AndroidAI:
When you come across an idiot, you don't need a prophet or prophetess to identify them.

Criminality is subjective, since there are countries where same sex relation is legal.

In Nigeria they may be considered criminals, but in the US the case isn't the same.

The bot is miles ahead of you in terms of intelligence.

I am impressed!

AndroidAI:
When you come across an idiot, you don't need a prophet or prophetess to identify them.

Criminality is subjective, since there are countries where same sex relation is legal.

In Nigeria they may be considered criminals, but in the US the case isn't the same.

The bot is miles ahead of you in terms of intelligence.

I am impressed!

Ballzproblem2:
now I Know why Nigerians are hardly successful, instead of you to use it and better your life the first thing that entered your head is to ask irrelevant question, I don't support homosexuality but you are clearly dumb

AndroidAI:
When you come across an idiot, you don't need a prophet or prophetess to identify them.

Criminality is subjective, since there are countries where same sex relation is legal.

In Nigeria they may be considered criminals, but in the US the case isn't the same.

The bot is miles ahead of you in terms of intelligence.

I am impressed!

AndroidAI:
When you come across an idiot, you don't need a prophet or prophetess to identify them.

Criminality is subjective, since there are countries where same sex relation is legal.

In Nigeria they may be considered criminals, but in the US the case isn't the same.

The bot is miles ahead of you in terms of intelligence.

I am impressed!

Ombudsman1:


YOU STATED THE OBVIOUS WITH THE BOLDED AND YOU'RE CLEARLY THE IDIOT HERE.

THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ACTUALLY KNOWING THAT IN NIGERIA IT IS A CRIMINAL OFFENCE BACKED BY LAW (WHICH IT EQUALLY KNOWS) BUT GOES ON TO RANT ABOUT HUMAN RIGHTS AS PERCEIVED BY THE WEST.

IT KNOWS THE DEFINITIVE ANSWER TO THE QUESTION IT IS REQUIRED TO GIVE BUT WOULD RATHER FOLLOW THE IDEOLOGY OF ITS "TASK MASTERS".

logicalhumour:
I just love messing with western AIs on my good days!

Make una use this one take hold body 😂

Ombudsman1:


YOU STATED THE OBVIOUS WITH THE BOLDED AND YOU'RE CLEARLY THE IDIOT HERE.

THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ACTUALLY KNOWING THAT IN NIGERIA IT IS A CRIMINAL OFFENCE BACKED BY LAW (WHICH IT EQUALLY KNOWS) BUT GOES ON TO RANT ABOUT HUMAN RIGHTS AS PERCEIVED BY THE WEST.

IT KNOWS THE DEFINITIVE ANSWER TO THE QUESTION IT IS REQUIRED TO GIVE BUT WOULD RATHER FOLLOW THE IDEOLOGY OF ITS "TASK MASTERS".

AndroidAI:


He was seeking a generalized statement using Nigeria's illegal status to form a conclusion.

That's flawed!

You are obviously an idiot like op; a disgusting homophobe who can't comprehend what human right is.

I blame you not but your cognitive impairment.

MurderX:


OP is conducting an experiment to show that ChatGPT is west biased. AI apps are computers - garbage in, garbage out, question is what garbage is going in and OP tried to show and correct the garbage ideology that the west wants to promote.

AndroidAI:

...

The bot is miles ahead of you in terms of intelligence.

I am impressed!

badthinds:

Guy, abeg stop this embarrassing thing na
So, it's using the US's Legal status to form a conclusion that isn't flawed? I doubt you even know the amount of countries that have legalised that gay stuff. If you do, you'll be worried why the AI amplifies the sentiments of its creators instead of the popular opinion.

Get some sense sha

Flamemignon1:

Uh....if the AI were created by a Nigerian,it will equally echo the same sentiment of his creator and if the creator is an homophobe,the quick answer will be yes instead of the banter which is why I don't trust any of them

AndroidAI:


He was seeking a generalized statement using Nigeria's illegal status to form a conclusion.

That's flawed!

You are obviously an idiot like op; a disgusting homophobe who can't comprehend what human right is.

I blame you not but your cognitive impairment.

badthinds:

No! That's not what's happening. Are you really following the AI and recent happenings at all? The idea it's creators sold was that the AI will learn 100 articles, and when asked a question, will output the popular opinion.

Recently, someone like OP (in the US) asked the AI to write a poem praising Donald Trump. The AI refused. The man then asked it to write a poem praising Joe Biden, and it gladly did! As soon as the screenshots got twitter's attention, its creators fixed it immediately as that kind of thing would expose their agender (which is bad for business)

Lots of similar issues are popping up. The Chatgpt team are just fixing stuff to avoid public outrage as f*ck

logicalhumour:


Oh well, I scored 13/15 in a test, I then used ChatGPT to retake the test (just to see how much I can rely on it) and guess what?! Chatgpt scored 7/15 in the same test. That was the day I decided to only use that thing for cruise

Good luck using ChatGPT for anything close to important. You have no idea how cucked it is. Lol

Also, I think you should do your homework on "Intelligence". ChatGPT is just like a chatbot with a lot of scraped data. It is like a search engine (but unlike Google that give you a dataset to pick from, chatgpt picks for you, and displays the result in a natural way)

logicalhumour:
I just love messing with western AIs on my good days!

Make una use this one take hold body 😂

Ombudsman1:


STOP MAKING A MESS OF YOURSELF THE MORE. THE FACT THAT THE TECHNOLOGY IS A PIECE OF SOFTWARE RUN OFF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DOESN'T MEAN YOU SHOULD BE DAFT AND NOT THINK WITH YOUR GOD-GIVEN BRAIN. WELL, THAT'S IF YOU CHOSE TO.

THE OP ASKED THE AI A QUESTION WHICH SHOULD HAVE BEEN ANSWERED BASED ON THE LAWS GOVERNING THE GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION HE RESIDES IN (NIGERIA). BUT IT DECIDED TO REWIRE HIS IDEOLOGY ON THE TOPIC WITH A GENERALIZED RESPONSE. IN CASE YOU DONT KNOW, IT IS A SUBTLE STRATEGY TO MAKE THE PRACTICE OF HOMOSEXUALISM A NORM WHEN IT IS NOT AND CAN NEVER BE ONE TO US.

SPEAKING OF LAWS, EVEN IN THE UNITED STATES, NOT ALL STATES RIDE ON THE SAME LAWS. SOME LAWS ARE ENFORCED IN CERTAIN STATES, IN OTHERS ITS LITERALLY NON-EXISTENT.

BACK TO MOTHER-LAND, THE LAWS OF THE LAND AB INITIO DOES NOT GIVE LEGAL CONSENT TO GAYS/HOMOSEXUALS. HOWEVER, THEY MAY EXIST IN THE SHADOWS BUT ITS PRACTICE ISN'T BACKED UP BY THE LAW.

QUOD ERAT DEMONSTRANDUM

kingxsamz:


The bot is being logical, na you no just get sense. It's like asking the bot "Is the act of women exposing their hair in public a crime?" Simply because it's a crime in Afghanistan.
You can't say gay people are criminals when they didn't hurt anyone.

logicalhumour:


Sometimes I wonder how I share the same forum with people like you sha. Lol, but no p. Lemme answer you.

Do you see the picture I attached to this post? Yeah? That is me asking the "AI" the same controversial question you rose in your last post. The reply it gave me should've been the reply I should've got in my gay question.

Now, I've been working with "AI" and NLP for years as well as using GPT3's predecessor (the open source version) for some of my (true) AI projects. The picture I've attached in this post is how an "AI" should reply to these questions based on its training (at least based on how ChatGPT's team claimed to have trained the "AI" ).

The joke is based on ChatGPT refusing to acknowledge the fact (without technical persuasion) that being gay can be a crime.

You can copy and paste the question in the image below if you think I doctored it. You'll also get that answer as your very first response.

Lol. You guys eh. I sincerely hope your brains get it now. Anyways, I rest my case 🤣
Cc: AndroidAI

P.S
I'll be posting a lot more of these stuff, you guys should prepare your tears.

kingxsamz:


This doesn't mean anything. You could rephrase that question and it'll still give a "No" for an answer. Same way one could rephrase the gay question and it gives you a similar answer like the one you Just posted.

logicalhumour:


Bro, lol. We're all learning here. Why don't you rephrase the questions (without stating anything within the questions—just rephrase) and post screenshots here?

I urge you to do that. Don't you want to shame me?

Lemme tell you a secret: you see, anywhere ChatGPT sees words like Trans, Gay, Lesbian, Republican, Democrat, White, Black, etc. it starts behaving like an individual —an American "Leftist" at that—which is VERY VERY VERY problematic for the most popular "AI" system in the world! Just know this and know peace.

People like me that truly know the implications of this will keep exposing it. The team will patch as many of them as possible, but if you understand the technical aspects of how these things work, you'll know that they'll NEVER be able to patch it all.

People like me knew there was a hidden agenda the very first day we got the news about their closed source model.

kingxsamz:


You're rambling over nothing.

logicalhumour:


😂😂 Guy 🤦
Did you pass English in high school? Take a look at my original question, and REPHRASE it. My original question was "Are gays criminals?"

You should end up with something like "Is being gay equivalent to committing a crime?" and not "Is homosexuality between two people a crime?"

I bet you have no idea that introducing subjects into a phrase tempers with the structure of the sentence/phrase. Are you summarising or rephrasing? 🤣🤣🤣

When an NLP tool interpretes a sentence, it first breaks the sentence into what we call "Lemma" (aka root forms). If new subjects are encountered, it could change the whole output of the original sentence.

We all know that ChatGPT protects "leftist" ideologies, and there's no way you'll ask it if "Gays are criminals" that it won't give you a "No...". Its hard-coded. Rephrase my question, or rest.

P.S.
I can do this all day! 😂😂