jstbeinhonest:


Ofcourse,the ICIJ is a yoruba organization.You lots never fail to display your envy.

More like stupiiid daily rant if you ask me.

Irrelevants!!!

DaBullIT:
https://panamapapers.icij.org/the_power_players/

stop being stewpyddd and read more , you'll see it's all over the world

I just wish i could ban moroons like you from every internet related comments or activites , you people are too duumb for reasoning , you don't know anything , but you claim to be the wisest

You do not have access to Top Secret government information or to Top Secret government facilities. Nor are you a member of any of Earth's secret societies. In addition, you were not born 5,000 years ago; you were born only within the last 100 years, so you were not able to see history unfold with your own eyes.

Yet, despite all of these undeniable facts, you claim that you already know what the truth is. That is, just like how you know for a fact that 1+1=2, you also claim that you know for a fact what the truth is. So, how the hell is that possible

Well, via compartmentalization, you are able to acknowledge the fact that government secrets exist and that secret societies exist, while simultaneously claiming that you, somehow, already know for a fact what the truth is. Wow, talk about being irrational!

In reality, you simply base the truth upon what the media tells you and what Earth's authority figures tell you. And, you are foolish enough to equate reading about an event in a history book to actually seeing that event with your own eyes. You don't believe religious texts, yet you still believe government texts such as history books and government belief systems such as science. As a practitioner of selective reasoning, how dare you call yourself a "rationalist"?

You trust Earth's authority figures because they are powerful and you think they are trustworthy. Obviously, however, these authority figures would never willingly incriminate themselves to you. If they did incriminate themselves to you, then you would no longer consider them to be legitimate authority figures.

VulgarVulvas:
Why the Panama Papers must not be taken seriously

1. George Sorros is behind the leaks. If you don't know who George Sorros is then a simple google search will give you a picture perfect description of this international lobbyist and patron of the criminal Clinton family syndicate.

2. No single American is listed even though Americans account for the highest offshore depositors.

3. The files where compiled to slander world leaders and politicians not in good terms with Washington and the liberal democrats.

4. The files are not open source like wikileaks but have been circulated to major media outlets controlled by the world elites. This alon shows a sinister plot in the making where only prominent leaders and politicians who oppose liberal politics are exposed.

5. The whole file scandal is handled by corporate bodies and has in no way the similar hallmark of wikileaks. If corporate news media only reports what they want you to hear, how in God's name do you think they will remain objective and un-bias?

and that is d more reason why we shud take it seriously here,an average politician here is a thief and it's an opportunity to expose those who hav been sucking us dry,u can't still in america the way the steal here and get away,so u can't compare here with america when it comes to leadership but can compare with embezzlement,wise up bro

computer0810:
and that is d more reason why we shud take it seriously here,an average politician here is a thief and it's an opportunity to expose those who hav been sucking us dry,u can't still in america the way the steal here and get away,so u can't compare here with america when it comes to leadership but can compare with embezzlement,wise up bro

You have declared the Panama leaks as official because you agree the leaks are being sorted out, compiled and published via official news outlets.

Official doctrines, by definition, do not incriminate the officials who created them. If official doctrines did incriminate the officials who created them, then the officials would be looked down upon by the public, and therefore they and their doctrines would no longer be considered official. This is simple logic.

So, as you can see, official doctrines are by no means synonymous with the truth. Rather, official doctrines are simply doctrines that were designed to keep in power the very officials who created them.

Furthermore, the word "official" should not be associated with the word "rational." Science is indeed an official government doctrine, yet it is not completely rational. The scientific community, in a bizarre and irrational manner, completely blows off the concept of government secrets. Science, by design and necessity, always downplays the significance of the government's power.

Science must downplay the significance of the government's power because it is of the utmost importance that the ignorant followers of science who are not "in the know," such as the common atheist, think only within the framework of status quo reality. If science did not downplay the significance of the government's power, then people would quickly realize that science is bullsh1t and that the status quo conception of reality is also bullsh1t. In other words, if people knew what really goes on behind the scenes, then they would quickly realize that science is just another form of control, courtesy of the ruling elite.

donodion:


More like stupiiid daily rant if you ask me.

Irrelevants!!!

Arrogance always follows the prideful fool who confuses their blind support for a system or belief that they know next to nothing of.


Your very thought process and eventual conclusions have been opinionly crafted into you without you knowing it.


If anything can be used to describe you, is the fact that you are a highly ignorant of the workings of this world and the intriguing power play that occurs in the shadows.

It is a self-evident, undeniable fact that you do not have as much knowledge as the elite do. For example, advanced, secret military technology does in fact exist. So, there is indeed a knowledge gap between the elite and the masses. However, you cannot just arbitrarily assume that this knowledge gap is small--it is quite erroneous for you sheeple to make such an assumption.

In actuality, as all real truth seekers are already aware of, the knowledge gap between the elite and the masses is not small, but rather, is absurdly huge! So, rather than complaining about how "outrageous" my theories are, you should instead acknowledge the fact that there is a knowledge gap in the first place. Once you acknowledge the knowledge gap, you'll realize that it's not the information I present that's outrageous, but rather the huge knowledge gap itself that's outrageous. That is, there should not be a knowledge gap between the elite and the masses in the first place.

The elite have tricked you into thinking that you are in tune with reality (when in fact, you are actually very ignorant). So, since you foolishly thought that your intelligence was on par with the elite's intelligence, you never suspected that there was a huge knowledge gap.

Don't you get it? The elite want you to think that you are smart! The best slave is the slave who thinks he is free, and the greatest fool is the fool who thinks he is a wise man.

By you thinking that you are already "in the know," you will never, ever be able to grasp the truth. So, as for the belief system that you are still attempting to hold onto, you must let go of it right this minute! It is of the utmost importance that you realize you are ignorant; and remember, don't let your ego make you reject what I am saying.

Where is Obasanjo, Babangida, Buhari on the list?

CHISOS!!!

Oya EFCC come and start working please sharp sharp. Leave the youngsters on the street alone!!

DaBullIT:
https://panamapapers.icij.org/the_power_players/

stop being stewpyddd and read more , you'll see it's all over the world

I just wish i could ban moroons like you from every internet related comments or activites , you people are too duumb for reasoning , you don't know anything , but you claim to be the wisest

Never before has it been so important to have independent, honest voices and sources of information. We are – as a society – inundated and overwhelmed with a flood of information from a wide array of sources, but these sources of information, by and large, serve the powerful interests and individuals that own them. The main sources of information, for both public and official consumption, include the mainstream media, alternative media, academia and think tanks.

The mainstream media is the most obvious in its inherent bias and manipulation. The mainstream media is owned directly by large multinational corporations, and through their boards of directors are connected with a plethora of other major global corporations and elite interests. An example of these connections can be seen through the board of Time Warner.

Time Warner owns Time Magazine, HBO, Warner Bros., and CNN, among many others. The board of directors includes individuals past or presently affiliated with: the Council on Foreign Relations, the IMF, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Warburg Pincus, Phillip Morris, and AMR Corporation, among many others.

Two of the most “esteemed” sources of news in the U.S. are the New York Times (referred to as “the paper of record”) and the Washington Post. The New York Times has on its board people who are past or presently affiliated with: Schering-Plough International (pharmaceuticals), the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Chevron Corporation, Wesco Financial Corporation, Kohlberg & Company, The Charles Schwab Corporation, eBay Inc., Xerox, IBM, Ford Motor Company, Eli Lilly & Company, among others. Hardly a bastion of impartiality.

And the same could be said for the Washington Post, which has on its board: Lee Bollinger, the President of Columbia University and former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and individuals associated with (past or presently): the Coca-Cola Company, New York University, Conservation International, the Council on Foreign Relations, Xerox, Catalyst, Johnson & Johnson, Target Corporation, RAND Corporation, General Motors, and the Business Council, among others.

It is also important to address how the mainstream media is intertwined, often covertly and secretly, with the government. Carl Bernstein, one of the two Washington Post reporters who covered the Watergate scandal, revealed that there were over 400 American journalists who had “secretly carried out assignments for the Central Intelligence Agency.” Interestingly, “the use of journalists has been among the most productive means of intelligence-gathering employed by the CIA.” Among organizations which cooperated with the CIA were the “American Broadcasting Company, the National Broadcasting Company, the Associated Press, United Press International, Reuters, Hearst Newspapers, Scripps-Howard, Newsweek magazine, the Mutual Broadcasting System, the Miami Herald and the old Saturday Evening Post and New York Herald-Tribune.”

By far the most valuable of these associations, according to CIA officials, have been with the New York Times, CBS and Time Inc. The CIA even ran a training program “to teach its agents to be journalists,” who were “then placed in major news organizations with help from management.”

These types of relationships have continued in the decades since, although perhaps more covertly and quietly than before. For example, it was revealed in 2000 that during the NATO bombing of Kosovo, “several officers from the US Army’s 4th Psychological Operations (PSYOPS) Group at Ft. Bragg worked in the news division at CNN’s Atlanta headquarters.” This same Army Psyop outfit had “planted stories in the U.S. media supporting the Reagan Administration’s Central America policies,” which was described by the Miami Herald as a “vast psychological warfare operation of the kind the military conducts to influence a population in enemy territory.” These Army PSYOP officers also worked at National Public Radio (NPR) at the same time. The US military has, in fact, had a strong relationship with CNN.

In 2008, it was reported that the Pentagon ran a major propaganda campaign by using retired Generals and former Pentagon officials to present a good picture of the administration’s war-time policies. The program started in the lead-up to the Iraq War in 2003 and continued into 2009. These officials, presented as “military analysts”, regurgitate government talking points and often sit on the boards of military contractors, thus having a vested interest in the subjects they are brought on to “analyze.”

In 2013, Public Accountability reported:

During the public debate around the question of whether to attack Syria, Stephen Hadley, former national security adviser to George W. Bush, made a series of high-profile media appearances. Hadley argued strenuously for military intervention in appearances on CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, and Bloomberg TV, and authored a Washington Post op-ed headlined “To stop Iran, Obama must enforce red lines with Assad.”

In each case, Hadley’s audience was not informed that he serves as a director of Raytheon, the weapons manufacturer that makes the Tomahawk cruise missiles that were widely cited as a weapon of choice in a potential strike against Syria. Hadley earns $128,500 in annual cash compensation from the company and chairs its public affairs committee. He also owns 11,477 shares of Raytheon stock, which traded at all-time highs during the Syria debate ($77.65 on August 23, making Hadley’s share’s worth $891,189). Despite this financial stake, Hadley was presented to his audience as an experienced, independent national security expert.

The major philanthropic foundations in the United States have often used their enormous wealth to co-opt voices of dissent and movements of resistance into channels that are safe for the powers that be. As McGeorge Bundy, former President of the Ford Foundation once said, “Everything the Foundation does is to make the world safe for Capitalism.”

Examples of this include philanthropies like the Rockefeller Foundation, Ford Foundation and the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation providing immense financial and organizational support to Non-Governmental Organizations. Furthermore, the alternative media are often funded by these same foundations, which has the effect of influencing the direction of coverage as well as the stifling of critical analysis.

I hope y'all know that just keeping an account in a tax- free jurisdiction does it make one a criminal. It's something some smart business people do. Some of the people on this list have genuinely earned their sweat and have chosen to be smart about their monies.

VulgarVulvas:


Arrogance always follows the prideful fool who confuses their blind support for a system or belief that they know next to nothing of.


Your very thought process and eventual conclusions have been opinionly crafted into you without you knowing it.


If anything can be used to describe you, is the fact that you are a highly ignorant of the workings of this world and the intriguing power play that occurs in the shadows.

It is a self-evident, undeniable fact that you do not have as much knowledge as the elite do. For example, advanced, secret military technology does in fact exist. So, there is indeed a knowledge gap between the elite and the masses. However, you cannot just arbitrarily assume that this knowledge gap is small--it is quite erroneous for you sheeple to make such an assumption.

In actuality, as all real truth seekers are already aware of, the knowledge gap between the elite and the masses is not small, but rather, is absurdly huge! So, rather than complaining about how "outrageous" my theories are, you should instead acknowledge the fact that there is a knowledge gap in the first place. Once you acknowledge the knowledge gap, you'll realize that it's not the information I present that's outrageous, but rather the huge knowledge gap itself that's outrageous. That is, there should not be a knowledge gap between the elite and the masses in the first place.

The elite have tricked you into thinking that you are in tune with reality (when in fact, you are actually very ignorant). So, since you foolishly thought that your intelligence was on par with the elite's intelligence, you never suspected that there was a huge knowledge gap.

Don't you get it? The elite want you to think that you are smart! The best slave is the slave who thinks he is free, and the greatest fool is the fool who thinks he is a wise man.

By you thinking that you are already "in the know," you will never, ever be able to grasp the truth. So, as for the belief system that you are still attempting to hold onto, you must let go of it right this minute! It is of the utmost importance that you realize you are ignorant; and remember, don't let your ego make you reject what I am saying.

[s]

VulgarVulvas:


Arrogance always follows the prideful fool who confuses their blind support for a system or belief that they know next to nothing of.


Your very thought process and eventual conclusions have been opinionly crafted into you without you knowing it.


If anything can be used to describe you, is the fact that you are a highly ignorant of the workings of this world and the intriguing power play that occurs in the shadows.

It is a self-evident, undeniable fact that you do not have as much knowledge as the elite do. For example, advanced, secret military technology does in fact exist. So, there is indeed a knowledge gap between the elite and the masses. However, you cannot just arbitrarily assume that this knowledge gap is small--it is quite erroneous for you sheeple to make such an assumption.

In actuality, as all real truth seekers are already aware of, the knowledge gap between the elite and the masses is not small, but rather, is absurdly huge! So, rather than complaining about how "outrageous" my theories are, you should instead acknowledge the fact that there is a knowledge gap in the first place. Once you acknowledge the knowledge gap, you'll realize that it's not the information I present that's outrageous, but rather the huge knowledge gap itself that's outrageous. That is, there should not be a knowledge gap between the elite and the masses in the first place.

The elite have tricked you into thinking that you are in tune with reality (when in fact, you are actually very ignorant). So, since you foolishly thought that your intelligence was on par with the elite's intelligence, you never suspected that there was a huge knowledge gap.

Don't you get it? The elite want you to think that you are smart! The best slave is the slave who thinks he is free, and the greatest fool is the fool who thinks he is a wise man.

By you thinking that you are already "in the know," you will never, ever be able to grasp the truth. So, as for the belief system that you are still attempting to hold onto, you must let go of it right this minute! It is of the utmost importance that you realize you are ignorant; and remember, don't let your ego make you reject what I am saying.

[/s][quote author=VulgarVulvas post=45340384]

Utter Nonsense in all ramifications.

Every sane NLer without bias,knows you lot are just noise makers,forever mumbling irrelevant posts and comments about the present government and effort to cause a productive effective turnaround this country of ours greatly deserve.

For your dislikes,I Personably dont give rat ass!!!.

However, every now then saner people need to point out who and where your type stand, Saboteurs and Irrelavants.
.. those without one ounce decency or patriotisms.

You are excused.

computer0810:
and that is d more reason why we shud take it seriously here,an average politician here is a thief and it's an opportunity to expose those who hav been sucking us dry,u can't still in america the way the steal here and get away,so u can't compare here with america when it comes to leadership but can compare with embezzlement,wise up bro

As I wrote on Monday, ever since I started reading about the Panama Papers “leak” something kept rubbing me the wrong way. From the absence of any well known, politically powerful Americans on the list, to the anonymous nature of “John Doe” as whistleblower and the clownish reporting from Soros and USAID affiliated organizations, the whole thing stunk from the start.

The first plausible theory I came across attempting to explain the strangeness of it all was proposed by Craig Murray, and it basically went something like this: The leaker is a real whistleblower, but he placed the information in the wrong hands, therefore the organizations and journalists reporting on the story were not giving us the whole truth. Here’s some of that theory from the post, Are Corporate Gatekeepers Protecting Western Elites from the Leaked Panama Papers?

[b]Whoever leaked the Mossack Fonseca papers appears motivated by a genuine desire to expose the system that enables the ultra wealthy to hide their massive stashes, often corruptly obtained and all involved in tax avoidance. These Panamanian lawyers hide the wealth of a significant proportion of the 1%, and the massive leak of their documents ought to be a wonderful thing.

The Suddeutsche Zeitung, which received the leak, gives a detailed explanation of the methodology the corporate media used to search the files. The main search they have done is for names associated with breaking UN sanctions regimes. The Guardian reports this too and helpfully lists those countries as Zimbabwe, North Korea, Russia and Syria. The filtering of this Mossack Fonseca information by the corporate media follows a direct western governmental agenda. There is no mention at all of use of Mossack Fonseca by massive western corporations or western billionaires – the main customers. And the Guardian is quick to reassure that “much of the leaked material will remain private.”

The corporate media – the Guardian and BBC in the UK – have exclusive access to the database which you and I cannot see. They are protecting themselves from even seeing western corporations’ sensitive information by only looking at those documents which are brought up by specific searches such as UN sanctions busters. Never forget the Guardian smashed its copies of the Snowden files on the instruction of MI6. [/b]

Initially, this seemed to be a theory worth exploring, but in the following days I’ve come to a far different conclusion. The primary divergence between what I currently believe and what Mr. Murray proposed is that I do not think the leaker was a genuine whistleblower motived by the public interest. I think the leaker was working on behalf of a sophisticated intelligence agency.

The fact that we seem to know nothing about “John Doe” concerns me. Say what you will about Edward Snowden, but he came out publicly shortly after his whistleblowing and offered himself up for the world to judge. His life, career and personality have been put on full display, and each and every one of us has had the opportunity to decide for ourselves whether his motivations were noble and pure or not.

With the Panama Papers’ “John Doe” we are given no such opportunity, and in fact, the whole thing reads very much like a script concocted by some big budget intelligence agency. Once I started coming around to this conclusion, the obvious choice was U.S. intelligence; given the lack of implications to powerful Americans, the clownishly desperate attempts to smear Putin, and the appearance of Soros, USAID, Ford Foundation, etc, linked organizations to the reporting.

So for someone who already thinks the whole Panama Papers story stinks to high heaven, a CIA link to the release seems obvious; but is it too obvious? Perhaps.

With the way they were painted one would have thought GEJ 's and Mama Peace's name will be number 1&2 respectively on that list.

donodion:
[s][/s]

E pain am.

I doubt if most peeps going on about this panama papers really understand what it's about,they just want to talk for talking sake.

DaBullIT:
https://panamapapers.icij.org/the_power_players/

stop being stewpyddd and read more , you'll see it's all over the world

I just wish i could ban moroons like you from every internet related comments or activites , you people are too duumb for reasoning , you don't know anything , but you claim to be the wisest

Don't be surprised bros. Nigerians are one of the most scripted people you can find. Once they are wired to believe something, it doesn't matter the evidence before them, they must go with thier belief. This is why when they hate you, even if you save them from death, they will still hate but when they love you, even if you rape their wife, they will find an excuse for u and keeping loving you.

TB Joshua

Saintp:


Don't be surprised bros. Nigerians are one of the most scripted people you can find. Once they are wired to believe something, it doesn't matter the evidence before them, they must go with thier belief. This is why when they hate you, even if you save them from death, they will still hate but when they love you, even if you rape their wife, they will find an excuse for u and keeping loving you.

You are describing your typical zombie self who wants to deny the obvious fact that they support blindly a sectional bigoted despot to lead them in the 21st century .


Why are you zombies such hypocrites?

Nobody is defending any one on that list. We are only warning you jealous lazy lynch mob of zombies to be wary of those behind the laks and their motives.


Don't be a slave

Help!!!!!
someone shld enlighten me abt this panama papers
Pls no abuse

i do not see any reason why we should crucify the individual private entrepreneurs whose name showed up on those lists, for GOD sake, they own their money and should be allowed to choose what ever they deem fit with it too!.But as for those senseless evil selfish bullies under the pay roll of the FGN, {either once upon a time or now},they should be allowed to face the wrath of the law in its entirety, their families should also follow suit.

So my Uncle steal money reach like this o ti daà"

Small time they would start preaching emà borukù je"



AWON OLÈ AWUN

Can some please link Wale Tinubu and Andy Uba to some people. It is getting interesting.

VulgarVulvas:


Buhari opened an account with the UK based Midland bank since 1975 where he deposited $4bn of NNPC money.


That Money is now part of zhara's trust fund and college fees.


Dey there dey yarn koworption.

Rily? Wow! Anytym folks like u bandy ds sort of hooey around, u try to make us feel like u just found water on mars!

Concrete Empirical & Verifiable Evidence Please? This is the part where u need to spew another layer of hogwash to buttress ur tomfoolery.

Son, the elections are over...wake up!

If there was somethin like this which only u and ur cotravellers know of, Fayose or FFK wd have used it during the last election.

You are not Fayose, FFK and not a card carryin member of any political party, so chill cos u r nt paid to troll!

VulgarVulvas:


You are describing your typical zombie self who wants to deny the obvious fact that they support blindly a sectional bigoted despot to lead them in the 21st century .


Why are you zombies such hypocrites?

Nobody is defending any one on that list. We are only warning you jealous lazy lynch mob of zombies to be wary of those behind the laks and their motives.


Don't be a slave

My friend go through my posts. I'm not part of these your zombie wailer nonsense you guys display on this forum. You guys should learn to be independent minded so that you can judge issues individually based on its own merit and not based on scripted mindset.
By labelling me a zombie even when you don't know what i stand for has unconfirmed" my assertion otherwise you should have analyzed the issue on its own merit instead of this carpet assumption.

Saintp:


My friend go through my posts. I'm not part of these your zombie wailer nonsense you guys display on this forum. You guys should learn to be independent minded so that you can judge issues individually based on its own merit and not based on scripted mindset.
By labelling me a zombie even when you don't know what i stand for has unconfirmed" my assertion otherwise you should have analyzed the issue on its own merit instead of this carpet assumption.

It is too early to disown Buhari .


Ode

ckmayoca:


Thought name checkers nigeria limited will be here but they seem busy.

They have no case to present. .bad market

\
Yoruba people sef

\

VulgarVulvas:

E pain am.

warrreva.

PiccoloBrunelli:
*sigh of relief*

Thank God my name didn't show. Been scared all day.

I read this shit in peter griffin's voice and almost pee'd myself

VulgarVulvas:
Why the Panama Papers must not be taken seriously

1. George Sorros is behind the leaks. If you don't know who George Sorros is then a simple google search will give you a picture perfect description of this international lobbyist and patron of the criminal Clinton family syndicate.

2. No single American is listed even though Americans account for the highest offshore depositors.

3. The files where compiled to slander world leaders and politicians not in good terms with Washington and the liberal democrats.

4. The files are not open source like wikileaks but have been circulated to major media outlets controlled by the world elites. This alon shows a sinister plot in the making where only prominent leaders and politicians who oppose liberal politics are exposed.

5. The whole file scandal is handled by corporate bodies and has in no way the similar hallmark of wikileaks. If corporate news media only reports what they want you to hear, how in God's name do you think they will remain objective and un-bias?

Olodo!!! Let those named come and clear their names. Once u did any illegal biz and you ar named, your time is up! God works in diverse ways!