airmark:
Augsburg has already bought a replacement for baba rahman, Philip max, all clear for him to move to Chelsea. Gundogan been chased too

Gundogan just signed a new contract!

Nihilist:

The way we dey gawk this summer just surprise me.

Tell me about it. I think there is an air of cockiness creating false belief in the club's management.


Anyway, Baba Rahman may have agreed to personal terms.

bigkesh:
Griezman and Reus are valued less than 50m........

keeping Willian,Oscar,Remy........That's loyalty
keeping Cuadrado, Moses,Mikel and Ramirez.....That's stupidity

REMY IS WACK HE NEED LEV

Bwahahahaha

The Big News

What is this morning's biggest football story?, Mediawatch hears you ask.

'Welcome to Manchester, Ana! Schweinsteiger takes his tennis star girlfriend out for dinner with United midfield partner Schneiderlin', MailOnline replies from the corner of the room. We didn't even know they were there.

'Manchester United duo Bastian Schweinsteiger and Morgan Schneiderlin haven't had long to settle in their new city, but they enjoyed some much needed down time on Monday night,' the piece begins.

'But with their debut Premier League campaign at United fast approaching, they took their partners out to the popular San Carlo restaurant.'

So what then happened to make it worthy of being the top story on MailOnline's homepage? Was it:

1) Both couples making love on one of San Carlo's tables?
2) A waiter disgracing himself by shitting onto a portion of spaghetti con vongole?
3) A tram ploughing through the restaurant's window, both players' lives being spared by a large block of Parmesan cheese becoming lodged in the wheels of the tram?
4) Nothing happening at all and that's the entirety of the story?

If you guessed 4), you know what the people want. Or you're prepared to tell the people what they want, and force feed it down their throats until they are sick.

homesteady:


Gundogan just signed a new contract!

So you think it's not possible for the club to still release him?

Chelseafan1:

Lol...Raumdeuter wud ignore this post and video....

He viewed it with his left eye.

Chelseafan1:

Lol...Raumdeuter wud ignore this post and video....

He viewed it with a left eye.

airmark:


So you think it's not possible for the club to still release him?

he signed the contract because no club including Man U(transfer market father Christmas) was willing to pay his high salary demand!

airmark:

He viewed it with a left eye.

Lol....he's probably thinking nd researching on anoda excuse to give....

So that fool Ramires is still at my club?


One of the tactical points was that Cesc Fabregas was used as a no.10, Oscar was dropped to the bench and Ramires slotted in alongside Nemanja Matic. The idea was to get Fabregas into the game more, reduce his defensive responsibilities and get him impacting the play again. He got an assist for Diego Costa’s goal as a result of this tweak.

Ramires though was very poor and it was his inability to keep hold of the ball in the first half that caused Chelsea problems as they didn’t manage to keep possession ticking over. He lost the ball too routinely and was unable to hold it.

Ramires, as we can see above, misplaced a number of passes and completed just 60% of his attempted 30 passes in the tie. It was a very bad performance from Ramires who didn’t command the midfield at all. He didn’t control the ball nor did he win it very well for Chelsea. He was sort of stuck. Two tackles, no interceptions and one clearance was not very impressive for a defensive midfielder.

This has become recurring theme. Ramires did well in a 4-3-3 under Carlo Ancelotti and later under Roberto di Matteo but in the 4-2-3-1 formation he has no obvious role. He’s careless on the ball and often gets it trapped under his feet when running and is not a good enough passer to fill the ball playing role of the two. He’s been used as a utility man but in truth it is because Chelsea do not have a good enough back up player in the defensive midfield area to cover for Fabregas or Matic. Ramires should be sold in the summer and a specialist player brought in. He is not good enough for this formation and for where Chelsea want to go. It’s time for them to let him leave and for the squad to be rejigged a bit, even if Mourinho envisages a quiet summer.

homesteady:


he signed the contract because no club including Man U(transfer market father Christmas) was willing to pay his high salary demand!

That does n't mean another club can't subsequently agree on his terms and buy him off. Luis suarez signed new contract in December 2013 that would have seen him play till 2018 but was later whisked away by barca few months later. It depends on how desperate the buying club is.

airmark:


That does n't mean another club can't subsequently agree on his terms and buy him off. Luis suarez signed new contract in December 2013 that would have seen him play till 2018 but was later whisked away by barca few months later. It depends on how desperate the buying club is.

.......... Yeah Yeah. ...... I know! Rumours can also say Chelsea will buy Messi, but Is it realistic?

homesteady:


.......... Yeah Yeah. ...... I know! Rumours can also say Chelsea will buy Messi, but Is it realistic?

Are you talking of financial commitment? Actually I will prefer rahman, john stones and griezman if available to beef up the team.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mJbC02BtFg&spfreload=10


seems this guy in always under the influence of something

lalaboi:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mJbC02BtFg&spfreload=10


seems this guy in always under the influence of something

Raumdeuter, I swear the igbo Pep is taking these days is from Ijebu..

Ibime:
So that fool Ramires is still at my club?


One of the tactical points was that Cesc Fabregas was used as a no.10, Oscar was dropped to the bench and Ramires slotted in alongside Nemanja Matic. The idea was to get Fabregas into the game more, reduce his defensive responsibilities and get him impacting the play again. He got an assist for Diego Costa’s goal as a result of this tweak.

Ramires though was very poor and it was his inability to keep hold of the ball in the first half that caused Chelsea problems as they didn’t manage to keep possession ticking over. He lost the ball too routinely and was unable to hold it.

Ramires, as we can see above, misplaced a number of passes and completed just 60% of his attempted 30 passes in the tie. It was a very bad performance from Ramires who didn’t command the midfield at all. He didn’t control the ball nor did he win it very well for Chelsea. He was sort of stuck. Two tackles, no interceptions and one clearance was not very impressive for a defensive midfielder.

This has become recurring theme. Ramires did well in a 4-3-3 under Carlo Ancelotti and later under Roberto di Matteo but in the 4-2-3-1 formation he has no obvious role. He’s careless on the ball and often gets it trapped under his feet when running and is not a good enough passer to fill the ball playing role of the two. He’s been used as a utility man but in truth it is because Chelsea do not have a good enough back up player in the defensive midfield area to cover for Fabregas or Matic. Ramires should be sold in the summer and a specialist player brought in. He is not good enough for this formation and for where Chelsea want to go. It’s time for them to let him leave and for the squad to be rejigged a bit, even if Mourinho envisages a quiet summer.

Story

So, Angel Di Maria scored four goals in 32 appearances for Manchester United last season....a meagre for goals I just saw this on BBC nd was shocked. Dopejemi, Debroslink and Raumdeuter, is this true

Chelseafan1:
So, Angel Di Maria scored four goals in 32 appearances for
Manchester United last season....a meagre for goals
I just saw this on BBC nd was shocked.
Dopejemi, Debroslink and Raumdeuter, is this true

how many goals did hazard score from open play last season?

lalaboi:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mJbC02BtFg&spfreload=10


seems this guy in always under the influence of something

Peo don go smoke better sk

lalaboi:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mJbC02BtFg&spfreload=10


seems this guy in always under the influence of something

Mehn either the weed he took is very strong or better sh1t dey hold am for there

dopeJemi:


how many goals did hazard score from open play last season?

This is about Di Maria £60m pounds player, not Hazard.
He has the PFA player of the year, EPL nd Carling cup to show for it....what about Di Maria.

Chelseafan1:

This is about Di Maria £60m pounds player, not Hazard.
He has the PFA player of the year, EPL nd Carling cup to show for it....what about Di Maria.

Di maria, champions league winner, man of the match in a champions league final, second on the assist chart in his debut season


Ikedia? Musa?

lalaboi:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mJbC02BtFg&spfreload=10


seems this guy in always under the influence of something

Most geniuses are always looking crazy anyway to normal people

Between Loic Remy and Radamel Falcao

From an Arsenal perspective I'd say the Falcao is the better striker. Remy was easier to deal with and apart from a cross to Ramires never really threatened Arsenal defence. Falcao made some intelligent runs and nearly caught Mertesacker if not for the speed of Koschieny, he would have been through on goal.

From this assessment I think he will score goals but needs very creative players behind; Hazard and Fabregas should do the job.

Spy360:
Between Loic Remy and Radamel Falcao

From an Arsenal perspective I'd say the Falcao is the better striker. Remy was easier to deal with and apart from a cross to Ramires never really threatened Arsenal defence. Falcao made some intelligent runs and nearly caught Mertesacker if not for the speed of Koschieny, he would have been through on goal.

From this assessment I think he will score goals but needs very creative players behind; Hazard and Fabregas should do the job.

I beg to differ, Remy is way sharper than falcao, he made lots of those runs at man united but still couldn't finish


Remy is a beast on his day

raumdeuter:


Most geniuses are always looking crazy anyway to normal people

Frank Rijkaard, Ancelloti, Hiddink, ottmar hitzfeld, Alex Ferguson, marcelo lippi are not always looking crazy like this your skunk-smoking pep guardiola.

dopeJemi:


Di maria, champions league winner, man of the match in a champions league final, second on the assist chart in his debut season


Ikedia? Musa?

Santi cazorla was 2nd behind cesc not dicross or diflop.

airmark:


Frank Rijkaard, Ancelloti, Hiddink, ottmar hitzfeld, Alex Ferguson, marcelo lippi are not always looking crazy like this your skunk-smoking pep guardiola.

van gaal, ferguson klopp, Hitzfeld lippi have been known to very eccentric figures

dopeJemi:


Di maria, champions league winner, man of the match in a champions league final, second on the assist chart in his debut season


Ikedia? Musa?

And yet he was benched by a player than won't make our u-21 team........
We talking Hazard,Sanchez......U guys keep forcing us to rate Angel Di-ssapointment

Keky:
Santi cazorla was 2nd behind cesc not dicross or diflop.

Due to the fact that di maria was always on the bench

raumdeuter:


van gaal, ferguson klopp, Hitzfeld lippi have been known to very eccentric figures

They don't look crazy as seen in the video of pep below


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mJbC02BtFg&spfreload=10

bigkesh:

And yet he was benched by a player than won't make our u-21 team........
We talking Hazard,Sanchez......U guys keep forcing us to rate Angel Di-ssapointment

Di maria was a disappointment last season no doubt but even at that he still managed to make 10 assists and score 4 to 5 goals from open play, but yet it was a disappointing season, that is to tell you more is expected from great players, but when hazard manages 10 to 11 goals a season with 5 to 6 assists, it is considered his best season... apples and oranges, the difference is clear, and to compare ikedia Musa to players that score 40goals + in a season is demeaning to those great players and shameful in our sight



On their best days

Di maria>> Ikedia Musa


Let's not further this argument because we'll just be at loggerheads and won't agree to any of our points



Young won't make your under 21? This is rich coming from a fan of a club who has cuadrado and moses as back ups for their flanks they won't make our team of spectators i'm just messing with ya