Stats: 3,191,865 members, 7,945,762 topics. Date: Wednesday, 11 September 2024 at 05:58 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Jobs/Vacancies / Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance (39808 Views)
Interview Question: Why Do You Want This Job? / How To Answer the terrific "Tell Me About Yourself?" Interview Question. / All The Applicants Failed This Interview Question. (please Help Out) (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by Nobody: 12:52am On Feb 17, 2015 |
icedbreez:I disagree sir. |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by makazona(m): 12:53am On Feb 17, 2015 |
efficiency will naturally give birth to effectiveness so,one cant be efficient without being effective. |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by Nobody: 12:55am On Feb 17, 2015 |
2Cents:no mind the guy jare, he went off point. It's good we are all learning sha! |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by dafuturis(m): 12:55am On Feb 17, 2015 |
EFFECTIVE - Real Madrid winning the champions league with Christiano Ronaldo, Gareth Bale and Angel Di Maria. Maximal effort and resources EFFICIENT - Arsenal winning the champions league with Olivier Giroud, Aaron Ramsey and Jack wilshere mininal effort and resources. 1 Like |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by ransomed: 12:56am On Feb 17, 2015 |
Simple question with simple fresh air answer. Jona is very effective in setting up committee to look into various urgent National challenges. He is very efficient in not implementing outcome or reports of committees. 2 Likes |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by Nobody: 12:57am On Feb 17, 2015 |
dafuturis:good, 69% for u. |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by jemype(m): 12:57am On Feb 17, 2015 |
That is exactly what employers want to hear becausethe man who is able to think differently than the lot and give all his best is the man or woman they are searching for not a use and dump. CHM11: |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by Nobody: 1:00am On Feb 17, 2015 |
drtwist:Man is by nature a political animal, so your hatred or apolitical stance shows you are indifferent towards the government and therefore, political. A bit confusing right? |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by Nobody: 1:01am On Feb 17, 2015 |
drtwist:Man is by nature a political animal, so your hatred or apolitical stance shows you are indifferent towards the government and therefore, political. A bit confusing right? Life without politics is a charade. |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by brandmix: 1:20am On Feb 17, 2015 |
A lot of people here are choosing efficiency over effectiveness. I tend to disagree, and as a young manager myself, and as some1 who understand the "goal" theory, I will have to go with effectiveness. let me explain From a managerial top line perspective... what exactly is the GOAL of my establishment? it is very possible to have a department filled with very extremely efficient people . . . efficiently doing the wrong thing @ the wrong time. Does this then reflect to organizational effectiveness and achieving that "company goal" which is the reason for the company's existence in the 1st place. As a manager who keys into my line managers priority ( we call this exercise "line of sight" ![]() What we see is global alignment from the top to the bottom, and this representation is reflected in how effective we are as A UNIT. Sumary: effectiveness is the bedrock upon which efficiency is built. without effectiveness, your efficiency is misdirected , and at best counter productive to your organizational goals 3 Likes |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by EbolaParasite: 1:23am On Feb 17, 2015 |
digitalsimboja: Effectiveness. End of Discussion. You may be efficient at what you do but that may not bring in MONEY for the company. If you are Effective, it means you do things that help the company progress. An efficient person is good for the company but an effective person is better. Kola is efficient - he comes to work at 7 and leaves at 5. He doesn't waste company time browsing, he doesn't waste company utilities. He knows how to compile his reports blah blah blah On the other hand, Atutupuyo comes in at 720 or even 730 and leaves at 4 or 430. Sometimes he is even out before 3. Despite these waywardness, he still managed to bring in revenue for the company and increase profits by 30%. He may not be efficient but HE GETS THE JOB DONE. The ideal candidate will be EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE but if you ultimately have to chose, EFFECTIVE is the way to go because a company only cares about one thing.....[size=32pt]PROFIT[/size].... 2 Likes |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by brandmix: 1:26am On Feb 17, 2015 |
EbolaParasite:on point 2 Likes |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by brandmix: 1:31am On Feb 17, 2015 |
franciskaine:why. Are you a manager by any chance? and do you understand the goal theory? efficiency like most people rightly said is doing more with less which is fantastic. But doing more with less does not always translate to being productive as a department or unit (especially if the directive, or leadership is faulty in the 1st place) effectiveness on the other hand is understanding how exactly your role as a mere cleaner is feeding into the company's area, regional, and global plan.... and making it happen! FYI : Organizational Effectiveness is a G40 role in my coy. we don't play with effectiveness 1 Like |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by ameryzzy(f): 1:55am On Feb 17, 2015 |
Nairalanders know book o 1 Like |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by InvertedHammer: 2:10am On Feb 17, 2015 |
chukux2: / You are hired! A very good comprehension of the subject matter. You nailed it. \ 1 Like |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by Jonwesley(m): 2:10am On Feb 17, 2015 |
yinkusminkus: This is the most appropriate answer. Only the time factor, nothing else. I'm embarrassed about the calibre of our graduates. Most of u were ranting. Even the expected answer required efficiency. So the interviewer already know U by ur answer, if U like choose what U are not. 3 Likes |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by InvertedHammer: 2:15am On Feb 17, 2015 |
Jokay07:/ I bet even you do not understand what you typed. \ 1 Like |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by scarplanet(m): 2:23am On Feb 17, 2015 |
From the first page I read; chukux, frinx and soe really hit the nail on the head; other people were just giving the dictionary definition of effectiveness and Efficiency! In business term, an effective employee get the job done however. An efficient employee uses the resources at his/her disposal to achieve organisations goal. A person can't literally be Effective and Efficient on separate terms, because an Efficient fellow is already effective! 4 Likes |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by ayandee: 2:41am On Feb 17, 2015 |
To differentiate the two terms, I will give an example. An IT support officer who manages the network of 12 bank branches got calls from 3 of the branches that their links were down and therefore could not pay their customers. The calls came in around 9am in the morning. An effective IT officer would get agitated. He would simply start running to the branches. Let us assume he gets to branch A at 10am and fixes the problem. Branch A customers would have been on queue for about an hour. Branches B and C customers would have stayed on queue much longer. He gets the job done at a huge cost cos he didnt make use of all resources available to him. He is effective but not efficient. An efficient officer would attempt to solve the link issues remotedly by telling his users what to do on phone thereby saving man-hours, energy, and cost. Hope this helps. |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by nafcoo: 2:48am On Feb 17, 2015 |
plss dear nairaland I ur sincere advice I got an invitation for interview from two different Assurance/Insurance company for marketing ....plss shld I go and how is it like to market Insurance policy. thanks |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by Closetoheart: 3:43am On Feb 17, 2015 |
victorVIC1: This is d answer the interviewer wants!!! 1 Like |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by soulglo: 4:22am On Feb 17, 2015 |
Drsheddy: LMAO. And on this note I'll say good night |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by DEGREE2466(m): 5:04am On Feb 17, 2015 |
femi4: i beg to diagree with you. One can be efficient without being effective. Effectiveness means utilizing the available resources at the barest minimum cost. In so doing a company may end up producing at a very cheaper rate but when their product gets to the product market, they discovered that people do not desire their product due to lack of quality. (Non-effectiveness). Effectiveness precedes efficiency. It is better to be effective without being efficient that being efficient without being effective as effectiveness is more important that efficiency. Infact all efficiency deals with is reduction in both time and cost which if not done effectively will result to deficiency and dis-effectiveness. In summary effectiveness should be first pursued before efficiency |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by janvier27(m): 5:17am On Feb 17, 2015 |
Effectiveness is getting the job done. Efficiency is getting the job done at the least cost. Cost could be in terms of timing or other resources. You are expected to be an efficient staffer. 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by 0700Jesse(m): 5:22am On Feb 17, 2015 |
digitalsimboja: i would go for efficient cuz an efficient staff is always effective but an effective staff might not be efficient 1 Like |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by eromspete(m): 5:42am On Feb 17, 2015 |
Effectiveness in the workplace - The ability to get things/tasks done by any means (The end justifies the means kind of people) Efficiency in the workplace - The ability to perform tasks using the RIGHT amount of effort or least amount of energy (It involves being smart at looking for ways/solutions to getting things done) I prefer EFFICIENCY compared to EFFECTIVENESS in the workplace ![]() Hope this answers your query |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by femi4: 6:04am On Feb 17, 2015 |
DEGREE2466:You can't rate a production until it gets to the final consumer. Your product effectiveness is determine by the consumer and not production materials. Both can't be separated, a product that is doing well in the market over the time is termed EFFECTIVE and when people keep recommending such product ahead of its competitors, that is called EFFICIENCY |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by uchennamani(m): 6:18am On Feb 17, 2015 |
digitalsimboj a:Lolz. One of the strong points of language is that each profession has its unique terminologies. In this regards, words lose its every day meaning and assume a special meaning as the requirements of the profession demands. 'Effectiveness' and 'efficiency' are both words we use in our every day speech. But they have a special or technical meaning in the language of administration- both public and private. The words, therefore, becomes misleading when subjected to their every day use. Effectiveness means the ability to achieve the organisation's stated objectives; while efficiency means achieving the stated goals using lesser resources. I will clarify the above with an practical example. When asked to diffrentiate between effectiveness and efficiency, your model answer should be like this: ' every organisation has goals that guide its operations. The goals answer the reason why the organisation was set up in the first place. Effectiveness means having the desired skills and resources to achive the organisation's goals. Efficiency, on the other hand, aims to achieve the same level of performance but with with a more reduced resources. So simply put, effectiveness is the ability to achieve an organisation's goals while efficiency is getting the job but with a much reduced resources.' |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by winnieG1(m): 6:25am On Feb 17, 2015 |
Effective simply means dedication whereas efficiency is higher level of accuracy, you need both to be successful in an organization. I will rather be an efficient staff because one can be dedicated at his job without attaining the accuracy required to be successful. |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by cjeriia: 6:46am On Feb 17, 2015 |
@ Chukux2: Spot on man 1 Like |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by Votukpa(m): 6:56am On Feb 17, 2015 |
Jokay07: I think you kinda babbled too son. An effective staff achieves goals period. You could be in any department. An efficient staff does what an effective staff does USING minimal resources. Which is better for a capitalist organization? Effiency of course. You would want to be an efficient staff because an efficient staff is effective as well. Effective staff are not always efficient. 1 Like |
Re: Interview Question That Threw Me Off-balance by vb0mb(m): 7:06am On Feb 17, 2015 |
allisonluvsu: This actually explains ineffectiveness and effectiveness 1 Like |
Diseases That Can Make You Fail Pre-employment Medicals / Please Does Anyone Know This Company DD African Co. I Have An Interview At 3 Ori / Customs Application Form
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 73 |