Ballzproblem2:
Onlyfans owner made over $1m everyday last year, excluding bonus That's the guy millions of simps money go to

PstDapo:
The problem with most men is that they are always on the look out to please women.
Don't look for a woman to please, look for a woman that will please YOU.

IconicR:
Redpill is a lie, that's the reason you no longer see the people that started this thread here.

HARDDON:


😂😂😂😂

IconicR:
E choke abi
Choken't it?

Ballzproblem2:
Onlyfans owner made over $1m everyday last year, excluding bonus That's the guy millions of simps money go to

AndrewTate:
Sincerely...
I really don't think women issues are as important as you all have made it look on this thread, just look at how many pages y'all have kept just for talking about women! And being so proud of it too!!
Sometimes I wonder your ages!
How men come together in such unshakeable unity not to help each other make money or get ahead but to talk about women... UNA DEY MENT?? EHN??

See wetin una wan turn to religion...
Spending so much time plotting against people wen nor even get una time.
Trying to figure out how to bleep miss world with 0$ at hand.
I be dey vibe with d redpill something da year o but these boys don turn am to something else.
D ginger wen una dey carry put on top woman matter make una channel dat ginger go where money dey, na men una be...nor be market women.
Make una sef imagine am make somebody discover this thread for d first time,everything wen una wan teach am e nor reach wetin ubunja don put up there for d early pages, make d later pages come dey about how to become a high value man where everybody dey share money making ideas with dis same ginger, at least then d thread go get head nor be dis rubbish wen una gather here dey claim Capone upandan 4.

I dey shame 4 una mata.

As usual una fit run una mouth o! I'm down for anybody wen ready 4 vawulence.
Bless y'all ❤️

CaveAdullam:
Well, I'm not an advocate of promiscuity in men even if it is instinctually wired in them, because when men begin to live according to this way, civilization will quickly run into a quicksand----and this is the problem we are facing today in the world----men becoming feeble without regards for their goals which is more higher than women. These men;simps as they are called will sacrifice their goals and youthfulness chasing women and doing anything to please them hoes.

Nevertheless, truth must be revealed. Men and women are not equal; psychologically, neurologically, biologically and cognitively. That is both genders are complementaries but WILL NEVER BE EQUAL.

A woman seeks a good provider, leader and protector role in a man, and will stick to this man for life because it is what tingles her v****a strings and causes vibration. But such kind of men are rare and for this reason---Women innate dual mating strategy; Alpha f^¢ks beta bucks. AKA Female Hypergamy.

A man will put a cutthroat to his promiscuity based on the love he has for his woman and on the grounds of morality/religion only if a woman can be able to seduce him with her feminine qualities. The women with a high dose of these untapped qualities are mostly virgins who grew up under the auspices of their traditional parents inculcating core values and tradtions into them, and educating them about sexual purity.

In the case above, love will flow naturally from the man to the wife without any thought of numero uno whorism in the mind of the man concerning his beloved wife.

Nature is already a sexist----why the f^¢k do men not have an hymen to determine their debauchery? It is an enigma for the feminists and they are foolishly led astray as a result of this cause.......looooool

Repentant hoes have a chance to lead a good marriage with simps but Kings has predilections for virgins with raw feminity only.

Men should pursue long term values for the sake of nature and civilization progress and not alter it in exchange for cheap hoes and their pu$$!es while women should seduce men with natural feminity within and outside marriage and not with useless feminism.

Thanks.

Good day.

Loverboi2cute:



Lexus 350, 2021 na eem u dey proud dey publish am 4 here 😏😏

Afrobasic:


That means some men are foolish na

I mean, why spend money aka "simp" on something you don't love?

SPAMBOX7:
Spending money on a woman isn't simping bro. Most of you mistake what simping is.
You may find a woman attracted and just wanna smash and move.
You could spend on her to get what you want. It's only simping when you keep spending when you don't get what you want.
For example she disrespects you, hoards sex or no longer adheres to your standards but you still taking her on trips, buys her some Birkin cos you want to act like a gentleman., instead of cutting her off.
Or you keep spending even when you have gotten what you want.

Since you don't love her, it is very okay to dispatch her once you got what you want.

But you need to understand whether you like it or not you gotta spend on a woman directly or indirectly.
Anyone that tells you otherwise is just some guy who types online and never try to practice what they type offline.

bolabizzle:


Yes, but the bitter truth is most times the woman that wants to please you, worship you, make you her one and all, will 99% of the time be unattractive physically to you. Life really sucks. It likes to play strange pranks on humans. It is never fair. Let us learn to be realistic and have a stoic approach towards life if not you'll keep going in a merry go round direction.

The big question is will you be mature enough to overlook what she lacks physically and focus on other qualities that she possesses? Have you trained yourself to a level were you no longer allow physical beauty to turn your brain upside down but rather look out for other important qualities that is needed in a woman? I can bet that most guys that come here to vomit and post quotes for likes have at some point in time met a lady that treated them like a king, but because she doesn't have hour glass shape, big nyash, big breasts and eye lash like cat, they didn't even for a second think of giving the girl a chance.

Alot of men focus entirely on a woman's physical looks and this in my opinion is why there is currently disarray in the manosphere community. Today no one can give a standard definition of the redpill because different sub groups have germinated from it. PUA'S, MGTOW, BLACKPILLERS, INCELS... Some crazy weird groups are beginning to spring up in hidden corners of the internet that tries to hypnotise men to become transgender.

For those that their fingers are inching to quote me and tell me they can never have anything to do wit a lady that is ugly, look let me tell you, during our forefathers days when arranged marriage was very common, the parents of the man focused more on the girls family, their background and most importantly the behaviour of the girl. Looks wasn't considered important and if at all it was, it was definitely the last criteria on the list. Was their marriage back then as short-lived and useless like that of today?

I wish the creators of this thread requested for it to be closed but pinned. The early posts, most especially the ones from ubunja that encouraged men to have a nice grooming and start any form of romance with girls that don't look physically attractive were the best because they were realistic. He clearly pointed out the reason behind the logic. if a girl knows you don't find her Physically attractive and she's head over hills for you, how, just how she go play you wayo? There is this natural dominance, wisdom and confidence that a man has when he is with a girl he doesn't find physically attractive. Let that sink in.

luminouz:


Here we go again with the 'you must spend money on women directly or indirectly' mantra. I find that many men who support this here pay for sex(hookers, oloshos or whatever) and you use that justification to overgeneralize and I don't agree with that. Me no dey pay for sex. You may and I'm not fighting with you, it's your money but don't force that fallacy down my throat biko because I no go ever gree.

SPAMBOX7:
I didn't force anything on anyone. Besides I didn't say pay for sex. You read wrong. Unless you see spending on a woman as a way of paying for sex then that's okay.

But If I bought my woman a chain cos she's possessed some kind of good behavior and I decide to reward her.. That's me spending on her but I didn't buy sex. If she misbehaves in some way I don't like I could ignore or cut her off.
The only time I will be simping is if she misbehaves and I still buy her a chain or keep her around. That's rewarding bad behavior which is a simp trait. Aside that I don't see any simping in rewarding a woman that respects you and has the type of energy you need around you.

luminouz:


Your scenario is different from what you painted up there earlier. Because now, she has become YOUR WOMAN, which I interpret to mean your wife. You have tested her and to an extent verified her. A girl will have proven herself to be very very good before she would get any chain from me. This means she would have bought me tons of stuff or shown her loyalty over and over again...to deserve my money. That's exactly what I mean.

I don't reward women for good behaviours, that's like training a dog to sit when you tell it. I give them what they NEED, not what they want.

N.B: I understand your concept but I do have a slightly different opinion. One love though.

IconicR:
RIP to redpill thread
Reality of life has dawn on you all
Unfortunately the people that started this mess of a thread ain't here to correct it.

Haydens:


Seems like this thread gives u orgasm.

luminouz:


You were making sense before the fourth paragraph. Who told you that in the olden days, women looks are not the primary criteria? It's always been top three on the list, never the bottom. Family, Unspoiled Youth and Beauty are the three pillars for marriage in those days. What are men paying bride price for if not these three(especially unspoiled youth or virginity).

Men will forever be attached to a woman's looks. How can you marry someone you are not attracted to? No be juju be that? Since beauty is subjective, even the socalled ugly girls get married to someone. What redpill teaches is to test her character/mindset and attraction cannot be bought. The same way many women reject men based on looks and attraction is the same for men too or are we supposed to just love every girl who expresses attraction for us, even when we don't want them? We should sleep with them, break their hearts, make them baby mamas and still end up vilified for it? It's called ATTRACTION.

Then, you have this erroneous view that all men want the same body shape in women. Men have many preferences when it comes to women. I won't be caught dead with a slim woman, yet I have friends who would kill for one. Big head, eyes, nose, mouth, small breasts, small ass and differing combinations of these ratios have made some girls attractive and unattractive to some and many men respectively.

What we can do is to tell any woman we don't feel anything for the truth because I don't think redpill is about hurting women or being sadists. It would interest you to know that since attraction can't be bought, the same so-called ugly girls are mercilessly rejecting other men who want them too...so why should you be compelled to love them if there is no attraction to begin with?

Smartb0y:
A woman allows herself to be fvcked by a frame she respects.

The stronger the man's frame,the more a woman will crave to be dominated by it.

If a woman doesn't want to be sexually dominated by a man, it's because she doesn't respect him.

- The Wall speaks

Seek Respect from women not love.
You'll get the best she has to offer.

heartofcity12:
This marriage has crashed despite all the lovey dovey they do online.
He’s at the peak of his career in Nigeria while she and the kids relocated to the USA for a better life. Sorry man, marriages barely work in the west, the law favors the women and its against the men, why won’t the women misbehave..

Smartb0y:


Body built but mind deflated

Lack of frame brings about irritation.
Too much irritation brings about divorce.

Pretty sure he's the equality type.
I hope he realizes he was responsible for not just his but his exes attitude.

Men have a heavy burden to uphold and it just doesn't end financially.

That burden of performance is in different phases.

The burden to provide for her
The burden to keep her in her feminine yet chaotic state.

There's no greater challenge a man can encounter than marriage.
He's not just responsible for himself but also his partner.

She knows he's not going anywhere which prompts her to unleash her fully chaotic state without any form of regard.

A man in such position won't survive such feminine force just like this fella.

Sad part is the single mom circle is still in order, breeding kids that'll eventually lack any form of frame to guide them.

No greater curse than a man with a weak mind who gushes over pussy.

He'll be served a cold thin ice of feminine chaos.

heartofcity12:


Well said!!
He had it coming, rumor has it that she cheated on him but he took the blame like he was the one that cheated to save their marriage when they first separated and reconciled. We don’t know what it is this time that led to this divorce, she probably cheated again.