dammyloye:
coming

dammyloye:
coming, this is not an exam....it's an argument, normally I would drop points but what ever I say to you will be null because you are a religionist.
you also can't show proof of a God's existence

KingEbukasBlog:
There are two challenges that have to be overcome before you can win 100,000 naira . Christmas day is around the corner and with the rate of increase in the prices of consumer goods , 100k to spare isn't a bad idea .

The rules are simple , the challenges may be simple or difficult (totally depends on your intellect ) . Here they are :

1. Provide one good argument ,reason or evidence that precludes the existence of God i.e your argument , reason or evidence makes it impossible for God to exist .

2. Refute my new definition of atheism here

Note that :

* The definition of God here is the separate conscious eternal entity that transcends the universe.

* Each overcome challenge nets you 50k naira (on the first 24 hours ).

* This runs for 120 hours ( ends on exactly 2:52 on December 23. 2017)

* At the end of every 24 hours , 10,000 naira will be deducted on each challenge . Eg

After 24 hours , challenge 1 and 2 will be 40k each
After 48 hours , challenge 1 and 2 will be 30k each
.
.
.
Between 96th and 120th hour , challenge 1 and 2 will be 10k each

Rules

1. You MUST take on the first challenge and succeed before moving onto the second . I have to concede that I can't refute your argument , reason or evidence in the first challenge

2. If you succeed in overcoming the first challenge you may not take on the second challenge .

3. Any argument that has been refuted before on this forum SHOULD NOT be mentioned . It is utterly gratuitous to reiterate debunked arguments .

4. Your argument , reason , evidence should well presented , sound and cogent .

5. If you are interested in participating , please begin with 'challenge accepted' and then proceed with your argument .

Goodluck !

** Questions to elucidate on what to note or the rules can be asked for clarity .

butterflyl1on:
-

KingEbukasBlog:


Tangible rewards like money can destroy creativity ; so if money is the source of motivation for them to participate, we could be seeing pretty poor arguments.

hopefulLandlord:
New level of attention seeking

butterflyl1on:


You wicked o. Choi.

Do not expect any one of them to come anywhere near this thread unless they wish to drink arsenic out of frustration. Not a single one of them can take on this challenge with any shred of hope of winning.

The only dummy I know who is dumb enough to attempt this is Jackbizzle aka dumbbizzle

But meanwhile you for try dash your boy like some of that cash up there for this Christmas na. *cough* cough*

Tozara:
Lol. I believe you to be intellectually penurious and materially destitute, so giving the prize to the winner of this challenge would be a CHALLENGE even for you. Because:

1. You do not have the intellectual muscles to perceive rationality, even when it's leading a band before you and performing the music of reason. So, how can you know whether someone has crushed your challenges or not?

2. I don't think you can afford the prize for crushing your arguments that are as weak and watery as your *****, so this is nothing but an avenue for entertaining yourself because you're bored.

CONCLUSION: Gerrarahere, Ebuka. And go and preach the Gospel to the gullible.

KingEbukasBlog:


Chai ... Sir. . you way be boss . mbanu !

butterflyl1on:


You no see Mr Bean face for the meme? E look serious to you?

blastac:
Atheist can only come to a Christian post, shout and make noise but won't do the same in a Muslim thread why??

donnffd:
This is like saying you would give 1million dollars to anyone who can tell you the color of air...

Tozara:
Lol. I believe you to be intellectually penurious and materially destitute, so giving the prize to the winner of this challenge would be a CHALLENGE even for you. Because:

1. You do not have the intellectual muscles to perceive rationality, even when it's leading a band before you and performing the music of reason. So, how can you know whether someone has crushed your challenges or not?

2. I don't think you can afford the prize for crushing your arguments that are as weak and watery as your *****, so this is nothing but an avenue for entertaining yourself because you're bored.

CONCLUSION: Gerrarahere, Ebuka. And go and preach the Gospel to the gullible.

budaatum:
Oh, thanks. I responded before reading yours, hence what I would call double posts on my part.

hakeem4:
Kingebukasblog Hahaha you’re saying atheists should disprove god . Anyhow ... I’m just here to have fun sha

1) why god doesn’t exist

A) people speak for god

B) god is old school :- during the days of Moses they were not technologically inclined so they had other ways of communicating with each other e.g the writing on rocks, and god used their technology to communicate with them. Why can’t he communicate with our generation using email

C) the Bible/ Qur’an is a mythical book inspired by the almighty god which there are a lot of scientific errors. How will the all wise, omniscient god make mistake?

D) cause I said he doesn’t exist :- if you ask a theist why god exist they’d gladly give you an excuse saying “ because I believe he exist ” and I’m also telling I believe he doesn’t exist

budaatum:
KEB, It's been pretty quiet since your post on 23 November. Careful observers would have noticed the true Christians (as opposed to deists like you) have held sway since that day, with even the most militant atheists having to be silent while God reigned. Welcome back.

So, to your challenge, I would take it up under certain conditions.

1. Who would be the judges? It can't be you as you have not shown the ability to comprehend positions that stand opposed to yours.

Lets sort that out and I'll take up your challenge.

obinna58:
You shouldn't have presented it with cash cos it seems useless, besides you're the judge and destroying the arguments also means destroying some parts your beliefs, how can you possibly accept defeat

hakeem4:
Kingebukasblog Hahaha you’re saying atheists should disprove god . Anyhow ... I’m just here to have fun sha

E) no evidence to prove god

F) there are different gods with different ways they operate

KingEbukasBlog:


I have read so many books ; I'm cognizant of many theological/ philosophical positions on God's existence and nature , religions and religious principles and beliefs ; I have argued with so many atheists in four years ; I have knowledge of many arguments on God's existence for/against ; I have developed my own definition of atheism and theism ; I'll be fine homie

obinna58:

Wow I never knew you posses such power, trust me dude there are many more intelligent people as well, people who can destroy your so called IQ without you knowing
You just need share an open mind and see from others perspectives, you think you do but you so wrong

KingEbukasBlog:


Honestly , because of how incredibly shallow and naively constructed these arguments are , I could give you the 100k to buy sense .