Ikillfools:
So true. I agree wholeheartedly. but what do you call a person who goes swimming in crocodile infested water?

it's the same with women who dress scantily, like why attract predators to yourself when you know you're not physically/mentally fit to wade them off.

Sagamite:


This is a prevalent issue taking place in the UK, where stupid c*nt SJWs and Liberals are bastardising the meaning of "harassment" to suit their nonsense anti-men (misandry) activities as usual.

These morons have turned putting a hand on a woman you know's knees as "sexual harassment", but of course if she puts a hand on your knee it is not. Moronic bastards!

Here is the hierarchy of how it should work in the law for your benefit:

1) Rape - The act of non-consensually putting your sex organ in (or on) the 3 sexual orifices (mouth, anus and pussssssy) of someone else.

2) Sexual Assault - The act of non-consensually touching the sex organs and primary attraction tools of someone else.

3) Sexual Harassment - The repeated act of unwanted sexual proposition after the intended target has clearly expresses their lack of interest/annoynace, worse still, if there is a threat of consequences if they don't acquiesce.

4) Inappropriate behaviour - The act of (i) non-consensually touching someone sexually (in parts that are not their sex organs or attraction tools) repeatly, (ii) exposing ones self to another person who you have no prior consensual intimacy with or (iii) talking sexually to a person who is not interested, and who you have no prior consensual intimacy with, in a PROFESSIONAL setting.

5) Unwanted advances - The act of attempting to (i) woo someone by approaching them verbally, (ii) woo someone by touching them non-aggressively in a non-sexual organ part of their anatomy ONCE or (iii) sexually propositioning them until the point they express firm lack of interest/annoyance

No 1 to 3 should be criminal offences.

For No 4, the naked bit (4ii) should be a light criminal offence while the other 2 should be a caution at best if needed.

No 5 is not a criminal offence and part of life everyone should get used to, otherwise they are free to commit suicide.

Both men and women should be guilty of all if they occur. Not only men as some c*nts would want it to be.

Daeylar:
Nice Simple things they don't know or claim not to know. Some comments can be really troubling.

Tozara:


I hope the animals controlled by their crocodile brain listen.

Ikillfools:


I still believe it's left for females to prove there's more to them than just boobs, ass, hips and the likes. most male react to what they see in females. if it's not her facial features, then it's her body feature, that's the way I see it.

DaddyKross:


Blessed be thy brain, sire.

MhisTahrah:
Wife not sex object. Sex is not a right that comes with marriage.It is not a wife's duty.

...She can't open her legs simply because her husband wants it. She doesn't give up her right to say yes or no the day she gets married.

...Wives do not belong to their husbands.Sex should be based on consent.

...However wives should under no circumstances withold sex from their husbands except there is a genuine reason for this.And even when she does,you have no right to rape her.

MhisTahrah:
Wife not sex object.Sex is not a right that comes with marriage.It is not a wife's duty.

...She can't open her legs simply because her husband wants it. She doesn't give up her right to say yes or no the day she gets married.

...Wives do not belong to their husbands.Sex should be based on consent.

...However wives should under no circumstances withold sex from their husbands except there is a genuine reason for this.And even when she does,you have no right to rape her.

chic2pimp:

FCu...k Me .. Saga Saga The Fuku faka Love machine. Is that really you?

Sagamite:


Yes o, my bruv.

It is really me with Sango, Ogun, Yemoja and Obatala watching over me and 1000 babes behind me waiting for my pure fuku faka fuku faka German-machine looooooooooooove making.

Mynd44:

Yes but is consent drawn by coercion really consent?

Jupxter:

Tushe. You've spoken well. On point

Afritop:
[s]Women are the greatest rapist.
A catwalking woman that dresses in a sexually destructive manner in a see through dress and denge pose in front a sexually frustrated mad man and thinks nothing will happen is a rapist[/s]

Sagamite:


It is, as long as you are NOT threatened with physical harm/restraint or threatened that someone you care about would be armed HENCE you still have the free will to say no.

That said, coercion that involves threat of non-physical negative consequences (that are not rape) should still be punishable under the law.

chic2pimp:


Hahaha Mateeeee longest time man. Where have you been? This forum has sorely missed your intellectual slaughterings of fuc..k.tards, Cretins and Products of Nigeria's failed Education system.

raumdeuter:


You this man. Where have you been

Ok on this, if a girl needs money and the guy told her he would only give after sex, is that coercion and is it punishable?

If a man threatens to breakup with his babe if he doesn't get sex, is that coercion and should it be punishable

TSOM:

True. Except she sexually objectifies herself like a lot of females do now on and off Nairaland - dressing deliberately provokingly and uploading pictures to focus on their butts and boobs - I guess she hasn't given passive consent or invitations to be treated as a plaything.

If you dress like a whöre, you forfeited the right to be treated like a duchess. She can't claim sexual harassment but rape is a not an option.

raumdeuter:


You this man. Where have you been

Ok on this, if a girl needs money and the guy told her he would only give after sex, is that coercion and is it punishable?

If a man threatens to breakup with his babe if he doesn't get sex, is that coercion and should it be punishable

Daeylar:
Tozara, how do you see the topic?

Sagamite:


No, it is not coercion except she is entitled to what she is asking for under the laws and constitution.

What you described in there are barter. She is free to give and take OR waka pass.

Sagamite:


I almost forgot. This motherfucker is DayoKanu.

How na?

ouigy99:
[s]@OP, based on what you have stated.... Girls are the ones most guilty of the act. You woo a girl, after some weeks of dating and it's time to have sex, that's when she remembers she hasn't paid her school fees, he needs to make her hair, her mother is sick, the following week is her birthday, her phone got spoilt the previous night; as guy man her Don stand and all him brain Don focus on "drilling the well" in front of him, he has no other option than to promise to take care of those things for her, else she will say "I am not in the mood again", leaving the guy blue balled[/s]

raumdeuter:


Ok good.

If this was a job in my company or a role in my movie or a favor I can grant

And I decide to ask for sex in return for granting those

Is this coercion and is it punishable

Daeylar:
I will never accept victim blaming in any way or form

A woman's dressing will never ever be an excuse for rape.

Instead of trying to create a society where people know, men know, that no matter how a woman dresses the thought of sexually harrasing her is not acceptable not to talk about carrying it out, we would rather tell women to cover up, to protect herself from predators??
Tacitly passing a message that if you dress in a certain way, you are inviting rape, tacitly telling rapists that they have an excuse, never ever acceptable,

Kids are raped, Muslim women covered head to toe are raped, well dressed women are raped, as we have seen countless times the problem is not the clothes,
So that dress well bullshīt is DOA.

The problem is the animals that are raping people, our solution should bother on how to get rid of the animals, and maybe teach the younger generation better values so that they know, no matter what was worn, rape is never acceptable, not to start attacking victims

Victim blaming culture is wrong.

raumdeuter:


I dey o. how's jennykadry
All the babes left me here. Even that amala guzzling ori eja called ifyalways go waka pass and do as if she no sabi me

Sagamite:


Yes.

It is in the category of my "Inappropriate Behaviour" in a professional setting.

It is similar to discrimination and should be fine-able.

kay29000:
It is a very complicated topic. Let me share my experience. I went to see a girl... It was already set in our minds that we were going to have sex. So, when I got there, we started off immediately. After a few seconds, she asked me to stop and begged me to leave. I was vexed, and I left. She called me on the phone and apologized, saying she was doing something like that for the first time, and felt somehow. But she then said I should have tried to maybe play with her/smooch her a little, maybe she would have gotten in the mood.

So, a few days later, she called again. And I specifically told her I ain't down for bullshiit. Hope you are sure this is what you want this time? She said yes. So, I went to her apartment again. She always turns the light off before I enter. She was already naked when I entered, and I started off with the position she said was her favorite (doggy), and then, after two minutes she asks me to stop again. So I remembered what she told me on the phone, and I slowed down and tried to smooch her boobs, that's how the girl said, "I'll shout rape o! I told you to stop." I jejeli stopped, wore my clothes, left her house and told her via a message I didn't want to have anything to do with her again.

Women are really complicated.

Ikillfools:

I once made a sexual overture to a reverend sister and she blushed. now this is someone who wasn't dressed scantily, though her boobs, curves and hips hug and cloth very well, it made my imagination come alive with lewd thoughts...

raumdeuter:


Wait so how's the girl wants my money scenario different from girl wants my job, wants my movie role.

Wants accommodation and I told her I can accommodate if she gives me sex. Naturally she wouldn't have done any of these but because of her limited options she grudgingly makes the choice