agaugust:


Bros make u chop remain for me o!
.

oga....abeg sniff this pawpaw leaves,make you use 'am take shine eye first....no worry,i go chop remain..

overhypedsteve:
men, you ve ruined that niggers opinion about his nations airforce. To be honest men i loved that comment. Lots and lots of Butthurts.

Patches is a Sinking ship. He's aware of his sunken state but wants to continue living in a state of self-imposed delusion.

Henry120:


Patches is a Sinking ship. He's aware of his sunken state but wants to continue living in a state of self-imposed delusion.

sinking what?,the guy is a sunk ship already man.

SA army can only try . u can't compare the impact of NA in UN,AU,ECOWAS,AFRICON e.t.c gallant NAF soldier's has died for these course not " SA story for the Gods".

Patchesagain:


Your own source says so:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HvZjxq3kYSs

This is boring, its too easily to debunk your pathetic arguments.

Hell, its gotten to the point where you are humiliating yourself!!*

*I seriously cannot beleive that you just tried to tell us that air at high altitude is more dense than air at low altitude!!

Quote where I said that.

I didn't even bother to talk about density of air at high altitude, all I said was and is that the snow in the photos tell you that you cold air on Himalayas mountain and cold air is heavier than hot air, I proved that with a source that gave example of golf ball shot that travels same parabolic movement like artillery shell, the golf ball is slowed down by heavy air on a cold day. Simple physics your Soweto brain will never know until I told you today.

Now the Indian army video NEVER said what you claimed, the army Bofors artillery officer said range is 41km at altitude, simple.

The officer did NOT define it as low altitude, medium altitude, or high altitude.....there are 3 levels of altitude and all of them above ground/sea level.

You are the one who personally claimed that the man meant high altitude because you want to twist the information to commit fraud as usual.

Also the army Captain did not specify what is at altitude, the gun or the target far away.

He just said "At altitude". Finish.

You are the one changing the analysis to high altitude, gun sitting on mountain top where there is snow and nobody can climb, then Bofors is heavy artillery too heavy for Indian helicopters to sling airlift.

@Patches, learn to accept defeat as you are a sunk ship already

.

agaugust:


[size=16pt] Biggie Fool [/size]

Artillery shells don't go straight up in the air 10km high ! The barrel is not vertical, it is inclined only, fool

If gun range is 20km and it wastes 10km climbing up the sky like an aero plane, the gun loses half it's shell travel range and falls down wasted half way before reaching target.

Your quote applies only to aeroplanes that fly 10km to 20km altitude, not artillery shells that do not even reach the clouds in the sky !

South African education is 100 years behind Nigeria

Cold air is all over Himalayas mountains because of snow, I live in snowland and snow is all over my house and yard now as I write, the air is heavier than normal warm terrain and it creates friction/resistance to vehicles we drive through it.

South Africa imported science teachers from Nigeria, now I see why your country came begging us to help improve your brains

# Show us how cold mountain air increases artillery shell range when it actually slows down the shell
.

Augusust.

You have been defeated.

Stop wasting my time.

The gun itself is sitting at 6000m above sea level in the Himalya's. The air is half as dense there as it is at sea level.

The gun gets longer range at high altitude, according to the same Indian army officer you have quoted many times.

Such high altitude is only acheiveable in the Himalyas

Dude, you are making a massive fool of yourself at this point. I recommend that you accept defeat.

agaugust:


Who told you that helicopter is moving the artillery to mountain top ? Show us where it landed because all the terrain in your photo is flat land....Mumu

I will mess y.ou up badly every time you struggle to get out of this Bofors artillery trap you pushed yourself into

Try again
.

Lol, now this guy wants a photo of every mountain range in the world

You have been shown how artillery gets into the mountains.

You have been shown artillery in mountain ranges.

What more do you want?

Keep squirming clown. This is very entertaining

agaugust:


Who told you that helicopter is moving the artillery to mountain top ? Show us where it landed because all the terrain in your photo is flat land....Mumu

I will mess y.ou up badly every time you struggle to get out of this Bofors artillery trap you pushed yourself into

Try again
.

I will show you the day you show me a picture of the Nigerian Airforce Super Tucano.

Patchesagain:


Lol, now this guy wants a photo of every mountain range in the world

You have been shown how artillery gets into the mountains.

You have been shown artillery in mountain ranges.

What more do you want?

Keep squirming clown. This is very entertaining

All the photos you showed are artillery guns on flat ground pointing to a mountain to fire into it.

It's your turn to prove your claim with sources, you failed, you are running away with excuses for your open failure.

@Patches is badly screwed trying to carry heavy artillery to mountain top, his helicopter rope/chain broke

.

agaugust:


All the photos you showed are artillery guns on flat ground pointing to a mountain to fire into it.

It's your turn to prove your claim with sources, you failed, you are running away with excuses for your open failure.

@Patches is badly screwed trying to carry heavy artillery to mountain top, his helicopter rope/chain broke

.

I think you should leave this topic because it makes you to embarrass yourselves even more. Hopefully, even your fellow countrymen are unimpressed by your level of immaturity and ignorance. Oga, my half brother please stop this embarrassment. Biko!!!

bidexiii:
SA army can only try . u can't compare the impact of NA in UN,AU,ECOWAS,AFRICON e.t.c gallant NAF soldier's has died for these course not " SA story for the Gods".

You forgot to also mention that we can't compare the impact of NA in cowardice and running away from a war zone. SA military has fought in WW1, WW2, Korean war, Bush war, UN, AU, SADC, etc. So, what do you want to say chief.

agaugust:


Quote where I said that.

I didn't even bother to talk about density of air at high altitude, all I said was and is that the snow in the photos tell you that you cold air on Himalayas mountain and cold air is heavier than hot air, I proved that with a source that gave example of golf ball shot that travels same parabolic movement like artillery shell, the golf ball is slowed down by heavy air on a cold day. Simple physics your Soweto brain will never know until I told you today.

Now the Indian army video NEVER said what you claimed, the army Bofors artillery officer said range is 41km at altitude, simple.

The officer did NOT define it as low altitude, medium altitude, or high altitude.....there are 3 levels of altitude and all of them above ground/sea level.

You are the one who personally claimed that the man meant high altitude because you want to twist the information to commit fraud as usual.

Also the army Captain did not specify what is at altitude, the gun or the target far away.

He just said "At altitude". Finish.

You are the one changing the analysis to high altitude, gun sitting on mountain top where there is snow and nobody can climb, then Bofors is heavy artillery too heavy for Indian helicopters to sling airlift.

@Patches, learn to accept defeat as you are a sunk ship already

.

@Agaugust, to put this simple is that, altitude is any position above sea level. If then your gun is not at the perfect altitude you may not be able to achieve the range of 41km.

agaugust:


All the photos you showed are artillery guns on flat ground pointing to a mountain to fire into it.

It's your turn to prove your claim with sources, you failed, you are running away with excuses for your open failure.

@Patches is badly screwed trying to carry heavy artillery to mountain top, his helicopter rope/chain broke

.

I showed you a Bofors Fh77 in the Himalayas

The average altitude of the Himalayas is 6000m above sea level

The air is half as dense there as it is at sea level

Why must we show you one on the top of a mountain? How is that relevant? Please explain

agaugust:

Quote where I said that.

I didn't even bother to talk about density of air at high altitude, all I said was and is that the snow in the photos tell you that you cold air on Himalayas mountain and cold air is heavier than hot air, I proved that with a source that gave example of golf ball shot that travels same parabolic movement like artillery shell, the golf ball is slowed down by heavy air on a cold day. Simple physics your Soweto brain will never know until I told you today

Now the Indian army video NEVER said what you claimed, the army Bofors artillery officer said range is 41km at altitude, simple.
The officer did NOT define it as low altitude, medium altitude, or high altitude.....there are 3 levels of altitude and all of them above ground/sea level. You are the one who personally claimed that the man meant high altitude because you want to twist the information to commit fraud as usual. Also the army Captain did not specify what is at altitude, the gun or the target far away.
He just said "At altitude". Finish.

You are the one changing the analysis to high altitude, gun sitting on mountain top where there is snow and nobody can climb, then Bofors is heavy artillery too heavy for Indian helicopters to sling airlift.

@Patches, learn to accept defeat as you are a sunk ship already
.

Quote where I said that.


Ok, if you insist:

agaugust:


Show me a source that says Bofors artillery range increases by a whole extra 10km in a heavier cold mountain air !

Its pretty clear that you think air at high altitude is more dense because it is cold... the irony that you have been bragging about superior nigerian education is too much for my sides

Now the Indian army video NEVER said what you claimed, the army Bofors artillery officer said range is 41km at altitude, simple.

[size=15pt]This is a lie[/size]

at exactly 2:36 in the video he says "at high altitude areas the gun acheives a maximum range of 42.3km"

The officer did NOT define it as low altitude, medium altitude, or high altitude.....there are 3 levels of altitude and all of them above ground/sea level. You are the one who personally claimed that the man meant high altitude because you want to twist the information to commit fraud as usual. Also the army Captain did not specify what is at altitude, the gun or the target far away.
He just said "At altitude". Finish.

He defined it as "high altitude areas"

Thus he meant high altitude.

As usual, you are the one who is commuting complete and utter fraud

and, as usual, when losing an argument you claim every-one else is commiting fraud, acting like you are some honest victim

You have been completely and utterly exposed in every way

You are the one changing the analysis to high altitude, gun sitting on mountain top where there is snow and nobody can climb, then Bofors is heavy artillery too heavy for Indian helicopters to sling airlift.

Indian army has the Chinook - the Chinhook can sling the FH77 with ease.

They also have roads in the Himalaya's.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khardung_La sits at 5,359m above sea-level
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsimik_La sits at 5,777m above sea-level

This means that they can drive the guns up to where the air is half as dense as it is at sea level

It does not need to be on the top of a mountain when the average altitude of the Himalaya's is over 6000m above sea level - it simply has to be in the mountain range.

This has been a wonderfull few days for me, I have broken Augugugbgugug and exposed his lies on a day to day basis.

Msauza:



@Agaugust, to put this simple is that, altitude is any position above sea level. If then your gun is not at the perfect altitude you may not be able to achieve the range of 41km.

There is no where in africa where the gun can achieve that sort of range

Emir of Kano doubts the capacity of military and instead rests his hopes on vigilantes and hunters.




http://news.yahoo.com/nigeria-cleric-backs-vigilantes-doubts-military-boko-haram-185542536.html

[size=15pt]The Truth Comes out!![/size]


[size=13pt]Nigeria's military has been cooperating with various vigilante forces in the northeast for more than a year, often relying on civilians to do the bulk of the fighting against the insurgents.

Witnesses said it was vigilantes who recaptured the symbolically important northeast town of Chibok from Boko Haram at the weekend, with troops staying clear of the heavy fighting.[/size]
http://news.yahoo.com/nigeria-cleric-backs-vigilantes-doubts-military-boko-haram-185542536.html

agaugust:


All the photos you showed are artillery guns on flat ground pointing to a mountain to fire into it.

It's your turn to prove your claim with sources, you failed, you are running away with excuses for your open failure.

@Patches is badly screwed trying to carry heavy artillery to mountain top, his helicopter rope/chain broke

.

Ever seen a dog spinning in circles trying to catch it's tail? Your behavior has been so in the past 48hours, you're stuck in limbo.

Msauza:



You forgot to also mention that we can't compare the impact of NA in cowardice and running away from a war zone. SA military has fought in WW1, WW2, Korean war, Bush war, UN, AU, SADC, etc. So, what do you want to say chief.

. SA army are good,being nollywood armies I don't see any modern warfare you people fought ! And donr forget NA fought in WW1,WW2, Angola 1st civil war,seria leone,liberia,biafra war,somalia,lebanon,and the area of yugoslavia and in kuwait e.t.c

NA don't just bluff ...... Captured stock piles weapons (ECOMOG mission) from rabels ! Just imagine these arms purification in the circulation and in wrongs hands.

bidexiii:
. SA army are good,being nollywood armies I don't see any modern warfare you people fought ! And donr forget NA fought in WW1,WW2, Angola 1st civil war,seria leone,liberia,biafra war,somalia,lebanon,and the area of yugoslavia and in kuwait e.t.c

Nigeria was no where to be found in WW1 and WW2.

bidexiii:
. SA army are good,being nollywood armies I don't see any modern warfare you people fought ! And donr forget NA fought in WW1,WW2, Angola 1st civil war,seria leone,liberia,biafra war,somalia,lebanon,and the area of yugoslavia and in kuwait e.t.c

saffers are just noisemakers.

Capturing arsenal from professional armies has been what SANDF been doing for more than 40 years

mzilakazi:



Nigeria was no where to be found in WW1 and WW2.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_West_African_Frontier_Force
.
.
Nigeria took part in WWI under the aegis of the royal west african frontier force{RWAFF}.
.
.
http://www.onlinenigeria.com/independence/?blurb=635
.
.
Though under colonial influence,nigeria fought in the WWII,in burma and other warzones before the first world.
.
.
Need i say more?

SANDF

EVarn:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_West_African_Frontier_Force
.
.
Nigeria took part in WWI under the aegis of the royal west african frontier force{RWAFF}.
.
.
http://www.onlinenigeria.com/independence/?blurb=635
.
.
Though under colonial influence,nigeria fought in the WWII,in burma and other warzones before the first world.
.
.
Need i say more?

That was not Nigeria it was merely allied forces of west Africa in general.


Nigeria is not there but SA is surely there.


http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I

Thiza:
SANDF

Dude, that is a poor example of the "hauls" we have made

The last picture is of one of SEVEN SA-8's (9K33 Osa) that we captured.

HAS THERE BEEN AN ACE IN THE NIGERIAN AIRFORCE? HAS ANY NIGERIAN PILOT WITNESS AIR TO AIR COMBAT?

MIG's SHOT BY SOUTH AFRICAN PILOTS

mzilakazi:



That was not Nigeria it was merely allied forces of west Africa in general.


Nigeria is not there but SA is surely there.


http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I

what is the difference between the RWAFF and ECOMOG?,they were{and are} made up of 80% nigerian army!.SA's paltry contribution to WW I was due to the british and german role in the war.

EVarn:
what is the difference between the RWAFF and ECOMOG?,they were{and are} made up of 80% nigerian army!.SA's paltry contribution to WW I was due to the british and german role in the war.

I say again, Nigeria's contribution in both WW1 & 2 is non-existent. SA fought alone to defeat the Germans in Namibia and colonised the South West Africa as a result. We fought the Italians also. Nigeria's contribution in Angola is speculative and hence amount to fallacy. Nigerian forces were very afraid and scared to see SADF to the core.

EVarn:
what is the difference between the RWAFF and ECOMOG?,they were{and are} made up of 80% nigerian army!.SA's paltry contribution to WW I was due to the british and german role in the war.

"paltry contribution"

You mean the total of 231 000 South African men who fought in the war?

Dude, just as an example, where the 1st (South African) Infantry Brigade inflicted over 7000 casualties for the loss of only 2 500 men and is largely credited with the destruction of one of Germanys best divisions (9th Division)

The Battle of Delville Wood.