toughest007:


The passion you have for 'anything' UK is unrivalled! Typing volumes back to back!!! Hand no dey pain you? I get back from work and I am gassed out!!!

Are you with the government?

She is a Bot.

LLM.

Zahra29:


Haba that's not accurate. He was saying that they would be processed in a 3rd country before being allowed to come into the country (for those who qualify).

Come on Zahra… you are the one putting those words in his mouth. He didn’t say so.

So, based on what you are saying, those that are in Calais, Starmer will process them in France (safe 3rd country) If they are successful, they come in. If they are not successful, they stay in France?
Or??

I did not watch the debate just catching snippets. Your opinions and feelings are very valid.
BUT I m not yet ready to go back to Nigeria so i m afraid i ll have to fight you if you are voting reform.

Peerielass:


As an avid Labour supporter, can you honestly say that you were impressed by his performance on Tuesday night’s debate? I’m sure that debate did more damage than good for Labour.

His response to the NHS question was based on political ideology rather than commons sense. He will not use private healthcare to help a dying loved one, he would continue to wait on NHS waiting list. That to me is either foolishness or plain white lie but each to their own. Same reason he finds it difficult to define a woman.

I can vote whoever I want to vote for or even spoil my ballot paper. Labour does not deserve my vote because I don’t know what they stand for. They have refused to provide clarification on a whole lot of issues which I’m interested in. At least with the Tory’s and Reform UK, what you see is what you get!

Zahra29:


Haba that's not accurate. He was saying that they would be processed in a 3rd country before being allowed to come into the country (for those who qualify). Similar way the Ukrainian refugees were processed off shore before being given visas to continue to the UK.

Those who don't qualify will remain in the 3rd country or elsewhere which sounds more common sense than the current system of allowing them all into the UK and then paying £ millions per day to house and feed them while they wait years for their claims to be processed.

What you are saying is a contradictory statement,
How can you process people in a 3rd country after they have illegally arrived your country. It’s the same as sending them to Rwanda. However, Sir Keir said the only difference with his policy and Rwanda is that he will do it in line with international laws.

missjekyll:
I did not watch the debate just catching snippets. Your opinions and feelings are very valid.
BUT I m not yet ready to go back to Nigeria so i m afraid [/b]i ll have to fight you if you are voting reform.[b]

Round one, Fight 🤺

Aunty be calming down o, lol 😂

Lexusgs430:


Not forgetting Keir clearly stating, he would rather his loved one's died in pain, than get procedure done privately.........😂🤑

That was the height of hypocrisy. But well, politicians are hypocrites anyways...

That is something a lot of those on the left are very good at, virtue signalling.

As far as Keir is concerned, there is a Big NHS, with a small country attached, not a country with an NHS.

missjekyll:
I did not watch the debate just catching snippets. Your opinions and feelings are very valid.
BUT I m not yet ready to go back to Nigeria so i m afraid i ll have to fight you if you are voting reform.

You can still watch in on catch up. It will tell you a lot about those two men.

Junior Doctors in the NHS are asking for a 35% pay rise.
Starmer: We will negotiate with them.

Really? What EXACTLY will you do differently?

On Immigration (legal immigration ohh):
Guess what the shocker was? Starmer accused Rishi of being THE MOST LIBERAL PRIME MINISTER. It means Starmer is not happy with the Care visas and Student/dependant visas that the Tories (read: Boris Johnson) introduced after Covid.

If Starmer described Rishi as THE MOST LIBERAL PM (and i am quoting Starmer verbatim, I ask anyone doubting to fact-check me) when it comes to Legal Migration, that means the Tories are the party of choice for LEGAL migrants. No?

BeckyB1:


I wish I can get the opportunity to meet you. Maximum respect to you for your contributions on this platform.

Honestly speaking, there are three people on this thread I would really really really love to meet:
Zahra29
MissJekyll
Justwise

missjekyll:
I did not watch the debate just catching snippets. Your opinions and feelings are very valid.
BUT I m not yet ready to go back to Nigeria so i m afraid i ll have to fight you if you are voting reform.

😂😂🤪

Don’t be a single issue voter! Apart from being anti-immigration, Reform UK have other policies which you might find favourable. I’m away to watch Question Time now.

Peerielass:


😂😂🤪

Don’t be a single issue voter! Apart from being anti-immigration, Reform UK have other policies which you might find favourable. I’m away to watch Question Time now.

So are you saying migrants should vote a party known for anti-immigration policies? Abeg how will they benefit from the so called favourable policies after they've been sent home?

I ll pass.
The far right is not for me.
Farage eulogises Enoch Powell ,vladimir putin ,white nationalists and denigrates immigrants.

I dare you to go doorknocking or to attend reform uk rallies.,then come and tell us how you were treated. Caveat: please dont go, skinheads and buver boot boys do not like black people.

Peerielass:


😂😂🤪

Don’t be a single issue voter! Apart from being anti-immigration, Reform UK have other policies which you might find favourable. I’m away to watch Question Time now.

ReesheesuKnack:



Come on Zahra… you are the one putting those words in his mouth. He didn’t say so.

So, based on what you are saying, those that are in Calais, Starmer will process them in France (safe 3rd country) If they are successful, they come in. If they are not successful, they stay in France?
Or??

That's what I understand their policy to be, albeit he didn't explain it in detail in the debate. Excerpts from Guardian

Labour is reportedly considering a scheme that would see asylum seekers’ claims processed elsewhere....

Under the plan, asylum claims would be processed overseas, with successful applicants allowed to come to the UK....

Other countries around the world do have schemes where they divert people on the way and process them elsewhere. That’s a different kind of scheme,” he told reporters after a speech in Buckinghamshire. “And, look, I’ll look at any scheme that might work.”


Also see below link from the MAC which explains and contrasts the proposed immigration policies for both Labour and Tories:

https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/commentaries/uk-election-2024-immigration-policy-tracker/

missjekyll:
I did not watch the debate just catching snippets. Your opinions and feelings are very valid.
BUT I m not yet ready to go back to Nigeria so i m afraid i ll have to fight you if you are voting reform.

Have you examined Labour's policies on legal immigration? They're talking quite tough, for example

In May 2023, Labour said that employers would have to meet extra conditions to receive a sponsor licence, such as demonstrating efforts to train domestic workers.

This is proposing a return to the stricter conditions that were in place pre Brexit where companies had to prioritise the domestic and EU workforce before they were allowed to hire internationally.

ReesheesuKnack:



Come on Zahra… you are the one putting those words in his mouth. He didn’t say so.

So, based on what you are saying, those that are in Calais, Starmer will process them in France (safe 3rd country) If they are successful, they come in. If they are not successful, they stay in France?
Or??

I'm only quoting the plans they said they would explore which is to divert people en route to the UK and process them elsewhere. If successful they will be allowed to enter the UK. If not then they would be free to go wherever they want, but they wouldn't be in the UK in the first place.

BouharryArtikou:



Honestly speaking, there are three people on this thread I would really really really love to meet:
Zahra29
MissJekyll
Justwise

🥰

Missjekyll and I can have a debate and Justwise will be the moderator 😂

babajeje123:

So are you saying migrants should vote a party known for anti-immigrant policies? Abeg how will they benefit from the so called favourable policies after they've been sent home?

Perhaps anti immigration is the wrong choice of words, I should have maybe said strict immigration policies. In any case I have had a look at their immigration policy and as far as I can see their proposed solutions are very similar to what the other political parties are proffering. See below:

https://www.reformparty.uk/immigration

You need to also remember that we are all different and are at different stages of our life journey. What might appear important to you might rank low in my list of priorities. I will very gladly vote Labour but I’m strongly against their proposed VAT on independent school tuition fees, Education is not taxed anywhere in Europe but due to Brexit, labour is now stealthy trying to impose tax on education. I will rather spoil my ballot paper than vote for that policy, I also have a young female child and I cannot vote a party that refuses to pledge to protect safe spaces for women and girls.

I have not made up my mind on which party to vote but Labour is definitely out of the question for me, based on the issues I have highlighted. I know Starmer will be our next PM with or without my vote, however I’m not prepared to aid that process. I’m also in Scotland and have the additional dilemma of SNP but those ones have completely lost their sense of direction and it’s now a case of the blind leading the blind.

Hi, please has anyone here gotten a refund from Nigerian embassy in London?
I had applied for passport and paid but couldn't get a preferred biometrics date as I was given 30-day ultimatum to provide an updated passport. I had to quickly travel to Naija to get it done. Now I am trying to get a refund from them but they refused saying they don't refund single applications. I have decided to raise a dispute with my bank.

I need help guys. Is it absolutely safe to keep money in my revolut bank? I have over 4k pounds in it, my BRP is expiring by end of next week and I have moved out of UK. I fear an update or whatever will require me to verify my identity with a UK card which I won't be having very soon.

Peerielass:


Perhaps anti immigration is the wrong choice of words, I should have maybe said strict immigration policies. In any case I have had a look at their immigration policy and as far as I can see their proposed solutions are very similar to what the other polities are proffering. See below:

https://www.reformparty.uk/immigration

You need to also remember that we are all different and are at different stages of our life journey. What might appear important to you might rank low in my list of priorities. I will very gladly vote Labour but I’m strongly against their proposed VAT on independent school tuition fees, [/b]Education is not taxed anywhere in Europe but due to Brexit, labour is now stealthy trying to impose tax on education. I will rather spoil my ballot paper than vote for that policy, I also have a young female child and I cannot vote a party that refuses to pledge to protect safe spaces for women and girls.

I have not made up my mind on which party to vote but Labour is definitely out of the question for me, based on the issues I have highlighted. I know Starmer will be our next PM with or without my vote, however I’m not prepared to aid that process. I’m also in Scotland and have the additional dilemma of SNP but those ones have completely lost their sense of direction and it’s now a case of the blind leading the blind.

I remember some comments you made about the proposed tax a few months ago so I knew the bolded would be one of your main reasons.

I think Labour will be forced to do a U turn at some point. There are so many strong arguments against it, plus on Question Time last week I think it was Nigel or maybe Piers who made the very good point that the same VAT policy had been rolled out in Greece a few years back and they had to change course as it was basically a big failure. So it doesn't bode well.

Gender issues is one of the reasons I'm in favour of a right wing balance in parliament.

Zahra29:


I'm only quoting the plans they said they would explore which is to divert people en route to the UK and process them elsewhere. If successful they will be allowed to enter the UK. If not then they would be free to go wherever they want, but they wouldn't be in the UK in the first place.

The elephant in the room:
What about those that jump into small boats and arrive in Kent & Dover. What will a Labour Govt do to/with them?

Does UK Labour Party honestly believe that because they are processing in a ‘3rd safe country’ then folks will not arrive in small boats?

Again the question is, what will a Labour govt do with those that arrive in the boats?
‘Smash the gangs’… I hear you say.

babajeje123:

So are you saying migrants should vote a party known for anti-immigration policies? Abeg how will they benefit from the so called favourable policies after they've been sent home?

Do you know what Labour party's legal immigration policies are?

Peerielass:


Perhaps anti immigration is the wrong choice of words, I should have maybe said strict immigration policies. In any case I have had a look at their immigration policy and as far as I can see their proposed solutions are very similar to what the other polities are proffering. See below:

https://www.reformparty.uk/immigration

You need to also remember that we are all different and are at different stages of our life journey. What might appear important to you might rank low in my list of priorities. I will very gladly vote Labour but I’m strongly against their proposed VAT on independent school tuition fees, Education is not taxed anywhere in Europe but due to Brexit, labour is now stealthy trying to impose tax on education. I will rather spoil my ballot paper than vote for that policy, I also have a young female child and I cannot vote a party that refuses to pledge to protect safe spaces for women and girls.

I have not made up my mind on which party to vote but Labour is definitely out of the question for me, based on the issues I have highlighted. I know Starmer will be our next PM with or without my vote, however I’m not prepared to aid that process. I’m also in Scotland and have the additional dilemma of SNP but those ones have completely lost their sense of direction and it’s now a case of the blind leading the blind.

If you feel dubious about Starmer (and UK Labour Party) unable to define what/who a woman is. If you feel dubious that a leading figure of a party thinks that a woman can have a p*nis. I understand your dilemma, having Nicola Sturgeon and Flynn and etc as leaders. Even Kate Forbes that somehow stood by what she believed in now is confused.
You start considering some of these things and you end up thinking... perhaps the Tories are not as scum as labour voters potray them.

ReesheesuKnack:


The elephant in the room:
What about those that jump into small boats and arrive in Kent & Dover. What will a Labour Govt do to/with them?

Does UK Labour Party honestly believe that because they are processing in a ‘3rd safe country’ then folks will not arrive in small boats?

Again the question is, what will a Labour govt do with those that arrive in the boats?
‘Smash the gangs’… I hear you say.

I can't speak for Labour but I imagine it would involve the Border Force, instead of escorting the small boats to the UK as they do now, rather diverting the same boats to this other location(s) where they will be processed. The whole point is to avoid them landing in the UK in the first place due to the huge costs, massive backlog and legal complexities.

The current process is a complete shambles, Rwanda was doomed to fail from the start and even Sunak didn't/doesn't believe in it, so why not explore an alternative? What's so wrong with trying something different?

Zahra29:


Have you examined Labour's policies on legal immigration? They're talking quite tough, for example

In May 2023, Labour said that employers would have to meet extra conditions to receive a sponsor licence, such as demonstrating efforts to train domestic workers.

This is proposing a return to the stricter conditions that were in place pre Brexit where companies had to prioritise the domestic and EU workforce before they were allowed to hire internationally.

I didn't believe that post above where someone said Starmer described Sunak as the most liberal prime minister the UK has had when it comes to Legal Migration. I wanted to fact-check. My conclusion is that the Tories are now the party with more favourable immigration policies towards immigrants.

See what i found
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/jun/05/rishi-sunak-keir-starmer-leaders-debate-panel-prime-minister-labour-tax-gaza-immigration

https://news.sky.com/story/keir-starmer-brands-rishi-sunaks-tax-claims-garbage-but-poll-suggests-pm-came-out-on-top-13148046

BouharryArtikou:


You can still watch in on catch up. It will tell you a lot about those two men.

Junior Doctors in the NHS are asking for a 35% pay rise.
Starmer: We will negotiate with them.

Really? What EXACTLY will you do differently?

On Immigration (legal immigration ohh):
Guess what the shocker was? Starmer accused Rishi of being THE MOST LIBERAL PRIME MINISTER. It means Starmer is not happy with the Care visas and Student/dependant visas that the Tories (read: Boris Johnson) introduced after Covid.

If Starmer described Rishi as THE MOST LIBERAL PM (and i am quoting Starmer verbatim, I ask anyone doubting to fact-check me) when it comes to Legal Migration, that means the Tories are the party of choice for LEGAL migrants. No?

wow...just wow.... cant believe I missed that point by Sir Keir during the debate

Zahra29:


I can't speak for Labour but I imagine it would involve the Border Force, instead of escorting the small boats to the UK as they do now, rather diverting the same boats to this other location(s) where they will be processed. The whole point is to avoid them landing in the UK in the first place due to the huge costs, massive backlog and legal complexities.

The current process is a complete shambles, Rwanda was doomed to fail from the start and even Sunak didn't/doesn't believe in it, so why not explore an alternative? What's so wrong with trying something different?

Look at the bolded...
The boats have left French waters. The boats are in UK waters, in the English Channel. Where will the UK border force 'divert' the boats to? France? Belgium? Netherlands? Germany? Rwanda?

ReesheesuKnack:


Look at the bolded...
The boats have left French waters. The boats are in UK waters, in the English Channel. Where will the UK border force 'divert' the boats to? France? Belgium? Netherlands? Germany? Rwanda?

That's not the area of Government I work in lol so I don't know.

But I believe they are exploring this option and if they come up with any workable solutions, I'm sure we will be apprised of the details.

I'd rather alternative solutions be explored than we continue on this foolish and expensive Rwanda scheme - which even if they miraculously managed to get any planes there, can only take a maximum of 100 - 150 migrants per year. The average number arriving daily is in multiples of this.

Zahra29:


That's not the area of Government I work in lol so I don't know.

But I believe they are exploring this option and if they come up with any workable solutions, I'm sure we will be apprised of the details.

I'd rather alternative solutions be explored than we continue on this foolish and expensive Rwanda scheme - which even if they miraculously managed to get any planes there, can only take a maximum of 100 - 150 migrants per year. The average number arriving daily is in multiples of this.

My dear sister. The major selling point of the Rwanda 'gimmick' (now this is me quoting Sir K.S) was/is meant to be the deterrent effect.

Now Imagine this scenario for a second:
200 people arrive in Dover on a boat. As soon as they approach the shores, they are given hot meals, nice fish and chips and ushered into the Bibby Stockholm. The next day, another 150 arrive. Same thing. That evening, 2 Boeing 777 planes take off with ALL 350 of the arrivals to Kigali.

The next day, most Newspapers in France and Belgium (plus UK Daily Mail and Telegraph) splashed their front pages with photos of the successful arrival of the 2 Boeing aircraft at Kigali International Airport.

What do you think will happen to those dudes (well and a few lasses) in Calais? Do you honestly think they will pay thousands of Euros to 'people smugglers' to put them on dingies? NO WAY!!

I tell you, 99% (my estimate) will ququma abort the mission immediately. Now, that is the deterrent effect.

PS: The ideal thing would have been for the Rwanda policy to be backed up with the UK foreign office expanding their consulate in France so that anyone in France who genuinely believes they are qualified for UK asylum could go to the consulate to be processed. Or in fact, the French Govt should allow the UK to open an asylum processing centre in Calais so that any successful applicants are ferried across the channel legally and smoothly - via Eurostar or HMS Belfast or HMS Elizabeth or HMS Zahradeen. I'm sure you know France will not want that. In this case, anyone who arrives at Dover in an inflatable is, strictly speaking, an illegal criminal (under UK laws).

I'm sure you have heard or read reports of French Coast guards escorting the dingies through French waters, and once they are in English waters, the RNLI rescues them.

For axa mansard travel insurance and other forms of insurance, call/chat:08061233831.

Hey guys
My mum has got a 5 years visiyors American visa... she has been to London once prior the American visa...

What scheme's can she benefit from it, I mean travel wise?

She's leaving for the US and has got a 10 hour lay over at the Heathrow Airport... can she be allowed in? I mean meet relatives at the arrival section of the airport then returns to continue her journey?

Does she need a transit visa for such things?

Need all the knowledge I can get perhaps when purchasing flight tickets in the future we could utilise some of these benefits

Thank you guys