google1:
Mkhitaryan (2018):"It’s a dream come true because I’ve always dreamed of playing for Arsenal"; Mkhitaryan (2016):“A dream comes true. I always wanted to play for Manchester United"; Mkhitaryan (2013): "It was always my dream to play for Dortmund"

A man can have many dreams, just saying

Lana1:
Ok. So it was United that caused Pep to use his first team in a competition u claimed was a mickey mouse competition.....ok!!

Guardiola thought they were a tough team when they beat Man utd, not knowing that Man Utd sef na otu team

elrony:

Shalom

peace unto you brother.

May our enemies be as confused as this in 2018!!

Bibidear:

the way manutd announced sanchez's arrival was out of this world.......it can only be MANCHESTER UNITED........i feel sorry for other teams......they are just jealous of the most successful club in england

The unveiling was surreal..

raumdeuter:


Guardiola thought they were a tough team when they beat Man utd, not knowing that Man Utd sef na otu team

Ok!

Ederson(24), Stones(23), Mendy(23), Laporte(23),
Zinchenko(21), Fred(24), Sane(22), Sterling(23),
Jesus(20), Bernardo(23), Diaz(18), Foden(17).Pep
is taking all the world's top talents and assembling
them into a cohesive unit. He's building a dynasty.

Man City average squad age will be 25. something after toure and Kompany feck off after this season.

Oasis no training pictures

Ederson(24), Stones(23), Mendy(23), Laporte(23),
Zinchenko(21), Fred(24), Sane(22), Sterling(23),
Jesus(20), Bernardo(23), Diaz(18), Foden(17).Pep
is taking all the world's top talents and assembling
them into a cohesive unit. He's building a dynasty.

No wonder he is able to get the results he is getting now. He can't do this without the top talents at his disposal. He is nothing without these top talents. Cheque book manager, makes us wonder hmmm...

Lmfao

eph12:

No wonder he is able to get the results he is getting now. He can't do this without the top talents at his disposal. He is nothing without these top talents. Cheque book manager, makes us wonder hmmm...

Mourinho doesnt get talents, Its not like Mourinho has Lukaku and Sanchez 2 of the top goal scorers in the league last year plus Pogba a FIFPro team of the year, or Mata a former CL winner or Alexis a 2 time Copa America winner

Mourinho just picks homeless people on the streets and make them lay football thats why he is 12 points behind

eph12:

No wonder he is able to get the results he is getting now. He can't do this without the top talents at his disposal. He is nothing without these top talents. Cheque book manager, makes us wonder hmmm...

keep on wondering while we keep on winning trophies and building a team. .....noisy neighbours.

65million for a fecking defender. So Man City want to spend 100million this January Jesus. Where Man City Money dey come from self.

raumdeuter:


Mourinho doesnt get talents, Its not like Mourinho has Lukaku and Sanchez 2 of the top goal scorers in the league last year plus Pogba a FIFPro team of the year, or Mata a former CL winner or Alexis a 2 time Copa America winner

Mourinho just picks homeless people on the streets and make them lay football thats why he is 12 points behind

You had to mention the same player twice so they look plenty abi?

Which team does not win trophy olodo2018?

eph12:

You had to mention the same player twice so they look plenty abi?

lol you de mind am. very soon we go hear. David the best EPL GK.. De the Spanish no 1 goalkeeper and Gea the highest paid keeper.

MrLouisVanGaal:

The unveiling was surreal..

mr van gaal,u still dey our club

Is it your money? We are the richest club in the world .We are not broke like Man United.

CapitalCee:


lol you de mind am. very soon we go hear. David the best EPL GK.. De the Spanish no 1 goalkeeper and Gea the highest paid keeper.

I just weak for dayo

Bibidear:

mr van gaal,u still dey our club

I still dey oo.. Your club is the biggest i have ever managed

You are not broke and ordinary 500k per week is giving you nightmares

MrLouisVanGaal:
I still dey oo.. Your club is the biggest i have ever managed

chop knuckles

In two and a half years, City have gone from

Hart ➡️ Ederson

Zabaleta ➡️ Walker

Demichelis ➡️ Stones

Mangala ➡️ Laporte

Kolarov ➡️ Mendy

Toure ➡️ De Bruyne
Fernandinho

Silva

Milner ➡️ Sterling

Navas ➡️ Sane

Agüero


That’s how you upgrade a team

MrLouisVanGaal:

I still dey oo.. Your club is the biggest i have ever managed

Let's pretend like van gaal didn't manage Barca and Bayern Munich. You try.

sinizia:


No offence intended, but the emboldened is an avalanche of bullshît. Better still, it's aptly described as apples and oranges. Makes no goddamn sense.

1. Watford have never spent the kind of huge money the likes of Shitty, United, Chelshit, Barcelona and other top clubs have spent in this modern transfer window in their entire history. Apples and oranges.

2. Watford are ambitious, but there own ambitions is survival in the EPL and having a good run generally in cup competitions or league. Any other achievements like winning the FA Cup, Caraboa Cup or qualifying for European competition is a bonus and a lucky achievement for them, so sacking managers is means of survival not to win major trophies. But when top clubs sack mangers, it's usually for them not making the UCL or winning trophies. Apples and oranges.

3. When Man Shitty sacked Pellegrini, they got Pep. Who did Watford get? When Man Shitty hired Pep, they did with the future dream of winning UCL, league titles and having the success Pep brought to Bayern, Barca. Which success or targets will Watford demand from the average coach that replaced Silva? Apples and oranges.

4. Watford after sacking the coach before Silva was appointed, how much did they spend, and what are the quality of players they bought? When Man City appointed Mancini, below is what a website had to write about their ambitions, and onslaught in the transfer window. Check out the players they got and how much they spent.



Man City's spending and the players they bought showed the higher ambitions of that club; Man City sack managers to aim higher, Watford sack theirs to escape relegation. Once again, apples and oranges.

5. Finally, the most funny one - You've the chutzpah to list Tevez, Mascherano and Lavezzi in your argument. First of all, the Chinese league just like the American league snap up mostly expired or waning TOP players who's past their prime (the young ones are usually average players or poor low tier ones) because theirs are still a growing league and need the influx of popular players to put their league on the map. They're not yet established. When LA Galaxy signed Beckham, they knew he's finished, or at least they signed him coz of his A-list status. He was signed to bring American league to the limelight. Beckham spent his prime at United and Madrid. It's same for Xavi and his Qatar quest. So if I find it funny that you're mentioning mercenaries and expired products like Mascherano, Lavezzi and Tevez who have their best years behind them. Who next will you mention? The Oscars, Anichebes and Ighalos of this world?

Chinese clubs owners are showing ambition like their American counterparts by bringing in this popular stars to help grow their league, while these expired stars are going their for the money. So yes, The Chinese club owners are showing ambitions, that's why they criticised Tevez for scamming them when they were dreaming of having a determined Tevez of yesteryears. Neymar moved from Barca to PSG but his dream of competing at the highest stage, playing in Europe's top competition and at the highest level were never in doubt. If he'd done the same with the Chinese league, everybody would've concluded it is for the money because Chinese league is a lowly rated league which top players in demand doesn't give a fùck about. If Lavezzi, Tevez and co moves to City, their ambitions are not questioned coz City is a top club in England and Europe top 5 league, but when they move to China, everybody knows the truth that's its about the money. The difference is clear.

I thought writing epistles was exclusively my thing?

Everyone who spends huge sums is not necessarily trying to win the league. Smaller clubs or big waning clubs need huge investment to compete. It is has been a fact since time immemorial. Enter Liverpool, Everton and AC Milan to the mix.

When the City Sheikh project began, it was not realistic to win the league in a flash: other teams with more history and pedigree (like United, Arsenal and Chelsea) were still in the mix and competing for the facilities needed i.e best players, so Sheikh had to dangle $$$ to lure such players. Enter Robinho and co.

At that point in time, the only reason a Robinho would have left RM to City over Chelsea was the MONEY. City had no lofty "ambitions". Everyone in world football knew this (except a few asinine dingbats). City finished 10th (Hughes) season Robinho signed, 5th, 3rd and 1st (Mancini, who should have been fired after finishing 5th if title-winning was their ambition, right?)

Sheikh, shook money infront of players who would have gone elsewhere and they came to City instead. Parent clubs got handsome recompense - all was right with the world. Subsequently - and almost inevitably - success came, and we have City of today.

Today, City do not believe they must overcompensate players to get them (they believe players will buy into the direction the team is heading to - some others want to play for the manager). For e.g, Gabriel was courted by your club, Barca and Real but he chose City for only 27M GBP (same money others tendered). His reason is online.

United used to be the team that got english, sometimes world talents because they knew they would win titles, play for perhaps the greatest british manager and earn well but you knew players were not coming as. . . mercenaries.

You are a United fan and this is probably going to rub you the wrong way, but that is not the case anymore. United dangled money at Pogba and his agent (to snatch him from Madrid), Lukaku (from Chelsea) and now Alexis from City - the evidence is online for all and sundry to read.

That is the exact claim I made for Alexis that generated all these hoopla and with it, the carcasses of used-to-be loud mouths now laying dead with tails between their legs.

I did not insult Alexis (I think he is a top 3/4 talent in the league), or United for getting him. I simply stated exactly what transpired: If United and City matched offers, Alexis would not have come to United. The proof is in the pudding. United gave a humongous offer and he went back to City to ask them to match it and City said no (no longer desperados like '08) and pulled out of signing him.

Eruditor:


I thought writing epistles was exclusively my thing?

Everyone who spends huge sums is not necessarily trying to win the league. Smaller clubs or big waning clubs need huge investment to compete. It is has been a fact since time immemorial. Enter Liverpool, Everton and AC Milan to the mix.

When the City Sheikh project began, it was not realistic to win the league in a flash: other teams with more history and pedigree (like United, Arsenal and Chelsea) were still in the mix and competing for the facilities needed i.e best players, so Sheikh had to dangle $$$ to lure such players. Enter Robinho and co.

At that point in time, the only reason a Robinho would have left RM to City over Chelsea was the MONEY. City had no lofty "ambitions". Everyone in world football knew this (except a few asinine dingbats). City finished 10th (Hughes) season Robinho signed, 5th, 3rd and 1st (Mancini, who should have been fired after finishing 5th if title-winning was their ambition, right?)

Sheikh, shook money infront of players who would have gone elsewhere and they came to City instead. Parent clubs got handsome recompense - all was right with the world. Subsequently - and almost inevitably - success came, and we have City of today.

Today, City do not believe they must overcompensate players to get them (they believe players will buy into the direction the team is heading to - some others want to play for the manager). For e.g, Gabriel was courted by your club, Barca and Real but he chose City for only 27M GBP (same money others tendered). His reason is online.

United used to be the team that got english, sometimes world talents because they knew they would win titles, play for perhaps the greatest british manager and earn well but you knew players were not coming as. . . mercenaries.

You are a United fan and this is probably going to rub you the wrong way, but that is not the case anymore. United dangled money at Pogba and his agent (to snatch him from Madrid), Lukaku (from Chelsea) and now Alexis from City - the evidence is online for all and sundry to read.

That is the exact claim I made for Alexis that generated all these hoopla and with it, the carcasses of used-to-be loud mouths now laying dead with tails between their legs.

I did not insult Alexis (I think he is a top 3/4 talent in the league), or United for getting him. I simply stated exactly what transpired: If United and City matched offers, Alexis would not have come to United. The proof is in the pudding. United gave a humongous offer and he went back to City to ask them to match it and City said no (no longer desperados like '08) and pulled out of signing him.

yes you where with Sanchez when he went back to city to ask them to match the pay. or are we also going to use deductive reason to know this one?

CapitalCee:


yes you where with Sanchez when he went back to city to ask them to match the pay. or are we also going to use deductive reason to know this one?

Google is a useful tool.

Eruditor:


Even if others are wearing rank idiocy like a crown you should dare to be different. Shebi I referred to you as "man" even when I knew you could be a bumbling oaf, why did you not respect yourself by making me look right?
Argue with less-educated people.

Good God in heaven.

Lana1:
.

Only a stupid, daft, dumb, insecure, vacuous, obtuse illiterate with an IQ that cant even flash Glo to Glo and a brain the size of a pebble would claim City had no title ambitions when the Sheikh took over them.
.

jah jehovah!

eph12:

You had to mention the same player twice so they look plenty abi?

Dont worry about the number of time, worry more if the fact presented is wrong

Eruditor:


If I urinate, your mum will guzzle it as the fountain of youth- and that is your mum, imagine what your neighbour's houseboy (your father) would do to my faeces. I could have that IQ you described above and still make hall of fame for intelligence in your painfully daft and irresponsibly dull-witted family lineage. Do you think you are engaging almajiris in Adamawa? Miss me with your pseudo-intellectualism.


Wild animals are being counted and an Agama is nodding because he read heard (the dolt can't read) he descended from dinosaurs. Sod off, wannabe!

!!!!!!!