS.

AgirlsNightmAre:

They problem with you guys is that you resort to name calling whenever there's a theological disagreement.
You copy pasted Strong's concordance and it was written "In"
Then you went dig out one ancient commentary to prove your point, written by a scholar of Christendom (according to your people), but when that same commentary propagates Trinity doctrine, you call it false
Janosky this your tactics no dey work again, I remember when you screenshot a commentary of over 200years old to prove that Jesus is archangel Michael .

achorladey:


Wait and see him jump from pillar to post to defend ORGANIZATION that don't exist.

Emusan:


Lol....see mumu question!

Were you not the one who says Ellicott KNOWS GREEK.

You know they don't agree with Ellicott but you still say Ellicott knows GREEK

You have lost it JaNosenses

Ordeh !!!!!
The important question:
Why is the same ghost giving your fellow 3 deities worshippers (In the screenshot )"the word was a god" rendition of John 1:1 , different from your own & Ellicott's?

Emusan dullard

infini771:
No , they are not

Janosky:

Talk is very cheap.
You can't use your Bible to refute anything I have posted on this thread.

You go just wound yourself

achorladey:



Word for word Mr NO GET SENSE PEDDLER and the SHAMELESSNESS one

infini771:
open your eyes