Krismas:
because of money? are you wyning me? wen has space X ever complained to you about being broke? wen they even thinking of transporting people to see space? so answer the question without delay why has there been no other known human landings on the moon, if the first is true

Well, I know that when Nigeria sent sattelites into space, people complained about the money spent. Same thing when India sent a robotic mission to Mars.

As at the time of the lunar landing, the USA had a large poverty problem (yes, it was not as bad as other nations, but to many Americans, no one should be poor in their country) and was fighting a war in Vietnam that was costing them a lot of money, and did not end till 1972. And also had a massive aid program to poorer countries. And it was spending a lot of money to combat all these issues.

And they were also spending billions to send about 15 or so men to the moon.

See how it burdens their budget already.?

The only reason why the American congress supported the moon landing was to beat the Soviets. Once done, the show was over. Many Americans wanted an end to the spending too.

That has not stopped NASA from doing other projects

1. Mars : Mariner series (1965),Viking 1 and 2 1976, and several others from 1996.
2.Jupiter: Pionner 11 and 12, Gallileo, Cassini (1974, 1994, 2005/6)
3.Saturn : Voyager 1 and 2, 1980, Cassini HYugens, 2006
4.Uranus, Neptune (Voyager 1 and 2).
5.Mercury : Mariner (1965)

Let's even talk about the USSR
1.Moon: Two unmanned probes 1971
2.Venus: Venera series 1970's and 80's
3.Mars: Several probes 1960's and 70's.
4. Space stations : Salyut, Mir, etc etc.

Discountsempai:


GPS was developed using satellite technology (the math was invented by a black woman, by the way)...which satellite tech is part of space technology, which involves landing on the moon and on other planets...

You see when you sell a propaganda, it is easier to see through. Any enlightened nairalander, would agree with me, the context of your submission, suggest an artificial material (satellite) made from earth materials and placed in a delusive environment.


Just go through your comment again.
I still maintain, you don't need to land on so called moon to invent any technology

Discountsempai:


The USA put a man on the moon. You can pretend it was a lie, but in the 1960's the USA did put a man on the moon.

Even if you don't believe, you can believe the USSR...who actually gave the USA some mementos to place on the moon (one in memory of Yuri Gargarian of blessed memory). And who were monitoring the flight of the Apollo 11 from A to Z. And who had spies all over the US industrial complex , who would have confirmed if any lying was going on. They did not.

Yes, the US has not gone back since 1972 because one moon landing cost a whole lot of money. American taxpayers of those days were sold the moon landing /tolerated the moon landing on the idea that they needed to beat the USSR In the space race. (And the USSR had an active lunar landing project. Alexei Leonov, the first man to walk in space, whould have been the first man on the moon...unfortunately the USSR was unable to fix the problems with the rocket they used). Once the soviets were beaten, funding for NASA was cut. Sad , but that's the way things are. Governments often get criticsed for 'wasting money on space exploration' (see how India got criticised by its own people for its successful Mars project...government was wasting money apparently).

Finally, there was a lot of research that went into the moon landing...starting with rocketry testing in the 1940's. Neil Armstrong, before he became a pilot, was testing spaceplanes...ie planes that were essentially flying at very very high altitudes..some even suborbital...by the 1950's. The guy did not become a lunar piliot by chance..read his biography.

The oyibo we all know are progressive in terms of tech arrangement

Broveens42:


You see when you sell a propaganda, it is easier to see through. Any enlightened nairalander, would agree with me, the context of your submission, suggest an artificial material (satellite) made from earth materials and placed in a delusive object.


Just go through your comment again.
I still maintain, you don't need to land on so called moon to invent any technology

There is no propaganda. It is a fact of history the US landed on the moon, and it is a fact of history they did it first.

It does not make the US a good or nice country, they are still imperailstic, and there are no good countries, just interests.....but they landed a man or men on the moon.

You can shout propaganda, but I believe in the advances the US, USSR and many other countries have made in space exploration. I always feel happy whichever country does anything in space. I don't have to bother about propaganda.

Besides, the Russians obviously believe the USA put men on the moon, as they had spies all over the USA, and were monitoring the whole thing via satellite.

But at the end, you are free to believe that the USA never landed men on the moon. It's your life, and it does not cause me or anyone else any harm. I am free to believe they did, and it does not make me a propagandaist.

The only dissapointment I have is that the money has not been enough to send more manned exploration to the moon, Mars, or even deep space. And that we don't have technology to explore the myriads of other planetary systems that exist out there.

Maybe one day...

Discountsempai:


The USA put a man on the moon. You can pretend it was a lie, but in the 1960's the USA did put a man on the moon.

Even if you don't believe, you can believe the USSR...who actually gave the USA some mementos to place on the moon (one in memory of Yuri Gargarian of blessed memory). And who were monitoring the flight of the Apollo 11 from A to Z. And who had spies all over the US industrial complex , who would have confirmed if any lying was going on. They did not.

Yes, the US has not gone back since 1972 because one moon landing cost a whole lot of money. American taxpayers of those days were sold the moon landing /tolerated the moon landing on the idea that they needed to beat the USSR In the space race. (And the USSR had an active lunar landing project. Alexei Leonov, the first man to walk in space, whould have been the first man on the moon...unfortunately the USSR was unable to fix the problems with the rocket they used). Once the soviets were beaten, funding for NASA was cut. Sad , but that's the way things are. Governments often get criticsed for 'wasting money on space exploration' (see how India got criticised by its own people for its successful Mars project...government was wasting money apparently).

Finally, there was a lot of research that went into the moon landing...starting with rocketry testing in the 1940's. Neil Armstrong, before he became a pilot, was testing spaceplanes...ie planes that were essentially flying at very very high altitudes..some even suborbital...by the 1950's. The guy did not become a lunar piliot by chance..read his biography.

The oyibo we all know are progressive in terms of tech advancement so you can't tell me they will abandon that kind of investment after spending that much. Iam only wondering why it has not been replicated. From car to any tech you can imagine has been advanced since the 70's.

Draslo:

Mother Earth has been subdued. Space is the next frontier. These powers that be are gearing towards nuclear annihilation of Mother Earth whether in 100 years or 500 years, it is inevitable. Extraterrestrial space stations will guarantee the continuity of our species

Continue deceiving yourself with nonsense. If it were an African project, everybody would call it superstition.
While these agendists are using these tactics to conquer more territories on earth (through major wars), you are dreaming of a glorified "heaven"..

Discountsempai:


There is no propaganda. It is a fact of history the US landed on the moon, and it is a fact of history they did it first.

It does not make the US a good or nice country, they are still imperailstic, and there are no good countries, just interests.....but they landed a man or men on the moon.

You can shout propaganda, but I believe in the advances the US, USSR and many other countries have made in space exploration. I always feel happy whichever country does anything in space. I don't have to bother about propaganda.

Besides, the Russians obviously believe the USA put men on the moon, as they had spies all over the USA, and were monitoring the whole thing via satellite.

But at the end, you are free to believe that the USA never landed men on the moon. It's your life, and it does not cause me or anyone else any harm. I am free to believe they did, and it does not make me a propagandaist.

The only dissapointment I have is that the money has not been enough to send more manned exploration to the moon, Mars, or even deep space. And that we don't have technology to explore the myriads of other planetary systems that exist out there.

Maybe one day...

The US and USSR just taught other nations the importance of propaganda in times of wars. Propagandas could be more effective than bullets

DeepSight:


All these things may come in key for the protection of the Earth in the event of an external cosmic threat.

Givien that the moon regulates Earth's climate. As the only natural satellite of the earth, any cosmic disturbance to the earth will ultimately impact on the moon since it is held in orbit by Earth's forces.

Also, man orchestrated disaster on the moon will have a far reaching negative impact on earth.


The moon is not another planet, it's earth only natural satellite.

matify83:
The race for the moon to me is a distraction and waste of Earth's scares resources which would have been been better deployed in solving the litany of environmental problems on the mother planet.

We have not subdued mother earth in totality yet and here we are racing for the moon to do what exactly?

To do exactly what you are advocating for, the race to the moon, reseach and subsequent discoveries will help understand and subdue the earth better. You must not be a science student?

Artscollection:


The oyibo we all know are progressive in terms of tech advancement so you can't tell me they will abandon that kind of investment after spending that much. Iam only wondering why it has not been replicated. From car to any tech you can imagine has been advanced since the 70's.

Well, one thing about tech advancement is that it is subject to return on investment.

Like now, it is possible for the USA to set up a lunar base...and man it. The problem is, why spend billions for work that may not yield anything in return at that same value?

It is easy to land on the moon. But at the end, does it bring anything of value? Is it worth spending billions of taxpayer revenue for? All the moon landings did was bring back some rocks for analysis.

Space travel and exploration is expensive. That's why we don't have frequent lunar landings or a base on the moon. At the end, humans want return on investment, even governments.

matify83:


Givien that the moon regulates Earth's climate. As the only natural satellite of the earth, any cosmic disturbance to the earth will ultimately impact on the moon since it is held in orbit by Earth's forces.

Also, man orchestrated disaster on the moon will have a far reaching negative impact on earth.


The moon is not another planet, it's earth only natural satellite.

At least, you have spoken like a science student, which isn't different from how our forefathers viewed these things.
And someone is telling me, people land on the moon. For what exactly?
what is the rationale behind this? Lol

Broveens42:



The US and USSR just taught other nations the importance of propaganda in times of wars. Propagandas could be more effective than bullets

Well, I doubt that the US and USSR would have wasted billions on space programmes for propaganda things. This was an effort involving scientists on both sides, which yielded a lot of inventions and stuff , some of which you use today. (Fiberglass is an obvious example).

At the end, the US , USSR and all spacefaring naitons have sent men and satellites and probes to space. If you want to believe it is propaganda , fine. I am free to believe that they did, and you are decieving yourself because you think the US Is evil. (I think all nations are evil, including mine, and they all have interests. That's why we have international bodies anyway).

Discountsempai:


Well, I know that when Nigeria sent sattelites into space, people complained about the money spent. Same thing when India sent a robotic mission to Mars.

As at the time of the lunar landing, the USA had a large poverty problem (yes, it was not as bad as other nations, but to many Americans, no one should be poor in their country) and was fighting a war in Vietnam that was costing them a lot of money, and did not end till 1972. And also had a massive aid program to poorer countries. And it was spending a lot of money to combat all these issues.

And they were also spending billions to send about 15 or so men to the moon.

See how it burdens their budget already.?

The only reason why the American congress supported the moon landing was to beat the Soviets. Once done, the show was over. Many Americans wanted an end to the spending too.

That has not stopped NASA from doing other projects

1. Mars : Mariner series (1965),Viking 1 and 2 1976, and several others from 1996.
2.Jupiter: Pionner 11 and 12, Gallileo, Cassini (1974, 1994, 2005/6)
3.Saturn : Voyager 1 and 2, 1980, Cassini HYugens, 2006
4.Uranus, Neptune (Voyager 1 and 2).
5.Mercury : Mariner (1965)

Let's even talk about the USSR
1.Moon: Two unmanned probes 1971
2.Venus: Venera series 1970's and 80's
3.Mars: Several probes 1960's and 70's.
4. Space stations : Salyut, Mir, etc etc.

why dont you admit america sent unmanned moon landings 5 times after Apollo 11? why no money suddenly? how sensible is that. go to moon, america has 5 flags on it, showing the number of times they have visited. the first flag is nowhere to be seen it should have been 6flags. but they claim the first flag may have been blown away.

Krismas:
why dont you admit america sent unmanned moon landings 5 times after Apollo 11? why no money suddenly? how sensible is that. go to moon, america has 5 flags on it, showing the number of times they have visited. the first flag is nowhere to be seen it should have been 6flags. but they claim it may have been blown away.

They sent five manned missions...

Anyway, you can believe what you want. It makes no difference anyway.

Discountsempai:


They sent five manned missions...

Anyway, you can believe what you want. It makes no difference anyway.

you joking? America has one manned moon landing and five unmanned landings. that's the record. google is your friend

Krismas:
you joking? America has one manned moon landing and five unmanned landings. that's the record. google is your friend

At the end, there is belief and there is actual facts.

Reflect7:


SHUT UP, LIAR.

NASA has never gone to the moon, and they have not claimed to have landed on the moon since the 1960s after they told the first lie.

I think you are very correct. They have not landed on the moon since that one of 1960s Neil Armstrong.

obedience4:



Everything is fake to the illiterate black man
Ode, yet you use GPS on your cars, you watch football matches live from miles away
You don't know all these all possible because of man innovation and the advancement from space technology
A moon landing that was televised Live, something that was verified and confirmed by experts in the space tech field, also by countries space agency.
Even Soviet space agency acknowledge the feats,. Ending the space war.
Yet one clown in Nigeria, is taking nonsense all because he has a phone and data ,that is powered by the. Technology that brought a about the moon landing

😆....people that will tell you that BUHARI WAS A CLONE OR JUBRIN OF SUDAN.

Or tell you that NNAMDI KANU attended UN meeting on behalf of biafra in 2016.


YOU DONT KNOW ANYTHING.

PEOPLE THAT beleived ICJ lodged in sharaton hotel Abuja in May 28 to arrest TINUBU on the day of his inauguration 😆

You are overrating the intelligence of some Nigerians

Krismas:
you joking? America has one manned moon landing and five unmanned landings. that's the record. google is your friend

I took your advice, and this is the first thing google showed me

Apollo 11 was the first crewed mission to land on the Moon, on 20 July 1969. There were six crewed landings between 1969 and 1972, and numerous uncrewed landings, with no soft landings happening between 22 August 1976 and 14 December 2013

SAUCE

So, you were wrong.

I have asked google, and google has spoken.

But now, you would start saying 'Kompromat'.

emmanbol:


I think you are very correct. They have not landed on the moon since that one of 1960s Neil Armstrong.

This is a big LIE

Go to Netflix and watched documentaries on several other missions

Discountsempai:


Well, I doubt that the US and USSR would have wasted billions on space programmes for propaganda things. This was an effort involving scientists on both sides, which yielded a lot of inventions and stuff , some of which you use today. (Fiberglass is an obvious example).

At the end, the US , USSR and all spacefaring naitons have sent men and satellites and probes to space. If you want to believe it is propaganda , fine. I am free to believe that they did, and you are decieving yourself because you think the US Is evil. (I think all nations are evil, including mine, and they all have interests. That's why we have international bodies anyway).

You call it waste, they have it at the back of their minds as major investment.
The returns you get from invested propaganda can't be overemphasized.

All these natural deposits they suck freely from war torn areas can fund your budget X 1000

Broveens42:


You call it waste, they have it at the back of their minds as major investment.
The returns you get from invested propaganda can't be overemphasized.

All these natural deposits they suck freely from war torn areas can fund your budget X 1000

All those wars too drain them of money.(Arthur Clarke blamed the VIetnam war for not allowing the US do more in space)

Plus, natural deposits abound in the USA, and they can just simply buy them.

(Iraq war benefited chinese oil companies more than US oil companies. Also benefitted the Iranians too)

Reflect7:


Do NOT believe them.

They faked the first so-called moon landing in the 1960s.

This could be another scam.

Every thing about the US is a scam to you, all their discoveries that you use today is also a scam to you so need to waste your energy. Just continue to use their product and shout scam

Discountsempai:


At the end, there is belief and there is actual facts.

the summary is simply that the first manned moon landing was a hoax. its definite. if sending a man to the moon were possible others would have replicated it even if America suddenly can no longer afford to repeat it. no human being can survive the belt of heat in deep space. there is no way to surmount this obstacle for now. a robot can take the heat. but a human cant. thats why its unmanned galore in moon landings for now

Discountsempai:


The USA put a man on the moon. You can pretend it was a lie, but in the 1960's the USA did put a man on the moon.

Even if you don't believe, you can believe the USSR...who actually gave the USA some mementos to place on the moon (one in memory of Yuri Gargarian of blessed memory). And who were monitoring the flight of the Apollo 11 from A to Z. And who had spies all over the US industrial complex , who would have confirmed if any lying was going on. They did not.

Yes, the US has not gone back since 1972 because one moon landing cost a whole lot of money. American taxpayers of those days were sold the moon landing /tolerated the moon landing on the idea that they needed to beat the USSR In the space race. (And the USSR had an active lunar landing project. Alexei Leonov, the first man to walk in space, whould have been the first man on the moon...unfortunately the USSR was unable to fix the problems with the rocket they used). Once the soviets were beaten, funding for NASA was cut. Sad , but that's the way things are. Governments often get criticsed for 'wasting money on space exploration' (see how India got criticised by its own people for its successful Mars project...government was wasting money apparently).

Finally, there was a lot of research that went into the moon landing...starting with rocketry testing in the 1940's. Neil Armstrong, before he became a pilot, was testing spaceplanes...ie planes that were essentially flying at very very high altitudes..some even suborbital...by the 1950's. The guy did not become a lunar piliot by chance..read his biography.

You seem not to understand these are mostly islamic terrorist sympathisers who never see anything good about the USA.
These are people recently celebrating Iran's satellite launch into space and they will never doubt that but are quick to call you a slowpoke for believing everything the west feeds you.

obedience4:



I don't have time to argue with fools,
I believe you also believe the earth is flat

Your proof is that they didn't do another moon mission

NASA did and exploration of Pluto when they started the New Horizons probe in July 2015,
So because they were no further trips to the planet Pluto, NASA didn't explore Pluto and it was all a lie. Loooooool

Moon landing, doesn't mean it was a man landings, NASA was landed more than 5 rover's on the moon after the Apollo man landing

Please go find another illiterate to converse with.

Op no mind d werey abeg
hin dey hungry
ebi npawa

[quote author=Reflect7 post=128599262]

Do NOT believe them.

They faked the first so-called moon landing in the 1960s.

This could be another scam.[/quote1 Who they deceived you Oga, wake up. Stop reading the wrong books.

11doubledee:

You seem not to understand these are mostly islamic terrorist sympathisers who never see anything good about the USA.
These are people recently celebrating Iran's satellite launch into space and they will never doubt that.

Moon landing skepiticim is not an Islamic thing...it is quite common among a large swathe of beliefs and religions, and even atheists.

The whole thing even started in the USA In the year 1971....

Russian has been leading all this while now it's U.S turn

GoodSpirit:



Every thing about the US is a scam to you, all their discoveries that you use today is also a scam to you so need to waste your energy. Just continue to use their product and shout scam

Definitely, moon landing generally, is the biggest scam you can ever think of after Religion. What's even the difference.

What is the rationale behind landing on an object that supplies the earth... What is scientific about moon landing? Give details.
What materials are you looking for in the moon that's so special and can't be found on earth?
Why are they not quick to cross the lines at the Antarctica on planet earth, give us more information, rather than placing restrictions?
Why are there so many sites on planet earth, placed with global restrictions?

Discountsempai:


Well, one thing about tech advancement is that it is subject to return on investment.

Like now, it is possible for the USA to set up a lunar base...and man it. The problem is, why spend billions for work that may not yield anything in return at that same value?

It is easy to land on the moon. But at the end, does it bring anything of value? Is it worth spending billions of taxpayer revenue for? All the moon landings did was bring back some rocks for analysis.

Space travel and exploration is expensive. That's why we don't have frequent lunar landings or a base on the moon. At the end, humans want return on investment, even governments.

They must have factored all those indices before the lunar exploration and there has been several failed attempts that have not been in the public domain for some reasons. Lunar exploration is a very lucrative one if you can come up with the technology to harness the potential. If they could land man in d 70's i strongly believe that the same technology could have evolve by now. Elon musk is building a starship That is one aspect of lunar exploration n he listed alot of other obstacles that need to be taken care of which i Believe wasnt possible then.