taurus25:

I simply do not know if such being exist or not. hence i refuse to assume one does.

taurus25:


Honestly, his question is meaningless. How can you explicitly say something is illogically without any arguments to state why, and then ask people to counter your assertions?

KingEbukasBlog:


How then are you going to know ? Or how would you come to the realization that such being exists ?

KingEbukasBlog:
strawman , I see you bro

taurus25:

used to introduce god into the picture due to lack of incomplete human understanding.

JideAmuGiaka:


Any question that's hard for the atheists to comprehend is always meaningless to them why?.

KingEbukasBlog:


How then are you going to know ? Or how would you come to the realization that such being exists ?

Strawman:


Why, hello there!


Interesting thread. Popped by to read responses

KingEbukasBlog:


I posted this not too long ago :

The first atheists in history opposed the existence of God because they thought the universe has always been . They even ignorantly declared this . Like the charvaka school of philosophy in India believed that everything that exists is composed of fire , water , air and earth . Those guys after Diagoras of Melos promoted atheism .

There were people like Bertrand Russell posited that

The universe needs no explanation; it is “just there, and that's all

But we see superior evidence in Science confuting such egregiously ignorant statement that the universe came into being approx 14 billion years ago

The atheists through out history from the inception of atheism 2500 years have been arguing for the existence of an eternal universe and all have failed in the face of evidence .

---

Don't you think atheists are doing the exact same thing you accuse theists of ?

taurus25:


It is abosulutely not necessary for me to find out if such a being exists, it has not and would not bear any significance to my life. Im only concerned with tracing the roots of my existence in the most logical means possible.

KingEbukasBlog:
Dalaman , your chance to finally prove that atheism is not illogical is here

Ranchhoddas:
It's too early for goal-post shifting. The thread is about the illogicality of atheism. He has explained his position, show that it's illogical or go to bed.

dalaman:


I do not believe that any God exist. You defined God but failed to show how such a being exist. What can be asserted without evidence needs to be dismissed without evidence as well.

KingEbukasBlog:


That means you need evidence right ? What kind of evidence are you talking about here ?

taurus25:

lol, you now argue for the big bang?.........interesting

A non-eternal universe on its own is by no means an argument for a creator.

KingEbukasBlog:


There is no goal shifting here . He is to prove that atheism is not illogical not me .

Pay attention to the title of thread or go to bed

dalaman:


Direct evidence. What is the evidence that the sun exist? What about the wind? What about other planets? I need direct evidence to show that God/Gods exist.

Pointing to the existence of other things as existence of God is just a copout. People don't point to plants as evidence for the existence of the sun. The point to the sun it self. Why is God hidden? In religious stories we hear God coming to interact with me in various ways directly. I need direct5evidence not arguments based on ignorance which is what all the theist augments amounts to.

felixomor:


Wind exist.
Can u see it?

dalaman:


Who mentioned sight. There is direct evidence for the wind.

dalaman:


Direct evidence. What is the evidence that the sun exist? What about the wind? What about other planets? I need direct evidence to show that God/Gods exist.

Pointing to the existence of other things as existence of God is just a copout. People don't point to plants as evidence for the existence of the sun. The point to the sun it self. Why is God hidden? In religious stories we hear God coming to interact with me in various ways directly. I need direct5evidence not arguments based on ignorance which is what all the theist augments amounts to.

Incidentally Plants are a proof that the Sun exists as without the Sun there would be no Photosynthesis which plants need to generate food and live. So when you see Plants thriving you know they have enjoyed abundant sunlight. So the Plants affirm to the existence of the Sun

4everGod:



Incidentally Plants are a proof that the Sun exists as without the Sun there would be no Photosynthesis which plants need to generate food and live. So when you see Plants thriving you know they have enjoyed abundant sunlight. So the Plants affirm to the existence of the Sun

4everGod:



Incidentally Plants are a proof that the Sun exists as without the Sun there would be no Photosynthesis which plants need to generate food and live. So when you see Plants thriving you know they have enjoyed abundant sunlight. So the Plants affirm to the existence of the Sun

dalaman:


Direct evidence. What is the evidence that the sun exist? What about the wind? What about other planets? I need direct evidence to show that God/Gods exist.

Pointing to the existence of other things as existence of God is just a copout. People don't point to plants as evidence for the existence of the sun. The point to the sun it self. Why is God hidden? In religious stories we hear God coming to interact with me in various ways directly. I need direct5evidence not arguments based on ignorance which is what all the theist augments amounts to.

felixomor:


Try to always answer directly, can u see wind?

dalaman:


The sun affirms to the existence of the sun. You have no point.

dalaman:


The sun affirms to the existence of the sun. You have no point.

KingEbukasBlog:


Dalaman

If life on earth should be obliterated , how can we tell that intelligent life existed on earth ?

dalaman:


You are making things up and running commentary on them. Who.mentioned sight any where? I said direct evidence. There is direct evidence for the wind.

4everGod:


million dollar question right here