Kobojunkie:


2. Men aren't themselves virgins so these unrealistic ideas that you keep spewing are best left worming around in your mind and not outside.

Unseen:
■Men themselves are not Virgins so should not desire a virgin wife but broke girls that are not rich should desire rich men..... Dey play

Mekuseh11:


I'm very intentional with what I say or write.
Do you agree Yahoo boys and every criminal out there is referred to as rich first before they are discredited for indulging in social vices?

Society will always pick rich criminals over decent men.
I do not support whatever they are doing, but in the context of women not wanting to build with broke men . They are all part of the larger community ( rich men/broke men)

Banilla:
Wrong!

There's acute poverty in countries like Nigeria, where poor people's only concern is getting married and breeding like rats.

I would strerilize half the population if I could. Most of you don't even deserve to pass on your genes.

If you are poor, don't get married! If you insist, use a damn condom everytime you have sex. We don't need any more poor children of poor parents!

LikeAking:
Broker men have suffered on NL..

Banilla:
Over 40 percent of the population live below the poverty line. How many are well to do? Extremely few. Even with steady incomes, they are still struggling.

Must they get married? Can't a man say, "I'm poor, I shouldn't bring children into this world to suffer"? If he hustles and makes it, then he gets married and have kids... If he doesn't, then he's done himself and the society a favour. Same goes for women, but they still have the option of marrying rich men. So let them battle for the man who can atleast feed himself, whoever wins gets married and impregnated. Who doesn't stays single.

Isn't that ideal?

Kobojunkie:
1. These two things don't compare in any way at all given that virginity once lost can never be regained. However, poor men or women can raise themselves from the shackles of poverty through much effort, so it makes sense for a broke girl to desire a non-broke man, and for a broke man to desire a non-broke woman.

We have brains for a reason. Let's start turning that light on more often than not up there in the brain so we can easily reason these things out this 2023 abeg!

Unseen:
■Of course virginity and riches cannot be compared. Because every woman is born a virgin all she has to do is keep it for her husband
■ But not all men are born rich...... Most Men toil to acquire riches. Between what you got free from birth and what you struggled to acquire over years which one is easier ? I am making these points for those that need the understanding. Not for you that has TURN ON THE LIGHT IN YOUR BRAIN. 👇🏿

Yusufisraelj:


Says who? Wealth is created my brother. If the economy is shit, that tells you to a large extent the kind of people in such economy. Okay let me come open and say it. A bad economy shows you that most people in that country are not productive, being productive means bringing needed solutions that's relevant globally, in this context.

So in essence telling a guy or lady not to settle for less is not demanding what doesn't exist, rather we're saying create your own fortune, which is a possibility any day one decides and is willing to do what it takes properly.

Mekuseh11:




A lot of people in Nigeria will be broke( despite working hard)
Attaining davido's wealth is not feasible for the average Nigerian man, don't deceive anybody.

Kobojunkie:
1. Every man is equally born a virgin and could also keep it for his wife but most men do not do that as they are under no law to do so much like the women are not.

Unseen:
■ Exactly my point.... Every woman can also toil and struggle to acquire riches and stop waiting for men to make money and then come and marry them. Money does not have a gender

Kobojunkie:
1. Money shouldn't have a gender but your forefathers instituted the culture that allowed you to sit as god over your women in marriage so long as you bore all financial responsibility in marriage. So the ones you ought to blame arent the women but your forefathers who created such rules for you to live by.

Unseen:
■Our forefathers married virgins and carried the financial responsibilities We are marrying girls with several body counts and we still bearing the financial responsibilities..... Who's fooling who?
■ The standard of women our fathers married have deteriorated.... But the standard of men is expected to remain like our fathers.
👇🏿

Kobojunkie:
1. Your forefathers' married women they assumed were virgins maybe, but virgins all, I doubt they got. No be the same forefathers who believed in the myth that a virgin is a woman who bleeds when you have sex with her? You no read of how many of your mothers and grandmothers fooled your fathers by having chicken or pig blood painted sprinkled on the sheet? You no even know story at all. Your forefathers were not as intelligent as you think at all.

2. Nna, you mean you are basically clueless as far as your ancestors? Many of them ended up fathering children that belonged to other men out of ignorance as many of the so-called virgins came already pregnant and were accepted by your ancestors who chose to believe believe they were virgins because of the presence of blood on the sheets after intercourse.

pansophist:


Until reality sets in

Unseen:
■ Since you assumed that your forefathers did not get virgins and were victims of paternity fraud..... You can as well as know that your forefathers did not singlehandedly provide for the families.... That your mothers worked hard in the farm and sell the farm produce in the market to provide for their families.
■ No matter how you twist it ...... A man has the right to decide not to marry a non virgin girl same way you girls have the right to reject broke men... We all have the right to our standards.
👇🏿

Bullythebully:
I hope you also relay this "bleak reality" to men when they scream ,"no hymen,no commitment".

It seems to me that only women's choices are delusional and outrageous,and unfeasible.

While,men desires(virgin,below 23 etc) are all feasible.

It is crystal clear that alot of you men wear the lens of "reality " scanning women choices. But wear the lens of "hope" when scanning men choices.

Everybody will settle,both men and women,tell everyone the truth.

If men can openly rant on how they will marry only chaste women,or childless or young women while getting applause,why can't women rant on marrying comfortable men without being told their choices are unrealistic?



As for you the op,so you has to wail as a clapback .lol. groan, cry, and mourn,there is nothing you can do about women hypergamy...sadly.Whether you scheme revenge on them or whatnot,there is nothing you can do about it. Even if they marry broke men,would the men be comfortable in their skin knowing that they are the low hanging fruit accepted because they couldn't get the best men?
Learn to attach your self worth outside of women's choices.if you did,there would be no need for a counter thread.lol

saladinnoir:


Wealth can not be created without opportunity.

The economy is in the hands of those that control the means of production and capital. The nigerian people have neither.

The people can not be productive in an incondusive enviroment. Developed countries have the highest amount of wealthy people because they are already developed and have the capacity to create wealth.

The economy makes the people not vice versa.

The government, upper classes and capitalists are not the people and do not represent them or their best interest. And so the nigerian economy is not geared to benefit the nigerian people.

Businesses in developed countries are heavily subsidized. Their goverments frequently bail them out of financial crises. A lot of foreign companies would have collapsed with out goverment intervention through out the years

heartofcity12:
You even have time creating the thread for them. Like I always say “we’re watching”. Reality can’t be escaped and they’ll all come to terms with this harsh reality like those that came before them did, they like it or not. Men do well by accepting reality for what it is, women don’t, they’re very delusional and live in bubbles until reality sets in. When it starts to happen, most will deactivate their NL profiles to save face. For now, let them keep capping and bragging 😆

Mekuseh11:


If you knew in person you wouldn't even try to put me in the same sentence with self worth and women validation.
Like I said reality is not emotions.
Majority of women will marry broke men
Likewise majority of men will marry non virgins.

What I expect of the delusionist is to build with a guy and hopefully their is growth. Finding a rich man should be a plus.

I don't hate women, I have tons of them in my life. You can choose to disregard and make fun of my write up. The end justifies the means ( I don't wish you poverty).

heartofcity12:
You even have time creating the thread for them. Like I always say “we’re watching”. Reality can’t be escaped and they’ll all come to terms with this harsh reality like those that came before them did, they like it or not. Men do well by accepting reality for what it is, women don’t, they’re very delusional and live in bubbles until reality sets in. When it starts to happen, most will deactivate their NL profiles to save face. For now, let them keep capping and bragging 😆

Bullythebully:
I hope you also relay this "bleak reality" to men when they scream ,"no hymen,no commitment".

It seems to me that only women's choices are delusional and outrageous,and unfeasible.

While,men desires(virgin,below 23 etc) are all feasible.

It is crystal clear that alot of you men wear the lens of "reality " scanning women choices. But wear the lens of "hope" when scanning men choices.

Everybody will settle,both men and women,tell everyone the truth.

If men can openly rant on how they will marry only chaste women,or childless or young women while getting applause,why can't women rant on marrying comfortable men without being told their choices are unrealistic?



As for you the op,so you has to wail as a clapback .lol. groan, cry, and mourn,there is nothing you can do about women hypergamy...sadly.Whether you scheme revenge on them or whatnot,there is nothing you can do about it. Even if they marry broke men,would the men be comfortable in their skin knowing that they are the low hanging fruit accepted because they couldn't get the best men?
Learn to attach your self worth outside of women's choices.if you did,there would be no need for a counter thread.lol

Yusufisraelj:


I'll still maintain, the people make the economy.

Correct wealth is a product of opportunity, then it's safe to ask, what's the product of opportunity? Opportunity lies in the individuals ability to see what's needed, it doesn't lie with the government or parents or country. Now one can be encouraged by country (government) or individuals to see opportunities, however if that opportunity will benefit that person, he has to put in the work or pay for the work required to make that opportunity profitable. So you see my friend, the people makes the economy.

Yes people should thrive in a conducive environment, that's where the government comes in to act in the best interest of people, sadly this where our dear country has failed, however it will interest you to know that when it comes to capital and production, the government don't call the shots, they only provide enabling environment for entrepreneurs to make such available, the private sector is what drives productivity not necessarily the government. The question I keep asking is that Dangote, Matthew Ashimolowo, Mike Adenuga, Jim Ovia are all living in Nigeria and living under same condition as all Nigerians, some of these names I mentioned started from nothing yet mike is a captain in telecoms and Matthew a captain in real estate, these guys started from almost nothing yet stupendously wealthy.

What makes the difference have you asked? They decided to see opportunity in same place where other's are complaining and made a living out of it.

Now I'm not being oblivious to the fact that government needs to make the enabling environment this is why the people put them there in the case of democracy but studying countries like the USA and Singapore have shown that, individuals can bring a nation out of poverty in the case of USA (Vanderbilt, Carnegie, Rockefeller, Morgan, Henry Ford) this is private sector driven and what they did to checkmate these tycoons is to put laws in place which they must respect, hence the society grew, because the laws were meant to bring progress, however in the case of Singapore the government sort out external help to build local industries hence the country grew. To your point government certainly has a role to play, again the individuals are the determining factor if government policies will work or not.

Your segmentation of the people, assumes that there are the rich up there and the poor down there, hence the rich doesn't represent the poor, my brother leave that thing abeg. To a large extent people create thier destinies.

Very few businesses are heavily subsidized in developed places and bail out are only given to critical sector's occasionally. Most times businesses lives by themselves.

Yusufisraelj:


I'll still maintain, the people make the economy.

Correct wealth is a product of opportunity, then it's safe to ask, what's the product of opportunity? Opportunity lies in the individuals ability to see what's needed, it doesn't lie with the government or parents or country. Now one can be encouraged by country (government) or individuals to see opportunities, however if that opportunity will benefit that person, he has to put in the work or pay for the work required to make that opportunity profitable. So you see my friend, the people makes the economy.

Yes people should thrive in a conducive environment, that's where the government comes in to act in the best interest of people, sadly this where our dear country has failed, however it will interest you to know that when it comes to capital and production, the government don't call the shots, they only provide enabling environment for entrepreneurs to make such available, the private sector is what drives productivity not necessarily the government. The question I keep asking is that Dangote, Matthew Ashimolowo, Mike Adenuga, Jim Ovia are all living in Nigeria and living under same condition as all Nigerians, some of these names I mentioned started from nothing yet mike is a captain in telecoms and Matthew a captain in real estate, these guys started from almost nothing yet stupendously wealthy.

What makes the difference have you asked? They decided to see opportunity in same place where other's are complaining and made a living out of it.

Now I'm not being oblivious to the fact that government needs to make the enabling environment this is why the people put them there in the case of democracy but studying countries like the USA and Singapore have shown that, individuals can bring a nation out of poverty in the case of USA (Vanderbilt, Carnegie, Rockefeller, Morgan, Henry Ford) this is private sector driven and what they did to checkmate these tycoons is to put laws in place which they must respect, hence the society grew, because the laws were meant to bring progress, however in the case of Singapore the government sort out external help to build local industries hence the country grew. To your point government certainly has a role to play, again the individuals are the determining factor if government policies will work or not.

Your segmentation of the people, assumes that there are the rich up there and the poor down there, hence the rich doesn't represent the poor, my brother leave that thing abeg. To a large extent people create thier destinies.

Very few businesses are heavily subsidized in developed places and bail out are only given to critical sector's occasionally. Most times businesses lives by themselves.

saladinnoir:


All these would have been correct if the average nigerian had capital. He does not. All your ideas mean nothing if you don't have money to actualise it and a customer base to sell it to.

The nigerian industrialists you mention all started in a more favourable climate and at a time of high undevelopment in nigeria. They cashed in and had the opportunity to establish monopolies and act free of relative competition.

Most importantly the people you site both nigerian and foreign we're born into some form of wealth and influence. Wealth begets wealth. Going from rich to poor is largely a myth.

No individual can bring a country out of poverty. That's a bloody lie. The vast majority of people are and will always be workers. If they weren't then who would work for the industrialist?

The people can not make the economy they adapt to it.

You're country is your destination. What commands your destiny is often outside your control. People react to life they don't act on it. You can only do so much with what you have and nigerians barely have anything.

Yusufisraelj:


Brilliant

@Mekuseh11

Poverty is a reflection of your own inadequacies in thinking, discipline and implementation, you can change that when you decide to become better. The issue of marriage is a different ball game all together, a person who decides to marry a poor person who isn't lazy and is willing to learn, hasn't really married a poor person with time that will change, but a person who marries a lazy poor person is in trouble, this is what should be emphasized, so also if you marry a rich lazy person, money fit run dry. Cheers