adamma24:
So science is somewhat correct to state that homo sapiens are relatively new and evolved from chimpanzees. They just don't know the full details.

It is not stupid or laughable for science ( white man ) to say they do not have the full details as to how human metamorphos from chimpanzees up till this day...and you op believe the bullcrap that we humans metamorphosis from ape or chimpanzees...when oyibo way tell you.. no even get answer to that question

CuriousCart:
Please read until the end to make meaning of my write up. I'm going to apply both scientific and biblical references and use relatable terms for better understanding.


Here's how I see it:

Human beings were created by beings from another world who had a leader/project manager (God).

These beings were not of this world. They possibly stumbled upon life on Earth while exploring and were obviously fascinated by the animals they met (no humans yet).

These beings of superior intelligence decided to experiment with the life they met on Earth by mixing their genes with chimpanzees (who happened to be the closest animal in semblance to them). So science is somewhat correct to state that homo sapiens are relatively new and evolved from chimpanzees. They just don't know the full details.

Out of this experiment they created Man who looked and behaved like them but he was primitive (Blacks). They created Man to act as their servant/labourer/assistant in taking care of the Earth they discovered for them. Think of it like a Bigman and his gateman or driver. They do not hate you but the gulf in class will be maintained.

Later on, some of these beings began to lust after the Man they created and eventually had sex with Man to produce further mutated offsprings. This is not too difficult to imagine because while Mankind were of inferior stock some must definitely have enticing features that appealed to the creators. The product of this union is mentioned in the Bible.

After this, their leader (God) decided to leave Earth since his original project had been tampered with but not before kicking out the erring members out of their spaceship (Heaven) into Earth (Hell without his supervision). These exiled beings rallied around a leader (Satan) and decided to make sure they destroyed their former leader's most revered project (Mankind) in petty retaliation. Like when your spoilt child pours away the pot of soup because you disciplined him.

I will explain the previous paragraph better:
Before the betrayal, God and his beings could come down here on Earth physically to live and give instructions to Man (like in the Bible). They could come down sometimes to solve problems with their superior technology (miracles) when summoned. Man also had a longer age limit since he was created with their DNA. But after the abomination, God decided to wipe out all of that anomaly with a flood. This flood did not cover the whole world as the Bible mentioned but just the inhabited parts.

The flood lasted longer than 40 days. It lasted many years and the ark people multiplied within it.

Some people survived the flood without being inside the ark.


These non-ark survivors migrated to Europe and Asia away from the flood and evolved over many years while the flood people were holed up in their ark. They explored and developed skills to survive on their own instead of waiting for their creators to save them as used to be the case then.

These survivors are the Whites of today.
Their skin whitened because they moved high up into the mountains and away from sunlight/sky to avoid the flood.

This is why the White's mentality is distinct from the Black's who still have the saviour gene in him. The Blacks are only just learning to survive on their own and still lag behind Whites whose ancestors managed to figure out a way during the flood.


This is also why Whites enslave Blacks throughout history because their genes still carry the original creator+creation DNA that God tried to wipe out. The ark survivors were chosen because they had the original lab experiment intact without sexual intercourse with the creator beings.

Now, through centuries of mixed race intercourse, almost everyone in the world will carry the creator/created DNA that God opposed.

That is the Mark of the Beast.

When all of Mankind finally have it, the leader of the exiled beings (Satan) plans to wage war (Armageddon) with his former boss (God) since his own project has overshadowed his boss' own.



Ask me any questions.


OAM4J nlfpmod Seun

HellVictorinho6:



What rubbish

CuriousCart:


Shut up

CuriousCart:
Please read until the end to make meaning of my write up. I'm going to apply both scientific and biblical references and use relatable terms for better understanding.


Here's how I see it:

Human beings were created by beings from another world who had a leader/project manager (God).

These beings were not of this world. They possibly stumbled upon life on Earth while exploring and were obviously fascinated by the animals they met (no humans yet).

These beings of superior intelligence decided to experiment with the life they met on Earth by mixing their genes with chimpanzees (who happened to be the closest animal in semblance to them). So science is somewhat correct to state that homo sapiens are relatively new and evolved from chimpanzees. They just don't know the full details.

Out of this experiment they created Man who looked and behaved like them but he was primitive (Blacks). They created Man to act as their servant/labourer/assistant in taking care of the Earth they discovered for them. Think of it like a Bigman and his gateman or driver. They do not hate you but the gulf in class will be maintained.

Later on, some of these beings began to lust after the Man they created and eventually had sex with Man to produce further mutated offsprings. This is not too difficult to imagine because while Mankind were of inferior stock some must definitely have enticing features that appealed to the creators. The product of this union is mentioned in the Bible.

After this, their leader (God) decided to leave Earth since his original project had been tampered with but not before kicking out the erring members out of their spaceship (Heaven) into Earth (Hell without his supervision). These exiled beings rallied around a leader (Satan) and decided to make sure they destroyed their former leader's most revered project (Mankind) in petty retaliation. Like when your spoilt child pours away the pot of soup because you disciplined him.

I will explain the previous paragraph better:
Before the betrayal, God and his beings could come down here on Earth physically to live and give instructions to Man (like in the Bible). They could come down sometimes to solve problems with their superior technology (miracles) when summoned. Man also had a longer age limit since he was created with their DNA. But after the abomination, God decided to wipe out all of that anomaly with a flood. This flood did not cover the whole world as the Bible mentioned but just the inhabited parts.

The flood lasted longer than 40 days. It lasted many years and the ark people multiplied within it.

Some people survived the flood without being inside the ark.


These non-ark survivors migrated to Europe and Asia away from the flood and evolved over many years while the flood people were holed up in their ark. They explored and developed skills to survive on their own instead of waiting for their creators to save them as used to be the case then.

These survivors are the Whites of today.
Their skin whitened because they moved high up into the mountains and away from sunlight/sky to avoid the flood.

This is why the White's mentality is distinct from the Black's who still have the saviour gene in him. The Blacks are only just learning to survive on their own and still lag behind Whites whose ancestors managed to figure out a way during the flood.


This is also why Whites enslave Blacks throughout history because their genes still carry the original creator+creation DNA that God tried to wipe out. The ark survivors were chosen because they had the original lab experiment intact without sexual intercourse with the creator beings.

Now, through centuries of mixed race intercourse, almost everyone in the world will carry the creator/created DNA that God opposed.

That is the Mark of the Beast.

When all of Mankind finally have it, the leader of the exiled beings (Satan) plans to wage war (Armageddon) with his former boss (God) since his own project has overshadowed his boss' own.

Ask me any questions.

JessicaRabbit:

---

Is there any actual evidence for your write up? If yes, please cite them. Thanks.

CuriousCart:


Madam, where did you see "the factual & accurate human creation story" in my write up?

JessicaRabbit:


What's the point of your write-up then?

CuriousCart:
My topic starts with "my belief" and "here's how I see it" yet some dumbos are here to ask me dumb questions.

JessicaRabbit:


I don't see why you're getting so upset about me asking you to cite the bases for your beliefs. Beliefs do not exist in a vacuum, just so you know. I mean listen to yourself. You claim your "beliefs" are not meant to be factual, yet somehow it weirdly hinges on specific historical events for legitimacy. And you expect people to take you seriously?

CuriousCart:


If what you really need is citation then did you miss the part where I said I'd use scientific and biblical references?

CuriousCart:


If what you really need is citation then did you miss the part where I said I'd use scientific and biblical references?


Exactly why I said if you could read you would have figured whatever you are looking for out yourself.

JessicaRabbit:


Classic appeal to the invisible bookshelf, by the way. Maybe next time you can cite chapters from the Encyclopaedia Britannica of Really Creative Fanfiction.

JessicaRabbit:


Then what are you waiting for to use them? I'm interested to see your references. If you already used them and I missed it, please link me.

CuriousCart:
Please read until the end to make meaning of my write up. I'm going to apply both scientific and biblical references and use relatable terms for better understanding.


Here's how I see it:

Human beings were created by beings from another world who had a leader/project manager (God).

These beings were not of this world. They possibly stumbled upon life on Earth while exploring and were obviously fascinated by the animals they met (no humans yet).

These beings of superior intelligence decided to experiment with the life they met on Earth by mixing their genes with chimpanzees (who happened to be the closest animal in semblance to them). So science is somewhat correct to state that homo sapiens are relatively new and evolved from chimpanzees. They just don't know the full details.

Out of this experiment they created Man who looked and behaved like them but he was primitive (Blacks). They created Man to act as their servant/labourer/assistant in taking care of the Earth they discovered for them. Think of it like a Bigman and his gateman or driver. They do not hate you but the gulf in class will be maintained.

Later on, some of these beings began to lust after the Man they created and eventually had sex with Man to produce further mutated offsprings. This is not too difficult to imagine because while Mankind were of inferior stock some must definitely have enticing features that appealed to the creators. The product of this union is mentioned in the Bible.

After this, their leader (God) decided to leave Earth since his original project had been tampered with but not before kicking out the erring members out of their spaceship (Heaven) into Earth (Hell without his supervision). These exiled beings rallied around a leader (Satan) and decided to make sure they destroyed their former leader's most revered project (Mankind) in petty retaliation. Like when your spoilt child pours away the pot of soup because you disciplined him.

I will explain the previous paragraph better:
Before the betrayal, God and his beings could come down here on Earth physically to live and give instructions to Man (like in the Bible). They could come down sometimes to solve problems with their superior technology (miracles) when summoned. Man also had a longer age limit since he was created with their DNA. But after the abomination, God decided to wipe out all of that anomaly with a flood. This flood did not cover the whole world as the Bible mentioned but just the inhabited parts.

The flood lasted longer than 40 days. It lasted many years and the ark people multiplied within it.

Some people survived the flood without being inside the ark.


These non-ark survivors migrated to Europe and Asia away from the flood and evolved over many years while the flood people were holed up in their ark. They explored and developed skills to survive on their own instead of waiting for their creators to save them as used to be the case then.

These survivors are the Whites of today.
Their skin whitened because they moved high up into the mountains and away from sunlight/sky to avoid the flood.

This is why the White's mentality is distinct from the Black's who still have the saviour gene in him. The Blacks are only just learning to survive on their own and still lag behind Whites whose ancestors managed to figure out a way during the flood.


This is also why Whites enslave Blacks throughout history because their genes still carry the original creator+creation DNA that God tried to wipe out. The ark survivors were chosen because they had the original lab experiment intact without sexual intercourse with the creator beings.

Now, through centuries of mixed race intercourse, almost everyone in the world will carry the creator/created DNA that God opposed.

That is the Mark of the Beast.

When all of Mankind finally have it, the leader of the exiled beings (Satan) plans to wage war (Armageddon) with his former boss (God) since his own project has overshadowed his boss' own.



Ask me any questions.


OAM4J nlfpmod Seun

JessicaRabbit:


A couple of things here

(1) Science actually suggests humans share a common ancestor with chimpanzees, not that we're their directly-engineered cousins. It's a gradual process, not a mad scientist's lab project.

(2) The idea that skin color is linked to intelligence or creator-given status is demonstrably false. It's a product of adaptation, not divine decree.

(3) Extensive geological evidence suggests a global flood like Noah's is highly improbable. Plus, how did animals from all continents magically appear on a boat in the Middle East?

JessicaRabbit:


A couple of things here

(1) Science actually suggests humans share a common ancestor with chimpanzees, not that we're their directly-engineered cousins. It's a gradual process, not a mad scientist's lab project.

(2) The idea that skin color is linked to intelligence or creator-given status is demonstrably false. It's a product of adaptation, not divine decree.

(3) Extensive geological evidence suggests a global flood like Noah's is highly improbable. Plus, how did animals from all continents magically appear on a boat in the Middle East?

CuriousCart:



Look for a husband and family so that you don't spend your bedtime trolling online.

CuriousCart:


You are so dumb that you just supported everything I wrote with 3 strong points. LMAO

JessicaRabbit:


Hold on, let me get this straight.

(1) You claimed humans were created by beings from another world, but I pointed out to you that science shows a natural process of evolution... and you considered it a merit to your argument?

(2) You implied skin color determines intelligence or status, which is a harmful and false idea without any actual evidence. I noted this... and you considered it a merit to your argument?

(3) You proposed a global flood, but geological evidence contradicts this. I mentioned this... and you considered it a merit to your argument?

🤦🏽‍♀️

You wouldn't look this pathetic if you didn't keep harping on about me not reading your posts. Life sure is funnier than any team of comedy writers can imagine.

Can you now see who merits the dumbass epithet yet?

CuriousCart:
Please read until the end to make meaning of my write up. I'm going to apply both scientific and biblical references and use relatable terms for better understanding.


Here's how I see it:

Human beings were created by beings from another world who had a leader/project manager (God).

These beings were not of this world. They possibly stumbled upon life on Earth while exploring and were obviously fascinated by the animals they met (no humans yet).

These beings of superior intelligence decided to experiment with the life they met on Earth by mixing their genes with chimpanzees (who happened to be the closest animal in semblance to them). So science is somewhat correct to state that homo sapiens are relatively new and evolved from chimpanzees. They just don't know the full details.

Out of this experiment they created Man who looked and behaved like them but he was primitive (Blacks). They created Man to act as their servant/labourer/assistant in taking care of the Earth they discovered for them. Think of it like a Bigman and his gateman or driver. They do not hate you but the gulf in class will be maintained.

Later on, some of these beings began to lust after the Man they created and eventually had sex with Man to produce further mutated offsprings. This is not too difficult to imagine because while Mankind were of inferior stock some must definitely have enticing features that appealed to the creators. The product of this union is mentioned in the Bible.

After this, their leader (God) decided to leave Earth since his original project had been tampered with but not before kicking out the erring members out of their spaceship (Heaven) into Earth (Hell without his supervision). These exiled beings rallied around a leader (Satan) and decided to make sure they destroyed their former leader's most revered project (Mankind) in petty retaliation. Like when your spoilt child pours away the pot of soup because you disciplined him.

I will explain the previous paragraph better:
Before the betrayal, God and his beings could come down here on Earth physically to live and give instructions to Man (like in the Bible). They could come down sometimes to solve problems with their superior technology (miracles) when summoned. Man also had a longer age limit since he was created with their DNA. But after the abomination, God decided to wipe out all of that anomaly with a flood. This flood did not cover the whole world as the Bible mentioned but just the inhabited parts.

The flood lasted longer than 40 days. It lasted many years and the ark people multiplied within it.

Some people survived the flood without being inside the ark.


These non-ark survivors migrated to Europe and Asia away from the flood and evolved over many years while the flood people were holed up in their ark. They explored and developed skills to survive on their own instead of waiting for their creators to save them as used to be the case then.

These survivors are the Whites of today.
Their skin whitened because they moved high up into the mountains and away from sunlight/sky to avoid the flood.

This is why the White's mentality is distinct from the Black's who still have the saviour gene in him. The Blacks are only just learning to survive on their own and still lag behind Whites whose ancestors managed to figure out a way during the flood.


This is also why Whites enslave Blacks throughout history because their genes still carry the original creator+creation DNA that God tried to wipe out. The ark survivors were chosen because they had the original lab experiment intact without sexual intercourse with the creator beings.

Now, through centuries of mixed race intercourse, almost everyone in the world will carry the creator/created DNA that God opposed.

That is the Mark of the Beast.

When all of Mankind finally have it, the leader of the exiled beings (Satan) plans to wage war (Armageddon) with his former boss (God) since his own project has overshadowed his boss' own.



Ask me any questions.


OAM4J nlfpmod Seun

JessicaRabbit:


A couple of things here

(1) Science actually suggests humans share a common ancestor with chimpanzees, not that we're their directly-engineered cousins. It's a gradual process, not a mad scientist's lab project.

(2) The idea that skin color is linked to intelligence or creator-given status is demonstrably false. It's a product of adaptation, not divine decree.

(3) Extensive geological evidence suggests a global flood like Noah's is highly improbable. Plus, how did animals from all continents magically appear on a boat in the Middle East?

CuriousCart:
Please read until the end to make meaning of my write up. I'm going to apply both scientific and biblical references and use relatable terms for better understanding.


Here's how I see it:

Human beings were created by beings from another world who had a leader/project manager (God).

These beings were not of this world. They possibly stumbled upon life on Earth while exploring and were obviously fascinated by the animals they met (no humans yet).

These beings of superior intelligence decided to experiment with the life they met on Earth by mixing their genes with chimpanzees (who happened to be the closest animal in semblance to them). So science is somewhat correct to state that homo sapiens are relatively new and evolved from chimpanzees. They just don't know the full details.

Out of this experiment they created Man who looked and behaved like them but he was primitive (Blacks). They created Man to act as their servant/labourer/assistant in taking care of the Earth they discovered for them. Think of it like a Bigman and his gateman or driver. They do not hate you but the gulf in class will be maintained.

Later on, some of these beings began to lust after the Man they created and eventually had sex with Man to produce further mutated offsprings. This is not too difficult to imagine because while Mankind were of inferior stock some must definitely have enticing features that appealed to the creators. The product of this union is mentioned in the Bible.

After this, their leader (God) decided to leave Earth since his original project had been tampered with but not before kicking out the erring members out of their spaceship (Heaven) into Earth (Hell without his supervision). These exiled beings rallied around a leader (Satan) and decided to make sure they destroyed their former leader's most revered project (Mankind) in petty retaliation. Like when your spoilt child pours away the pot of soup because you disciplined him.

I will explain the previous paragraph better:
Before the betrayal, God and his beings could come down here on Earth physically to live and give instructions to Man (like in the Bible). They could come down sometimes to solve problems with their superior technology (miracles) when summoned. Man also had a longer age limit since he was created with their DNA. But after the abomination, God decided to wipe out all of that anomaly with a flood. This flood did not cover the whole world as the Bible mentioned but just the inhabited parts.

The flood lasted longer than 40 days. It lasted many years and the ark people multiplied within it.

Some people survived the flood without being inside the ark.


These non-ark survivors migrated to Europe and Asia away from the flood and evolved over many years while the flood people were holed up in their ark. They explored and developed skills to survive on their own instead of waiting for their creators to save them as used to be the case then.

These survivors are the Whites of today.
Their skin whitened because they moved high up into the mountains and away from sunlight/sky to avoid the flood.

This is why the White's mentality is distinct from the Black's who still have the saviour gene in him. The Blacks are only just learning to survive on their own and still lag behind Whites whose ancestors managed to figure out a way during the flood.


This is also why Whites enslave Blacks throughout history because their genes still carry the original creator+creation DNA that God tried to wipe out. The ark survivors were chosen because they had the original lab experiment intact without sexual intercourse with the creator beings.

Now, through centuries of mixed race intercourse, almost everyone in the world will carry the creator/created DNA that God opposed.

That is the Mark of the Beast.

When all of Mankind finally have it, the leader of the exiled beings (Satan) plans to wage war (Armageddon) with his former boss (God) since his own project has overshadowed his boss' own.



Ask me any questions.


OAM4J nlfpmod Seun

CuriousCart:






Your points 1-3 staring you in the face.
Dumb Bleep.



Better go find an equally dumb man to keep you away from making a fool of yourself online.

Bloody illiterate.

These beings of superior intelligence decided to experiment with the life they met on Earth by mixing their genes with chimpanzees (who happened to be the closest animal in semblance to them). So science is somewhat correct to state that homo sapiens are relatively new and evolved from chimpanzees. They just don't know the full details.

Some people survived the flood without being inside the ark.


These non-ark survivors migrated to Europe and Asia away from the flood and evolved over many years while the flood people were holed up in their ark. They explored and developed skills to survive on their own instead of waiting for their creators to save them as used to be the case then.

These survivors are the Whites of today.
Their skin whitened because they moved high up into the mountains and away from sunlight/sky to avoid the flood.

This is why the White's mentality is distinct from the Black's who still have the saviour gene in him. The Blacks are only just learning to survive on their own and still lag behind Whites whose ancestors managed to figure out a way during the flood.

JessicaRabbit:


I must say, it's very sad watching you pull this pitiful "I was right all along, you just didn't understand my brilliance" move. At great pains, I've decided to give a slightly more thorough assessment of your OP, highlighting flaws in certain areas (not for you by the way, but for people viewing the thread, since I've now realized you have the intellectual capacity of a rusted iron bucket).

Now, in your most recent rejoinder, you highlighted some parts of your OP as proof of where you cited scientific evidence. Let's now examine them and find out who the real dumbo is.

(1) Addressing the "Extraterrestrial Beings".

You highlighted this part of your OP:


For the avoidance of doubt, I never made any comment corroborating this rubbish. Just because you've tacked on a pseudoscientific veneer to your original claim doesn't mean it's suddenly supported by evidence. Your "beings of superior intelligence" are still unfalsifiable, untestable, and unproven. And now you're trying to co-opt the very science you initially dismissed to prop up your...let's call it a "hypothesis"? Newsflash, my dear: slapping genetic engineering on your "divine" intervention doesn't make it any more plausible. If anything, it highlights your desperation to cling to an unproven idea. You're essentially saying, "I was right, but only because I'm redefining what 'right' means!".

And please, spare me the "full details" canard. If your intergalactic geneticists were real, we'd have, you know, actual EVIDENCE. Not just a hasty retrofitting of scientific concepts to salvage your original, flawed argument.

(2) Addressing your theory about white people, and the global flood:

You also highlighted this part of your OP:


You posit that a global flood occurred, despite geological evidence to the contrary, then introduce a fictional group of "non-ark survivors" who migrate to Europe and Asia, conveniently ignoring the fact that human migration patterns and genetic diversity contradict this tale. You also claim these survivors evolved into modern white people, with skin whitening due to avoidance of sunlight (a clever rehashing of debunked 19th-century race theories). And, of course, you couldn't resist revealing your hidden inferiority complex, implying that white people are more advanced and self-sufficient, while black people lag behind due to some sort of "saviour gene"?

And you have the temerity to insist that you corroborated these fantastical tales in your OP with scientific references, pretending as if your narrative is anything other than a jumbled mess of unconnected ideas, ungrounded in empirical evidence? How can you claim there were scientific references when you can barely reconcile your fable with the overwhelming scientific consensus on human evolution, migration, and genetic diversity?

And then we have the bucket list of logical fallacies that consume your entire post:

- False dichotomy: You created a binary between " Whites" and "Blacks" as if these are fixed, biological categories, ignoring the fact that race is a social construct, and the concept of distinct "races" has no scientific basis.

- Ad hoc reasoning: You conjured up an unproven flood narrative to explain skin color and supposed cognitive differences. This is an unfalsifiable hypothesis, meaning it can't be tested or proven wrong.

- Non sequitur: You jumped from a biblical flood story to modern-day racial differences without any actual logical or scientific connection.

I think it's very obvious who the blundering illiterate is on this topic. But, by all means, keep trying to project your mental inadequacies on to me. I'm only here to point and laugh at you for my entertainment.

AlbertNewton:


Are you saying that animals and humans had different creators ?

CuriousCart:


You are a stark illiterate and your comments continue to prove so. I'll go straight to the point.

1. Show us who has ACTUAL EVIDENCE on the origins of mankind as you are requesting.

2. Show us the part in my original write up where I posited a global flood.


Please there's no need to type epistles.
Just point out these two things.

If you can't, then you are exactly what I know.
Dumb.

CuriousCart:


Yes.
Animals have lived longer on Earth than homo sapiens.

Homo sapiens are not natural inhabitants of Earth but a creation from two or more beings.

AlbertNewton:


How did the animals become inhabitants of earth ? Who created them ?

CuriousCart:


Who created our creators?


I have no idea sir. I only gave mankind's creation theory.

AlbertNewton:

Oh, so the animals are our creators ?

By the way, don't call your story creation theory sir, creation fable sounds better