Pataricatering:

Coercion is rape ! If the consent was obtained by blackmail , violence etc then that means there was no consent , therefore it’s rape .

Nonsense!

Sagamite:


Yep. Eastern European girls love their Naija men, not even just black. Naija!

Arab girls, if you are into up the arse, then they are there because they have to be virgins at marriage. The only other option is target the ones that are divorced.

Naija chics, I don't take their BS. If I find one beginning to get rude, I rapidly put her in her place and sideline her. I am known for that on NL. I can even see on this thread earlier names of some that have faced such. I don't take prisoners.

Lol @ I don't take prisoners. I'll imbibe yet another character of yours. Nice one. Yes @ arab girls have to be virgins at marriage or risk getting stoned to death from the report i got.

God help me,Eastern Europe here i come, Wait Cyrus, Wait Greece, Wait for me Ukraine, i dey come, wait for papii

Sagamite:


Maybe not. But what were the questions for?

the question is unraveling a shameless attempt at ridiculing men without calling women who seek to exploit the sexual vulnerability of men.

• before a woman finds herself visiting a man at odd hours, she should be open to the possibility of...

• a woman yielding to the sexual overtures of her boss has put her pay above her pussy. Both are to share in the blame.

• A woman who accepts being taken out on dates and receiving gifts from a man without thinking sexual demands would be made must be from Saturn.

Always remember if the door isn’t locked , it isn’t theft.

Mariinee:
This is bullshit, please. Absolute bullshit. If you wanna get naked and not be raped, then do that in the presence of an eunuch or something.

Get unclad in the presence of a full-blooded male with all the right hormones pumping in his body and see if you won't be slept with without consent.

I think there should be a legal punishment for females who choose to sexually arouse and seduce men on purpose.

Rape threads have brought enough bad lucks this year. So,i'll leave it to you guys. Whatever goes, my biz associates are seeing this,so i'll pass

happney65:


How?Before i employ her i will tell her the terms and conditions,either she accepts it or she leaves..She is not yet my employee so your analysis of taking me to court does not hold water..The company is mine,and our agreement from the word go is sex included..If she wants,she accepts,if not she can go..You have no case at all..

Na wa o, see person mind

shaybebaby:

Should a naked male too expect to be raped as well by your warped logic?

I was expecting this.

As we all know, women rarely get aroused by sight but men do. So, if you already know that a man is prone to acting irrational when he sights a naked body, why tempt him with the naked body in the first place?

Jupxter:



Rape threads have brought enough bad lucks this year. So,i'll leave it to you guys. Whatever goes, my biz associates are seeing this,so i'll pass

Hahahahaha.

Mariinee:
This is bullshit, please. Absolute bullshit. If you wanna get naked and not be raped, then do that in the presence of an eunuch or something.

Get unclad in the presence of a full-blooded male with all the right hormones pumping in his body and see if you won't be slept with without consent.

I think there should be a legal punishment for females who choose to sexually arouse and seduce men on purpose.

I’m with you in this.

Dumb females and effeminate males will never accept men are very very sexually vulnerable

And yet we wonder why there’s a law forbidding indecent exposure.

Mariinee:
Actually, as a sane female, if you think it is okay to be unclad in the presence of the opposite sex without anything happening, you are misguided.
If you already know how a male would react when he sees a female body unclad, why get naked in his presence?
Unless you have an unattractive and wobbly body or maybe the male has a very high degree of self control, my dear, you will be raped and nothing shall happen.

If a woman is naked in front of him, he is perfectly free to try his luck (otherwise he is a slowpoke and needs to come to my Masterclasses) but once she firmly says "No" repeatedly, he needs to stop and leave her alone.

God knows I have been called at 2am in the middle of the night to come over by a girl with her knowing me and what I want. She lives alone, we are lying there stark naked after pre-intimacy and she still said "No" except I commit. SHE CALLED ME O! (Witch!)

I had to leave it. Even found out later from our conversation that she is a NL girl, but I didn't catch her username and she does not know mine.

Sagamite:


I no dey waste time.

https://www.nairaland.com/1083598/knowing-nairalanders-better-interviews/1#12945175

Haha...I like your profile. Very suave and smart.

WrathOfHadez:
the question is unraveling a shameless attempt at ridiculing men without calling women who seek to exploit the sexual vulnerability of men.

• before a woman finds herself visiting a man at odd hours, she should be open to the possibility of...

• a woman yielding to the sexual overtures of her boss has put her pay above her pussy. Both are to share in the blame.

• A woman who accepts being taken out on dates and receiving gifts from a man without thinking sexual demands would be made must be from Saturn.

Always remember if the door isn’t locked , it isn’t theft.

No! If the door is not locked and you enter and take what is not yours IT IS THEFT!

Abi what village are you from who have such counter moronic laws.

As for females exploiting the sexual vulnerability of men, that is true. You have a point there. That is the main food of feminists and I hate them with a passion.

You just have to ignore them, don't bow to them, stand up to them and never apologise for liking sex with women and many of them.

DON'T BE THE slowpoke CALLED A "REAL MAN"!

Be you and look out for your self-interest, not a woman. Don't follow that stupid real man mantra of coming to the world to please or serve a woman.

Read my old posts on these issues.

Sagamite:


If a woman is naked in front of him, he is perfectly free to try his luck (otherwise he is a slowpoke and needs to come to my Masterclasses) but once she firmly says "No" repeatedly, he needs to stop and leave her alone.

God knows I have been called at 2am in the middle of the night to come over by a girl with her knowing me and what I want. She lives alone, we are lying there stark naked after pre-intimacy and she still said "No" except I commit. SHE CALLED ME O! (Witch!)

I had to leave it. Even found out later from our conversation that she is a NL girl, but I didn't catch her username and she does not know mine.

I agree with you on this but for NO to bring back a man, it has to be that the man has some level of self-control. Some men can't control their lust, you know? Glad to know you are one of the few who can.

Mariinee:
I was expecting this.

As we all know, women rarely get aroused by sight but men do. So, if you already know that a man is prone to acting irrational when he sights a naked body, why tempt him with the naked body in the first place?

But that's not true is it? Because like our male counterparts, we have five senses with which to make sense of our world and sight is part of that. Appreciating a fine male form, a big diick(if that's your thing), well toned muscles, full lips etc all these, we judge and respond to by sight.

I disagree with your assertation that men lose all their wits at the sight of naked women. Not so I'm afraid, and a bit demeaning to ascribe that to the male gender-like they are some sort of primitive being with no control over their baser instincts.

If what you say is true, we wouldn't have nudist beach/colonies where both sexes hang out unclad and without fear of assault from each other.

What is a given in your little corner of the world is not representative of the world at large.

WrathOfHadez:


I’m with you in this.

Dumb females and effeminate males will never accept men are very very sexually vulnerable

And yet we wonder why there’s a law forbidding indecent exposure.

Exactly, Lezz. That's what I am about. Women know that men are sexually vulnerable and so, they seek to exploit the vulnerability. Yet, they play the victim card when it goes sour.

Mariinee:
Haha...I like your profile. Very suave and smart.

I was born with a super brain, darling.

VERDA:


Yes she should be free to wear what ever she wants but she should be wise too,you can wear a bikini in a pool or beach but can't in a rough street with criminal elements,it is just common sense.

Do you also have a list of what you wear, Do you also apply this common sense and not wear body hugs, shorts or even go bare chested for fear of getting raped

Mariinee:

I agree with you on this but for NO to bring back a man, it has to be that the man has some level of self-control. Some men can't control their lust, you know? Glad to know you are one of the few who can.

I am always fair and objective, so I have self control.

I don't want to go to jail or harm anybody while I have fun. And it is not fun when the other person is not a willing participant or even a participant.

I will catch my fun somewhere else on another day.

Sagamite:


No! If the door is not locked and you enter and take what is not yours IT IS THEFT!

Abi what village are you from who have such counter moronic laws.

I meant this in its contextual application not its legal import.

“ if the door isn’t locked, it isn’t theft”. If the pissy isn’t closed and the girl didn’t set a lock , or barricade it against a waiting , erect , forthcoming dick, it isn’t rape.

No force, no braking , no duress.

Hope you ain’t too fast to let a missile go!!!

The dumb op called mynd44 isn’t even aware a lot of ladies say no when they mean yes.

Some of considerable number ladies want sex to be forced on them subtlety, to be subdued and conquered.

That’s how they enjoy it.

shaybebaby:

But that's not true is it? Because like our male counterparts, we have five senses with which to make sense of our world and sight is part of that. Appreciating a fine male form, a big diick(if that's your thing), well toned muscles, full lips etc all these, we judge and respond to by sight.

I disagree with your assertation that men lose all their wits at the sight of naked women. Not so I'm afraid, and a bit demeaning to ascribe that to the male gender-like they are some sort of primitive being with no control over their baser instincts.

If what you say is true, we wouldn't have nudist beach/colonies where both sexes hang out unclad and without fear of assault from each other.

What is a given in your little corner of the world is not representative of the world at large.

Actually, it is true. Men are more vulnerable sexually than women. An average man would react to the sight of a big boobs in ecstasy while an average woman will react to the sight of a big dick in horror or irritation(albeit feigned).

Why is it easier for a woman to tempt a man with her body than for a man to tempt a woman with his body? For women, sex is secondary and for men, it is primary.
I didn't say men lose all their wits when they sight a naked woman but it's no secret that they lose parts of their wits, maybe temporarily.

About the nudist beach and colonies, I suppose they have rules and regulations guiding them so why would anyone want to go against those rules?

Mariinee:
Actually, as a sane female, if you think it is okay to be unclad in the presence of the opposite sex without anything happening, you are misguided.
If you already know how a male would react when he sees a female body unclad, why get naked in his presence?
Unless you have an unattractive and wobbly body or maybe the male has a very high degree of self control, my dear, you will be raped and nothing shall happen.

So much stupidity in one post. It took me out.


Just Too damn much.
Just imagine her last line, a human being made this comment . And you think you can say what a sane or a guided human being will do when you're not sane.


How? Did I ever say go nakêd in the presence of males? Can you point out where I said that? And even if so damn what?



That statement is saying that what a woman wears is never an excuse to be raped. If it were this point bolded wouldn't be true.

"Kids are raped, Muslim women covered head to toe are raped, well dressed women are raped, as we have seen countless times the problem is not the clothes,
So that dress well bullshīt is DOA."


And Even if she is naked in the man's presence she does not deserve to be raped.




You are just doing the exact same thing he is doing.

Refusal or inability to read and comprehend or just the decision to be obtuse.



Only that your last line makes it worse.
What kind of madness is that at your last line?

A human being will be raped and cannot do anything about it? You are sick. Yet you think you can say what a sane human being can and cannot do.

Imagine a human being who pretends to be "sane" and "guided" justifying rape and ends with there is nothing a victim can do.

You are disgusting.

shaybebaby:

But that's not true is it? Because like our male counterparts, we have five senses with which to make sense of our world and sight is part of that. Appreciating a fine male form, a big diick(if that's your thing), well toned muscles, full lips etc all these, we judge and respond to by sight.

I disagree with your assertation that men lose all their wits at the sight of naked women. Not so I'm afraid, and a bit demeaning to ascribe that to the male gender-like they are some sort of primitive being with no control over their baser instincts.

If what you say is true, we wouldn't have nudist beach/colonies where both sexes hang out unclad and without fear of assault from each other.

What is a given in your little corner of the world is not representative of the world at large.

Her argument is very true.

Men are more visual than women when selecting a mate.

And men have more strength. Hence the fact they can physically overcome a woman when visually sexually aroused is why men rape far more than women.

The man has to have principles, values and a conscience to make sure they don't do such. Strong law enforcement is also a complementary deterrent.

Sagamite:


I was born with a super brain, darling.

I am inclined to agree with you.

I have never caught your scent on NL but you are obviously an oldie. You don't visit romanceland, do you?

Mariinee:
Exactly, Lezz. That's what I am about. Women know that men are sexually vulnerable and so, they seek to exploit the vulnerability. Yet, they play the victim card when it goes sour.

Babe, men have never felt mentally and sexually brutalized than in this era of skin-hugging leggings.

Women have somehow made us so sex-fixated to the point of unconscious body checkout and Yansh evaluation.

Daeylar:



So much stupidity in one post. It took me out.


Just Too damn much.
Just imagine her last line, a human being made this comment . And you think you can say what a sane or a guided human being will do when you're not sane.


How? Did I ever say go nakêd in the presence of males? Can you point out where I said that? And even if so damn what?



That statement is saying that what a woman wears is never an excuse to be raped. If it were this point bolded wouldn't be true.

"Kids are raped, Muslim women covered head to toe are raped, well dressed women are raped, as we have seen countless times the problem is not the clothes,
So that dress well bullshīt is DOA."


And Even if she is naked in the man's presence she does not deserve to be raped.




You are just doing the exact same thing he is doing.

Refusal or inability to read and comprehend or just the decision to be obtuse.



Only that your last line makes it worse.
What kind of madness is that at your last line?

A human being will be raped and cannot do anything about it? You are sick. Yet you think you can say what a sane human being can and cannot do.

Imagine a human being who pretends to be "sane" and "guided" justifying rape and ends with there is nothing a victim can do.

You are disgusting.

I hate it when people get offensive in an argument.

You clearly said that a woman shouldn't be raped even if she goes unclad in the presence of a full-blooded male and that was what my argument was meant to counter.

You seem like the disgusting one here.

Mariinee:
Actually, as a sane female, if you think it is okay to be unclad in the presence of the opposite sex without anything happening, you are misguided.
If you already know how a male would react when he sees a female body unclad, why get naked in his presence?
Unless you have an unattractive and wobbly body or maybe the male has a very high degree of self control, my dear, you will be raped and nothing shall happen.

WrathOfHadez:
I meant this in its contextual application not its legal import.

“ if the door isn’t locked, it isn’t theft”. If the pissy isn’t closed and the girl didn’t set a lock , or barricade it against a waiting , erect , forthcoming dick, it isn’t rape.

No force, no braking , no duress.

Hope you ain’t too fast to let a missile go!!!

The dumb op called mynd44 isn’t even aware a lot of ladies say no when they mean yes.

Some of sick ladies want sex to be force on yh subtlety, to be subdued and conquered.

That’s how they enjoy it.

Mate, pusssy is always open. I don't know of any that has padlock mechanism. Maybe you watch to much Star Trek.

The fact pusssy is open is not an excuse to take. The only excuse to take is when she gives consent verbally or physically. Anything else is rape (theft in your terminology).

If she says "No" seriously/firmly AND/OR recoils in fear/disgust/rejection, then it is not consent.

If you subdue or conquer a girl because you think that is what she wants and while she is doing the above, and later she says she was raped, mate, you should be thrown in jail.

You take the risk, you suffer the consequences.

WrathOfHadez:
Babe, men Jane never felt mentally and sexually brutalized than in this era of skin-hugging leggings.

Women have somehow made us so sex-fixated to the point of unconscious body checkout and Yansh evaluation.

I don't want to imagine how it feels to be a man

Some people are so blinded by misandry that they won't see this point though. To be fair, men face far more problems than women do when it comes to sex and its likes.

Sagamite:


Her argument is very true.

Men are more visual than women when selecting a mate.

And men have more strength. Hence the fact they can physically overcome when visually sexually aroused is why men rape far more than women.

The man has to have principles, values and a conscience to make sure they don't do such. Strong law enforcement is also a complementary deterrent.

I did not dispute men being visual but in addition, I am saying women are the same as well (I love me a nice male butt and it is a turn on).

We are civilised now and a big part of that is controlling our primal urges. Ever had road rage? Where you want to Fvcking smash someone's head in? I bet you have, so do many people. But control is the word here. Will there be provocation? In whatever form, visual, verbal etc? Yup.

But because we are no longer cave dwellers, hunter gatherers driven primarily by instinct to survive (that includes procreation), we have evolved (both male and female) to tame those instincts.

We live in the age of reason now, and reason dictates there is simply no valid excuse not even, "you know men get aroused visually". Yes we know you do, but anyone who can't control themselves, it's on them. Their failure.

tosyne2much:
This one you objectified every man as a potential rapist ehn

I disagree strongly with the guy o

Mariinee:
I am inclined to agree with you.

I have never caught your scent on NL but you are obviously an oldie. You don't visit romanceland, do you?

Not for the last 3 years and I have been off for 2 years.

MhisTahrah:

I am very open-minded and realistic. Is there something you disagree with?