Amoto94:
Dash, the Ghanaian fintech has shut down. The startup raised $86.1 million in five years and attracted big-name investors. It raised $32.8 million in a seed round—the second largest seed round for an African startup—in 2021. http:///Sx4x1F

izzou:


Na wa.

Amoto94:

Perhaps it could be argued that the fraud tag associated with tech bros is somewhat justifiable except proven otherwise.

izzou:
One of my best ever made.

nihilistjnr:


There was a keeper that ate meatpie on the pitch during an FA cup match against Arsenal a couple years ago, because sometimes betting company was offering very good odds as a joke he would eat a pie on the pitch.

People that saw the odds were fuming they didn't cash out....I bet the keeper did though.

A40:
I know someone that would have won $3k.

Villareal vs Rennes No penalty no sending off. Pepe Reina 2 minutes into injury time caused penalty

Then saved it to spoil show for the people that predicted at least 2 goals

If you're banking on bets you will run mad.

izzou:


I remember sef.

I think Abou was carried away that he scored against a team like Brazil.

Even the referee shake am before e give am red card. I liked that scene

KingTom:

come to think of it, I understand Ivan Toney's ban completely now... suppose Tony picks a game against a mid team and with the odds "TONEY NOT TO SCORE" Why, I'd like to think with his fate and indeed money in his own hands, the fool would be nowhere near the net

It betrays a stupendous poverty of legal and logical imagination to say that the “forgery” (unauthorized redesign is a better expression) of a non-legally-binding ceremonial document of a validly earned degree invalidates the degree. It’s never mentioned in CSU’s diplomas that alteration of the documents renders them invalid because they have no validity beyond being decorative documents

afrodoc2:


You have a right and option not to hold them accountable though. It is actually not compulsory.

How people have demonised holding leaders accountable on this forum must be one of the wonders of the modern world.

A40:
Did Tinubu go to that school? No. You know it and I know it

Will he be impeached? With Akpabio of all people as Senate President. No! You know it and I know it

So let's enjoy the show

Amigoss:



He graduated from Govt college Lagos in 1970 while the school was established in 1974...

According to him,he has a degree in Economics,submitted to inec and swore an oath with it...where is that certificate?

TrebleChamp:
Because majority of people on this thread saying hold your leaders accountable, are the same people supporting the bad leaders and attacking those who want to hold the leaders accountable. It is called hypocrisy in English

BlueRayDick:


Na this particular scene Silverbird cinemas use entice people to watch the movie that year. Once the advert comes up on STV , the whole action in this scene would make u crave watching the whole movie.

The movies didn’t disappoint sha

A40:
When Israel retaliate now that's when we will hear pray for Palestine, and Palestine sympathizers start crying all over the internet

obainojazz:
Na innocent civilians they go attack… I won’t even pity them when Isreal start because they surely will retaliate… BRUTALLY

afrodoc2:


Whether a leader is bad or good he needs to be held accountable. So asking “these are the kind of leaders we are meant to hold accountable” shouldn’t come into it. Even if the leader was a mix of Jesus/Mohammed/Otem/Bertrand Russell/Marcus Aurelius, you still have to hold him or her accountable.

Also if you claim majority of the people saying hold leaders accountable are supporting bad leaders, you are implying that the ones supporting perceived good leaders don’t want leaders to be held accountable, which we both know is not the case.

All leaders need to be held accountable. Whether perceived to be bad or good. I don’t think that statement should be demonised the way it has been here. Unless you see it as a bad thing and want to stop holding them accountable, there is no point focusing on that statement. The focus should actually be on putting pressure on them and actually holding them accountable.

afrodoc2:


Whether a leader is bad or good he needs to be held accountable. So asking “these are the kind of leaders we are meant to hold accountable” shouldn’t come into it. Even if the leader was a mix of Jesus/Mohammed/Otem/Bertrand Russell/Marcus Aurelius, you still have to hold him or her accountable.

Also if you claim majority of the people saying hold leaders accountable are supporting bad leaders, you are implying that the ones supporting perceived good leaders don’t want leaders to be held accountable, which we both know is not the case.

All leaders need to be held accountable. Whether perceived to be bad or good. I don’t think that statement should be demonised the way it has been here. Unless you see it as a bad thing and want to stop holding them accountable, there is no point focusing on that statement. The focus should actually be on putting pressure on them and actually holding them accountable.

Amoto94:

Perhaps it could be argued that the fraud tag associated with tech bros is somewhat justifiable except proven otherwise.

monerozi5590:



Nobody can defend that no matter how smart you are.

On Sunrise yesterday on Channels TV, they asked one lawyer wei be APC member to defend that, the guy just the stammer d say em! em!! em!!em!! My guy come jump the question. Very funny.

TrebleChamp:
I don't think anybody here is demonising that statement to be honest, they are just calling out the hypocrisy of people who tell them to hold leaders accountable, but still attack them for calling the leaders to account. Was it not on this same Nairaland people were being insulted for criticising Buhari Govt for 8 wasted years? Why tell people to hold their leaders accountable, then insult the people for trying to criticise the leaders actions because you support that leader or party?