JOSHUA SELMAN IS A FALSE TEACHER

By: Biodun Shotola and Deji Yesufu

“A dog barks when his master is attacked. I would be a coward if I saw that the truth of God is attacked and yet remained silent.” – John Calvin

We acknowledge, along with the rest of the Christian community, that God operates in mysterious ways and may employ even the most unqualified individuals to tend to his flock. However, we reject the notion that a man who consistently assails the inspired scripture and preaches messages contrary to the holy scriptures can be deemed “a man sent from God.” Joshua Selman, a self-proclaimed apostle from Nigeria, has been lauded by certain “Christians” for his purported feat of shutting down the largest indoor arena in the UK. These “Christians” consider Selman’s achievement in the UK as a sign of a 21st-century revival.

Yet, as disciples of our Lord Jesus Christ, we stand in opposition to this man, his false doctrines, and his so-called revival. We choose to distance ourselves from the fallacious belief that a man, merely by invoking God’s name or amassing a considerable following, is divinely ordained to spearhead a revival. It would have been preferable, or at the very least prudent, if his works had not been attributed to our Lord. We shall persistently and resolutely employ all the resources that our God has provided us to denounce this imposter. While we empathize with our critics, who are easily swayed by their emotions, we derive no satisfaction from being labeled “holier than thou” or “assistant to Jesus.” Our critics may hurl insults and utter whatever they wish, but it is our duty to expose false teachers.

We shall refrain from laboring to expound in detail on the erroneous teachings of this man. Such an undertaking would be superfluous and an article cannot document all the false messages of Joshua Selman. Perhaps we may briefly touch upon a few of them. This is not an act of cowardice or an attempt to misconstrue the man’s sermons. Many sincere Christians have already highlighted the egregiousness of this man’s teachings. However, instead of adopting the Berean attitude of scrutinizing Selman’s message, his followers and sympathizers have resorted to name-calling.

In one of his messages, Selman attempted to explain the involvement of Joseph of Arimathea in the burial of Jesus Christ, stating, “The name of Jesus is so weighty that it requires financial resources to exalt it before the world.” However, this teaching by Selman deviates from scriptural truth, the teachings of the apostolic fathers, and the spiritual leaders of our faith. Nowhere in the Bible did Jesus or any of the Old Testament prophets suggest that financial resources are necessary to elevate the name of Jesus.
In another video, Selman boldly declared to his audience that not every verse in the Bible is the word of God. He went on to say, “There are many things Paul said in the Bible that are inconsistent with the character of God.” This statement directly undermines the divine inspiration of the word of God and amounts to an attack on its authenticity.

In yet another video, Joshua Selman tells the story of how he obtained his apostolic credentials. He talks about meeting Apostle Paul and conversing with him. Yet again, he meets with no other than Jesus Christ, who imparts apostolic authority and prophetic mantles on him. In the video, titled “MY ENCOUNTER WITH APOSTLE PAUL AND THE LORD JESUS”, Selman recounts other encounters with both biblical figures and historical Christian figures – who are long dead. It is the stock in trade of false teachers to employ vision of encounters with divine beings, like angels, to legitimize their claims to the apostolic. When you remember that the foremost modus operandi of false teachers is to resort to dreams and revelation, rather than depend on the simplicity of teaching scripture, you understand that Selman is yet another false Apostle – a false teacher that the Bible command we beware of.

Charles Spurgeon, in a sermon delivered on March 18th, 1885, regarding the Bible, eloquently proclaimed, “Thou book of immense authority, thou art a proclamation from the Emperor of Heaven; far be it from me to employ my reason to contradict thee. Reason! Your role is to stand and discern the meaning of this volume, not to dictate what this book ought to convey. Come, my reason, my intellect, sit down and listen, for these words are the very words of God.”

Certain critics, driven more by their emotions than by scripture, adamantly assert that the gathering of such a multitude can only be a work of God. They contend that it is inconceivable for someone who is not a true apostle of God to attract thousands to their meetings. We remind our critics of the inspired words of Peter:

2 Peter 2:2 – And MANY will follow their destructive ways because of whom the way of truth will be blasphemed. (Emphasis added)

In a rather derisive manner, our critics have asked us, “What have you done to preach Christ’s gospel?” While we could respond to our critics with a detailed account of our endeavors, our sense of piety restrains us from succumbing to the sin of pride. Instead, we implore our critics to focus on the matter at hand and refrain from constructing straw man arguments. Is the message that Selman preaches aligned with the teachings of Christ? If Christ were to descend today, would he commend Selman’s efforts or rebuke him? How else should we describe a man who fails to proclaim the excellences of Christ? It is far from acceptable for us to remain silent when our Savior is diminished and a man is exalted. We shall not permit an impostor to usurp the honor that belongs to our God.

A newly converted Christian, who has embraced the true Gospel and recently placed their faith in Christ Jesus, would find it utterly preposterous to be instructed that they must journey to Abeokuta and Lagos in order to succeed in life – as Joshua Selman once suggested in a sermon. The new Christian understands the redemption offered by Christ from the consequences of sin. They acknowledge that they possess no inherent goodness and will never be capable of fulfilling God’s righteousness through their own efforts. They find solace in the good news that the sins of sinners can be transferred to Jesus Christ, while the righteousness of Christ is imputed to the sinner.

Scripture contains numerous admonitions regarding false teachers. None of these impostors would brazenly declare to a congregation, “I am false and an enemy of Christ.” Instead, they present themselves in sheep’s clothing. They may employ the language of the chosen, yet they are deceivers. They may invoke the name of Christ and perform miracles in His name, but they are enemies of God. We implore our readers, who may perceive our fervor as unrestrained, to reflect upon the words of Jesus Christ:

Matthew 24:24 – For false christs and false prophets will arise and perform great signs and wonders to lead astray, if possible, even the elect.

Deji Yesufu is a missionary pastor to Providence Reformed Baptist Church, within University of Ibadan, Ibadan. Biodun Shotola, the lead writer of this piece, is a graduate of Archaeology, University of Ibadan, and a member of Providence Church.

Source: https://textandpublishing.com/joshua-selman-is-a-false-teacher/

Wetin this man do una now? What feathers has he ruffled?

It is a fact, that not everything in the Bible is the word of God.

GodHimself:
It is a fact, that not everything in the Bible is the word of God.

Really?!

2 Timothy 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 3:17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.

Discuss the above scripture in the light of your submission

VBCampaign:


Really?!

2 Timothy 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 3:17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.

Discuss the above scripture in the light of your submission

My intention is not to hold brief for any person here.

The verses you quoted do not say that your Bible is the Word of God, as it instead points to Scripture being inspired(not necessarily of Truth) of God, and we know that even the words of Satan(the father of lies himself) are recorded in Scripture.

Kobojunkie:
My intention is not to hold brief for any person here.
The verses you quoted do not say that your Bible is the Word of God, as it instead points to Scripture being inspired(not necessarily of Truth) of God, and we know that even the words of Satan(the father of lies himself) are recorded in Scripture.

The words of Satan are in scripture is a pointer to the fact that we live in a world full of demons and Deception. But the Holy Bible are the very words of God bc the Bible, as a collective, do not present the words of Satan but the words of God, especially such as point us to salvation to come.

When Selman teaches that the Bible is not the word of God, and adds that Paul's words are not necessarily the words of God, Selman is contending against God himself who says Paul's words are Scripture: 2 Peter 3:15-16.

CC: Seun, Mynd44, Lalasticlala

VBCampaign:
■ The words of Satan are in scripture is a pointer to the fact that we live in a world full of demons and Deception. But the Holy Bible are the very words of God bc the Bible, as a collective, do not present the words of Satan but the words of God, especially such as point us to salvation to come.
■ When Selman teaches that the Bible is not the word of God, and adds that Paul's words are not necessarily the words of God, Selman is contending against God himself who says Paul's words are Scripture: 2 Peter 3:15-16.

1. So the words of Satan--- lies --- constitute the Word or God?

2. According to Scripture, Jesus Christ is the embodiment of the Word of God -- the Word out of God's own Mouth. And even Paul said, in his letters, "Let God be true, and all men liars". So, either Jesus Christ is the Word of God or your Bible is -- it can't be both.

VBCampaign:


Really?!

2 Timothy 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 3:17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.

Discuss the above scripture in the light of your submission

How can these verses be used for doctrine, reproof, correct and instruction in righteousness?

Songs of Solomon 4 v 3-5;

3 Your lips are like a scarlet thread, and your mouth is lovely.Your cheeks are like halves of a pomegranate behind your veil.
4 Your neck is like the tower of David, built in rows of stone; on it hang a thousand shields, all of them shields of warriors.
5 Your two breasts are like two fawns, twins of a gazelle, that graze among the lilies.

OkCornel:


How can these verses be used for doctrine, reproof, correct and instruction in righteousness?
Songs of Solomon 4 v 3-5;
3 Your lips are like a scarlet thread, and your mouth is lovely.Your cheeks are like halves of a pomegranate behind your veil.
4 Your neck is like the tower of David, built in rows of stone; on it hang a thousand shields, all of them shields of warriors.
5 Your two breasts are like two fawns, twins of a gazelle, that graze among the lilies.

When you find yourself in a bad marriage, you'll appreciate that these words are indeed divine

VBCampaign:


When you find yourself in a bad marriage, you'll appreciate that these words are indeed divine

Same logic applies to Romantic/Erotic novels. It’ll sound divine to anyone in a bad marriage.

That being said, people have been mentally programmed to defend Songs of Solomon because it’s in the Bible. If it wasn’t no one will even consider it as anything remotely divine.

Still waiting for concrete explanation as to how these erotic words are profitable for

1) doctrine,
2) for reproof, for correction,
3) for instruction in righteousness.

Thanks sir 🙂

OkCornel:


Same logic applies to Romantic/Erotic novels. It’ll sound divine to anyone in a bad marriage.

That being said, people have been mentally programmed to defend Songs of Solomon because it’s in the Bible. If it wasn’t no one will even consider it as anything remotely divine.

Still waiting for concrete explanation as to how these erotic words are profitable for

1) doctrine,
2) for reproof, for correction,
3) for instruction in righteousness.

Thanks sir 🙂

Those who have ears to hear, will hear. Those who don't will keep asking these kinds of questions. I've been here long enough to know those who are true seekers and those who are here to waste one's time.

VBCampaign:


Those who have ears to hear, will hear. Those who don't will keep asking these kinds of questions. I've been here long enough to know those who are true seekers and those who are here to waste one's time.

Interpretation: I don’t have an answer to this question.


Noted, thanks sir.

Are you alright?

VBCampaign:


Really?!

2 Timothy 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 3:17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.

Discuss the above scripture in the light of your submission

If true then Joshua Selma is a false teacher.

OkCornel:


How can these verses be used for doctrine, reproof, correct and instruction in righteousness?

Songs of Solomon 4 v 3-5;

3 Your lips are like a scarlet thread, and your mouth is lovely.Your cheeks are like halves of a pomegranate behind your veil.
4 Your neck is like the tower of David, built in rows of stone; on it hang a thousand shields, all of them shields of warriors.
5 Your two breasts are like two fawns, twins of a gazelle, that graze among the lilies.

All scriptures including songs of Solomon is given for reproof, correction....

Songs of Solomon reveals what true love is about withing the context of marriage.

Every scripture reveals christ, you don't know this that is why you speak in ignorance.

Steep:
All scriptures including songs of Solomon is given for reproof, correction....

Songs of Solomon reveals what true love is about withing the context of marriage.

Every scripture reveals christ, you don't know this that is why you speak in ignorance.

Nigerian Christians and their sentimental thinking.

Ok, kindly explain to us how you use those erotic words in Songs of Solomon to instil morals in your kids….hmmm?

Songs of Solomon 4 v 3-5;

3 Your lips are like a scarlet thread, and your mouth is lovely. Your cheeks are like halves of a pomegranate behind your veil.
4 Your neck is like the tower of David, built in rows of stone; on it hang a thousand shields, all of them shields of warriors.
5 Your two breasts are like two fawns, twins of a gazelle, that graze among the lilies.


Do you use them as prayer points?

Where is the evidence of reproof, correct and instruction in righteousness in these erotic words?

VBCampaign:


Those who have ears to hear, will hear. Those who don't will keep asking these kinds of questions. I've been here long enough to know those who are true seekers and those who are here to waste one's time.

Bonus question.

What is your definition of “All Scriptures”?

1) 66 books of the Bible?
2) Old Testament, New Testament and the Apocrypha per the 1611 KJV bible?
3) The Ethiopian Bible which is the oldest in the world with over 80 books?

Cc: Steep

OkCornel:


Nigerian Christians and their sentimental thinking.

Ok, kindly explain to us how you use those erotic words in Songs of Solomon to instil morals in your kids….hmmm?

Songs of Solomon 4 v 3-5;

3 Your lips are like a scarlet thread, and your mouth is lovely. Your cheeks are like halves of a pomegranate behind your veil.
4 Your neck is like the tower of David, built in rows of stone; on it hang a thousand shields, all of them shields of warriors.
5 Your two breasts are like two fawns, twins of a gazelle, that graze among the lilies.


Do you use them as prayer points?

Where is the evidence reproof, correct and instruction in righteousness in these erotic words?

what do you mean by Nigerian Christians? In your stupidity you quote just a snipeth of it hoping to make a jest out of it.

So what is wrong in mentioning breast?


Didn't the book of proverb teach same?

What is being thought is pure love and desire withing the context of marriage.




Proverbs 5:18 Let thy fountain be blessed: and rejoice with the wife of thy youth.

5:19 Let her be as the loving hind and pleasant roe; let her breasts satisfy thee at all times; and be thou ravished always with her love.

You are an ignorant man, so scripture is meant to be used as prayer points?
You are blind that is why you can't see any instruction in songs of Solomon.
Songs of Solomon is showing us the relationship between jehovah and Israel, christ and the church m, husband and wife, desire with purity, patience, faithfulness, and commitment.
All scriptures are given in righteousness.

Steep:
what do you mean by Nigerian Christians? In your stupidity you quote just a snipeth of it hoping to make a jest out of it.

You are an ignorant man, so scripture is meant to be used as prayer points?
You are blind that is why you can't see any instruction in songs of Solomon.
Songs of Solomon is showing us the relationship between jehovah and Israel, christ and the church m, husband and wife, desire with purity, patience, faithfulness, and commitment.
All scriptures are given in righteousness.

Kindly show us the chapter and the verses in Songs of Solomon where the author clearly mentioned these erotic words between lovers represent;

1. Relationship between Jehovah and Israel
2. Relationship between Christ and the Church.

Is that what the author of Songs of Solomon claimed? If yes, kindly show the chapter and verse in Songs of Solomon.

Nigerian Christians and eisegesis. Mind you, I’m still awaiting answers on how admiring a lady’s breasts translates to evidence of reproof, correct and instruction in righteousness.

Oya, get emotional and spew more insults. It’s typical of shallow Nigerian Christians

OkCornel:


Bonus question.

What is your definition of “All Scriptures”?

1) 66 books of the Bible?
2) Old Testament, New Testament and the Apocrypha per the 1611 KJV bible?
3) The Ethiopian Bible which is the oldest in the world with over 80 books?

Cc: Steep

The bible is just 66 books, Genesis to revelation.

Steep:
The bible is just 66 books, Genesis to revelation.

So the 1611 KJV Bible that includes the Apocrypha is what exactly? A novel?

The extra books in the Ethiopian Bible are not the words of God too abi?

OkCornel:


Kindly show us the chapter and the verses in Songs of Solomon where the author clearly mentioned these erotic words between lovers represent;

1. Relationship between Jehovah and Israel
2. Relationship between Christ and the Church.

Is that what the author of Songs of Solomon claimed? If yes, kindly show the chapter and verse in Songs of Solomon.

Nigerian Christians and eisegesis. Mind you, I’m still awaiting answers on how admiring a lady’s breasts translates to evidence of reproof, correct and instruction in righteousness.

Oya, get emotional and spew more insults. It’s typical of shallow Nigerian Christians

So what is wrong in one admiring the breast of his wife/bride?

OkCornel:


So the 1611 KJV Bible that includes the Apocrypha is what exactly? A novel?

The extra books in the Ethiopian Bible are not the words of God too abi?

what is the meaning of Apocrypha? Go ahead and explain?

Steep:

So what is wrong in one admiring the breast of his wife/bride?

Did the storyline Songs of Solomon tell you the characters (lovers) involved got married?

If Romeo and Juliet was included in the Bible as the word of God, you will still come here and defend it.

Songs of Solomon is an erotic/romantic literature, there’s nothing for reproof or sound doctrine there.

Simple truth

Steep:
what is the meaning of Apocrypha? Go ahead and explain?

See below from Encyclopaedia Britannica

In Biblical literature “works outside of accepted canon of scripture”

Edited: Mind you, I asked for the definition of “ALL SCRIPTURE”, not Bible.

When Paul wrote his letters to Timothy, there were scriptures in circulation (not Bible). More so, books like that of Revelation wasn’t written by then.

So what is your definition of “ALL SCRIPTURES”?

OkCornel:


Did the storyline Songs of Solomon tell you the characters (lovers) involved got married?

If Romeo and Juliet was included in the Bible as the word of God, you will still come here and defend it.

Songs of Solomon is an erotic/romantic literature, there’s nothing for reproof or sound doctrine there.

Simple truth

what story line?

What does this tell you? That is the bride is probably already betrothed probably the wedding proper had not taken place?
Song of Solomon 2:16 My beloved is mine, and I am his: he feedeth among the lilies.

Steep:
what story line?

What does this tell you? That is the bride is probably already betrothed probably the wedding proper had not taken place?
Song of Solomon 2:16 My beloved is mine, and I am his: he feedeth among the lilies.

I don’t want to hear “probably” betrothed.

Where is the evidence these lovers got married?
You asked if it’s wrong admire a bride/wife’s breast, so I’m asking you for evidence where these lovers in Songs of Solomon got married.

Patiently waiting.

OkCornel:


See below from Encyclopaedia Britannica

In Biblical literature “works outside of accepted canon of scripture”

outside of accepted scrupture because these books were Fraudulent books that were not written by the apostles nor were recognized as inspired by the jews especially in Jesus days.

OkCornel:


I don’t want to hear “probably” betrothed.

Where is the evidence these lovers got married?
You asked if it’s wrong admire a bride/wife’s breast, so I’m asking you for evidence where these lovers in Songs of Solomon got married.

Patiently waiting.

maybe you are blind,

Now read this verse below and tell me what it means.

Song of Solomon 2:16 My beloved is mine, and I am his: he feedeth among the lilies.

Can a man and woman belong to each other without marriage?

Steep:
outside of accepted scrupture because these books were Fraudulent books that were not written by the apostles nor were recognized as inspired by the jews especially in Jesus days.

Smh, you have confused Apocrypha for Pseudepigrapha.

Let me laugh a bit. You want to tell us the book of Maccabees is a fraudulent book?

Events that happened in Maccabees (the conquest of Israel by Antiochus Epiphanies) can also be verified by historians is a fraudulent book?

Most Nigerian Christians are really shallow. I’m not surprised

Steep:
maybe you are blind,

Now read this verse below and tell me what it means.

Song of Solomon 2:16 My beloved is mine, and I am his: he feedeth among the lilies.

Can a man and woman belong to each other without marriage ?

Ever heard of concubines in your Bible?

Did Judah also marry Tamar before she conceived? Hmmm?

Back to my question, where in Songs of Solomon did the author mention these lovers are husband and wife?!

When I say most Nigerian Christians are shallow, you are justifying it by your comments here

Oya vex, spew more insults