Ellexy:
How is banishment not punishment?

They are still at the club getting paid.

dreamxhaser:


We don't care!

All those feminist should go fvk themselves. We want our boy back, na today dem start dey beat women? Sometimes I feel like beating all those yeye women complaining

2 bums liked this post.

Trevor012:

Yes this season he is the back up striker. We need to buy Osimhen for 150million as our main striker. That's what you want right 😂

Fire on with your agenda my bruda. Sure you've got the 'Ten Hag out' posts saved up somewhere.

Sell the nonsense Greenwood to any unfortunate club interested and end all this elaborate charade.

ChristoBam:

I don't know what style you're on about. Rashford plays from the left. Play him in his preferred position and he'll ball.

Your own solution is to sell one of the best forwards in Europe and buy whoever you think fits ETH style. And who's that?

Bet you'd have gladly exchanged Rashford for Dortmund's Sancho.

Rashford position when with the ball in the third half is to first run with the ball and look for how to shoot even though his best option is to look for the pass. He will also abandon his defensive duties.

He may be one of the best forwards in Europe, and also not good for the team. It's very possible

You don't have a main striker and you went to buy back up striker first? It's not easy to defend some things sha

eph12:

Rashford position when with the ball in the third half is to first run with the ball and look for how to shoot even though his best option is to look for the pass. He will also abandon his defensive duties.

He may be one of the best forwards in Europe, and also not good for the team. It's very possible

There are so many other things he can do with the ball in the third half. But whatever he's been doing has helped Ten Hag tremendously so far. You think ETH has tried to change anything so far?

The only flaw that I don't think he'll ever improve on is the defensive thing. And I don't think ETH is too bothered about that.

It's not a must every single player in the team has to fit the exact style perfectly. Exceptions are made for certain players. Rashford is certainly one. Who would have thought a striker like Haaland would be perfect for Pep. Man's always wanted every single player in his team involved in the build up.

You can't be saying we should sell a player that our fate this season partly depends on his form.

eph12:
You don't have a main striker and you went to buy back up striker first? It's not easy to defend some things sha

Na budget cause this thing na. They truly believed in his talent they couldn't pass on the deal.

Should we wait for him to have his breakout season, then come back with 180m?

ChristoBam:


There are so many other things he can do with the ball in the third half. But whatever he's been doing has helped Ten Hag tremendously so far. You think ETH has tried to change anything so far?

The only flaw that I don't think he'll ever improve on is the defensive thing. And I don't think ETH is too bothered about that.

It's not a must every single player in the team has to fit the exact style perfectly. Exceptions are made for certain players. Rashford is certainly one. Who would have thought a striker like Haaland would be perfect for Pep. Man's always wanted every single player in his team involved in the build up.

You can't be saying we should sell a player that our fate this season partly depends on his form.

I agree with you. ETH does not try to change anything. Antony did the same annoying thing through out last season and ETH didn't change it.

ChristoBam:

Na budget cause this thing na. They truly believed in his talent they couldn't pass on the deal.

Should we wait for him to have his breakout season, then come back with 180m?

We don't have all the budget in the world, that's clear. So why did we buy Mount and the promising forward when we could have pursued other options?

nitrogen:


This!

I guess it’s because Utd is owned by Americans. Like you said, American businessmen don’t care. I still think Greenwood will be sold or loaned out. Fingers crossed!

I reckon that's what will happen in the long run. They simply released the statement to test the waters and gauge fan reactions. Once they perceive any threats of a significant backlash, He'd promptly be withdrawn and sold.

Ellexy:
They have a contract with United. It's within their rights to honour and fulfil the contract if they so wish. Banishment without cause can lead to legal issues.

Well, it's their right to stay. But it's not their right to play.

Simple as saying, you are not fit and adequate enough to play with the first team. And not include them in cup competitions. They can't do jack.

dreamxhaser:


We don't care!

All those feminist should go fvk themselves. We want our boy back, na today dem start dey beat women? Sometimes I feel like beating all those yeye women complaining

You might not care but the owners sure do.

I don't think you realise the power these various groups wield in the west. The major investments Women sports are currently enjoying in the west are in no small part to them. Btw it's not just Women in these organisations, there are tonnes of Men in them too.

eph12:

We don't have all the budget in the world, that's clear. So why did we buy Mount and the promising forward when we could have pursued other options?

the only signing that may be unnecessary so far is Mount. let's just assume he'd be a Bruno sub because we had non anyways.
every other deal and even rumoured interest so far is very necessary.
don't make it out like we are some perfect one-plug-to-completion unit.
Weghorst and Martial were our CF last season, with Rashford as an option. Weghorst is gone, Martial will never available. what increase in output are you expecting from this position this season? it's almost a continuation of the same. One CF, one never available CF and Rashford as option. the CF is not match fit and we were already back to option 3 first game of the season.
run same scenario for the midfield and center back.
inability to offload dead weight is another serious problem.
in my view, there were a lot of smart deals that could have been done this summer if we are truly serious about competing.

ChristineC:
the only signing that may be unnecessary so far is Mount. let's just assume he'd be a Bruno sub because we had non anyways.
every other deal and even rumoured interest so far is very necessary.
don't make it out like we are some perfect one-plug-to-completion unit.
Weghorst and Martial were our CF last season, with Rashford as an option. Weghorst is gone, Martial will never available. what increase in output are you expecting from this position this season? it's almost a continuation of the same. One CF, one never available CF and Rashford as option. the CF is not match fit and we were already back to option 3 first game of the season.
run same scenario for the midfield and center back.
inability to offload dead weight is another serious problem.

I agree with you. But christobam argument here is that Rasmus is for the future, not now. We needed a striker and we got Rasmus, why are we now hearing that he was bought for the future when we haven't solved the present? But if you tell me that ETH mandate is to use this season to train his team in preparation for next season, hence the Rasmus purchase, I have no argument

ChristineC:
the only signing that may be unnecessary so far is Mount. let's just assume he'd be a Bruno sub because we had non anyways.
every other deal and even rumoured interest so far is very necessary.
don't make it out like we are some perfect one-plug-to-completion unit.
Weghorst and Martial were our CF last season, with Rashford as an option. Weghorst is gone, Martial will never available. what increase in output are you expecting from this position this season? it's almost a continuation of the same. One CF, one never available CF and Rashford as option. the CF is not match fit and we were already back to option 3 first game of the season.
run same scenario for the midfield and center back.
inability to offload dead weight is another serious problem.
in my view, there were a lot of smart deals that could have been done this summer if we are truly serious about competing.

I don't know which one is worse right now. Our inability to sell off unwanted players or buy new players

eph12:

I don't know which one is worse right now. Our inability to sell off unwanted players or buy new players

Our ability to buy new players is worse.

MRTA7:


Our ability to buy new players is worse.

But its looking like the former is what's holding us back atm

eph12:

But its looking like the former is what's holding us back atm

now it is,, but just look at what we have spent and what we did with it.

The solution to Greenwood's problem is simple if Manchester united will listen to my advice.

The solution is this...

Get the babymama to support the boyfriend and be involved publicly and exclusively. Since the feminist is pointing their hate fingers on Greenwood, get the girlfriend to support Greenwood; if possible plead on his behalf on live tv (that's if she truly loves Greenwood). Piers Morgan will be happy to conduct the interview.

YourBestWriter:
The solution to Greenwood's problem is simple if Manchester united will listen to my advice.

The solution is this...

Get the babymama to support the boyfriend and be involved publicly and exclusively. Since the feminist is pointing their hate fingers on Greenwood, get the girlfriend to support Greenwood; if possible plead on his behalf on live tv (that's if she truly loves Greenwood). Piers Morgan will be happy to conduct the interview.

Manchester United have noted your suggestion and will save it under advisement.

ChristoBam:

Lol, Chelsea will tag their team last season as one of the worst they've ever had. This is a team that recently won the UCL. What's the crazy thing in finishing 2nd and 3rd?

A team can be good in one season and become totally terrible in another. That's what the likes of SAF and Pep are masters in avoiding. They start gradually clearing out players before the become something else(toxic or past it).

The problem is when I say team, you're thinking of individuals. You're wondering how a team that had Pogba, Ronaldo, Rashford, and co is termed the worst in years. But what I mean is the team as a collective. Cuz that's what matters.

The thing is that if as a collective, a good squad suddenly turn worse, then all the fault should rest with the coach.

Aston Villa and Leicester of last season is a very good example. With Gerrard failing, it seems as if the collective of Aston Villa players were very bad. Look at them individually and you'll know they shouldn't be dragging for relegation but they did until Gerard was swiftly sacked and replaced with an elite coach and you can see how they suddenly look a good fit again.

Contrast that to Rodgers who wasn't sacked on time and a team of Madison, iheanacho, ndidi, vardy and co were relegated. No how an elite coach wouldn't have those people to play good football.

So my point is that a collective group who were once good can't suddenly turn bad all at once, if they did, then the coach needs to go Asap

eph12:
You don't have a main striker and you went to buy back up striker first? It's not easy to defend some things sha

Him being injured + the price just makes things a lot more complicated. Only trophy success can help ETH here.

eph12:
You don't have a main striker and you went to buy back up striker first? It's not easy to defend some things sha

You go explain, explain tire because... no evidence!

melodyogonna:

"This season" 😂😂 it's been just one game bro, tf

I'm not responsible for your lack of comprehension.

YourBestWriter:
The solution to Greenwood's problem is simple if Manchester united will listen to my advice.

The solution is this...

Get the babymama to support the boyfriend and be involved publicly and exclusively. Since the feminist is pointing their hate fingers on Greenwood, get the girlfriend to support Greenwood; if possible plead on his behalf on live tv (that's if she truly loves Greenwood). Piers Morgan will be happy to conduct the interview.

Tag Nitrogen.

He works with the Club

eph12:

I agree with you. But christobam argument here is that Rasmus is for the future, not now. We needed a striker and we got Rasmus, why are we now hearing that he was bought for the future when we haven't solved the present? But if you tell me that ETH mandate is to use this season to train his team in preparation for next season, hence the Rasmus purchase, I have no argument

The logic of some argument here is head scratching.

No be here them argue say Kane that will guarantee the team at least 20 league goals a season for 3 - 4 season for 100m is expensive?

TeslaFC:


Him being injured + the price just makes things a lot more complicated. Only trophy success can help ETH here.

He was injured before we paid for him.

ETH does not need to win a trophy this season to have a good season. We just need to see that we're much closer to the current best clubs than we were a year ago. Then we can say we've made significant progress and with some purchases here and there, we can be certain to be around the top or at the top for a while

KingTom:

You go explain, explain tire because... no evidence!

My brother

larride:




The logic of some argument here is head scratching.

No be here them argue say Kane that will guarantee the team at least 20 league goals a season for 3 - 4 season for 100m is expensive?

It's the same Kane that they want to blame the board for not buying. Me I don't even care about who they buy, I just need the midfield solved and everyone using their head on the pitch

Trevor012:
Damn we just paid 70million for a back up striker. Glazers please buy our resident lawyer Osimhen for 160million so we can be rotating them 😂😂

When e no be Skepta 🤣🤣