pappilo:


Na this una mouth go carry una go where una no know. You didnt do anything after Endsars, you didnt do anything after the elections in 2023 and you will do nothing after 2027 elections which Bitter Obi will lose if he stupidly contests again.

You are a mob of gbajue online noisemakers.

Carazon:


Yes, NAFDAC did and her claims were false so let her come forth with a prove

CaptainGo:


What truth?

She said Erisco tomatoes was killing people, she has to show the people that have died from consuming the product.

How hard is that?

You have no idea what it takes to build a business in Nigeria just for some clout chaser to spread that sort of false allegation.

Maobichek:


Both NAFDAC and SON confirmed that Erisco tomatoes is good and edible; who then will defend her?

Freedom of speech is entirely different from what she did, there are records ok. She agreed to apologize but later decline and dare Erisco to go to Court.

Court will not pass judgement base on sentiment and emotion; she had the opportunity to free herself but she was headstrong and this is the reason why we all are still here, thank you.

Dougad:


What year did it happen? Was it before 2009?

See below

"Coroners and Justice Act 2009 finally abolishes common law libel offences
Section 73 of the new Coroners and Justice Act 2009, which came into force today, has abolished the common law offences of sedition, seditious libel, obscene libel and defamatory libel."

abdsamad:


They arrested her without justification and flee her to Abuja. Yet you want her to apologise and delete.

People, you have rights. Stop defending the pipu telling you that you don't. This is no different from the cases of people talking trash about the president and getting kidnapped by sss the next day.
If someone offends you, approach your lawyer. They'll serve them papers, you'll both have your days in court. Lobatan!

Haba! Stop defending de facto kidnappings in the name of hurt feelings.

abdsamad:


Where is the post and what was the context. We’ve seen this one too many times. Take something out of context and run with it. What exactly did she say and within what context.

TimeManager:
Unfortunately, obidients egging her on wouldn't love you enough to share the jail room, sufferings and pains with you. She lost the baby wtf!, be careful of stupid people in large numbers.. lesson learnt.

-Kiss the truth!

7demons:

Before then you will eventually die of hunger like I'm sure you don't even have up to 500k in your bank account. Go and eat first before talking to me.

abbey621:


Does the tomato paste have more sugar than alternatives?
Does sugar cause diabetes?
Does diabetes kill people?
Has diabetes killed people in Nigeria?


CASE CLOSED!

wirinet:

I am tired of educating you guys on the simple principle of law. You are are either highly ignorant or choose to be highly ignorant.
She does not need to show anyone thar people have died consuming the product, she only needs to show that that she believes that the sugar in the product is capable of killing people. Please not the word believes (or in other words her opinion)
The main plank of a crime in criminal law is intent. Did she start out intending to demarket the product? Erisco lawyers must present evidence that the lady deliberately wanted to harm Erisco tomato and the company. They have to present evidence that maybe she is an agent of a rival company, she has a grudge against the company or that she knowingly lied against the company in order to harm then.
Where Erisco lawyers made the mistake is filing a criminal case. In a criminal case they would have to prove premeditation and malicious intent for her posts, and beyond all reasonable doubts. If it was a civil case, these conditions need not be met, all Erisco has to prove is that her posts caused grave damage to the company. This is why someone can be found liable for a crime but not criminally. Trump was liable for raping Eugene Carrol but not criminally guilty. Same with O J Simpson and his murdered wife.

This case is a no brainer and instituted just to lock the lady up.

smogicesamson:



You should have been in court yesterday to defend her na.

ppogba:


Irony of life or rather the stupidity of an idiot.
You wonder why Inibehe the lawyer with beards like Osama pushed her this far but could not sue for violation of fundamental human right when he was clamped into jail in Cross River abi which state again.

Message is, shine your brain.

Racoon:
So this matter is still raging? This is gross injustice. This Erisco of a man will not escape it.

Agadinaagwuofe:


Exactly no matter the outcome is a loss for her, she has lost a baby, she's now remanded in prison till 31st when her Vail application will be heard and after the bail conditions might make her stay inside prison for days, her mental health has been affected, the family also will be put into emotional stress, I don't even want to talk about funding. I am sure this is not what she bargained for when she made the statement. The "wise" thing to do since agreement was made in front of IG suppose tell the lady of she doesn't have "an influential backbone" she should have tow the line of peaceful resolution than all the strong head.

DeepSight:


You people dont deserve to live in a free society. You simply dont understand the concept of freedom of speech, freedom of thought and conscience.

FreeStuffsNG:
Recall that the CEO of Erisco Foods, Eric Omeofia, had alleged in 2023 that a negative product review by a customer, Chioma Egodi, negatively impacted his business when she claimed that the Nagiko Tomato Mix she bought had too much sugar.

Okoli’s lawyer, Inibehe Effiong, told the court that his client suffered miscarriage in the course of the case and eventually lost her baby.

Okoli is standing bordering on conspiracy and cyberstalking leveled against her.


O pari.

This erisco tomato paste matter should not have escalated to this extent in my opinion. The extent it has gone now is not helpful for an amicable resolution at all.

This is a lesson to everyone to be careful about the advice people give to you, especially if it's a legal opinion.

If you post a comment or say something the other party consider as offensive to his or her brand ,if your comment is a well-intentioned advice but ,unfortunately, taken wrongly, please just delete the comment(s), apologize to the one who took your feedback in a wrong way and move on with your life. If you're right, you will eventually be justified by posterity and one day the person who feels wronged today will credit you as the one who gave a truly sincere feedback yet you apologized for peace to reign. You become the bigger and more matured party eventually.

I will encourage her husband, family and lawyer to help her out of the current predicament. Let all the parties please explore amicable resolution options if it's not too late yet. It's good that she's being given the opportunity to defend herself so that justice can prevail.

May God bless Nigeria for ever! Check my signature for free stuffs!

Carazon:


Yes, NAFDAC did and her claims were false so let her come forth with a prove

Ezmans:
at last the lady will go free not a murder case I no see case there

7demons:

What has Obidents git to do with Tomato paste?
Now I understand why you guys are daft?
So what happened in 2023 to you is free & fair election? Make that nonsense repeat again in 2027 na then una go know khaki no be leather.

wirinet:

She should be home while the case is still in court.

She does not need to prove the tomato killed people, she only need to genuinely believe that sugar in the tomato kills people.

Show me examples of where people are jailed for fake reviews in Nigetia or any other country in the world.

FreeStuffsNG:


https://saharareporters.com/2024/05/28/nigerian-court-remands-tomato-paste-reviewer-chioma-okoli-prison-over-comments-erisco

wirinet:

I am tired of educating you guys on the simple principle of law. You are are either highly ignorant or choose to be highly ignorant.
She does not need to show anyone thar people have died consuming the product, she only needs to show that that she believes that the sugar in the product is capable of killing people. Please not the word believes (or in other words her opinion)
The main plank of a crime in criminal law is intent. Did she start out intending to demarket the product? Erisco lawyers must present evidence that the lady deliberately wanted to harm Erisco tomato and the company. They have to present evidence that maybe she is an agent of a rival company, she has a grudge against the company or that she knowingly lied against the company in order to harm then.
Where Erisco lawyers made the mistake is filing a criminal case. In a criminal case they would have to prove premeditation and malicious intent for her posts, and beyond all reasonable doubts. If it was a civil case, these conditions need not be met, all Erisco has to prove is that her posts caused grave damage to the company. This is why someone can be found liable for a crime but not criminally. Trump was liable for raping Eugene Carrol but not criminally guilty. Same with O J Simpson and his murdered wife.

This case is a no brainer and instituted just to lock the lady up.

nnachukz:
Cash and carry judiciary. Did any entity investigate her claim and find it to be false?

Obycus:
The Erisco owner is just a wicked and a sadistic fellow. The outcome of this his useless court case will be disasterous on him and his business. People are watching and waiting.

CaptainGo:


Freedom of speech yeah! Go and make a false allegation against somebody, and you would eat watery beans in prison.

E say na freedom of thought and conscience

CaptainGo:


What do you assume is the intent of that comment from her?

Racoon:
So this matter is still raging? This is gross injustice. This Erisco of a man will not escape it.