GrammarNazi1:

The supporters of the fraud would say the fraud did not himself carry out the rigging; The fraud only benefited from it.

Lol.

A001:
A thief wey no sabi a course in elementary physics sef dey discuss the Big Bang theory. Interesting.

seankafor:
So like this una don use legal battle retire our own elder statesman

Never thought our own 50 year old keyboard elder statesman will be retired by a mere legal battle threat

TrebleChamp:
Abeg point me to the page wey this matter happen...

seankafor:
bro, you can write all epistles you want to defend your favorite scientists, it doesn't make you different from religionsits who go extra lengths to preach and manufacture variety of things for their followers to keep them in check..

Atheists worship scientists more like religionists worship their preachers.. nothing more nothing less..

These scientists, yes are trying to at least come up with practical solutions to the world's problems.. but they overstep their boundaries when they try so hard to explain what's beyond them, like how the world formed, what and what existed billion years ago.. that's where I draw the line in listening to their craps..

You can still choose to worship them as you wish.. it's your choice, but know there are people like me who will not agree and will attack the junks you Chun out here in a public forum..

The only way you get to enjoy these half cooked beliefs of yours is if you keep them to yourself alone

Bombblacks:

Nothing in science is a confirmed fact. In natural science we cannot prove anything to be true.

A001:

You can't find any scientist that knows his onions that would tell you the Big Bang is bogus. It's the most established model explaining the origin of the Universe.

It has still its limitations which are active areas of research.

seankafor:
but that guy wants to force it down our throats like how y'all Batists forced tinubu down our throats

monerozi5590:



Haba bro. Nothing in science is a confirmed fact. This is not true. Most laws in Physics are confirmed fact under certain conditions.

Law of gravity to my level is a fact especially here on earth.

monerozi5590:



I understand your points. Ok then. Let's wait for the research to be completed.

Bombblacks:


* Newton's laws of physics allowed us to calculate how to land a man on the moon. is it therefore a fact? Newton's laws fail to work well at velocities approaching the speed of light so needed adjustment.



* Law of gravity is not a fact. It has various proven flaws.

A001:

I'm almost certainly sure the limitations of the Big Bang theory will be improved in our lifetime.

Nevertheless, it's not something to believe in. You don't have to believe in gravity. It's there, whether you believe it or not.

monerozi5590:



Tell me the flaws of gravity under the right condition on earth. Emphasis on the right conditions.

Bombblacks:

Bombblacks:



*You are actually comparing people who create theories and then carry out experiments and observation to prove those theories to people who believe in fairytales lol.

~~In my post you quoted, I applaud them(scientists) who/when they translate these theories to solve the world problems, but I draw the line when they tend to push above their weights by manufacturing some numbers and postulations as to when this and that happened especially when it has to do with the pleistocene and beyond age.. like 100 billion years ago and the rest.. I shut my ears 👂 to these and wouldn't want to hear or listen further..


* Worship scientist? Elaborate on this statement cause am lost. How does stating a principal or theory equate to worshipping a scientist.

Nothing to oveflog, yall self acclaimed atheists tends to lean towards scientific answers to buttress your questions, hence you all are somehow biased and tend to lean towards these scientists and therefore indirectly worshipping them since you tend to take their words hook line and sinker..


* Beyond them? If scientist did engage in things that were beyond them you won't be enjoying the advance technology of the 21st century. You are very bold.

This is where I draw the line, when people over inflated their importance.. what will make a someone tell me this and that happened billion years ago? Extraterrestrial beings, big bang, etc happened billions of years ago.. I can agree when they say dinosaurs 🦖🦕 etc existed (because there has been some archeological findings to support these claims) but when you begin to tell me things like when and how the world 🌍 formed.. you re making fool of yourself.. more still people who tends to believe you.

Bombblacks:


It's called universal law of gravity so why are you restricting it to earth?

seankafor:

monerozi5590:



Is like you didn't understand my post you quoted before now. I said most laws in Physics are fact under certain conditions. Truth.


Tell me the flaws of gravity on earth all conditions being equal.

seankafor:
Dem call airstrike to clear everything away

Bombblacks:

You don't see how flawed that statement is. How is something a fact only under "certain condition".

Bombblacks:


*Stop talking from a place of ignorance and learn. Obviously we didn't see the Big Bang, and we can't make another Big Bang in labs So what scientist do is to devise theories to explain why the universe looks the way it does, and then do experiments to compare their theory with the real world. If the experiments match the predictions the more confident they feel about the theory being accurate.


* The theory we use to describe the universe is General Relativity. When we make a few assumptions about the universe and feed these into General Relativity it tells us that our universe is described by an equation called the F.L.R.W metric .This have been used to make predictions about the universe, and so far they've all been proven true, so we know it works.
*The thing about the FLRW metric is that we can use it to wind time back and calculate how the universe must have been in the past. If we do this we find the universe gets denser and denser and hotter and hotter, until around some billion years ago the density and temperature become infinite. This is the point called the big bang.

monerozi5590:


How is something not fact under certain conditions? E.g

A body will remain in its state of rest until a force is applied. Is that statement not true?

Why are you doing this?

seankafor:

monerozi5590:


How is something not fact under certain conditions? E.g

A body will remain in its state of rest until a force is applied. Is that statement not true?

Why are you doing this?

Bombblacks:


*In non inertial frames it's not.

monerozi5590:


But but do you know the meaning of Inertia?

Can you explain your point or you just want to ridicule Physics.

Tataffo:

Lol,How/When did Time come into being?

Bombblacks:


* You are the one that actually needs to explain cause right now am confused on what you are saying. You talked about Universal law of gravity and I told you it's flawed. It has been observed to be flawed around the universe then you switched to Newtons first law.

VoteTinubu2023:

The repackaged fraud is running about shouting 'rigging' and 'electoral malpractice' but forgot that the 2011 elections that brought in GEJ who appointed him as SEC chairman was terribly flawed.

The 2011 election that brought in GEJ was plagued with voters' suppression, over-voting, ballot box snatching, electoral violence, blatant election rigging. The GEJ government that was formed as a result of that same election gave him an appointment but the hypocritical Fraud accepted it and never concerned himself about the electoral malpractice that ushered in GEJ.

Fraudster of a man.

Bombblacks:

Nothing in science is a confirmed fact. In natural science we cannot prove anything to be true.