Creamish:
Why am I smiling at the pixs?

its inhuman...Yes.. Brutal...Yes... Uncalled for...YES...


...but i'm still smiling ... dat wifey musta been thru a lot..so tey dem cut hair..chai..

pinceprinz:


This one's head is not correct oh, I mean, u dey think say na d same rule of law wey US dey use na hin dem dey use for Saudi? Abi what exactly are u trying to say when you said adultery no be crime ? Oh, go to Saudi and commit that atrocity and see if dem na go throw u boulders till you take your last breath. Ogbeni, the stoning to death thing isn't a gender biased thing , don't dare paint it to be so. You don see your zombie for here?

joseph1832:
Out of respect for you, I'll refrain from saying what I have to say.

Lezzlie:


A married woman who finds her husband greasing the carnals of another should first seek to warn off the supplanting whøre. But it is a difficult asking.

The cognitive abilities of women aren't built for such rendering of logicality in a heated circumstance like that. She will strike, and she'll choose the most disposable of the them, and it has to be the whøre.

Once a woman finds out about her husband's secret squeeze, every odd behaviour of the husband, every unexplained financial denial, every night of cold response, every lack of complement of her looks will suddenly have an answer:

It's in the warm thighs of the LovePeddler: Her reactions shouldn't always be reasonable.

joseph1832:
Can you quote in the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, where it explicitly say, I repeat, explicitly say, that "adultery is a crime?".

joseph1832:
Still, that doesn't give the wife and her friends that right to assault the mistress.

The wife should have taken this ish up with her husband. If she had caught them defiling her matrimonial home, then I'll understand, but to assault her like this, is not it.

If she had the balls, why didn't she beat her husband with her friends? You wouldn't be surprised that her husband might be the one chasing the mistress up and down.

Creamish:


Explain the bolded better cos the mistress confessed to having an affair with the husband for a year..

daretodiffer:
She has every right to kill her. She became her business the moment she knowingly slept with another man's husband.

Islamically and Biblically, both have sinned. Morally, they have acted unconsciously. The concubine and the husband have acted together to break the husband's vows and trust to his wife

The way some people think sef?

The above surprised the Shiits outta me!!


Please tell Me your accnt was hacked.

joseph1832:
I meant if she had caught them in her matrimonial bed/home.

Creamish:


Therez a lil devil in everyone Joe. Ur free to spill ur guts. This mistress was having an affair with the husband of a woman who helped her get a job.. she had the affair for a year. The wife got a job for this ingrate.

Abeg.

Creamish:


Whatz the difference? Hearing a confession and actually catching them...does one make the heart ache less than the other?

Are you saying that it is ok to beat her up when shez caught red-handed?

joseph1832:
So? Of course emotion will always take over reason when women are involved. One would have expected her to know who initiated the whole thing, the mistress or the husband.

Or did it bother anyone that may be husband coerced the mistress into having an affair with him, like sleep with me, or loose your job. I'm sure you've heard of such tales?

And I intend to keep my guts intact, it means very much to me, thank you very much.

pinceprinz:


Are u really asking me this question ? , Joking? or is this your way of saying hi? Clarify or if yo serious, reread my lines paying a lil more of your attention to draw reasonable inference please!

Creamish:


Whatever happened, the mistress is guilty. Once she decided to sleep with the hubby, she became guilty. She must av known that she wont be celebrated when caught but she still decided to fvck on nwayz.. So if ur wife decides to sleep with her boss cos she was threatened of her job, u will approve cos it's not her fault?

Let's be realistic here pls..

joseph1832:
In the court of law emotions aren't used as evidence, facts are!. That's the difference.

I'm saying its wrong of her to attack her, that if she had done that in her home, then I can be understood and it may fly in court.

The wife assaulted the lady, that's for sure, not just assault, but pre-meditated assault.

joseph1832:
My dear, being realistic means being reasonable. The mistress is guilty? What about the husband? Did it occur to you that may be the man might have been the one who started the whole affair? Funny you blame the mistress and accuse her of being guilty and you totally ignored the husband.

If my wife decides to cheat on me just to keep her job, I trust she would see the need to tell me that her husband is sexually assaulting her, from there, I'll handle it.

This is why I make damn sure that I'll get married to a woman who respect reason and logic, not one who is a slave to her emotion and her religion.

daretodiffer:
She has every right to kill her. She became her business the moment she knowingly slept with another man's husband.

Islamically and Biblically, both have sinned. Morally, they have acted unconsciously. The concubine and the husband have acted together to break the husband's vows and trust to his wife

The way some people think sef?

Creamish:


We are on the same page on the assault.

What i am trying to understand is your stand on the mistress. Is she right or wrong? Was it ok for her to date a married man?

Creamish:


@bolded.. read thru my earlier post.

joseph1832:
May be I misunderstood you. Might I be so bold to ask you what you meant?

pinceprinz:

In plain, simple English? OK

In Saudi Arabia, the price of adultery is sentence to death by stoning so, don't do it@ all when you're there even if you're a human right fundamentalist till you reach your West where you are free to even fukc your Dad's wife in the open street without even sleeping in the police den overnight...

Only if you'd understood Pidgin English, this woulda sounded better . Poor u mate!

Estharfabian:
The above surprised the Shiits outta me!!


Please tell Me your accnt was hacked.

joseph1832:
I did. I'm just bothered you seem more intent on killing the mistress than the man.

joseph1832:
Why the focus on the mistress? The husband is now left totally in the loop.
Now, I'll ask as regard the emboldened, from which perspective are you coming from, religion, moral or logic?.

joseph1832:
Well only if you had appropriately stated your statement there wouldn't have been any need for this.

daretodiffer:
Nope! It takes two to tango

joseph1832:
So if the lady is a slut_ what is the husband, Rambo?.

Creamish:


Exactly!!

mimzy:
Like seriously!!! What the heck!!! I just read a story on FP bout a wife (and her friends) that beat up her husband's mistress at work, used scissors to cut her hair, stripped her, poured slimy substances on her body and made her walk naked from the office to the car!!!

This is all shades of wrong!!! Whatever in the world happened to the woman beating up her husband if she really wants to prove macho If there is anyone that should be put in check, it is the husband for crying out loud, she has not freakn business with that mistress.

Yes, the wife has every right to be angry but she has absolutely no RIGHT WHATSOEVER TO TOUCH THAT LADY!!!
If you as a woman cannot put your husband/boyfriend/fiance in his place, then do not go about picking up your man's phone to curse,stalk or arrange to have their mistresses beaten!!! its b*sh!t.

DemiGoddess:


Nope.

He's a blasted son of a b!tch who deserves to die by chinese water torture.

I was writing from the wife's point of view and not the husband which is pretty much obvious.

Did I ever glorify the man's ass?

So either you have problem understanding or you just trying to spite me.


Please don't ever get sarcastic with me again 'cause it never goes down well.


Thank you fine sir!

Okijajuju1:



You are filled with wisdom..


The lady that was assaulted should just go to court and watch the wife spend some quality time in prison.

And the damages she should sue for in Civil Court should be large enough to keep the woman bankrupt for life.




Attacking the partner your spouse is cheating on you with is much more stupid than attacking your spouse.

Why attack anyone?