Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,209,548 members, 8,006,425 topics. Date: Tuesday, 19 November 2024 at 03:18 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" (15441 Views)
Women From The Tomb- Another Bible Contradiction! / Bible Contradiction In The Book Of Genesis / Christians How Would You Deny This Blatant Contradiction (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (Reply) (Go Down)
Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by felixomor: 10:25pm On Dec 25, 2016 |
The Bible does not contradict itself. Over the centuries past, Numerous Agnostic and even some atheist professors who have thoroughly studied the entire bible have on many occasions, come to that conclusion, even despite admitting they dont believe it. Although many came to later believe after a complete study of it. I would like to first define what a contradiction is according to the Oxford English dictionary; A combination of statements, ideas, or features which are opposed to one another: A good example will be thus: "John went to school " To contradict or oppose this statement, I will have to say; "John never went to school" In the light of the aforementioned definition; "John went to market" would not even by any means, be a contradiction to "John went to school" Why? You may ask. The answer is simple; John may have gone to both school and the market, but at different times. Both statements can be correct, and so will not be qualified to be regarded as opposed to each other. Hence not contradicting nor inconsistent with each other. Another example would be: 1. "John met a girl called Mary at school" 2. "John met many girls at school" These two statements coming from 2 different authors can be correct. How? The answer is simple; John could have met Mary at 8am and subsequently met Patricia, Rose, Bolanle and Rukky at 9am, 10am, 11am and12noon respectively. So it would obviously have been foolish to call both statements contradictions of each other, or to say both statements are not consistent with each other. It would have been a different scenario if the original statement was; "John met only Mary at school" In this case, "John met many girls at school" would be a contradiction. The word "only" would clearly be the changing factor. And Still on this example, It will even be more foolish to ask, "how many girls were at John's school?" Why is it foolish to ask so? The answer is easy too. The subject of the statements was not the total population of girls at John's school. The subject was rather based on the fact that John met girl/girls at school. A last example would be; "John said we could come" and "They said we could come" These 2 statements coming from 2 different authors are not by any means contradictions, neither are they inconsistent, as there are numerous possible ways both could happen and still be true as follows; 1. John could be the spokesman of "they" OR 2. John and "they" could have said so at different times. OR 3. John and "they" could have also said so at the same time in unison 4. And so on and so forth The only way I could have contradicted "John said we could come" Is to have said "John never said we could come".. Thats that for buttressing the explanation of what contradictions are. Coming Back to the bible and the issue of young internet users who claim to be atheists today, its quite unfortunate that many seem to throw around the word "contradiction" all in an attempt to discredit the bible for their personal fleshly gain. They usually use the internet for this by posting falsely titled articles that make them appear like well researched bible skeptic sholars. The Parts of the bible where they usually do this, are where different authors give accounts of the same biography or events. For example, the gospels, 1st and 2nd Kings, Chronicles, Samuel etc. I will, for the sake of this article, pick one from the popular ones they throw around. Luke 24:4-5 And it came to pass, as they were much perplexed thereabout, behold, two men stood by them in shining garments: 5. And as they were afraid, and bowed down their faces to the earth, they said unto them, Why seek ye the living among the dead? AND Mark 16:5-6 And entering into the sepulchre, they saw a young man sitting on the right side, clothed in a long white garment; and they were affrighted. 6.And he saith unto them, Be not affrighted: Ye seek Jesus of Nazareth, which was crucified: he is risen; he is not here: behold the place where they laid him. Firstly, Take note, Luke says what happened "as they were perplexed" Mark says what happened "as they entered" As we can see, Two different points in time Just take note. Secondly, also take note The subject topic of both scriptures is NOT the total population count of men or angel messengers that were inside the tomb. As a matter of fact, if you observe, carefully, none of those two parts of scriptures mentions the total number of angels that were at the tomb. The subject of both scriptures was what transpired at different points in time while the women entered and also while they were within the tomb. Just take note. But guess what These two portions of the bible are boldly and wrongly pointed as contradictions to each other on an anti-christian bible quiz website that was featured on one article written by Seun recently You can check it here: http://exchristian.net/3 To tell you the extent of their insincerity and utter dishonesty, They did it by asking the question " How many men were in Jesus' tomb when the women arrived?" A careful look at this question would show you that the subject of this question is based on the total population count seen by the women on arrival. Hence the phrase "How many men" Moreso, the quiz question also specified subject time; "on arrival" However and contrarily, none of those bible verses highlighted above had the subject of total population counts. And also, Mark was the only one who decribed in detail what happened as "they entered" which is synonymous with "on arrival" They intentionally used a question with a different subject and subject time to arrive at the conclusion that both portions of the bible contradicted each other. When in actual truth, their question (based on "arrival" was generated from a momentary description from Mark. They devilishly picked another momentary description for another point in time, from Luke and arrived at the false claim of "contradiction". Just As illustrated in our earlier example, "John met a girl at school" Vs. "John met many girls at school" Also, For clarity sake, no portion of the bible talks about the total number of angels that were at the tomb. Unfortunately, This is not the only portion of the bible they have dishonestly represented as contradiction before. They have done so on many other verses, as I said before. For example, the bible never mentioned the number of wise men who came to present gifts to baby Jesus. But what we find commonly today even among Christians is "three wise men". This is Wrong! Another example; the bible never mentions the age of the earth despite the fact that many people go around saying the bible says the earth is 6000 years old Thank God for bible explanation websites today that can easily be found using search engines like google. As a result, These verses can now easily be researched. A good one is www.biblestudytools.com Such websites are free for everyone to use. And most importantly, thank God for the Holy Spirit Who reveals these things to us. Whenever a sincere truth-seeking person is in doubts, he should pray for understanding and the Holy Ghost would open his eyes to understand God's word. You could also search bible verse explanations on google and youtube. There are many other free resources online. Bible explanation is not meant for only theologians and seminarians. It is sad that many of these young folks who have not read the bible completely before, fall for this "bible contradiction" gimmick and begin to call themselves atheists. When u Ask them "why?" they would scream "bible contradiction". The "bible contradiction" gimmick is a plot by the devil directed towards young people of today, to discourage them from approaching what he fears the most, which is the Sword of the Word of God. He makes them to Forget what the term "contradiction" means in the first place. Giving them a false sense of protection for their sins. As a result, they never get to ask God for forgiveness. The devil also makes them forget the fact that being skeptic doesnt necessarily make you an atheist. My prayer is that, may the Lord Open their eyes to the truth and deliver them from this grand deception. Amen. cc kingebukasblog, felixomor, anas09, shadeyinka, Gombs, Goodmuyis, promise10, pigdin2, lacklicklabendin, naijadeyhia, 4everGod, damogul 14 Likes 6 Shares
|
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by jonbellion(m): 10:30pm On Dec 25, 2016 |
Why did you now mention yourself Is Christmas beer doing you 13 Likes 2 Shares |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by CoolUsername: 11:00pm On Dec 25, 2016 |
jonbellion: There's something not quite right about the guy. 9 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by hahn(m): 11:27pm On Dec 25, 2016 |
After mentioning yourself finish Tell us what your score is on http://exchristian.net/3/ I am really curious 4 Likes |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by 4kings: 11:47pm On Dec 25, 2016 |
Oga Felixomor , I was expecting you to address all "contradictions", on that site. Can you? |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by felixomor: 11:56pm On Dec 25, 2016 |
4kings: One on the front page is already addressed. I wanted to avoid writing a long thread. There are hundreds of other such biblical misconceptions. One thread is not enough. But the formula on this thread will easily resolve such. Thanks for your time. 1 Like |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by 4kings: 12:11am On Dec 26, 2016 |
felixomor:9 or 5 more should not be stressful na. At least I learnt something from the first one. |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by felixomor: 12:12am On Dec 26, 2016 |
4kings: I guess i will have to open another thread for that. |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by 4kings: 12:20am On Dec 26, 2016 |
felixomor:OK. But is a new thread necessary |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by felixomor: 12:23am On Dec 26, 2016 |
4kings:Yes. I want to keep this one easy to read. 2 Likes |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by Caveatemptor(m): 1:13am On Dec 26, 2016 |
There is no point of this thread if you can not address the twenty contradictions on Seun's thread. The contradictions in first and second Samuel and the contradictions in first and second Kings are just too numerous and glaring to be wished away. 3 Likes |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by 4kings: 1:25am On Dec 26, 2016 |
Caveatemptor:He said he will open another thread for that. Just chill |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by Ferruccio(m): 2:07am On Dec 26, 2016 |
Well, that was enlightening, Felixomor. 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by Caveatemptor(m): 2:40am On Dec 26, 2016 |
4kings: Okay o |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by oluwalfa: 2:49am On Dec 26, 2016 |
this supposed word of god, na headache o 2 Likes |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by felixomor: 5:03am On Dec 26, 2016 |
Caveatemptor: Sorry Oga. There are no "contradictions" there. Unless u want to say, u never read this article. Check the oxford dictionary meaning of "contradictions". No time for arguments. 1 Like |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by felixomor: 5:42am On Dec 26, 2016 |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by datyrone(m): 7:03am On Dec 26, 2016 |
I like this....bring it on felixomor 2 Likes |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by Nobody: 7:31am On Dec 26, 2016 |
Always seeking a way out... If it was to be scientific errors, the story would ve been entirely different, but since its biblical stuff, there are no contradictions but biblical misinterpretations by the people(readers) and atheists.... Christians sha 9 Likes |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by felixomor: 8:32am On Dec 26, 2016 |
adepeter26: That is why i took the pain to define "contradiction" from the oxford english dictionary. Cheers. Seasons greetings... |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by Caveatemptor(m): 8:33am On Dec 26, 2016 |
felixomor: Goggle should be your best friend at all times pal. |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by felixomor: 8:37am On Dec 26, 2016 |
Caveatemptor: Google is not dictionary. English existed before google came. Cheers 3 Likes 2 Shares |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by Caveatemptor(m): 9:01am On Dec 26, 2016 |
felixomor: WTF? Guy I give up on you.... 2 Likes |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by felixomor: 9:02am On Dec 26, 2016 |
Caveatemptor: Of course kids tend to give up on schooling. Hence the need for correction. I understand. Cheers 7 Likes 2 Shares |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by Edenoscar(m): 9:17am On Dec 26, 2016 |
jonbellion:seriously that guy could be typing from a mental institution, dude doesnt even recongnize himself 3 Likes |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by felixomor: 9:46am On Dec 26, 2016 |
Edenoscar: *Yawns* |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by Nobody: 10:10am On Dec 26, 2016 |
Question: when Jesus rode into Jerusalem, was he riding on one donkey or two? Matthew 21: 71 They brought the donkey and the colt, laid their clothes on them, and set him on them. Mark 11:7 Then they brought the colt to Jesus and threw their clothes on it, and he sat on it. |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by felixomor: 10:13am On Dec 26, 2016 |
NinjaX: Another crisply perfect example This just shows u didnt read the article. |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by Nobody: 10:55am On Dec 26, 2016 |
felixomor: Couldn't bother. Articles like this have been written before. There's nothing new under the sun. |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by felixomor: 11:04am On Dec 26, 2016 |
NinjaX: Shame is dead.... 4 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by Nobody: 11:09am On Dec 26, 2016 |
felixomor:Indeed. |
Re: Bible "Contradiction" For Dummies: A Correction For Internet "Atheists" by DoctorAlien(m): 7:01pm On Dec 31, 2016 |
felixomor:This cracked me up. LOL 6 Likes 3 Shares |
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (Reply)
TB Joshua Ministries Deny 2Go Death Prophecy Rumour / Tithe, Vow, And Seed Sowing. Which Is Most Effective In Drawing God's Blessings? / Emmanuel Collins: Pastor Busted For Faking Accident, Says Hackers Did It
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 53 |