Aphrygian:
you better leave the guy, the guy does not no that the s400 is a liability when it comes to detecting and firing at low flying objects which the tomawhack missiles are. Thats why usa didnt use jets to deliver the missiles because that area is covered by the s400.

seunny4lif:

Even US said there was no S400 around that base bro
The Generals said it too and Russia was info about the strike more than 2 hours earlier.
You can move 10 fighters jets in a matter of mins.

seunny4lif:

Even US said there was no S400 around that base bro
The Generals said it too and Russia was info about the strike more than 2 hours earlier.
You can move 10 fighters jets in a matter of mins.

Aphrygian:
However, President Trump gave the Russians advanced notice of the attack before the 1,450kg missiles struck the air strip.
Russia deployed the advanced air defence systems after a Turkish F-16 shot down a Russian Sukhoi-24 bomber in November 2015 after it encroached Turkish airspace.
Following last night's devastating attack, Russian politicians claimed their service personnel were being kept save by the S-400 and the older S-300 air defence systems.
Viktor Ozerov of the Russian upper house defence and security committee told Sputnik: 'Regardless of today's US attack on the Syrian air force air base, our air base [in Latakia] and logistics centre in Tartus are secured from the sea and from the air by S-300 and S-400 systems.
The Russian Defence Ministry claimed it may improve protection of Syrian airbases following the attacks.
According to The Aviationist , the Tomahawks flew straight through the 'Missile Engagement Zone' covered by Putin's 11,000mph Growler missiles.
Syrian sources suggested only some 30 of the Tomahawks failed to hit their targets, but the US insists all the weapons were successful.
Russian military sources claim their advanced air defence systems can protect against incoming missiles and aircraft - including stealth jets - however, they have not been tested against US equipment.
Andrei Kortunov, director of the Russian International Affairs Council told the Interfax News Agency: 'The risks of a direct military confrontation of Russia and the U.S. have risen significantly. Whether or not it could lead to WW III depends on how responsible the leaders are.'this is from daily mail. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4391656/Why-didn-t-Putin-s-Growlers-intercept-Trump-s-Tomahawks.html

Aphrygian:
oga dis is a big fat lie. They were informed yels i agree but why was russia fuming and spitting out brimstone. That area is at the range of the s400,even russians were questioning the potency of the triumf after the attack

vantage001:

Really?
So if the US fires 100 Nukes and 73 goes through, you will still call that a super system?
Have you checked the success rate of the iron dome?

Aphrygian:
you better leave the guy, the guy does not no that the s400 is a liability when it comes to detecting and firing at low flying objects which the tomawhack missiles are. Thats why usa didnt use jets to deliver the missiles because that area is covered by the s400.

Aphrygian:
However, President Trump gave the Russians advanced notice of the attack before the 1,450kg missiles struck the air strip.
Russia deployed the advanced air defence systems after a Turkish F-16 shot down a Russian Sukhoi-24 bomber in November 2015 after it encroached Turkish airspace.
Following last night's devastating attack, Russian politicians claimed their service personnel were being kept save by the S-400 and the older S-300 air defence systems.
Viktor Ozerov of the Russian upper house defence and security committee told Sputnik: 'Regardless of today's US attack on the Syrian air force air base, our air base [in Latakia] and logistics centre in Tartus are secured from the sea and from the air by S-300 and S-400 systems.
The Russian Defence Ministry claimed it may improve protection of Syrian airbases following the attacks.
According to The Aviationist , the Tomahawks flew straight through the 'Missile Engagement Zone' covered by Putin's 11,000mph Growler missiles.
Syrian sources suggested only some 30 of the Tomahawks failed to hit their targets, but the US insists all the weapons were successful.
Russian military sources claim their advanced air defence systems can protect against incoming missiles and aircraft - including stealth jets - however, they have not been tested against US equipment.
Andrei Kortunov, director of the Russian International Affairs Council told the Interfax News Agency: 'The risks of a direct military confrontation of Russia and the U.S. have risen significantly. Whether or not it could lead to WW III depends on how responsible the leaders are.'this is from daily mail.

scully95:

Another Ode talk, this is why i dont like talking to kids on here. The Russian s-300 and s-400 systems while they do have anti cruise missile capability, are not made specifically for that. What is made specifically for firing down cruise missile flying at low orbit is S-300Vm and there was no report of any missile being fired from it. While U.S also has this a specific system design t also intercept Cruise missiles. Comparing Iron dome to s-300Vm ? Are you insane ? Iron Dome that is only shooting down hamas Rockets.. Unguided Rockets, is this one ok at all ? Just like firing stone, and shooting it down. You know where it will land.


S-300VM built to shoot down Cruise missile can detect and shoot Tomawhack down but that would escalate the war more in Syria ok. Russia in Syria as it is now is not there to escalate it's there to kill the Terrorist the west is also trying to kill (So when they change it, cos that tomawhack provocation will also meet the right one the same way Turkey met the right answer after shooting down SU-24. Now let me answer the next copy and paste from you.






Yes, this is actually true in BOLD above (Rest fake news as usual from the Propaganda west at large). Let me explain to you what that means. It simply means Russia in the event of further provocation from the west, it will transfer more powerful Anti-Air defense system to Syria. The same way Russia Used Turkey shooting down SU-24 as the reason to arm Russian forces in Syria with all the defense systems you have in Syria now protecting Russian forces for now.. When SU-24 was being shut down, there was no S-400 and SU-35 armed with Air to Air missile in Syria until Turkey decided to up the War.. In the History of SU-35, it has never been shut down. Just to tell you, Turkey will never dare SU-34 with its outdated F-15/F-16


Now the same thing Russia is suggesting is, they will now start arming Syria with those Anti-missile systems if U.S want to continue. It just makes super sense since U.S(its illegal and uninvited coalition of 76 countries) is not fighting Russia directly in Syria but fighting Assad. Now it will also make super sense and at the right time for the same Russia to say. We will be transfer these missiles to Syria to protect itself but Russians wont be firing those missiles. Ok (That would mean Russia started 3rd world war ok.)

Same way, vise versa.. If Russian fired a missile and U.S decided to shoot it down, it would mean the same thing and the start of real 3rd world war. So get this simple terrain of war kid and grow up already.

scully95:


Let him continue giving his vassals hope to see the pope.. This is what they know how to do best, he should remember Russia already changed its military doctrine long ago to attack NATO.. it now puts NATO as its direct foreign threat to Russia.

Ikio:
maybe u don't knw U.S/WEST WAR TECH ARE THE BEST EXPECIALLY IN SHOOTING DOWN MISSILES, even thaad are far better than russian s-400, arrow-2 and 3 u.s helped israel to build it.SM-6,SM-3 ARE D BEST IN D WORLD are too good Electronic warfare .u.s don't test missiles alot again they just have 2 types of ICBM.

akinszz:
as it stands now Russia is number 1 in terms of electronic warfare... their jamming device is the best in the world. America may take over probably 10 years to this time or less. Russia invest heavily on defensive equipment while America invest on fighter jets and carriers which are obsolete in todays warfare. America is afraid to start a war with Russia, because Russia will outsmart them with out firing a single shot.........
I'm not a pro Russia or anti America, I say this base on what I read and comments from American and Russian military generals.

illitrate:



That is to say you Base your fact on propaganda.

scully95:

S-400 is the only missile
What is THAAD range ? 200km ? (Another trick the bully always use to sell junk, they will tell you it's classified lol, mad people)
Meanwhile lets check the existing ones and how it has managed to shoot down anything.. Pariot is actually not patriotic one bit. It could not shoot down outdated soviet built Squad missiles. The one fired recently from Yemeni was unable to intercept it. Even though the saudi wahabist and

Ikio:
SM-3 and sm-6 are the best set defense system in the world and thaad is better than s-400 why ur s-400 Didn't Actually Shootdown Anything. Patriot missile, Arrow-2, Iron dome all did. SM-6 can sink ships. u mention range when ur s-200 couldn't shootdown f-16 arrow 2 had a score a point even israel make better Defense system than them.Russia is just good at making tanks, antitanks, and ICBM.Patriot is old and still one of the best in the world i thought it destroyed a syria su-34,UAV, and yemen missiles ?

scully95:


Just grow up please. I have no time really.. In which war did sm- whatever shut down/intercepted anything ? Patriot destroy SU-34.. lol Now i know you are kid forming your own propaganda. Get lost jooo. Ode

scully95:


Just grow up please. I have no time really.. In which war did sm- whatever shut down/intercepted anything ? Patriot destroy SU-34.. lol Now i know you are kid forming your own propaganda. Get lost jooo. Ode

Ikio:
some people are naturally stupid.

scully95:


Im still looking for a name to give you. You are just too dense. You need rehabilitation, you should register for handicap social security pls. Or apply for Buhari 5k per month for a start. Ode Osi. Patriot shut down SU-34. Mufu

Ikio:
i don't think you can see wat u ar look 4 wif that brain.
u actually confirmed 3 things to me.
*One u ar worst than an idiot.
*two u agreed patriot missiles are one of the best if not d best in the world.
*three you don't read.
I won't answer you anymore i would advice you to go back and read.so daht why u always think junk.

scully95:


Just grow up please. I have no time really.. In which war did sm- whatever shut down/intercepted anything ? Patriot destroy SU-34.. lol Now i know you are kid forming your own propaganda. Get lost jooo. Ode

Ikio:
I was just wondering about ur stupidity then i started reading your comments and i can i just say pls pray to your God. so google didn't told u u.s patriot is the best in the world, it have shotdown an advanced SU,UAV,ICBMs,advanced western jet, maybe u should go learn history from who teaches.wat i am say u said Russia made defense systems are better than u.s/western made maybe u should go read the fall of saddam,gaddafi,israel-egyt war,israel-syria state of conflict.U are so stupid u don't knw russia millitary suffered set-back doing the collapse of soviet union. Russia are the best in nukes not even anti-tanks U.S makes the best maybe u should go read HELL-FIRES, e.t.c antitanks missiles.

seunny4lif:

Really
Gadaffi war bro I witnessed that one.
Do you know how NATO loss jets during the beginning of the war before declaring no flying Zone
No need to ague with you cos person no dey win internet argument

Ikio:
I also know he told is creator about how e died.U.S have done terrible things and evil one 2. but in all wars U.S/western made tech because superior, while soviet made one where just good.

seunny4lif:

Really
Ok ooooh
I no get power to ague with you .
USSR weapons are just good
Nothing person no dey hear from Nairaland

Ikio:
I was just wondering about ur stupidity then i started reading your comments and i can i just say pls pray to your God. so google didn't told u u.s patriot is the best in the world, it have shotdown an advanced SU,UAV,ICBMs,advanced western jet, maybe u should go learn history from who teaches.wat i am say u said Russia made defense systems are better than u.s/western made maybe u should go read the fall of saddam,gaddafi,israel-egyt war,israel-syria state of conflict.U are so stupid u don't knw russia millitary suffered set-back doing the collapse of soviet union. Russia are the best in nukes not even anti-tanks U.S makes the best maybe u should go read HELL-FIRES, e.t.c antitanks missiles.

scully95:


Get lost joo ode osi.. grow up first.. Hellfire ko hellhole ni. Mumu osi.... T-90 in Syria is deflecting TOW.. Thereby redering over billions spent on the useless thing waste.. Make ur foolish warlord go test Hellhole missiles or even Javelin in Syria nah.. See hw it will also render it useless.. Bad business. Ode that knows nothing... WHich war is this mufu saying ? I no get ur time ok. Isreali that could not defeat ordinary Hezbolar forces in Lebanon this one is talking here.. Another ode is talking abt Gaddafi and Saddam.. Lol.. U re too foolish.. Russia has come out now to say enough is enough... Any time in history Russia did that.. It always come out in flying colours and will stop at nothing this time.. Ode..

Mind you Russia is in the fight in Syria.. Russians were not in Libya or Iraq.. Last time Russia was in the fight Georgia 2008 ?? Ww2 ?

I wont reply u again...Just grow up 1st.