THE LOSER

The two major party conventions, the three presidential debates, and various scandals large and small—all these features of the 2016 presidential general election have come and gone. Now the campaign draws to a close. And one outcome seems increasingly likely: Donald J. Trump will lose.

We put it that way because Trump—after his impressive and even unprecedented outsider victory in the Republican primaries—has done more to lose the general election than his opponent, Hillary Clinton, has done to win it. It's also prudent to note that with two weeks left in an unpredictable political year, we could be surprised. But if history is any guide, a candidate who has never been ahead in the general election campaign and now trails by about six points (if not more) in the polls—and who has a 60 percent or so unfavorable rating—will not prevail on November 8. On that evening, Donald Trump will stand before us as a loser.

Not that there's necessarily anything wrong with that. Winston Churchill taught his fellow citizens that we could only act so as to deserve victory. Leo Strauss remarked in a letter to National Review that "The argument which is concerned exclusively with calculations of success, and is based on blindness to the nobility of the effort, is vulgar." History is replete with undeserved losses and noble defeats.

Trump seems not to understand this elementary fact of the human condition. Perhaps for that reason, "loser" is one of his favorite epithets. And those of us who do not admire him will—let's be honest—enjoy bestowing this sobriquet on him. But of course we should remember, "let us judge not that we be not judged."

What we can and should judge are the intimations from Trump that he intends to be a sore loser, a very sore loser, a big league sore loser. That's no surprise. On the other hand, maybe it's all a head fake. Trump may be setting the bar low in order to get untoward credit for anything resembling a normal concession speech on the evening of November 8.

In either case, the republic will survive. It will do so with less damage if Republicans, especially those who are Trump supporters, repudiate ahead of time his lame excuses for losing, his invented claims of a rigged result, his willingness to break long-established norms of appropriate public behavior. There is one civic task Republicans can perform for our country in the final two weeks of this campaign: trying to ensure that Trump the loser stands alone, that his complaints fall on deaf ears, that his rabble-rousing fails to rouse the usual rabble.

But there is more that can be done in these next two weeks to help the country. Republicans still have some chance to hold the Senate and decent odds of holding the House. As Fred Barnes explained in this space last week, voting for the down-ticket Republicans would be a service not just to conservatism but to the country. The last thing America needs is President Hillary Clinton, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and Majority Leader Chuck Schumer riding roughshod for two years over free markets, individual liberties, and civil society.

The task of the next two weeks is simple: Save every salvageable Republican candidate for the Senate and the House from being dragged under by the dead weight of a sinking Trump. This means the national party and the candidates themselves have to stop being coy about what they expect the outcome of the presidential race to be. They need to make clear that Hillary Clinton is likely to be our next president. They need to paint as vivid a picture as they can of what it would mean for our society if she's complemented by a Democratic Congress, not checked and balanced by a Republican one.

The American people should be reasonably receptive to such a message. In the presidential elections since 1952, voters have returned a divided government to Washington more often than not. The case for doing so again should resonate strongly when the next president is viewed as unfavorably as Hillary Clinton is. A majority of Americans really did believe in hope and change in 2008 and were happy enough to give Barack Obama a Democratic Congress. A majority of Americans aren't thrilled at the prospect of President Hillary Clinton. For that matter, her slogan—"Stronger Together"—lends itself perfectly well to bipartisanship in Washington. Let her be stronger together with Speaker Paul Ryan and Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.


http://www.weeklystandard.com/the-loser/article/2004996

Trump never had a chance against the Clinton machine. Congrats to the first female President of the US. Hillary Rodham Clinton

O.k ooo

Make l go read am first...I dey come.

I did not know the. Presidential election scheduled for Nov 16 has been done in October

akpanbaba:
I did not know the. Presidential election scheduled for Nov 16 has been done in October

November 8. In US elections can be predicted based on scientific polls.

Osyabj:


November 8. In US elections can be predicted based on scientific polls.

Which useless scientific poll

Wait till Nov 8

And you will be shock

Hahahaha......the loser won........hahahaha