benalvino3:


it was being taught to kids

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wOc9s07Vak


Sounds like you have no idea what CRT is. Some teachers might be weird about it, you said what are you admitting here?



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxS_T9NpdUU


No... they are teaching kids to perform MouthAction with their agemates and masturbation. This has nothing to do with gays but their problems are there as well.


they are teaching kids 13 and below how to eat poosie.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFKdRjsRHEI
A lot you have been saying sounds like you are ignorant on this matter. you need to really look at what is going on.

Sucking dicks and touching another guy's dick when I was 10 years old. a book in the school library says

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsYsndQ9w2E

raumdeuter:


Those are things that affect people's lives

Like telling their children about sexuality without the parents approval
Like telling an underage who everyone believes is too young to make life decisions to change sex or use hormones blockers

Like having men compete in female sports

Like having people's children believe they are evil because of the color of their skin
Defending the police
Decriminalization of crime. Where you can steal from a store and not get charged

If you have children of your own which one of these will be acceptable

Having someone teach your 7yr old sex without your approval
Perform sex change on your child
Have a 16yr old boy compete with your 16yr old daughter in competitive sport

Go and read what the mayor of New York a Democrat has to say about these woke ideologies of the Democratic party

How many of these policies can you defend in good faith and not look crazy to people

It's a fight between normal and crazy to think any of these with a straight face

benalvino3:


it was being taught to kids

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wOc9s07Vak


Sounds like you have no idea what CRT is. Some teachers might be weird about it, you said what are you admitting here?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxS_T9NpdUU

No... they are teaching kids to perform MouthAction with their agemates and masturbation. This has nothing to do with gays but their problems are there as well.

they are teaching kids 13 and below how to eat poosie.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFKdRjsRHEI
A lot you have been saying sounds like you are ignorant on this matter. you need to really look at what is going on.

Sucking dicks and touching another guy's dick when I was 10 years old. a book in the school library says

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsYsndQ9w2E

CoolUsername:
People complain about the ban on critical race theory, but to quote the Idaho Bill that 'bans' it.

All it prevents is teaching 3 things:
(i) That any sex, race, ethnicity, religion, color, or national origin is inherently superior or inferior;
(ii) That individuals should be adversely treated on the basis of their sex, race, ethnicity, religion, color, or national origin;
(iii) That individuals, by virtue of sex, race, ethnicity, religion, color, or national origin, are inherently responsible for actions committed in the past by other members of the same sex, race, ethnicity, religion, color, or national origin.

Why exactly is this bill considered controversial if CRT only teaches about the existence of racism and black history?

benalvino3:


I think he must have limited himself to leftwing media. He has no clue what is really happening

budaatum:


This is disingenuous, or you understand wrong.

If CRT taught that what you claim above, is it your understanding too that it teaches blacks are inherently superior and whites should be adversely treated?

Because that's the only reason blacks would support CRT if what you claim above is true.

IMAliyu2:

Can you define CRT in your own words?

I watched the video.
It's a parent complaining about a woman that got fired for using racial slurs, a few charts and a book "Not my ideas" that teaches the reality and history of racial discrimination in America, and a republican congressman agreeing with her.
The specific paragraph she talks about is literally part of a passage condemning White supremacy in America. The specific image is Satan holding up a contract promising whiteness (white supremacy) in exchange for your soul.
How's that CRT?
It's always odd when this people feel attacked by stating history and the reality of things, and it's telling when the person identifies with those that did the oppression rather than the people that fought to make things better.

IMAliyu2:

The subject material of the book in the last vid is indeed bad, though I don't know the whole context, however it was in the library of a high school.
High schoolers aren't people I consider to be innocent, immature or need protection from vulgar books.

God knows l knew more about sex and brutal nature of reality than I ever let my parents know when I was younger.

IMAliyu2:

Can you define CRT in your own words?

I watched the video.
It's a parent complaining about a woman that got fired for using racial slurs, a few charts and a book "Not my ideas" that teaches the reality and history of racial discrimination in America, and a republican congressman agreeing with her.
The specific paragraph she talks about is literally part of a passage condemning White supremacy in America. The specific image is Satan holding up a contract promising whiteness (white supremacy) in exchange for your soul.
How's that CRT?
It's always odd when this people feel attacked by stating history and the reality of things, and it's telling when the person identifies with those that did the oppression rather than the people that fought to make things better.

Here's a short explanation of the theory if you don't know

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_gdxrkwpPKc

I mean it depends on how the teacher goes about teaching anti-racism. It'd be wrong to tell the kids that they themselves are racist or evil due to their skin color. It's just that past wrongs have been done and have yet to be made right, and those wrongs still have a lasting effect to this day.

7th grade.. this isn't elementary school.
The school was also willing to change the book for the kid if the parents weren't comfortable with it.

Aside from that, I see nothing with wrong having a few rash themes in a novel meant for adolescents.

And it's also fine if school boards decided to remove it from there recommend reading list for being too vulgar.

You don't seem to understand my major gripe is the threat of imprisonment for teachers, for possession of an unsanctioned book in a classroom.
That's just some straight up authoritarian stuff.

??

The subject material of the book in the last vid is indeed bad, though I don't know the whole context, however it was in the library of a high school.
High schoolers aren't people I consider to be innocent, immature or need protection from vulgar books.

God knows l knew more about sex and brutal nature of reality than I ever let my parents know when I was younger.

SlyFoxxEternity:


The democrat party has gotten too radical for Obama and that really says a lot.

In my opinion he is the one who started this whole identity politics rubbish that has infiltrated the whole party. He used identity to win the 2012 election when he was in political trouble and Romney was gaining ground. But he himself never thought it would get to this level.

Obrigardo:


Seems you did a number on that idiot who just can't get enough of you lol

IjeBos:


My man. I told you you couldn't help yourself. 2 Kikikis and a homosexual reference. The trifecta. You really do have tourrette's.
I had to google kikiki (men don't use that ish), and what do you know. Even the word kikiki is something homosexuals use. Just come out already. It'll be ok.

IjeBos:


There goes your Tourette's.. 3 more Kikikis. It seems the more upset you get the more Kikikiki's come out. Ahhaha You are a weirdo.

Here's another definition I found online. So it seems you are also a "dumb bitch" (apologies for the use of that word). Men don't speak like that. It's ok to come out fam.

CoolUsername:


OK, so no CRT ban, then.

budaatum:


I don't known, so I'm borrowing a response from IMAliyu2.

Can you define CRT in your own words?

The previous person asked couldn't.

CoolUsername:
People complain about the ban on critical race theory, but to quote the Idaho Bill that 'bans' it.

All it prevents is teaching 3 things:
(i) That any sex, race, ethnicity, religion, color, or national origin is inherently superior or inferior;

(ii) That individuals should be adversely treated on the basis of their sex, race, ethnicity, religion, color, or national origin;

(iii) That individuals, by virtue of sex, race, ethnicity, religion, color, or national origin, are inherently responsible for actions committed in the past by other members of the same sex, race, ethnicity, religion, color, or national origin.

Why exactly is this bill considered controversial if CRT only teaches about the existence of racism and black history?

The evidence showing puberty blockers helped improve the mental well-being of children with gender dysphoria is dubious at best. The published results showed a statistically significant improvement after 12 months. However, this improvement disappears after 18 months. This particular fact happens to locked behind a paywall, though. This seems to follow the conclusions of the Nordic Institute of Psychiatry

Link:
tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08039488.2019.1691260

This is also one of the reasons why Finland stopped using WPATH's guidelines. Finland will sometimes give hormone blockers to minors, so no, they aren't being transphobic. They mostly just disagree with the gender-affirming psychology that we see in America.

If we really wanted to follow the science, we would exercise caution before allowing children to potentially irreversibly damage their bodies. That's the definition of conservatism.

CoolUsername:


Idpol grievance studies

raumdeuter:


Those are things that affect people's lives

Like telling their children about sexuality without the parents approval

Like telling an underage who everyone believes is too young to make life decisions to change sex or use hormones blockers

Like having men compete in female sports

Like having people's children believe they are evil because of the color of their skin
Defending the police

Decriminalization of crime. Where you can steal from a store and not get charged

If you have children of your own which one of these will be acceptable

Having someone teach your 7yr old sex without your approval
Perform sex change on your child
Have a 16yr old boy compete with your 16yr old daughter in competitive sport

Go and read what the mayor of New York a Democrat has to say about these woke ideologies of the Democratic party

How many of these policies can you defend in good faith and not look crazy to people

It's a fight between normal and crazy to think any of these with a straight face

Watch any of those videos posted which are just a few examples

CoolUsername:


This is a feint. Intellectual sleight-of-hand. Whiteness ≠ White Supremacy. Whiteness is whiteness and white supremacy is something else.

Bro, the book is insinuating that white people have no soul.