njokusboy:


Lolzz, is bestiality wrong because it is animal abuse??
What is even animal abuse?
If slaughtering a cow for breakfast or throwing a live lobster into a pot of boiling water I wonder what other assault on the animals "sovereignty" is bigger to be termed so.....
Animals have no rights

pickabeau1:


Can you school your fellow feminazis on this that bring bible to justify feminism?

That people commit adultery and profess to be Christians is not the issue here

We are talking about the equality vs the concept of male headship in marriage

cococandy
Treating others as you want to be treated is a divine principle but still does not negate headship in marriage

TV01:

Homos know that - hence their continuing push for lowering the age of consent

Lezzas, then Lifters. And when we specify "marriage" as opposed to just "domestic", we have the safest type of domesticity for women and children. That warms the heart of NL's chieftest marriage advocate and purveyor of marital bliss ! Even without specifying marriage, it's still Lezzas then Lifters!

Humans beings do not have conscience?
So, right or wrong is what we (majority) decide it is - at any given point?

From a Christian point my position is fixed. If you want to do it in the abstract, shoot - you'll prolly miss there as well .

Vickybee:

1) He revered an adulterous woman.

2) He had only earthly mother without father.

3) Three women were first to see him at the tomb.

4) A woman commanded him for his first miracle.

5) a woman was the source of our salvation

You say?

pickabeau1:


PETA on the loose
If they mark you... u are marked for life

BABE3:

1) so?
2) so Mary being a single mum means jesus isn't sexist?
3) that was all women were good for to jesus; good for amebo and reporting. Plus, did jesus have control over who saw him first? C'mon now..
4) his job was to perform miracles on earth, innit? Whoever commanded the miracle is irrelevant.
How about you address the fact that the 12 most important people to jesus were MEN. He had control over who he chose to be his discipline. He decided to go with men, why?

Vickybee:
Feminism can mix with christianity; if you don't like it, drink an acid.

I've come to understand that you men have a warped definition of feminism.

coogar:


some of them do have rights while others have no chance at all. you can go to a stream anywhere and kill a fish. you wouldn't get away with doing the same to a dog or a cat(whether stray or owned)

babygirlfl:

[s]
please I do not want to ever have any discussion with you. Do not quote me again. You do back and forth and enjoy insulting people. I don't. So please do not quote me again[/s].

coogar:


animal rights activists are much worse than feminists. they pelt celebrities with eggs for wearing furred jackets or crocodile-skin shoes.

njokusboy:


Lolzz, is bestiality wrong because it is animal abuse??
What is even animal abuse?
If slaughtering a cow for breakfast or throwing a live lobster into a pot of boiling water isn't, I wonder what other assault on the animals "sovereignty" is bigger to be termed so.....
Animals have no rights

Shollypopzz:


I personally have no issues with bestiality. I am just stating how homosexuality is different from bestiality and how silly it is to group them together. I remember having a long talk with this chic who had a thing for dogs. It was very enlightening. She seemed to believe that she could tell when the dog wanted it. She even claimed the dog started initiating sexx after a while of doing "it" with it.

I eat animals, and I have no problem with animals being used for testing or used to make furs, so animal rights and me do not go together.

"Animals have no rights" is a different argument entirely.

pickabeau1:


enlightening?

or weird

Shollypopzz:
I have heard lowering the age of consent more from heterosexuals. And I can post linkS to articles that many heterosexuals have written on the issue. Btw, your point is redundant because this doesn't prove anything.

Shollypopzz:
This is why I find you extremely weird and boring. Why are u saying the same thing over and over again after you've been corrected?? The numbers are online. Please get your facts from a credible source.

Shollypopzz:
You should ask yourself why there is a high rate of domestic violence in the gay community.

Shollypopzz:
They do not have an INBORN conscience, conscience is developed over time.

Shollypopzz:
Just mouth, no sense. Boring! You are the one that has to prove objective morality, not me.

Shollypopzz:


Trust me, it was enlightening.

coogar:



after what eve did to adam, Jesus wouldn't let any female have that kinda access. it's not impossible for satan to have possessed a woman to seduce Jesus.........and we all know women of those days had a good understanding with satan.

pickabeau1:


50 Shades (Zoology edition)....ermmmmm

shudders

BABE3:


don't mind these people trying to paint jesus as a feminist.
every single man then was sexist. It wasn't a sin or crime. The woman's place was in the kitchen. That was the modus operandi.

Jesus was NOT a feminist! I read somewhere that jesus is the unchangeable changer. So therefore, the feminist wave didn't affect jesus or God. He still isn't a feminist! He's still very much sexist.

Vickybee:

He revered an adulterous woman.

He had only earthly mother without father.

Three women were first to see him at the tomb.

A woman commanded him to his first miracle.

A woman was the source of our salvation.

You say?

bukatyne:


The Jesus I know in the Bible is not sexist neither is God or the Holy Spirit.

It is either of three things:

A man is superior to a woman
A man is equal to a woman
A man is inferior to a woman.

I have not read anywhere in the Bible God designed a man to be superior to a woman and there is a difference between the customs and what God wants.

I thought God was sexist until I learned to dig deeper.

bukatyne:


The Jesus I know in the Bible is not sexist neither is God or the Holy Spirit.

It is either of three things:

A man is superior to a woman
A man is equal to a woman
A man is inferior to a woman.

I have not read anywhere in the Bible God designed a man to be superior to a woman and there is a difference between the customs and what God wants.

I thought God was sexist until I learned to dig deeper.

coogar:

if you think 2 siblings above the age of consent should have consensual sex then you need deliverance.

coogar:

you were the one that used the only difference in your comment to separate what is moral or immoral. if anything, you were the one posting from a black & white position.

coogar:
are you too big to admit you were wrong or is it until i force-feed you?

BABE3:


can you address the 12 MALE disciple situation? why Mathew and Markk? Why not a Vickybee and Bukatyne?

and you do realize the creation of woman was an afterthought? "It's not cool for a man to be alone, let's make someome that looks like him out of his rib".


I know it's hard for a modern day Christian to accept the fact that God and jesus are sexist. So you try your best possible to manipulate and twist facts until you're comfortable with your lies.

The hierarchy in the bible from genesis to revelation is
--MAN
--woman
-- animals

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
Gen 1. 28

pickabeau1:


You could have made your points without the drama and histrionics
You have your moment of fame
lol

BlackLeopard:


Politely stated boundaries aren't drama and histrionics, miss/ma'am.

pickabeau1:



Are u her appointed mouthpiece

Have u finished your schooling on bestiality vs consent vs moralcy(sic!)

Ow KAY

pickabeau1:


The creation was not an afterthought

The manifestation of woman in physical form came after though

BlackLeopard:

Actually nawh, I'm my own disappointed mouthpiece the obvious isn't obvious.
There was no schooling, just discussion we're all free to do as we deem fit.

BABE3:
Gen 2:7 And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
And the Lord God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.
It's either there two different versions of the creation story (genesis 1 and genesis 2) OR Moses was high and half asleep when he was writing genesis.
The help that was talking about wasn't even eve, it was was animals. He created animals before eve.

Go to Gen 1vs 26 - 31

v 26 Let us make man in our image, after our likeness and let them have dominion

v 27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

That was the creation

Gen 2.7
vs 7 And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul


That was the physical manifestation

Women were manifested in verse 21

pickabeau1:


Speaking cryptically at times does not necessarily bestow intelligence on posts

BlackLeopard:
I'm merely saying requests to be left alone are personal and to call a decision of another about their well being histrionic is undeserved. As simple as that.

BlackLeopard:


Politely stated boundaries aren't drama and histrionics, miss/ma'am.

BlackLeopard:

I'm not saying SHOULD. There are things that are preferable to be done and that are not preferable to be done. Doesn't change this is something that falls into the individual's own consideration. What two adults do, unless it harms them? Is not my business. People have freedom to do as they please. Saying there is freedom is nowhere near endorsing some behaviors; only acknowledging they may be more harmless than societal groupthink leads people to believe about them.

It may not be the only factor. However, it still stands consent is crucial in a variety of situations. Pretending it can be simply ommitted, is endorsing immoral behavior.

I don't have issue admitting to mis phrasing However, don't fan yourself, believing you can force feed me anything. (By the way bro, why are you so stuck on these metaphors of force? There is no need for that sort of speech. We're just conversing about human issues, don't be dragging force into this where everyone sees you're doing it only to feel better about yourself. We can be having discussions without this sort of rhetorical bollocks. It's arguments deciding, not force.)