DeadRat:
hahahaha. Thats Why I Have To Run Soon Before They Pour their acidic Furstration on Me

I stopped taking them serious the day a thread titled "Are You In A Relationship" was opened sometime this year and I realized that most of these romance land ladies that form Arnold Schwarzenegger are actually not in relationships.. Roflwkmd

MhisTahrah:
I'm so shocked I'm speechless.I am seriously trying not to yab you.Don't provoke me any further.I'll let this pass.

DeadRat:
Honey! Its God Who Made Things So when He Told The Woman That Her Husband Would Rule over Her

tosyne2much:
Kindly take this thread to the family section and you will be astonished with the responses you will get from matured and happily married women

You can only get responses like this from heart broken ladies. In fact, most of them have been mayweathered by fcck boys .. LMAO

pocohantas:


I am used to the narrow mindedness of most Nigerians. Yours isn't surprising either...

And your aggrandizement when submissiveness and faithfulness are being discussed doesn't surprise me too

MhisTahrah:
Look it up in the dictionary.Absolutely not,'cept if she is submissive to a dictator who tells her not to work.The one who dominates her body,soul and mind.The one who is always taking decisions for her.Her master.

tosyne2much:
And your aggrandizement when submissiveness and faithfulness are being discussed doesn't surprise me too

DeadRat:
hahahaha. Thats Why I Have To Run Soon Before They Pour their acidic Furstration on Me

DeadRat:
carry Your Furstration to God... Let Him Pour Water On Your Head... The Curse He Placed Will Never Stop Manifestin Till World ends... Go And Yab him For Cursing Eve not Me abeg

tosyne2much:
I stopped taking them serious the day a thread titled "Are You In A Relationship" was opened sometime this year and I realized that most of these romance land ladies that form Arnold Schwarzenegger are actually not in relationships.. Roflwkmd

tosyne2much:
I stopped taking them serious the day a thread titled "Are You In A Relationship" was opened sometime this year and I realized that most of these romance land ladies that form Arnold Schwarzenegger are actually not in relationships.. Roflwkmd

MhisTahrah:
Arrrgh!He's one helluva Sexist God.

pocohantas:


I don't think there is any post I have been against submissiveness.

The narrow mindedness of my way or no other way is what's limiting the reasoning of the average man.

How does aggrandisement fit into this discourse?

Your aggrandizement of anger and disagreement perfectly fit into this discourage. Each time a woman is caught in the act of cheating and castigated, you're always looking for way to embellish such an act by saying men are not in any way different

MhisTahrah:
Arrrgh!He's one helluva Sexist God.

tosyne2much:
You can see one of them attacking me for expecting loyalty and faithfulness from a woman. Is that surprising?

I give up on them jawe

DeadRat:
hahahaha. Them Use Style De Advertise Themselves Make You Notice Them. You Know Say You Be Commissioner Of Women Affairs. .

tosyne2much:
Your aggrandizement of anger and disagreement perfectly fit into this discourage. Each time a woman is caught in the act of cheating and castigated, you're always looking for way to embellish such an act by saying men are not in any way different

shaybebaby:

Yeah but they aren't appointed because of the presence or absence of a swinging pendulum between their legs.

They are their because they have earnt the right to lead. They have proven their mettle, that they are up to the task.

So tell me, how does having a pair of balls equate to a measure of effective leadership?

DeadRat:
seriously that Was Not Necessary. Why Are You So Pained. Since You Have Chosen To Be A Feminist then... Carry Go

shaybebaby:

Yeah but they aren't appointed because of the presence or absence of a swinging pendulum between their legs.

They are their because they have earnt the right to lead. They have proven their mettle, that they are up to the task.

So tell me, how does having a pair of balls equate to a measure of effective leadership?

pocohantas:


aggrandizement of anger and disagreement? that's a new one!!! Shall we check up the meaning of that word?

You're mistaking me for someone else obviously. Any proof of the coloured?

pocohantas:


aggrandizement of anger and disagreement? that's a new one!!! Shall we check up the meaning of that word?

You're mistaking me for someone else obviously. Any proof of the coloured?

Lemme ease you the stress of checking up the meaning of that word

Aggrandizement: to make great or greater, to increase or elevate

Back to the issue, I know you more than you think dear. I usually stumble on your comments very well even though I'm not following you

DeadRat:
no Be English Language Class Be This... Stop Feminism Today! Free Yourself From illogical Mentality

2buffagain:


If you don't trust him to LEAD you then why did you accept his proposal?
You don't accept a job as vice president if you don't trust the president to be an effective leader in his own capacity.

Because that is what marriage is.
You are agreeing to be LED by the man. This comes with respect.
If you have no respect for the man, you cannot love him the way he is meant to be loved.

tosyne2much:
Lemme ease you the stress of checking up the meaning of that word

Aggrandizement: to make great or greater, to increase or elevate

Back to the issue, I know you more than you think dear. I usually stumble on your comments very well even though I'm not following you

shaybebaby:

Respect is earned and it goes both ways.
Relationships- Partner work in tandem, it is not an advert for whom to lead the woman. More like a joining of forces.

Even in the workplace that you guys are fond of using as illustration, the modern organisation is leaning towards a flatter organisational structure with more decentralisation-why?

It is more efficient letting people play to their strengths and make make decisions without having to report to a figure of authority. People's output are measured against predetermined organisational objectives.

Anyways, are you lot even capable of leading amongst your fellow men?

I'd say the answer is No!

pocohantas:


That's what you all always say, I ask for evidence and they start semantics. There is never an evidence of me supporting or downplaying female infidelity . I'm used to the no evidence... there would never be one.

Stick to words you know. You're fond of using unnecessary big words.

I will quote you each time I stumble on some of your old posts

Okay, I will be careful with choice of words

pocohantas:


We need men that can argue logically, not men whose only resort is calling you a feminist when they have nothing else to say. Anyone whose defence is what some holy book says, if far from having a logical mentality.

supersystemsnig:



Hey, what's up


This question has always been on my mind for a very long time...

Mind sharing some tips...

How's the knight?


Personally, i feel men should be trusted to take the leadership mantle, he earns the trust with time, and the wifey works with him trusting his leadership qualities...I used to assume this way the order


Leadership should not imply sexual prowess, but the collective ability of the male and his abilities which should have been measured and trusted int he relationship by the female, and this should be reciprocated by willful submission to this will, trusting that even if he makes a mistake, it'snot because he's flimsy, but he must have tried all his best but fail short for some reason...


This is how i see leadership in relationships...Share your thoughts ma

shaybebaby:

Well, I may hand over the reins sometimes over decisions affecting my life when I have had a chance to observe how you handle your OWN shït.

You guys keep getting it wrong, it's not about leadership, it's about playing to your individual strengths to achieve outcomes favourable to your partnership. It means that roles in the relationship are fluid depending on what needs to be achieved at any given time.

supersystemsnig:




A loose partnership, where roles can be switched, and either partner can take the lead, without competition, both parties striving for the overall performance and productivity of the team

The overall focus is the productivity and output of the team...This will require partners on seemingly equal cognitive levels... In this current world, if this is the case, where does one find an equally intelligent partner? Too many people are stuck on average and mediocrity....

It's a gloom picture

shaybebaby:

Respect is earned and it goes both ways.
Relationships- Partner work in tandem, it is not an advert for whom to lead the woman. More like a joining of forces.

Even in the workplace that you guys are fond of using as illustration, the modern organisation is leaning towards a flatter organisational structure with more decentralisation-why?

It is more efficient letting people play to their strengths and make make decisions without having to report to a figure of authority. People's output are measured against predetermined organisational objectives.

Anyways, are you lot even capable of leading amongst your fellow men?

I'd say the answer is No!