Nunushokoto:
With all due respect sir this is quite unfair. I sense a lot of biasness in this result because these score are way beyond low nd I would like the moderators to loom into this. Even the 2nd speaker for OAU wasn't actively involved in d countering session,isn't that supposed to have a mark attached to it? D judge asked questions from both speakers from funaab and only from one speaker from OAU. I sense a foul play here

Miscellaneous:

Bro calm down……

Miscellaneous:
A careful look at the sum total of scores from the concluded group stages, one would notice that two schools perform a bit more than average and based on schedule, a debate match will be held between these schools.

FUNAAB vs IBADANPOLY

Nunushokoto:
With all due respect sir this is quite unfair. I sense a lot of biasness in this result because these score are way beyond low nd I would like the moderators to loom into this. Even the 2nd speaker for OAU wasn't actively involved in d countering session,isn't that supposed to have a mark attached to it? D judge asked questions from both speakers from funaab and only from one speaker from OAU. I sense a foul play here

Nunushokoto:
With all due respect sir this is quite unfair. I sense a lot of biasness in this result because these score are way beyond low nd I would like the moderators to loom into this. Even the 2nd speaker for OAU wasn't actively involved in d countering session,isn't that supposed to have a mark attached to it? D judge asked questions from both speakers from funaab and only from one speaker from OAU. I sense a foul play here

Nunushokoto:
With all due respect sir this is quite unfair. I sense a lot of biasness in this result because these score are way beyond low nd I would like the moderators to loom into this. Even the 2nd speaker for OAU wasn't actively involved in d countering session,isn't that supposed to have a mark attached to it? D judge asked questions from both speakers from funaab and only from one speaker from OAU. I sense a foul play here

Nunushokoto:
With all due respect sir this is quite unfair. I sense a lot of biasness in this result because these score are way beyond low nd I would like the moderators to loom into this. Even the 2nd speaker for OAU wasn't actively involved in d countering session,isn't that supposed to have a mark attached to it? D judge asked questions from both speakers from funaab and only from one speaker from OAU. I sense a foul play here

pseudonomer:


It's nothing, you can't expect fair result all the time in any competition and I'm not implying that this result is fair or not. To frank, I don't really know I just accept what comes my way. But when one of the judges is OAU alumni, we need to ask questions. It's like webb(from England) being the official ref. for the match between Man. utd vs Barcelona. And how can OAU be the only school that was so lucky to be supporting every motion from the start, and I think they got lucky and OAU placing over ABU also show how lucky they can be. But I guess the result is not really that bad. I do appreciate the effort of the judges and the coordinators, it has never been easy judging or coordinating events.

Fynestboi:




You sha want me to talk...... Lol..... How is been an alumni or supporting had to do with this.....? Am surprised this is coming from you..... Well just know that the way we assume things are not always the case....

Fynestboi:




You sha want me to talk...... Lol..... How is been an alumni or supporting had to do with this.....? Am surprised this is coming from you..... Well just know that the way we assume things are not always the case....

pseudonomer:


I know you are an alumni. You shouldn't get me wrong bro, I don't have any issue with today's result and I am being sincere. At least, I respected Jarus so much, I religiously believe in him, in fact, I look up to him. So we all got what we deserved today. But you know sometimes we felt that the result of things did not actually reflects our efforts. This is the reason why Nunu wasn't that happy with the result. I had to encouraged the team not to give up and that we can win because the stance we took was a difficult one, I guess Nunu put so much effort, and he believed he deserved better. And sometimes, our best is never good enough.

I am saying my opinion, in case of next time. In a fixture like this, a school should not be supporting the motion in all its fixtures, I am so sure you oblivious of that, and it is not your fault, it is big task, you might not see that. And an alumni should not be judging. I mean, so that you can protect the integrity of the competition, and that someone somewhere will not have a reason to doubt the integrity of the result.

On behalf of my partner and myself, we are very sorry if you think we doubted the integrity of the Judges. Thanks

Jarus:
Is this fellow called Pseudonomer serious?

This is why I select activities I engage in on NL.


Can someone tell the young man that OAU has never won any debate I judge, since last yer, including this one? Can someone tell the fool that I was the Judge 2 that scored OAU 69 and FUNAAB 70? How is it my business if the other judge, whom I don't even know, scored OAU higher and eventually won the aggregate.

Nunushokoto:
Boss pls calm down,e neva reach dat one Na . I was d one dat complained dat the 2nd judge marked me down

Jarus:



"When one of the judges is an alumnus of OAU" - Was that from you too? Are you talking to a kid?

Jarus:
Is this fellow called Pseudonomer serious?

This is why I select activities I engage in on NL.


Can someone tell the young man that OAU has never won any debate I judge, since last yer, including this one? Can someone tell the fool that I was the Judge 2 that scored OAU 69 and FUNAAB 70? How is it my business if the other judge, whom I don't even know, scored OAU higher and eventually won the aggregate.

pseudonomer:


This is why I keep quiet most times, I don't really talk much if you know me in person reason being this. I may have to quit the debate. If you actually try to read my post, you will not resolve to "cursing". You actually call me a "fool". I don't believe you just said that.

I am quitting this already. Thanks

Nunushokoto:
Bro jst let it pass. Dis all started because of me

Miracy:
Seriously, I'm shocked to see you guys think this way.... For christ sake, FUNAAB still tops the list...when you guys won, no one complained... Why bringing up issues now? ??
Your assumption about oau and jarus is actually very wrong, jarus' judgments have never favoured oau... In fact, i often wish for another judge.
You guys talk like you're the only one putting real effort into this debate... Every debater have been working tirelessly. ...
@Nunushokoto... You claim that the judge didn't rebut my partner's points... well you're wrong, she did and i think that's fair enough.

This shouldn't even result into any form of disagreement cos this is a platform for learning and not a means for showing which school is best... We've all represented our schools well so far... kudos to all.


#oneluv

Jarus:


Your comment was highly unsportmanly and borders on bad loss, especially for a team that has won all but this, but that was none of my business. I was mad at the fool that attributed his loss to my being OAU graduate as if I wasn't the Judge in all the previous debates that OAU lost, including this one (by my judging scores alone).

I don't suffer fool gladly at all.

Nunushokoto:
I apologise on his behalf nd for sparking up an argument buh calling someone a fool is quite too much.#Peace

Jarus:
This was my scoring as I sent to organisers today:


Miracy: presentation 7; logic 6 facts 7; persuasion 6 knowledge 7 Total 33

Samtolly: presentation 8; logic 7 facts 7; persuasion 7 knowledge 7 Total 36

Pseudonomer: presentation 7; logic 7 facts 7; persuasion 7 knowledge 7 Total 35

Nunu: presentation 8; logic 7 facts 6; persuasion 7 knowledge 7 Total 35

OAU 69
FUNAAB 70

You can see why I'm angry at that boy!

Nunushokoto:
Bro I was referring to d 2nd judge not u. I'm even tired of explaining

Jarus:


Oga, I know. That is why you were not the fool ( yours was only unsportmanly, at least in my opinion). It is the guy that accused me of being the cause of your loss because I am an OAU grad, that is.

Jarus:
This was my scoring as I sent to organisers today:


Miracy: presentation 7; logic 6 facts 7; persuasion 6 knowledge 7 Total 33

Samtolly: presentation 8; logic 7 facts 7; persuasion 7 knowledge 7 Total 36

Pseudonomer: presentation 7; logic 7 facts 7; persuasion 7 knowledge 7 Total 35

Nunu: presentation 8; logic 7 facts 6; persuasion 7 knowledge 7 Total 35

OAU 69
FUNAAB 70

You can see why I'm angry at that boy!

Nunushokoto:
I apologise for that. I jst felt d judge wasn't fair enuf for giving me 28

Jarus:
Is this fellow called Pseudonomer serious?

This is why I select activities I engage in on NL.


Can someone tell the young man that OAU has never won any debate I judge, since last yer, including this one? Can someone tell the fool that I was the Judge 2 that scored OAU 69 and FUNAAB 70? How is it my business if the other judge, whom I don't even know, scored OAU higher and eventually won the aggregate.

sammyscholar:
THIS HAS BEEN TAKEN TOO FAR. i have read through the arguements of each rep and i can say that none of you guys is judged unfairly. in the debate between ABUZARIA and IBPOLY, one of ABU's rep did not take part in the rebutting stage and still have good score (even more than me. according to the judgement of one of the judges). nunushokoto, you dont need to dwell much on your score. what i expected of you is to work on your weaknesses and bring out a better you in the subsequent debate. @pseudonomer, your choice of words is not so encouraging. your essay is one of the essays i am always eager to peruse. even, if at all you have the need to register your displeasure, you should have done so with diplomacy. well, let everything slid; you have qualified for the final stage already. peace.