jpphilips:


I have seen the attached document in several places, and i can not help but laugh at the ignorance of people who are throwing it around as fact.
The fact that an ignorant person published a book does not make his opinion sacrosanct.
I told you that Ojukwu's consultative assembly were his neigh saying "Aburi we stand" friends, if they had any relevance, why were they not negotiating the fate of igbos in Aburi?
I repeat again those men were hand picked by Ojukwu, they were NEVER elected as such they were there to serve the interest of their master Ojukwu not the Igbos, saying they were traditional heads is the fattest lie of the 21st century.

You asked what Zik will do in Aburi? what was Timothy Omo Bare doing with the Nigerian delegates in Aburi? Zik the first Governor general of Nigeria has no say on the fate of Igbos in Aburi? The man who proposed independence to the South eastern General assembly? please don't insult my intelligence.
You claim you know history yet you have such ridiculous opinion, Listen again and very clearly, the reason they went to Aburi in the first place was to negotiate a treaty that will stop the pogrom aka genocide at the time, what has that got to do with confederation?
You question Lord lugard because Nnamdi Kanu told you so right? what did nnamdi Kanu's father do to stop the British invasion of Lagos in 1861 or you don't know what Ethiopia did to halt British invasion?

Such illogical question can only come from lunatics like Nnamdi Kanu, did he question slave trade also? BTW what is the source of that text you attached? don't tell me you take Nowa Omoigui seriously, he actually wrote that nonsense you are throwing around, check his surname and tell me what to expect when a Yoruba man is writing Igbo history, clowns

jpphilips:


I have seen the attached document in several places, and i can not help but laugh at the ignorance of people who are throwing it around as fact.
The fact that an ignorant person published a book does not make his opinion sacrosanct.
I told you that Ojukwu's consultative assembly were his neigh saying "Aburi we stand" friends, if they had any relevance, why were they not negotiating the fate of igbos in Aburi?
I repeat again those men were hand picked by Ojukwu, they were NEVER elected as such they were there to serve the interest of their master Ojukwu not the Igbos, saying they were traditional heads is the fattest lie of the 21st century. For educational purposes you may go and read up the people's consultative assembly of Indonesia to learn how consultative assemblies are constituted.

You asked what Zik will do in Aburi? what was Timothy Omo Bare doing with the Nigerian delegates in Aburi? Zik the first Governor general of Nigeria has no say on the fate of Igbos in Aburi? The man who proposed an independent Nigeria to the South eastern General assembly? please don't insult my intelligence.
You claim you know history yet you have such ridiculous opinion, Listen again and very clearly, the reason they went to Aburi in the first place was to negotiate a treaty that will stop the pogrom aka genocide at the time, what has that got to do with confederation?
You question Lord lugard because Nnamdi Kanu told you so right? what did nnamdi Kanu's father do to stop the British invasion of Lagos in 1861 or you don't know what Ethiopia did to halt British invasion?

Such illogical question can only come from lunatics like Nnamdi Kanu, did he question slave trade also? BTW what is the source of that text you attached? don't tell me you take Nowa Omoigui seriously, he actually wrote that nonsense you are throwing around, check his surname and tell me what to expect when a Yoruba man is writing Igbo history, clowns
The same Omogui who wrote that Gowon was the most senior military officer after the death of Aguiyi ironsi abi?

kingzizzy:


You are a funny individual. You write so many things without making any point.


Im asking you a simple question and you are beating about the bush:


On what mandate did Lord Lugard make you a Nigerian?

Ovamboland:


I must first say i appreciate your civil response to the few observations i made, and i agree to a large extent on the possibility of Ibos coming together at some point in history. But another possibility is they could have being conquered and split up by the more organised neighboring tribes who might have also developed means to overcome the thick forest that shielded the Ibolands from external invaders.
All is left to conjecture on what might have been.

So we can see their was some unintended benefits to Ibos with the adventures of Lugard, and you probably benefited more than the other organised tribes. Lugard probably saved the Ibo culture from been absorbed or at worst annihilated by other warring groups.

It is well understood that Ibos were deeply hirt by the attacks and pogroms in the Northern parts of Nigeria from 1966 but the leaders that took the weighty decisions to leave Nigeria how were they selected or elected? Did they ever submit that decision to the general populace to get approval?
We can however say the approval was demonstrated by the zeal observed in fighting the war even by unarmed Biafran lads. But remember leaders that were voted by Easterners including Ibos represented their interest just about 9 - 10 years earlier at conferences to put a legal seal on Lugard's adventures subsume Ibo destiny within Nigeria.
The attempt to reverse this agreement by other means is what led to the civil war and a similar but not serious pattern is again playing out today.
If Ibos are truly tired of Nigeria and not again thinking with their heart as in 1967, i think they would not have freely participated in the presidential election of 2015 and they SE is possibly among the top 3 regions in terms of percentage turnout to vote. The other thing is the need for independence should have been a vote Player for Ibo candidates for political office in particular the National legislature. But as things stand today i ma not aware of any elected Ibo politician and any other noteworthy leader in league with those i refer to as thugs and misguided elements.
The fact that some people come out to protest does not make the Biafra idea a popular one, if those you call and vote for as leaders cannot support what you claim is dear to your heart, i will just say the struggle is still a long way to go.

jpphilips:
Mis information will only thrive when people like us are dead, so anyone who wish to spread propaganda and concocted lies must be weary of some usernames that will bury your lies.


IS THE SOUTH EAST REALLY DEVELOPED?

We need to define development, South east has a robust economy no doubt but I ask, is it not what they are about to destroy with this agitation, what was left of the SE in 1970 after the first agitation? is that what we really want?

When I visit the SE, I see a lot of individual efforts more than I see collective government responsibility being fulfilled, is that what we confuse for development? over 20yrs most places in Enugu rely on tankers for clean water unlike the 80's when the government provided water for everyone through the water board, such collective infrastructures are lacking in the whole of south east not just Enugu.
Enugu and Anambra are the only SE states that can boast of good road network the rest are cesspits of varying degrees of gullies, from Abia to Ebonyi, so why are we confusing individual efforts with development?

You built your house, I build mine is not development but individual effort, when you start benefiting from Government/cooperative provided low cost houses with Govt/cooperative provided access roads, central sewage, incinerator, electricity and security only then will you feel you are developed, as we chat, one of the most expensive estates in the SE Ngozika estate in Awka lack these amenities that people elsewhere consider basic yet we call that development, I disagree completely.
The South eastern Governors owe the people more than Abuja does, the fire power of the street demo of last week should be directed at the incompetent Governors that have left the South east comatose over years.

ARE THE IGBOS REALLY MARGINALIZED?


I am happy that Nnamdi Kanu did not succeed in twisting that part of our history, the Nigerian government won in battle as such there are consequences in defeat, I make out time from my busy schedule to enlighten people who are willing to learn on the consequences of their agitation, you don't go to battle and lose then expect your life to remain the same, there is agony in defeat Igbos should know better, let me take you on a tour round the world to buttress this situation so you can go and enlighten those urchins that blocked my office last week.

Japan today is not allowed to conscript their own soldiers beyond a particular number monitored by the united states who have repackaged the situation as an alliance yet by proxy undermining the sovereignty of Japan, do you have any idea how many military bases the US is maintaining in Japan? as at today, the US has 3 airforce bases (Kadena, Misowa and Yokota), 3 Army bases (camp zana, forte burtner and Tori station), 13 marine corps bases (courtney, fuji Gonsalves etc) and 4 Naval bases. A total of 23 military installations in another man's soil.

Can we see clearly that Japan is Under US occupation militarily (what Nnamdi Kanu will call military bondage) never mind their level of development and accomplishments, do you think the Japanese will not want to return to the pre WW2 era when they had a military that could match the US, soldier for soldier, combat for combat? pearl Harbor rings a loud bell, today they have lost that privilege thanks to their defeat at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Let me take you to South America, since Argentina was defeated in the Falkland conflict, the Argentine Government is denied of all the revenues accrual from that prosperous Island that originally belonged to them as a matter of fact, they are behind a territorial marker set by the British, Argentina MUST seek the permission of the British to use or Visit an Island that originally belonged to them that is the agony of defeat.

Lets go to the Middle east, since Palestine never won Israel in any of their recent conflicts, West bank and Gaza strip has remained under perpetual occupation and subjugation, it is so bad that as little as food rations and medicines has to be approved by Israel before the people of Palestine will feed, that is the Agony of defeat.

Let us go to Europe, I need not say much here but for the sake of enlightenment, below are the conditions given to the Germans after their WW1 defeat, the document is called, "Treaty of Versailles", Nnamdi Kanu doesn't know this much I suppose.

1) Germany had to accept the Blame for starting the war (Clause 231). This was vital because it provided the justification for harsh treatments
2) Germany had to pay £6.6 million (called Reparations) for the damage done during the war.
3) Germany was forbidden to have submarines or an air force. She could have a navy of only six battleships, and an Army of just 100,000 men. In addition, Germany was not allowed to place any troops in the Rhineland, the strip of land, 50 miles wide, next to France.
4). Germany’s colonies were given to Britain and France, Germany was forbidden to join the League of Nations, or unite with Austria.
5) SAAR coal fields belonging to germany was given to France to operate for 15yrs
6) Poland will be given a corridor into the Baltic cutting off East prussia from Germany
7) Posen a very rich farm land given to Poland free
Danzig will be owned by the League of Nations (our modern day United nations)
9) Alsace Lorraine will be given to France free
10) Eupen and Malmedy will be given to Belgium free
11) North Shelswig given to Denmark free
12) Germany was not allowed to unite with Austria which leaves Germany as a tiny, land locked desolate piece of land

You see young people, Nnamdi Kanu is feasting on the ignorance of most of you, can you compare what US did to Japan or what the League of Nations did to Germany with your 20 pounds saga?

If Bi@fr@ was Japan, Imagine if Nigeria sends military administrators to rule over all the states in Bi@fr@ with military bases everywhere to ensure you guys don't cough, for your importation business and the likes, you must seek permission from Nigeria before you can do that, how would you feel? japan has lived through that agony for over 50yrs.

If Germany was Bi@fr@, can you imagine Half of Bi@fr@ land will be seeded to Cameroon and the rest given to Benin Republic, how would you feel? Germany lived through that between 1914-1948, matter of fact the wall of Berlin actually fell in 1991, can you extrapolate the agony of the Germans in such situation? that is the Agony of defeat, in your case you were given 20 pounds and you are complaining, bros, it could have been worse, Nnamdi Kanu knowing that you have no idea the terms of the Versailles treaty, sold you the 20 pounds saga and you hated Nigeria for it, that is what propaganda does to feeble minds.

Bi@fr@ was not punished enough for their rebellion going by what was obtainable at the time, I believe that is why there are still individuals who want to cross that line again, make no mistakes, this time around no one can predict what lies ahead.

I have written here severally that Nigeria will take all Igbo properties in Nigeria if they get Bi@fr@, a lot of people don't believe me do you know why, because they are not enlightened enough to read the land use act of 1978. That law gives Nigeria the legal Justification to do that and not even United Nations will fault that, because Nigeria had the law before Biafra broke away hence it will not be adjudged as a form of punishment, be careful what you wish for because very few of you can actually see the end of your Bi@fr@n Journey.

They claim Igbos are the most developed yet they beg for development again, are they not speaking from the two compasses of their mouth?
Instead of brooding about who will develop you, why wont Igbos synergize to form a common political front that will project the Igbo interest beyond umbrages? afterall, Nnamdi Azikiwe and Nwafor orizu were all igbos who operated at the highest level of governance in Nigeria, go back to that formula and you will get what you deserve, how do you expect a government you are rebelling against to help you?
How many votes did you give to Buhari to help you? Jonathan a Bi@fr@n (by Nnamdi Kanu's conjecture) you supported fully, what did he do to develop you?
If your own brother can not develop you, is it anarchy you will use to get your enemy to develop you? at what point will Igbos realize that Jonathan was a failed project, dust themselves up and re strategize on how to define their interest around APC?

Pushing for Bi@fr@ will be both political and geographical suicide, don't say I did not warn you guys!!

Olabestonic001:


On the mandate of Her Royal Majesty, the Queen of England and on the mandates of the Great Men who caused the abolition of Slave Trades.
Your fore-fathers and mine were notorious slaves traders and if anything we should thank the British for coming rather than blaming them. Do you know that Fulani expansionism would have encroach the lands of Igbo's? Do you know how savaged Igbos were to Igbos by selling their own ethnic group to slavery? Thank Lugard for giving us that structure!
If Nigeria have anything to negotiate we should, rather than turning logic on its head to have an emotionally feel good euphoria.

N.B: The man that blames his pasts and others for his present situation is a weakling who can not negotiate bends in life. I hope IPOB (with sympathies from some Igbos) will not cause another destruction of the whole South East; now most Igbo's are having that 'feel good' feelings the way Northerners were having it before the Boko Haram menace. Hope they wont all live to regret not speaking against IPOB when the monster begins to bite.

kingzizzy:



It is interesting what you wrote however........

I'm not a Lawyer or legal expert but I do know a thing or two about the Laws of contract. Same as a woman and man will sign a marriage contract where both parties willingly and publicly give their consent to the formation of a "valid" union. Either party also reserve the right to walk out of the Union any time they wish and for whatever reason by instituting divorce proceedings. In the case of Nigeria, not only is Nigeria a fraud for there being no contractual agreement between the indigenous people of the land to enter into a union, people also insult we Igbos for demanding a divorce to a marriage that never existed in the first place. The legitimacy of Nigeria is based on the sovereign will of the people and who they lend it to. Without the consent of the people, any nation is a fraud. I want to see a document where my Igbo tribe agreed to the Union of Nigeria. Where did we agree to be Nigerians? Nigeria was created by fiat and had no shred of legitimacy. No doubt that we all benefited by the coming of the White man but that does not mean we gave up our sovereignty. So, Biafran agitators like me are insisting on a referendum to determin the fate of the British invention called Nigeria. Yes we may have voted for leaders to govern us but those leaders derive their just powers from the legitimacy of Nigeria as a nation. In the law of contract, if the main basis of the contract as stipulated is fraudulent, all other acts that follow the contract inherit that fraudulence. As of now, all elected politicians are occupying illegal positions because Nigeria was begotten from an act of illegality.

kingzizzy:



You Nigerians won't kill me with laughter. So the mandate of the queen of England superceeds the mandate of indigenous Igbos in their own land? Where did you Nigerians get this slave mentality from? The slave trade you are talking about was abolished in 1804, more than 100 years before Lugard created Nigeria in 1914. What mandate did anyone have to create Nigeria? My late Grandfather was born an Igbo man in 1902. He told me before he died that he first heard he was a Nigerian in 1920. What mandate did anyone have make my late grandfather a Nigerian? Where is the legitimacy of Nigeria?

jpphilips:
Mis information will only thrive when people like us are dead, so anyone who wish to spread propaganda and concocted lies must be weary of some usernames that will bury your lies.


IS THE SOUTH EAST REALLY DEVELOPED?

We need to define development, South east has a robust economy no doubt but I ask, is it not what they are about to destroy with this agitation, what was left of the SE in 1970 after the first agitation? is that what we really want?

When I visit the SE, I see a lot of individual efforts more than I see collective government responsibility being fulfilled, is that what we confuse for development? over 20yrs most places in Enugu rely on tankers for clean water unlike the 80's when the government provided water for everyone through the water board, such collective infrastructures are lacking in the whole of south east not just Enugu.
Enugu and Anambra are the only SE states that can boast of good road network the rest are cesspits of varying degrees of gullies, from Abia to Ebonyi, so why are we confusing individual efforts with development?

You built your house, I build mine is not development but individual effort, when you start benefiting from Government/cooperative provided low cost houses with Govt/cooperative provided access roads, central sewage, incinerator, electricity and security only then will you feel you are developed, as we chat, one of the most expensive estates in the SE Ngozika estate in Awka lack these amenities that people elsewhere consider basic yet we call that development, I disagree completely.
The South eastern Governors owe the people more than Abuja does, the fire power of the street demo of last week should be directed at the incompetent Governors that have left the South east comatose over years.

ARE THE IGBOS REALLY MARGINALIZED?


I am happy that Nnamdi Kanu did not succeed in twisting that part of our history, the Nigerian government won in battle as such there are consequences in defeat, I make out time from my busy schedule to enlighten people who are willing to learn on the consequences of their agitation, you don't go to battle and lose then expect your life to remain the same, there is agony in defeat Igbos should know better, let me take you on a tour round the world to buttress this situation so you can go and enlighten those urchins that blocked my office last week.

Japan today is not allowed to conscript their own soldiers beyond a particular number monitored by the united states who have repackaged the situation as an alliance yet by proxy undermining the sovereignty of Japan, do you have any idea how many military bases the US is maintaining in Japan? as at today, the US has 3 airforce bases (Kadena, Misowa and Yokota), 3 Army bases (camp zana, forte burtner and Tori station), 13 marine corps bases (courtney, fuji Gonsalves etc) and 4 Naval bases. A total of 23 military installations in another man's soil.

Can we see clearly that Japan is Under US occupation militarily (what Nnamdi Kanu will call military bondage) never mind their level of development and accomplishments, do you think the Japanese will not want to return to the pre WW2 era when they had a military that could match the US, soldier for soldier, combat for combat? pearl Harbor rings a loud bell, today they have lost that privilege thanks to their defeat at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Let me take you to South America, since Argentina was defeated in the Falkland conflict, the Argentine Government is denied of all the revenues accrual from that prosperous Island that originally belonged to them as a matter of fact, they are behind a territorial marker set by the British, Argentina MUST seek the permission of the British to use or Visit an Island that originally belonged to them that is the agony of defeat.

Lets go to the Middle east, since Palestine never won Israel in any of their recent conflicts, West bank and Gaza strip has remained under perpetual occupation and subjugation, it is so bad that as little as food rations and medicines has to be approved by Israel before the people of Palestine will feed, that is the Agony of defeat.

Let us go to Europe, I need not say much here but for the sake of enlightenment, below are the conditions given to the Germans after their WW1 defeat, the document is called, "Treaty of Versailles", Nnamdi Kanu doesn't know this much I suppose.

1) Germany had to accept the Blame for starting the war (Clause 231). This was vital because it provided the justification for harsh treatments
2) Germany had to pay £6.6 million (called Reparations) for the damage done during the war.
3) Germany was forbidden to have submarines or an air force. She could have a navy of only six battleships, and an Army of just 100,000 men. In addition, Germany was not allowed to place any troops in the Rhineland, the strip of land, 50 miles wide, next to France.
4). Germany’s colonies were given to Britain and France, Germany was forbidden to join the League of Nations, or unite with Austria.
5) SAAR coal fields belonging to germany was given to France to operate for 15yrs
6) Poland will be given a corridor into the Baltic cutting off East prussia from Germany
7) Posen a very rich farm land given to Poland free
Danzig will be owned by the League of Nations (our modern day United nations)
9) Alsace Lorraine will be given to France free
10) Eupen and Malmedy will be given to Belgium free
11) North Shelswig given to Denmark free
12) Germany was not allowed to unite with Austria which leaves Germany as a tiny, land locked desolate piece of land

You see young people, Nnamdi Kanu is feasting on the ignorance of most of you, can you compare what US did to Japan or what the League of Nations did to Germany with your 20 pounds saga?

If Bi@fr@ was Japan, Imagine if Nigeria sends military administrators to rule over all the states in Bi@fr@ with military bases everywhere to ensure you guys don't cough, for your importation business and the likes, you must seek permission from Nigeria before you can do that, how would you feel? japan has lived through that agony for over 50yrs.

If Germany was Bi@fr@, can you imagine Half of Bi@fr@ land will be seeded to Cameroon and the rest given to Benin Republic, how would you feel? Germany lived through that between 1914-1948, matter of fact the wall of Berlin actually fell in 1991, can you extrapolate the agony of the Germans in such situation? that is the Agony of defeat, in your case you were given 20 pounds and you are complaining, bros, it could have been worse, Nnamdi Kanu knowing that you have no idea the terms of the Versailles treaty, sold you the 20 pounds saga and you hated Nigeria for it, that is what propaganda does to feeble minds.

Bi@fr@ was not punished enough for their rebellion going by what was obtainable at the time, I believe that is why there are still individuals who want to cross that line again, make no mistakes, this time around no one can predict what lies ahead.

I have written here severally that Nigeria will take all Igbo properties in Nigeria if they get Bi@fr@, a lot of people don't believe me do you know why, because they are not enlightened enough to read the land use act of 1978. That law gives Nigeria the legal Justification to do that and not even United Nations will fault that, because Nigeria had the law before Biafra broke away hence it will not be adjudged as a form of punishment, be careful what you wish for because very few of you can actually see the end of your Bi@fr@n Journey.

They claim Igbos are the most developed yet they beg for development again, are they not speaking from the two compasses of their mouth?
Instead of brooding about who will develop you, why wont Igbos synergize to form a common political front that will project the Igbo interest beyond umbrages? afterall, Nnamdi Azikiwe and Nwafor orizu were all igbos who operated at the highest level of governance in Nigeria, go back to that formula and you will get what you deserve, how do you expect a government you are rebelling against to help you?
How many votes did you give to Buhari to help you? Jonathan a Bi@fr@n (by Nnamdi Kanu's conjecture) you supported fully, what did he do to develop you?
If your own brother can not develop you, is it anarchy you will use to get your enemy to develop you? at what point will Igbos realize that Jonathan was a failed project, dust themselves up and re strategize on how to define their interest around APC?

Pushing for Bi@fr@ will be both political and geographical suicide, don't say I did not warn you guys!!

baralatie:

I think you should go through Jpphillips comments properly.
he has explicitly answered your question!
and you can still ask how the founding father's of Nigeria of which nnamdi azikiwe and city were legitimately part of

baralatie:

the question of legitimacy of state is totally not only Nigeria but the whole of Africa and the world!
where the the Americans get their mandate to be the u.s.a
where did the Europeans get their mandate to be Greece,Luxembourg and Belgium.
if you know the history of Mansa musa where did Ghana get its mandate
where did Cameron get its mandate!
where did Australian get its mandate.

kingzizzy:


You are a funny individual. You write so many things without making any point.


Im asking you a simple question and you are beating about the bush:


On what mandate did Lord Lugard make you a Nigerian?

kingzizzy:



It is interesting what you wrote however........

I'm not a Lawyer or legal expert but I do know a thing or two about the Laws of contract. Same as a woman and man will sign a marriage contract where both parties willingly and publicly give their consent to the formation of a "valid" union. Either party also reserve the right to walk out of the Union any time they wish and for whatever reason by instituting divorce proceedings. In the case of Nigeria, not only is Nigeria a fraud for there being no contractual agreement between the indigenous people of the land to enter into a union, people also insult we Igbos for demanding a divorce to a marriage that never existed in the first place. The legitimacy of Nigeria is based on the sovereign will of the people and who they lend it to. Without the consent of the people, any nation is a fraud. I want to see a document where my Igbo tribe agreed to the Union of Nigeria. Where did we agree to be Nigerians? Nigeria was created by fiat and had no shred of legitimacy. No doubt that we all benefited by the coming of the White man but that does not mean we gave up our sovereignty. So, Biafran agitators like me are insisting on a referendum to determin the fate of the British invention called Nigeria. Yes we may have voted for leaders to govern us but those leaders derive their just powers from the legitimacy of Nigeria as a nation. In the law of contract, if the main basis of the contract as stipulated is fraudulent, all other acts that follow the contract inherit that fraudulence. As of now, all elected politicians are occupying illegal positions because Nigeria was begotten from an act of illegality.

A biafran agitator who wants to leave an illegitimate Nigeria will drag along an unwilling niger delta legitimately
Have you heard Anku Briggs the niger delta activist who represented them in the SNC speak on this subject? those are the kinda people i listen to not Nnamdi Kanu who represent the Igbo interest in the prison cell.
Since Lugard did you a disfavor I need you to present to me a document of consent from Niger delta that they are pro Biafra, I want to be sure you are not about to create another fraud like the Nigeria you so despise.
I will be the happiest man the day a South East Biafra will come to life.

tonychristopher:


Another post begging Igbo not to leave

kingzizzy:



I am not an Australian, nor am I from Belgium. I am in Igbo man who is asking on what authority was I made a Nigerian? What gives anybody the right to call me Nigerian when I never gave my consent to be one. The legitimacy of Nigeria is at the very heart of the demand for a referendum. Nigeria has no legitimacy and that is why a referendum must be conducted to know a Nigerian is. Simply put, Nigeria is an illegal entity.

kingzizzy:



I am not an Australian, nor am I from Belgium. I am in Igbo man who is asking on what authority was I made a Nigerian? What gives anybody the right to call me Nigerian when I never gave my consent to be one. The legitimacy of Nigeria is at the very heart of the demand for a referendum. Nigeria has no legitimacy and that is why a referendum must be conducted to know a Nigerian is. Simply put, Nigeria is an illegal entity.

jpphilips:


A biafran agitator who wants to leave an illegitimate Nigeria will drag along an unwilling niger delta legitimately
Have you heard Anku Briggs the niger delta activist who represented them in the SNC speak on this subject? those are the kinda people i listen to not Nnamdi Kanu who represent the Igbo interest in the prison cell.
Since Lugard did you a disfavor I need you to present to me a document of consent from Niger delta that they are for Biafra, I want to be sure you are not about to create another fraud like the Nigeria you so despise.
I will be the happiest man the day a South East Biafra will come to life.

baralatie:

like I said and your question goes generally across board.who is an Australian?who is a Belgian?who gave anybody to make boundaries?who gave anybody the right to say the continent will find yourself is called Africa?who said you are Igbo by definition when you are a Jew? who even said Igbo are Africans sef?

jpphilips:



On whose mandate was your grandfathers traded as slaves?

kingzizzy:



And that is why a referendum must be conducted in Nigeria so that the indigenous people can answer these questions for themselves.

jpphilips:


We know that already and a historical feat has been achieved by dislodging a 16yr old unproductive ruling party, that is the first civilized step to getting results, it insults every fabric of my sensibilities that you propose a biafra as the solution to the decadence you mentioned abinitio, a Biafra comprising of same Nigerian thieves and low IQ thugs? give me a break!!
Your analogy can be likened to saying that APC is change from PDP, that's for election purposes only!! when the same bastards in PDP are in APC, the only new kids on the block are Buhari and Fashola sane people like us know better to define our interests around them.
When you figure out the solution to the anomaly you mentioned, we will listen for now, Biafra is no solution and no sane man will take you seriously.

baralatie:

fortunately every geographical creation from Australia to south Africa have derived their self rule and all parties represented by each political representation have signed all documentation.
so basically a reorganisation of the world geographical design is considered a treasonable offense!

kingzizzy:


I'm happy that you have exposed your self as another Nigerian who has nothing to say. I expressly said that we Biafrans want a referendum in the South of Nigeria so that the indigenous people can decide what they want. But you are coming up with every reason to uphold the fraud of Lugard called Nigeria. It is actually people like you that are dragging other people into an illegitimate union.

kingzizzy:


Nigerian mentality is just too backward. The people own the land, the land never owns the people. If you want a country, you must first seek the permission of the indigenous people of the land. Without it, you have no country. How did you think that Lugard can come from Europe to give you your country? Britain that created Nigeria granted Scotland referendum last year. Unless the indigenous people that make up Nigeria such as Igbos, Ibibios, Efiks, Ijaws etc are granted the right to decide their destiny in a referendum, there will never be peace in Nigeria. Nigeria is not "by force"

SonOfEl:


You call biafran agitators "thugs, anarchists and misguided entities"? If so, who then are the citizens?

Your Nigeria reeks of nepotism, prebendalism, and such likes, how then would the voice of the common man be heard? Its funny you are comparing Nigeria with civilized societies like Scotland and co. Nigeria is a political failure. The system here does not work, and its corruption has even infected Igbo politicians, For Biafra to return to civility, the Nigerian system of things MUST BE AMPUTATED FROM BIAFRA. Simple.

Ovamboland:


Since Nigeria is not civilized and a failure what's the point of expecting a peaceful referendum? Since Lugard forced ibos into the union, it appears only force can set ibos free, wishing you luck in your adventures. just don't cry later somebody did not support your aspirations

SonOfEl:


You call biafran agitators "thugs, anarchists and misguided entities"? If so, who then are the citizens?

Your Nigeria reeks of nepotism, prebendalism, and such likes, how then would the voice of the common man be heard? Its funny you are comparing Nigeria with civilized societies like Scotland and co. Nigeria is a political failure. The system here does not work, and its corruption has even infected Igbo politicians, For Biafra to return to civility, the Nigerian system of things MUST BE AMPUTATED FROM BIAFRA. Simple.

jpphilips:


Interesting, kindly tell me about Igbo political failures like Mbadinuju, ochendo Orji etc, perhaps Anambra and Abia will likely be "Amputated" from biafra for biafra to make progress right? till Biafra is left without limbs, let me see the unity of the Biafra people to deal with ordinary herdsmen, then I will tell you whether or not Biafra will succeed.